Mr. Singh said the EBRC’s work is “important” and that its decisions have a significant impact on Singapore’s social landscape. However, he acknowledged that it is important.
” Because we all want to have a substantial stake in the nation we call home, we must create a working and strong social contract that fosters trust so that we can all be invested in our shared future,” This is the Forward Singapore report‘s nature, which upholds impartiality as a shared value for all Singaporeans, said Mr. Singh.
Based on a national strategy that aims to modernize Singapore’s cultural small, the Forward Singapore report was released in November 2024. According to the findings of the study, Singaporeans price a robust and active market along with fairness, inclusion, and stewardship.
Values like justice can lose their meaning when query marks about fairness appear right from the start, on an issue as essential as how we organize ourselves diplomatically as a nation, said Mr. Singh.  ,
He warned that this could cause institutions like the EBRC to carry a “real risk of being accidently controversial, putting paid to a united people – unfortunately, one that is needed most at a time of significant political shifts, prospective outside shocks, and demographic transition.”
Mr. Singh urged Singaporeans to “become one united individuals” in a wider call for justice, respect, and clarity, values he characterized as essential to national unity and endurance in times of change.
” A statement can be called any name. He urged” Forward Singapore, Singapore Up, Singapore 21, or Turbo-charge Singapore.”
The most recent version of the EBRC record only serves to illustrate how far we must go in order to create a democratic society that is based on equality and justice. However, each technology has the power to and may do its part. And come together as a single individuals. Take a move away. Let’s continue to create a more equitable social structure. It is possible.