Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Concept science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more .
This is simply not a movie. Or an exercise.
But don’t worry. Evidently, we’ve got this. Or at least NASA does.
On Monday, the Double Asteroid Redirection Test , or DART, spacecraft should really collide with Dimorphos, a small “moon” orbiting the near-Earth asteroid Didymos. NASA’s huge idea here is to find out whether using such unmanned hardware to nudge incoming room debris out of harm’s way is going to protect Planet in the future .
It’s remarkable but somehow seems a little deflating after decades of what I call “Chicken Little” movies, where humankind is threatened from above by cosmic mess that can’t be reasoned away except via drastic means.
You know the routine. Somebody finds unmistakable proof of a) an asteroid, b) a meteor, c) a comet, d) a rogue moon or e) a whole planet shutting in on all of us. Who believes these types of warnings? Exactly no one, until the skies are usually riddled with speeding particles sliding and capturing off the looming item. Then we possibly a) panic, b) submit or c) fly some of our very own humans up presently there to save us all.
Take those most recent example of this particular subgenre, ” Don’t Look Up . ” Released last year in theaters and on Netflix, writer-director Adam McKay’s unruly politics satire is set away from by two The state of michigan State University astronomers (Jennifer Lawrence plus Leonardo DiCaprio) who seem to discover a comet that will seems to have popped out of nowhere and within six months will conflict with our planet hard enough to extinguish countless living organisms.
Their findings initially set off incredulity and even ridicule from the government and media. But once the inevitability sets in, the world generally and the United States specifically engage the problems the way they seem to participate in everything else in the 21st century: narcissism, denial and fault of all the wrong individuals. It’s enough to generate you think the world as we know it already finished before it does.
Pending apocalypse has always been a workable metaphor for our seemingly inescapable folly. (Paging ” Dr . Strangelove “? ) But we weren’t normally so cynical about facing natural disasters from space. Since recently as the switch of this century, we were so solemn plus single-mindedly gung ho about our capabilities to engage perils previously mentioned that it was sometimes, properly, laughable.
In 1998, multiplexes had not one, but two big, body fat “Chicken Little” blockbusters: Michael Bay’s “Armageddon” and Mimi Leder’s “Deep Impact. ”
The former, whose threat was a Texas-size asteroid, was a crowded, bombastic action thriller, rippling with broad joy and even broader set pieces with hardly enough time for audience members to catch their breath.
These movie, whose risk was, as with “Don’t Look Up, ” a comet, was a more earnest, conscientiously constructed and far less flustered variation on this concept.
Both did properly at the box workplace, though Bey’s bombastic epic earned regarding $554 million , while Leder’s more ruminative thrill ride found roughly $350 million , according to the website Container Office Mojo.
“Armageddon” deals with the danger simply by setting up a couple of room shuttles (remember them? ) crewed by crack oil-drilling teams, the crack-iest of whom is Bruce Willis, neck-deep in John Wayne mode, as Harry Stamper. His motley support comes from, among others, Billy Bob Thornton (by far the coolest cat in the room as being a NASA exec), Dorrie Buscemi, Will Patton, Michael Clarke Duncan, William Fichtner, Philip Stormare (uproarious because the only guy still left on a Russian space station), Ben Affleck (who’s been online dating Willis’ daughter in order to dad’s violent displeasure) and Liv Tyler (the daughter).
The complications and idiosyncrasies of these and other characters swirl around lengthy enough to take our thoughts off watching parts of Manhattan and all of Paris, france being leveled simply by pieces of the asteroid.
“Deep Impact’s” main character is an investigative TV reporter (Téa Leoni), who thinks she’s caught the Cabinet member in the sex scandal but finds out that the US President (Morgan Freeman, of course) is all about to announce which the aforementioned comet is on a yearlong crash course with World. They try everything, including a space shuttle commanded by Robert Duvall loaded with nukes, to deflect the particular comet’s trajectory.
So , in which edition of impending extinction do we are able to go on with our lives? That would spoil things for individuals who haven’t seen possibly movie. All we feel safe within disclosing is that the technology in “Deep Impact” is far more reliable and trustworthy within “Armageddon. ” Or for that matter in “Don’t Look Up. ” Pull your own conclusions from that.
By the way, I wager you’re wondering whether or not a feature-length “Chicken Little” movie has been ever made. There sure was, an electronically animated film released in 2005 by Disney (sans Pixar). This version starts with the title personality getting plonked for the head by what he or she thinks is a part of the sky. Right after panic sets in around, the “piece of the sky” is identified as an acorn, producing Chicken Little a laughingstock for months until he finds unexpected redemption by an additional, more ominous dropping piece of an on the planet ? spaceship. All Items say here is it sounds a lot more fascinating than the movie turned into.
If the real-life DART succeeds in its mission, we may be able to chill out more when asteroids start coming too close. But that doesn’t necessarily mean the movies will altogether abandon “Chicken Little” themes.
In the end, the reason why the original “The sky is dropping! ” phrase obtained passed down from generation to generation is that at some point the story opens whether we earthlings believe or, worse, care that devastation may be imminent.