PUBLISHED: 4 Jan 2025 at 05: 00
The distributors of iCon Group have written to the Office of the Attorney-General ( OAG ) with additional documents and a letter outlining their desire to revoke their complaints against the business and its executives.
According to press options, a member of The image Group, identified only as Ms Pannatorn, led 60-70 business distributors to send a notice to the solicitor general.
Additionally, international distributors provided documents to back up the purpose to remove.
Ms. Pannatorn claimed that these vendors had carefully considered their complaints and had decided to halt them because some of the allegations were unfounded.
After submitting two rounds of words proving the company’s ignorance, she claimed she came to the company’s defense to investigate a pending answer.
She wanted to offer more specifics about the event in her capacity as a business consultant.
She claimed that the company’s consumers, who feared they wouldn’t get their goods if they placed orders, were largely in fear after the incidents because false information emerged following the events.
Ms. Pannatorn stated that the company and its members had been treated badly and that she had come forth as a testimony to prove her innocence.
She reiterated that the business is still reputable because the majority of vendors also have the ability to profit from selling its goods.
When questioned about worries about the number of people who had filed petitions for the image Group’s executives ‘ release from prison, Ms. Pannatorn said it was their right.
Ms. Pannatorn urged the business to conduct legitimate sales with available evidence, including products that have been investigated by the Department of Special Investigation ( DSI).
When questioned how many vendors planned to remove their issues, she responded that 200 had already made that decision, and that around 2, 000 testimony had provided evidence to back up the business.
She added that a group of the bank’s marketers would go back to the OAG on Monday to get more information and show moral support for the business.
Pornlapas Onchaiya, another member, 62, said she physically used the company’s goods and found them useful.
However, following the news information, she felt pressured by societal trends, authorities and even her community to report a complaint, despite originally having no purpose to do so.
And then she wanted to remove her issue.
Yuwadee Thongma, 55, another seller, said she filed a complaint with authorities out of concern that the company’s assets may be seized, which may stop her from receiving items stored in its inventory.
However, she claimed that her statement was not accurately recorded by officers.