Critics slam ‘failure of justice’ for Tak Bai

Scenes of chaos: Police disperse protesters gathered around Tak Bai police station in Tak Bai, Narathiwat, on Oct 25, 2004. (Photo: Tawatchai Kemgumnerd)
Images of conflict: Police evacuate demonstrators gathered around Tak Bai police stop in Tak Bai, Narathiwat, on Oct 25, 2004. ( Photo: Tawatchai Kemgumnerd )

Critics have criticised the justice system’s loss to trial defendants in the Tak Bai murder case before the statute of limitations had rolled.

They are advancing more pressing calling for rules changes to improve performance in the justice program, such as extending the statute of limitations for criminal offense prosecution.

Spectators also predicted that the government’s inaction could lead to more insurgents in the restive strong north, where locals may have lost faith in the judiciary and the state.

They warned that if righteousness is delayed further or denied, it might make it harder for the Paetongtarn state to achieve harmony in the heavy South.

The Tak Bai case’s 20-year statute of limitations came to an end at 11.59pm on October 25, and the Narathiwat Provincial Court issued a closing date of the case on October 28.

Seven Arab protesters were killed on October 25, 2004, in front of the Tak Bai authorities station in Narathiwat state.

Another 78 people eventually passed away from strangulation or tissue failure while being transported in trucks to a military tent in Pattani province, about 150 kilometers away.

Before the distribution, activists had been demanding the launch of six prisoners. During Thaksin Shinawatra’s rule, the Sudah Bai horror occurred.

Nine former top officials were charged with murder and other crimes in a lawsuit brought by the victims ‘ families to the Narathiwat Provincial Court in April of this year.

In August, the jury accepted the petition against seven individuals, including former Pheu Thai record MP Gen Pisal Wattanawongkiri, who served as the Fifth Army Place captain, Pol Lt Gen Wongkot Maneerin, next secretary federal police chief, and Maj Gen Chalermchai Wirunpeth, who commanded the 5th Infantry Regiment at the time.

Maj Gen Chalermchai, the attorney-general, was a believe in both instances on September 12 when the attorney-general filed a complaint against eight suspects with the Pattani Provincial Court. Overall, 14 defendants were found.

Another source of public anger was the return to work of Wissanu Lertsongkram, one of the Tak Bai accused, the day after the event expired.

He is currently the city chief of Tha Uthen in Nakhon Phanom’s Tha District.

A man was assigned to generate a military vehicle in 2004 to remove protesters from the protest site.

He requested depart from Oct 16 to Oct 18, but the district chief disapproved once the warrant was made, and he requested that he be granted an arrest warrant on October 15. But, Mr Wissanu went absent independently.

His plea for leave of absence has sparked rumors that he anticipated the jury order. Anutin Charnvirakul, the interior minister, began a probe after his arrival after the event had expired.

The government ruled out dismissing Mr. Wissanu because he had already returned to work within 15 weeks.

If an official is absent for more than 15 times without giving a reason, they may be fired without an investigation. In the event of shorter suspensions, penalties may involve reprimands or pay reductions.

Calls for legislation adjustments

Kamolsak Leewamoh, a Prachachat Party MP for Narathiwat, told the Bangkok Post that the House committee on laws, righteousness, and human rights may set up an inquiry panel to investigate the case.

The screen will also look into possible changes to the criminal prosecution statute of limitations.

Is it time to update the rules governing fatalities caused by law enforcement while on work? He requested, noting that the screen will also observe the Tak Bai case’s delay in handling by the officials.

When asked if the Tak Bai case’s conclusion might cause turmoil in the deep north, Mr. Kamolsak said unfairness frequently contributes to southern assault.

The lawsuit brought by the victims ‘ families is the first attempt by locals to seek justice through legal means.

Recently, another locals killed by regulators had households who chose not to pursue legal actions.

” In the southeastern issue, whichever side gains the aid of local people has the edge”, he said.

According to Jade Donavanik, a researcher and head of the College of Asian Scholars ‘ faculty of law, the public’s trust in the justice system has been undermined by the government ‘ failure to provide it.

He concurred with calls to alter laws to make sure that the statute of limitations in legal and corruption cases is sufficient to hold offenders guilty.

Mr. Jade argued that the government cannot avoid being held accountable for allowing the circumstance to disappear without taking decisive action.

” This was an supervision by the concerned government and the state”, he said.

” There were several methods available to provide the plaintiffs to righteousness, but no motion was taken”, he added.

Prior to this, Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra objected to requests for an executive order to extend the statute of limitations in the Tak Bai event.

The idea was first proposed at a public platform by Assoc Prof Prinya Thaewanarumitkul, a law professor at Thammasat University, who urged the government to acquire an executive order under Section 29 of the law.

According to Mr. Jade, regional areas in the heavy southern may now be less lenient with officials in light of the fact that the Tak Bai case’s justice system was denied.

Unfairness and Issue

Rangsit University associate professor of sociology and vice chairman Krisanaphong Poothakool also noted that insurgents might be able to use the prosecuted in the Tak Bai situation, more erodering local confidence in the government.

He claimed that the event was allowed to end because the accused had not been brought to justice in sufficient quantities.

Growing concerns about the inability to prosecute defendants could be used by rebels to fuel violence, he said.

Pol Lt Col Krisanaphong backed calls for constitutional changes to make it easier for criminal defendants to avoid fleeing fairness.

Senator Angkhana Neelapaijit, director of the Senate committee on social development, public cooperation, human rights, liberty, and consumer safety, said the failure to provide justice highlighted a culture of impunity among state officials.

She said,” It also suggests that the government has n’t upheld and protected human rights.”

She added that the Senate committee will prepare a report on the Tak Bai case, along with recommendations to stop similar problems, such as expanding the criminal case’s statute of limitations.

Despite the case’s expiration, victims ‘ families can still file complaints under the Prevention and Suppression of Torture and Enforced Disappearances Act, according to Ms. Angkhana.

She mentioned that four people are still missing in connection with the Tak Bai incident.

Kamolsak: Inquiry panel to be set up

Kamolsak: Inquiry panel to be set up

Jade: Undermines confidence in justice

Jade: Undermines confidence in justice

Angkhana: Culture of impunity for officials

Angkhana: Culture of impunity for officials

Krisanaphong: Extend statute of limitations

Krisanaphong: Extend statute of limitations