Court acquittal ruling released in beach steps assault case

The claimant did not provide any solid proof that the abuse took place.

Urs Fehr and his Thai wife at a press conference at the Phuket provincial hall on March 1. (Photo: Achadthaya Chuenniran)
Thiers Fehr and his Thai spouse attend a press conference on March 1 at the municipal house in Phuket. ( Photo: Achadthaya Chuenniran )

PHUKET: The total ruling in the case involving a European man who was accused of punching a woman doctor who was sat on steps at Yamu Beach on February 24th, 2014 has been made available.

The judge gave the accused, 45-year-old Urs Fehr, the benefit of fear, saying the plaintiffs had presented no distinct evidence proving the alleged physical abuse.

The&nbsp, judge’s ruling was delivered on Tuesday, and it was made public on Wednesday.

On February 24, an incident took place at Yamu Beach in Phuket’s Thalang city. Mr. Fehr, also known as David, allegedly kicked Dr. Thandao Chandam, 26, in the rear while she and a friend were sitting on actions on the beach and watching the entire moon from his occupied mansion. &nbsp,

The person previously claimed that he had mistakenly believed that the physician and her companion had trespassed on his house and that he had slipped on the steps.

A picture showed that Dr. Thandao turning her face to the correct and the back in the direction of Mr. Fehr, who was approaching them, according to the written decision released on Wednesday.

She may have confirmed that the gentleman kicked her and given information about how the alleged attack took place if Mr. Fehr had actually punched Dr. Thandao. Because the field was sufficiently lit and it was also a full moon, the judge said, the doctor should have been allowed to provide confirmation and the details.

The doctor reportedly got up and walked away from the picture in a regular manner, according to the court’s video footage. That was in opposition to what she claimed a police interrogator said about the European man’s kick that caused her to advance.

Also, the doctor did not ask the European male about his purpose for the alleged attack. Typically, a person may have posed that topic to an intruder if there had been no prior conflict, the court said.

The officers interrogator’s claim that the doctor sat on a next step away from the beach was also made by the court. If that were the defendant was not push her if he stood on the top action. The doctor may have elaborated on the alleged abuse if the person had kicked her and stood on the next step, the courtroom said.

The doctor and a public prosecutor who were also a co-plainant told the judge that the alleged blow had injured her, but the jury determined that the dentist who stood as their testimony had only been informed of the alleged wound through a photo and an unofficial report from a nurse.

Additionally, the attorney did not call the caregiver who posed for Dr. Thandao to give testimony in court.

Given the lack of apparent data and repeated protestations of the accused, &nbsp, the judge gave him the benefit of the doubt.

Additionally, the jury rejected Dr. Thandao’s claim that the event led to her developing posttraumatic stress disorder. According to researchers who were quoted by the judge, PTSD occurs after a person experiences a life-or-death experience, is seriously hurt, or is sexually abused.

Additionally, the court reversed its earlier prohibition on Mr. Fehr from leaving the country on Tuesday.