AN Royal Presidential CONTINUES WITH TRUMP’S GUARDRAILS.
Guardrails are made to point people away from danger and shield them from danger. As Trump re-enters company, he continues to issue existing handrails.
A Congress controlled by Republicans, many of whom came to power with Trump’s support, evidently will submit to him other than in the most severe examples, such as his first nomination of Matt Gaetz to become Attorney General.
Selecting someone who has been found guilty of paying for sex by parliamentary ethics authorities, including a 17-year-old lady, and using illegal medicines, including marijuana, crosses the line for Trump.
It remains to be seen if any of the other nominations, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Health and Human Services, Tulsi Gabbard as Director of National Intelligence, or Pete Hegseth for Defense, are confirmed. If any do, let alone all three, it does demonstrate Trump’s unrivalled political power in the post-war time.
The criticism group has also failed.
To have handrails, you may be willing to fight, according to Democrat strategist Peter Goelz. Democrats want someone else to handle the large lifting, such as Liz Cheney on the Jan 6 council or Robert Mueller serving as the impartial counsel in the first word. Today, it’s too late to stop him”.
Last July, the Supreme Court eliminated a crucial check on Trump’s strength.  , There, the Court ruled that presidents have “absolute” exemption for acts committed as leader within their” key constitutional powers”, at least “presumptive resistance” for “acts within the outer boundary” of their official duty, and no immunity for illegal acts.
Trump enters the president knowing that when he leaves company, he can essentially be held legally responsible for making decisions, including ordering activities with the intention to remain in authority after his constitutionally-limited next term.
However, the most recent Supreme Court ruling against Trump in the case involving hush money in New York surprised, particularly with the selection by Trump-appointed Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was the decisive vote in a 5-4 selection. The recent Supreme Court may simply not have had the statistics it needs to assert itself.  ,
A bit of a wall, and one on which no one really count.