In the current period of increased political tensions, the Chang’e- 6 objective is a unique example of productive international collaboration. The sensor carries equipment contributed by France, Italy, Pakistan and Sweden. The European Space Agency ( ESA ) provided funding for the development of the Swedish payload.
Given the current state of earth politics, it may seem surprising. However, despite having a briefing in recent years, ESA and the Chinese Academy of Sciences have had a record of shared space missions.
A Wonderful Enhancement
From a clinical viewpoint, Chang’e- 6’s worldwide engagement is a relaxing development. Universal principles that underpin the medical approach inspire professionals. We place great value on collaborative work, irrespective of one’s regional nature. Science does n’t know borders.
Chinese scientists are quickly gaining ground and exceedingly leading international scientific achievements, only one example of which is space missions. Foreign scientific and technological prowess have increased to the point where foreign collaborators and rivals can no longer ignore them.
However, our job as scientists is impacted by real-world boundaries in an exceedingly geopolitically volatile atmosphere, which affect what can be shared between international colleagues, and which must be taken into account when making informed decisions.
The free flow of ideas that might eventually lead to medical discoveries must be balanced carefully with protecting regional interests.
Not every academic exchange rises to the point where it warrants an alert for foreign interference or national security. To quote the American government’s foreign relations plan,” work where we can, exercising restraint where we must”. The Chang’e- 6 goal is an excellent example of this kind of successful international collaboration.
Richard de Grijs is Professor of Astrophysics, Macquarie University. This commentary , second appeared , in The Conversation.