THREE DEGREES OF SEPARATION
Beyond qualifications, there was also a strong emphasis on the candidates’ independence from the government.
This is indeed an important point to highlight, as the President’s role in safeguarding the reserves and approving high-level public sector appointments requires independence from the government of the day.
However and unlike their qualifications in finance, such notions of “independence” from the government vary across the three candidates.
In his presidential candidate broadcast, Mr Tharman highlighted his “independence of mind” and sought to assure voters that he will maintain this approach in fulfilling his presidential duties if elected. This is despite his prior roles in Cabinet and the People’s Action Party, which have resulted in Mr Tharman being seen as the “establishment” candidate.
Independence is a point that has repeatedly been highlighted by Mr Ng, who positions himself as the only truly non-partisan presidential candidate. According to Mr Ng, this will allow him to fulfil his duties “without fear or favour”, should he be elected.
While it is indeed true Mr Ng has enjoyed no party affiliations, there are many who continue to perceive him as a close-to-establishment figure, given his strong background in the public service.
Similarly, Mr Tan has emphasised his independence from the government, although he possesses political affiliations. Aside from his past membership in the People’s Action Party, Mr Tan’s presidential bid is supported by opposition figures such as Mr Tan Jee Say and Mr Lim Tean.
There are therefore three degrees of separation among the candidates from what is perceived as the “establishment”, with Mr Tharman’s background in Cabinet placing him closest to the establishment.
Mr Ng’s strong experience in public service has also led to perceptions of him being an establishment, albeit non-partisan, figure. Mr Tan’s support from members of the opposition places him much further away from the establishment.