According to the court president, social situations are so important that they are ignored.
PUBLISHED: 10 Apr 2025 at 17: 25
According to court leader Nakharin Mektrairat, the Constitutional Court takes a natural place in Thailand‘s politicians and is open to amendments to the constitution that would affect the selection of its courts.
Mr. Nakharin said the Constitutional Court had earned women’s respect as he addressed the situation of the prosecutor’s 28th celebration on April 11.
This is evident in the growing number of requests people have written to the judge asking for decisions in cases where they believe there are constitutional violations.
For petitions can be made through Part 213 of the 2017 military-drafted contract, which allows individuals to file petitions to the Constitutional Court in cases where they believe the practice of state authority is in violation of their rights and liberties.
According to Mr. Nakharin, strong petitions filed with the court have addressed such important issues as the straight of a husband or wife to bring legal action in cases of adultery.
The Civil Code may be amended in June 2024 in order for a person to also be able to reimburse the marriage of their lawfully married family, whether male or female.
The phrase “husband” and “wife” was replaced by the gender-neutral” spouse” in accordance with the decision.
Mr. Nakharin acknowledged that the Constitutional Court does not occur in isolation. Instead, it serves as a complement to the cupboard, parliament, and separate bodies.
The Constitutional Court’s leader said,” Appeals we have received are indicative of how confident people are in the Constitutional Court, that it can solve, more than generate, issues for them.”
The judge will simply take petitions submitted by qualified petition who meet legal requirements.
He claimed that agencies and institutions do not accept the contract court’s authority because they ask for assistance from the court to clarify constitutionally sensitive issues.
He added that the judge had previously had authorized disagreements between state agencies and institutions, which the judge had to resolve, which highlighted its role in upholding the purity of the legislation.
The Constitutional Court simply accepts plaintiffs who meet the legal requirements for review and takes the utmost precautions when doing so.  ,
The jury leader acknowledged that the judges ‘ psychological toll may have been taken by considering political cases, which is typical. The court’s main task is to preserve constitutionality, and political disputes simply make up one of its many responsibilities.
However, “people tend to concentrate their focus on that particular aspect of the jobs,” according to Mr. Nakharin.
He argued that the Constitutional Court should be focused on the situation in which it is deliberating or who is the subject of a complaint.
Mr. Nakharin cited South Korea as an example, where the Constitutional Court last month upheld Yoon Suk-yeol’s prosecution, stripping him of his position, and re-elections.
Mr. Yoon was removed from office after a fatal declaration of martial law that was rapidly overturned.
Mr. Nakharin added that there is no place for the Thai contract court to use it as a device in a political witch hunt because of its steadfast principle of being firmly independent.
Any petition that the judge determines to have an ulterior political motivation may be withdrawn, he said.
He continued, the court is available to any modifications to the selection of its judges as a result of a constitutional amendment.
The Supreme Court and the Administrative Court’s meetings, as well as a collection committee, are now selected to make the courts.
Before they can offer as magistrates, the candidates must have the support of the Senate.