HSF eyes emerging energy and tech opportunities | FinanceAsia

This month, London-headquartered law firm, Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) announced the expansion of its Singapore-based capability with three partners, in support of opportunities in emerging sectors such as technology and energy transition, as well as the “high priority growth area” of private capital.

At the start of September, the company shared the recruitment of energy transition specialist, Peiwen Chen from the Singapore office of competitor, White & Case; and the relocation of HSF M&A partner, Malika Chandrasegaran, from Sydney. This was followed by news on Thursday (September 21) of the recruitment of Anthony Patten as M&A and energy expert, from King & Spalding.

The three partners report to Jamie McLaren, Singapore-based partner and Andrew Blacoe, head of Corporates.

Discussing opportunity in the private capital space, McLaren told FinanceAsia, “There is a huge amount of dry powder available to deploy in Asia; and as private equity (PE) houses look to rebalance portfolios and benefit from the anticipated upside in a maturing Asian economy, there are an increasing number of PE houses moving into Asia and setting up Asia-focussed funds.”

He underlined that, while opportunities in the tech sector might have tailed off in recent months, they are likely to pick up on the back of consolidation yet to come, coupled with developments across artificial intelligence (AI) that are set to offer new potential.

Meanwhile, traditional PE sectors such as healthcare, financial services and the consumer segment are continuing to provide strong deal flow. “Markets such as Indonesia, India, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam continue to offer huge promise.”

Although deal activity has been fairly subdued in recent months, McLaren added that there are signs of this turning around, “with a number of recent high profile deals, including KKR’s investment in Singtel’s data centre business” and a busy few months in the pipeline.

With regard to the new recruits, the HSF team pointed to Chen’s experience advising financial sponsors, strategic corporates and sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) on cross-border transactions, including Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (CIP) on the NT$90 billion ($3 billion) development and subsequent sale of a strategic stake in the Taiwanese 589 MW Changfang and Xidao offshore wind projects; as well as Thailand-headquartered Ratch Group on its $605 million acquisition of Nexif Energy.

Patten brings to the firm three decades of track record working across the energy space – spanning sub-sectors comprising renewables, hydrogen, ammonia and carbon capture, as well as traditional oil and gas. In terms of other law firms, his LinkedIn profile highlights his experience at Ashurst, Allens and Shearman and Sterling, as well as six years spent as legal counsel at Shell, in London and Dubai.

The team drew attention to Chandrasegaran’s adeptness advising TPG on its A$16.5 billion ($10.6 billion) merger with Vodafone Hutchison Australia; and the A$18.7 billion acquisition of Origin Energy by a consortium involving Brookfield Asset Management, GIC, Temasek and EIG Global Energy Partners.

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Asean exchanges formalise sustainability governance efforts | FinanceAsia

Six Asean-based exchanges released a list of ten governance objectives last week( September 12 ) that are included in the Common ESG Metrics of the regional bloc. The points make up the last item on a list of 27 thorough disclosure recommendations from regional market-listed companies that address plethora of environmental, social, and governance( ESG ) issues. The articles titled” E”( environment ) and” S “( social ) elements were released in March and December 2022, respectively.

According to Dr. Soraphol Tulayasathien, senior executive vice president and head of the Corporate Strategy and Sustainable Market Development Divisions at the Stock Exchange of Thailand( SET ), the complete list” serves as a common basis for member stock exchanges to build upon to drive sustainability among their listed companies.”

He told FinanceAsia that” each specific trade within Asean will defend the acceptance and importance of ESG metrics in the framework of their local market dynamics.”

In 2021, the ESG Working Group ( ESG WG ) was first established by the Asean Exchanges in six nations, including Bursa Malaysia, Hanoi Stock Exchange, Ho Chi Minh Securities Exchange ( HOSE ), Indonesia Stock Exchange ( IDX ), Philippine Stockex( PSE ), and SET. In response to the growing fame of ESG issues that have come to guide global funding decision-making as well as other owing application procedures, the members work together to lead local sustainability-themed initiatives.

” The Asean Exchanges have been working together to create a framework for collaboration across different areas to elevate the Assen capital market, and we are seeing encouraging progress ,” SGX’s spokesperson told FA. One is the creation of ESG measures. & nbsp,

Additionally, Tulayasathien exclusively disclosed to FA that IDX, SET, and Bura Malaysia had recently signed a Memorandum of Understanding( MoU) to work together on additional sustainability-related opportunities.

This deal” emphasizes the collective responsibility of these three exchanges to encourage the adoption of good ESG practices and to promote responsible progress within their particular markets.”

The MoU, according to him, aims to offer cross-border ESG investment opportunities throughout the Asean area. ” The official announcement of the MoU will be made to the public shortly. Please stay tuned ,” said & nbsp.

The announcement comes after various strategic initiatives that were just made in the area. The Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited( HKEX ) and IDX announced their collaboration in July to look into potential mutually advantageous opportunities.

At the time, experts told FA that the development would put both domestic and foreign investors operating in Hong Kong in a position to take advantage of opportunities related to Indonesia’s onshore energy transition story, particularly to access the market ‘ abundant nickel reserves and contribute to the country of Indonesia developing its domestic electronic vehicle ( EV ) supply chain.

In order to investigate opportunities in finance, ESG, and cross-listing, among other areas, the HKEX and Saudi Arabian share exchange operator signed a MoU earlier in February.

efforts for products

The Asean governance metrics were formalized at a meeting on September 8 that was also attended by representatives from the Lao Securities Exchange and Cambodia Stock Exchange( CSX ).

The leaders acknowledged the complementary nature of their exchanges and the potential for product improvement-based connectivity opportunities, such as depository receipts ( DR ) collaboration.

Tulayasathien stated that the Asean-based ESG WG had seen rising demand from local market participants for a wider range of investment opportunities when discussing the potential for new, cross-border product offerings.

With the addition of five fractional depositary receipts ( DRx ) on technology and growth stocks from the US and Hong Kong, the SET currently hosts a total of 13 DRs on its exchange platform, including foreign shares and exchange-traded funds ( ETFs ) from China and Vietnam.

The SET is prepared to launch a DR featuring Singaporean underlying stocks starting on September 19 as part of the strategic partnership known as the Thailand-Singapore Direct Relationship ( THR ) between Thailand and Singapore.

The SGX representative confirmed that the DR connection was started when it was first launched in May and involved four different companies.

The trading volume of DRs has grown significantly since its founding in 2018. To increase our global reach and offerings, we welcome the chance to expand collaborative initiatives with another exchanges, Tulayasathien said.

Along with the creation of the bank’s unique net-zero transition plan, the SGX is still looking into a wide range of tools to assist investors in incorporating climate considerations into their investment portfolios.

The spokesperson stated that in order to achieve this, we have expanded our selection of climate-themed goods and services, including the listing of the iShares MSCI Asia ex-Japan Climate Action ETF as well as our arrangements for electric vehicles metal.

This is on top of the Nikkei 225 Climate PAB future and our FTSE Blossom Japan derivatives, which were released in March of this year.

The Straits Times Index( STI ) constituents that had started concentrating on low-carbon solutions had outperformed the larger benchmark, according to the contact.

” Sembcorp Industries, Keppel Corporation, and Yangzijiang Shipbuilding have been actively growing their portfolios for renewable energy and cleaner or green solutions; the three stocks have averaged 46.8 % total returns in 2023 YTD, compared to 3.0 % total return for the STI.”

According to the International Sustainability Standards Board’s ( ISSB ) requirements, the Sustainability Reporting Advisory Committee ( Srac ) in Singapore opened a public consultation in July on the requirement of mandatory climate reporting for all publicly traded companies. According to the SGX director, the most recent period of conservation reporting among the listcos is expected to begin in Q4 2023.

Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, the Securities and Futures Commission ( SFC) released a thorough roadmap and nbsp last month for the implementation of ISSB standards in the market.

Governance improvements

The monthly performance evaluation of board directors and continued and constant professional education programs for such leaders are two of the ten Asean governance recommendations.

Directors of Singapore-registered listcos are required to take one of eight prescribed conservation courses in order to gain a fundamental understanding of sustainability issues, according to the SGX spokeswoman, who also shared progress to date.

” SGX mandated conservation instruction for all directors of listed companies in 2022 because we recognize the value of instruction.” Over 3, 200 people have so far attended the required courses.

The number of listed companies taking part in Thailand’s Sustainability Investment ( THIS ) assessment increased from 100 in 2015 to 221 in 2022, according to Tulayasathien.

The extraordinary advancement of Thai listed companies in the area of ESG practices, which has earned them world recognition, is one of our major accomplishments, he said.

The Dow Jones Sustainability Indices presently list 26 Thai-listed businesses, and the FTSE4Good and MSCI ESG index, both, list 42 and 41 listed companies. Thailand is currently ranked first in the ESG rankings for the ASEAN location thanks to this outstanding accomplishment.

He added that members of the Thai industry have access to a number of ESG education portals, such as the creative network known as SETESG Data Platform, which consists of two organizations: the Acadamy and the Pool.

The measures are meant to serve as a starting point for and to enhance ESG reporting practices by businesses throughout Asean, according to & nbsp.

According to Tulayasathien, the initiative emphasizes the significance of close, consistent, and pertinent ESG data, which investors are increasingly demanding both locally and globally.

Requests for comment were never answered by Bursa Malaysia, the Hanoi Stock Exchange, HOSE, IDX, or PSE. In addition, & nbsp,

Haymarket Media Limited All right are reserved.

Continue Reading

Exclusive interview with Paul Yang, BNP Paribas CEO for Asia Pacific | FinanceAsia

Paris-headquartered BNP Paribas boasts a history of over 160 years in Asia and today, it draws upon a 20,000-strong team that is active in thirteen markets across the continent.

The regional effort is led by Paul Yang, who ascended to role of CEO for Asia Pacific in December 2020, as the world succumbed to the full throes of the beginnings of a three-year pandemic. As society grappled with widespread affliction, Asia’s key economies responded to rapidly evolving government direction with fervour: leaving borders closed and markets shaken.

However, as you will discover through this exclusive interview, Yang was defiant in his refusal to be beset by external challenges. Proving himself an astute leader at the regional helm, he navigated the uncertain scenario deftly, and would go on to secure solid returns for both full-year 2021 and 2022; as well as robust revenue for the first quarter of 2023.

With a view to steering the bank’s business in support of the group’s Growth, Technology and Sustainability (GTS) strategy for 2025, FinanceAsia sought Yang’s take on Asia as a key international powerhouse, and learned about the milestones of his international career to date.

Entering Asia

BNP Paribas’ forerunner, the Comptoir National d’Escompte de Paris (CNEP), was set up by France’s finance minister following the hardships endured during the French Revolution; to curb mass bankruptcy in the financial markets; and to stimulate the economy. 

Following signature of a free trade agreement with the British, the Comptoir sought to develop an international strategy to source the raw materials required to support the flourishment of European industry. To do so, it extended beyond its French national borders for the first time; establishing offices in Calcutta and Shanghai in 1860, independent of foreign partnership.

Later, CNEP merged with the Banque Nationale pour le commerce et l’industrie (BNCI) to form the Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP). Capitalising on these regional capabilities, the bank made Hong Kong the centre of its Asian platform.

Q: Paul, you’ve been based in Asia Pacific for the majority of your career with BNP Paribas. Can you share what has defined BNP’s corporate journey in Asia so far?

A: Well, I wasn’t there in the 1860s, but it’s true that we have had a very long presence in the region. However, I consider “modern” BNP’s presence to be quite recent. It was really the bank’s merger in 2000 that created who we are today, elevating us as France – and then Europe’s – leading financial group and the most profitable bank in the eurozone.

But regarding Asia, we’re proud to be able to say that we’ve been here for a long time, which demonstrates our commitment to the region.

In Hong Kong, for instance, we often deal with multiple family generations of entrepreneurs and tycoons. The same is the case for some of our mid-cap clients – we have dealt with their fathers. We have built a sufficient network in the region to be able to play a key role in executing succession plans and building businesses for the future.  It really means something that we’ve been here for so long and to be profitable in all of the 13 markets where we operate.

These days, being relevant to your clients counts. You need a strong balance sheet, presence and scale to guide key them from their home markets into new areas. This is how we started, building our financial institutions group (FIG), then multinational and corporate (MNC) franchises,before further progressing to build scale, solutions, products and platforms.

We have developed a strong Asian presence and over the last three years, we’ve built on connectivity to improve the flows between the various corridors we participate in. We are relevant to key local participants and accompany international clients in reverse, also.

This goes for all facets of our business: whether in the corporate and institutional world, or in consumer finance. We are bigger than the sum of our parts and many things we do have relevant purpose for our clients.

Q: How does the bank’s business in Asia compare to that of the European markets (e.g. France, Italy, Belgium and Luxembourg)?

A: Understandably, our stronghold is Europe and we are significant as well in America. But overall, Asia represents a sizable portion of group business.

The bank’s longevity and strong heritage in Asia Pacific, coupled with our integrated business model places us in good stead to extend and reinforce our presence in this growth region.

In this regard, BNP Paribas’ Asia Pacific revenue contribution to the group’s corporate and institutional business is about 20%; and it will continue to grow.

Ultimately, the bank is emerging as a leading player in the region – and this brings us to a better position to aim for larger deals and more ambitious goals.

In this respect, we have grown our market share in our regions – for example, we hold dominance in markets such as Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong in the wealth management space, and we have recently launched an onshore wealth capability in Thailand. Asset management is developing; and our insurance business – Compagnie d’Assurance et d’Investissement de France (Cardif), has also been successful.

Where we do not have underlying domestic market strength, we choose to partner. We are humble enough to realise that sometimes it is better to do so. For example, in Asia, on the insurance side of the business we have partnered with local banking distributors. We started exploring this type of partnership around 25 years ago in markets such as Taiwan, Japan and Korea, and we are building up our strength in China, India and Southeast Asia.

The same goes for the retail side – personal finance. In 2005, we became a strategic shareholder of Bank of Nanjing in China and we are now their single largest shareholder with a 15.7% stake. 

We have built core business through partnerships, but where we think that we can control the entire business because it’s part of our DNA, is on the wealth management and corporate institutional banking (CIB) sides.

Q: What are the bank’s strategic priorities across Asia over the short and long term?

A: We are a bank that tries to deliver short-term results alongside long-term goals. Long-term relationships are part of our nature from a strategy perspective, and we are not in the business of pursuing rash opportunities when things look great and then making drastic cuts in a down cycle. We have a long-term vision and try to cultivate trust and relationships with this timeframe in mind.

From a short-term perspective, we have targets around our top line to maintain cost discipline and ensure that we invest for the future. We are intrinsically risk-aware and we insist on having a good mix of new blood and older experience, to move forward prudently.

Diversification is key. When you pursue disciplined growth, you avoid temptation, fashion and fad and consequentially, mistakes. Across all markets and products, we want to be positioned as the number one European bank for CIB, the preferred partner for wealth management, insurance and asset management – and we are not far from achieving this goal. 

Asia comprises a mix of developed and developing markets. Whether you look at the position we have in Japan, Australia, or Korea – or across more emerging business hubs such as Southeast Asia or China, we are well positioned there for our clients and we generate good returns.

Some of our peers will concentrate their presence at a particular local base, say in hubs. But we do not believe in guaranteeing strong, underlying growth simply by sitting in Hong Kong and Singapore and flying bankers all over the place.

The creation of local platforms is important. We have been building these in a considered manner across Southeast Asia, Taiwan, mainland China and elsewhere for the past decade and we are able to see the results. For example, we recently complemented our business mix with a securities licence in China. Once we have completed the takeover of several prime brokerage businesses from our competitors, we will see an increase in the equity cash portion of our business mix. Then there’s the joint venture (JV) we secured with the Agricultural Bank of China, which is the largest bank in the market by network and with whom we’ll be structuring investment products for retail clients.

Q: Diversification is a theme that has emerged from the pandemic to build business resilience. But are there any particular geographies or sectors that stand out as offering growth opportunity?

A: We’ve seen some volatility in the banking sector, but as a group, our corporate culture has focussed on development in a very diversified way. In terms of resilience, this sets us apart.

If you look at our group results, you will see that around 50% of our business is in the domestic retail and consumer finance market;

a third is in CIB; and over 15% is concentrated on activities such as asset gathering – from private banking to asset management and insurance. Within CIB, there’s also security services, which might not have a great cost income, but involves limited capital consumption and brings recurrent fees.

This percentage mix has been kept stable as we’ve grown across all areas and however you slice and dice our business, you will always see diversification. It’s the same for our client base – we not only serve financial institution clients but also corporates and high net worth individuals (HNWI). These three pillars are quite well balanced and offer us the means to build a sufficient product platform.

Capital market activities, including equity capital markets (ECM), debt capital markets (DCM), fundraising and advisory services can be volatile and event-driven; while another big portion of our business and effort is in transaction banking: following the flow of finance, supply chains, trade finance and cash management activities.

The interest rate surge of the last 12 -18 months has been very much beneficial to the cash management business, while monoliners who rely only on investment banking, have suffered. We have benefitted. Whatever way the world or region goes, we are naturally hedged.

Across the Asian region, our presence differentiates us from the rest. We are more than 2,500 in Hong Kong, have 2,200 in Singapore, plus a solid foothold in Japan where we’ve ranked consistently within the top five thanks to our leadership in the global macro environment, both in fixed income currencies and commodities (FICC) and across equity and credit.

In Australia, we have a dominant position in the custodian business that we started 20 years ago; we do well in China, and then we have strong ambition in India and Southeast Asia. I cannot see any market where there isn’t potential.

Q: How do you aim to grow the Asian business?

A: In the past, we have grown organically – even when we looked to secure Deutsche Bank’s prime brokerage business in 2019, it was not a typical acquisition. They were trying to expand in terms of platforms and wanted to lighten up their equity business. Meanwhile, in July 2021, we acquired another 51% of Exane, the top-rated equity research business, following a successful 17-year partnership where we had held 49%.

Both deals demonstrated ambition and keenness to complement the building blocks of our equity business.

So yes, our focus is organic over external growth. We feel it’s better to rely on organic opportunity.

Q: Which developments excite you across sustainability?

A: We’ve been involved in sustainability for over a decade, having started our sustainable finance forum (SFF) in Singapore seven years ago. I’m happy to see that what was a niche market is now very much mainstream.

I would say we have been dominating the ESG thematic, especially when it comes to corporate social responsibility (CSR). We’ve exited from carbon-heavy energy, have moved towards renewables, and we are working to lighten up our upstream exposure. It’s pleasing that every year we do more, whether green bonds, sustainable loans or other structures. We are among the top three banks in the space and even if we cannot manage to stay number one, our efforts make a positive impact across society.

Last year, we created a group of more than 150 bankers, the Low Carbon Transition Group (LCTG), to support our clients’ energy transitions. We’re experienced, so are not having to start from scratch and can support those corporates who might not know where to begin.

We recently held an electric vehicle (EV) conference where we gathered more than 300 clients, corporates and investors in Hong Kong. The topic sits well with what we want to do in the sector around mobility as an engine for growth and we think we can bring value-add to our clients.

EV adoption figures are impressive. In 2019, they accounted for 2.2% of the global total in cars sold, and rose to 13% last year. In China, the penetration figures are double. We’ve seen how this market can surprise everybody regarding adoption of new technologies. China did it with internet access, the smartphone, payments, and now EV. It’s exciting.

Q: You started in the IT department, held positions in Paris, Taipei and Hong Kong, before taking on Asia Pacific leadership at the height of the pandemic. What has shaped your career?

A: You’re right, I took the helm of the region in the middle of the pandemic. I was very fortunate to have been based in Asia for more than 20 years, so I knew the people, the teams, key clients and our platforms, which helped tremendously. During the pandemic, we adopted new technologies and forms of digital communication to stay close to our clients. We succeeded and the vast majority of our clients did also.

I think I’ve been lucky. I started in IT – I’m not sure I was good enough to stay in it, but my first business trip was to Hong Kong. I loved the place and dreamed of how amazing it would be to be based there. Thirty years later, here I am.

Like everybody, I’ve worked hard, but I was very fortunate, and at times, daring. When I wanted to switch from IT to credit, people said “No, Paul. We like you very much, but please don’t do something stupid. You already have a promising future.”

My response was to ask for a chance. I was curious to learn and probably would have gone elsewhere if I hadn’t been given opportunity. Fear around not succeeding makes you try harder and you don’t want to disappoint the people who see something in you.

A few years in, I moved from credit to corporate banking, where I was offered a great job in China – everybody wanted to be in China, but interestingly, it was a bit early – nobody was ready to do much there. So, I transferred to Taiwan to lead the corporate banking team and learned management on the ground. Doing quite well, I was later promoted to head of the territory and then after, moved to Hong Kong. That was 18 years ago!

For me, it’s been a combination of hard work, opportunity, luck and meeting the right senior people to support my development.

One memory that stands out was when the bank appointed a Hong Kong local to lead Greater China. It was a big move, as previously, the standard was someone French and male, but a Hong Kong woman took on the role and I worked for her for many years, learning from her insights. She believed in me and offered me the support to grow.

Q: What’s been the biggest highlight of your career to date?

A: This is difficult! But a key milestone was being given the opportunity to move from IT to banking. I’ve always liked a challenge – from coding, to implementing new tech systems and platforms, to what I do today.

I’ve seen many different things in my career and I have always been very curious. I’ve really cherished every opportunity I’ve had.

I’ve been very happy in the organisation and even today, it’s meaningful to partner with faces old and new. Back in 2004-2005, I had the opportunity to build a partnership in China. After much research, we invested in the Bank of Nanjing, which, two years later, was the first City Commercial Bank to list. There are many board members who I know well. It’s great for both them and me – it’s nice that our professional focus involves making core connections. It’s meaningful.

Q : If you weren’t in banking, what do you think you’d be doing?  

A : Very early on, I think we all wanted to be football players! For France or Argentina – the recent World Cup rivals!

Sometimes I reflect and think I would have been pretty good at teaching. But whatever alternate path I would have taken, it would have involved international opportunity.

I grew up first in Taiwan before moving to France and it was at that point that I knew that I wanted to see the world and find opportunity to do so.

Of course, these days, when I look at my daughter evolving, I can see that there is a lot of opportunity ahead for her, more so than when I was young.  

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Is the US banking crisis truly over?

Early in the year, concerns about the international banking system were sparked by the US banking crises. Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate, and Signature, three mid-sized US businesses, all experienced sharp declines in rapid succession, lowering cant share prices all over the world.

The Federal Reserve, the nation’s central bank, made sizeable sums of money available to failed businesses and established a financing program for other struggling organizations. With only one more US local banks, First Republic, collapsing a few weeks later, buyers were calmed and an instant disease was avoided.

However, it’s not entirely clear if the issue is truly over. How are things likely to turn out as investors return from their summer vacations to a time typically associated with market revolution?

slender margins and decreasing debris

In recent months, central bankers have kept raising interest rates to combat persistent prices. The Fed increased its key interest rate in July to 5.5 %, the highest level in 20 years. As late as February 2022, the charge was close to zero.

Although the increases have slowed this year, a sudden change like this can be very bad for banks, especially in light of the U-shaped rate movement that has been present since the global financial crisis of 2007 – 2009.

US forecast interest rate from 2007 to 23

Graph showing US benchmark interest rates over the past 15 years
via The Conversation, St. Louis Federal Reserve

Raising interest rates lowers the value of banks’ assets, raises what they must pay to use, limits their profitability, and usually makes them more vulnerable to bad things happening. Lenders have struggled with minimal product development and high payment fees, which refer to the amount they must pay out in relation to customer deposits, particularly in the first half of 2023.

This increased price is partially due to the fact that many consumers have been withdrawing their cash and depositing them in money market funds, where they can earn more interest. In order to make sure they had enough money, it forced businesses to acquire more from the Fed at prices that were significantly higher than they used to be.

The banks falls in the flower, which destabilized them at a time when the value of the debt on their balance sheets had likewise sharply decreased, were caused in part by this. As a result, more customers at different banks stopped making deposits out of concern that their wealth wasn’t secure either.

In conclusion, US banks observed a nearly 4 % decline in deposits between June 2022 and July 2023. This is usually bad information for the banking industry, along with higher interest rates.

By examining overall net interest margins ( NIMs ), you can see how this affects banks’ profitability. These represent the interest money that businesses receive less than what they pay out to lenders and other donors.

Online interest margins(%) for US banks

Graph showing US banks' net interest margins
based on 641 businesses P Capital IQ, S & amp

Credit grade declines

The rating companies have put more strain on people. Fitch downgraded its assessment of US government debt from AAA to AA at the beginning of August. It mentioned a potential decline in the public finances over the following three years as well as constant lobbying regarding the loan ceiling, the highest amount the government can use.

Devaluations by sovereigns frequently reflect issues in the larger market. Lenders may become unstable as a result of appearing less legitimate, which may cause their credit ratings to decline as well.

They may find it more difficult as a result to use funds from the Fed or even the industry. This may then have a negative impact on banks’ ability to lend money, capital buffers for handling poor bills, overall profitability, and share prices.

Share prices for US businesses in 2023

Graph showing US banks' share prices in 2023
Bank of America is red, Citigroup is peach, Goldman Sachs is pale blue, JP Morgan is golden, Morgan Stanley is indigo, and Regional Banks are purple. View of buying

Sure enough, Moody’s downgraded the credit scores of ten US mid-sized banks a week after the Fitch news, citing mounting economic challenges and strains that might reduce their success. Additionally, it forewarned that bigger institutions, such as State Street and the Bank of New York Mellon, might experience a potential drop.

Since then, S & amp, P Global Ratings, another significant ratings agency, has done the same, and Fitch has threatened to follow suit. According to our research, bank downgrades are linked to making them riskier and more fragile, especially when they are accompanied by a royal downgrad.

Despite all of that, there are advantages for US businesses. In the upcoming months, it is at least anticipated that both interest rates and bank deposits will stabilize, which may benefit the sector.

Bigger bankers are reporting improved profits from charging higher interest on loans despite the overall reduction in banks’ revenue. Later in the year, some of these businesses anticipate a increase from things like increased deal-making. Such indicators might contribute to greater balance across the board.

Credit Suisse needed to be saved by other European banks UBS in March because banks in Europe have recently seen lower payments and net attention profits.

However, in the most recent couple of rooms, German payments and gain profits have been rising. Additionally, new stress tests conducted by the European Banking Authority revealed that huge EU banks are strong.

UK businesses seem to be in somewhat worse shape than businesses in the EU. Although their payments have not recovered to the same degree as in Europe, they are still tenacious on their stability plates. In anticipation of additional price increases by the Bank of England, they have also been reducing their revenue projections.

Governmental action

The regulators intend to further raise the minimum cash levels that must be held by big US banks( with assets for more than US$ 100 billion ) in order to strengthen the US field.

Although they will get more than four years to fully implement, these plans to improve banks’ ability to absorb costs are stimulating. Similar changes were made to the Basel II international banking regulations in 2004, but they were not put into effect in time to stop the world monetary problems.

For the time being, the US banking system is still open to both economic system surprises and more widespread disasters. Before we can say with certainty that the worst is around, it will still be a few months.

George Kladakis teaches financial services at Edinburgh Napier University, and Alexandros Skouralis works as a research associate at the University of London’s Bayes Business School.

Under a Creative Commons license, this essay has been republished from The Conversation. Read the article in its entirety.

Continue Reading

Setting sights on Southeast Asia | FinanceAsia

Global investors have always been drawn to Southeast Asia’s growth story, as one of the world’s fastest developing economies and home to a relatively youthful population of 600 million.

This year’s Asean Summit chair, Indonesia, pitched that the region would continue its role as an epicentre for expansion. Even amid the backdrop of a challenging external environment – from the Russia-Ukraine war, to rising inflation and interest rate escalation – there is still substance behind the Southeast Asian story.

East Ventures, a venture capital (VC) firm based in the region, raised a total of $835 million in the past year across various strategies, achieving in May the first and final close of its debut Growth Plus fund, at $250 million. The vehicle aims to support innovators within the company’s ecosystem of portfolio companies that demonstrate strong potential.

“The successful fundraise shows that with the right strategy, management team and mandate, capital is still available,” Roderick Purwana, managing partner at East Ventures, told FinanceAsia.

The East Ventures team is experiencing promising traction across its portfolio – 60% of its growth-stage start-ups have delivered a positive earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) or are in the process of doing so; and more than 40% have a secured a cash runway beyond 2025. At the end of May, the company had invested in more than 20 start-ups so far this year, across sectors ranging from waste management and mental health, to digital mortgages.

In total, the firm has $1.5 billion in assets under management (AUM) across 12 funds that are active across Japan and Southeast Asia. In the latter, it has invested in over 300 companies and was an early backer of Indonesian start-ups, Traveloka and Tokopedia, which merged with GoJek, in 2021.

The firm sees particular opportunity in Indonesia and is among the most active in the market, even though Purwana admits that pace of activity has slowed due to market sentiment.

Money continues to flow into Southeast Asia, as evidenced by the accumulation of $10.4 billion in the region’s start-up ecosystem, in 2022. According to Cento Ventures’ recent Tech Investment report, last year marked the strongest performance of the market for three years on record. In spite of a global slowdown, it finished up on par with pre-pandemic investment levels.

“Southeast Asia will face or is already facing a correction, but the ramifications of this are not as profound as those being experienced by other emerging regions like Latin America and India,” Dmitry Levit, partner at Cento Ventures, told FA from Singapore.

“It remains to be seen whether this contraction is justified by the return to a pre-2022 baseline, or overdone, as a result of investor panic; but as a firm, we take the view that when valuations are low enough, we should invest in such a market.”

Financing the future

Levit and his VC peers remain focussed on digital financial services. It is the fintech sector that they view as key for Southeast Asia, having accounted for 46% of overall liquidity in 2022, according to the firm’s report. 

The Cento Ventures team has capitalised on this opportunity through recent investment in Indonesia’s Finfra, which provides embedded finance solutions; and Philippine cross-border payments start-up, Aqwire.

In May, Singapore-based fintech start-up, Jenfi, secured one of the highest fundraising milestones across the region to date, raising $6.6 million in a pre-series B round led by Japan-headquartered Headline Asia. The round also saw participation from existing investors, such as Monk’s Hill Ventures.

“The opportunity in Southeast Asia – especially across traditional working capital and SME loans – is huge. Banks tend to deprioritise this segment as it is riskier, so participation opens up to technology companies like Jenfi, to act as alternative lenders and to offer something that is differentiated but also commercially viable,” said Susli Lie, partner at Monk’s Hill Ventures. She is also the co-founder of ErudiFi, a tech-enabled education financing company.

Jenfi co-founder and CEO, Jeffrey Liu, attributes the firm’s recent successful fundraise to experience. With a background in finance, he founded GuavaPass in 2015, before setting up Jenfi in 2019, alongside Justin Louie. His endeavours in the start-up segment have seen him replicate the process every one to two years.

“I always thought it was a numbers game, but as I’ve built track-record, I’ve realised that it’s more important to focus on quality conversations and connections,” Liu said.

“From start to finish, Jenfi’s pre-Series B capital raise took six months. We had a shortlist of funds that we wanted to talk to from day one, and the fact that investors were already aware of us supported entry into real deal conversations,” he added.

To date, Liu’s firm has raised $40.2 million, which includes $15.2 million in equity, but he thinks it is unlikely that the Jenfi team will fundraise again, before 2024. While he shared that the firm had managed to shield from some of the market challenges during this recent round, unfortunately, this is not the case for the majority of other start-up peers.

Jenfi’s business enables digital native companies – including e-commerce or software-as-a-service (Saas) firms – to scale their ambitions by funding their growth and marketing expansion plans. So far, they have deployed $30 million across 600-plus companies.

“We’ve noticed in the last six months that the VC-backed companies we aim to support are in more challenging positions, in the sense that they have less of a cash runway. We’re hearing that it’s a lot harder for them to secure capital and that there are delays in their overall fundraising processes,” he explained.

Going for growth or pursuing profitability?

This perspective is shared by Lie, whose Southeast Asian VC firm has invested in early-stage technology companies since its foundation in 2014. Reports indicate that Monk’s Hill Ventures has raised at least $380 million across three funds and it has invested in over 40 fast-growing technology companies in Southeast Asia, including Singapore logistics company, NinjaVan; and Indonesian rural e-commerce start-up, Dagangan.

“In this market environment, we see that later-stage deals are taking longer to complete, which means that there is even more of an imperative to ensure as long a cash runway as possible,” she shared.

Before the current cycle, Lie saw deals close in as little as a couple of weeks to a month, but she cautions that this is not the norm. In this environment, she believes that start-ups need cash on balance sheet to support funding for at least 12-months of activity.

“Where our portfolio companies are concerned, the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) made indirect impact by way of sentiment. The bank had always been a pioneer in terms of its product offerings and for its activity to be curtailed without anyone else stepping in to take on the whole business, this will alter the flow of capital throughout the entire ecosystem,” said Lie.

“There are fewer investors that are actively deploying compared to the past. For those that are, they want to take a bit more time to conduct due diligence and get to know prospective investments better. Fewer months of runway translates to weaker negotiation power,” she added.

A clear path to profitability is also imperative in this part of a cycle. With it, access to capital remains open; without it, Cento Ventures’ Levit believes that start-ups are exposed to very steep valuation discounts.

Southeast Asia’s top tech companies, Grab and GoTo, which listed in 2021 and 2022 respectively, have yet to show investors that they can stem the red ink. However, this factor is not unique to the region.

“This isn’t a Southeast Asia-specific problem; we see it happening globally, as well. For high-growth tech companies, the path to profitability is a long one,” said Niklas Amundsson, partner at the Hong Kong office of placement agent, Monument Group.

Levit’s perspective indicates that by going for growth, a start-up downplays its push for profitability. However, Purwana believes that both elements are of equal importance and can progress in tandem.

“Sometimes, people think that it’s a question of deciding on growth or profitability, but it shouldn’t be either-or. Ultimately, any company must work to ensure profitability –  whether one year, five years or 10 years into existence. They have to be able to turn a profit eventually,” he shared.

Curiosity and caution

As investors seek exposure to start-ups that can sustain growth momentum and pursue profitability, they are keeping an eye on developments in the generative artificial intelligence (AI) space.

KPMG’s 1Q23 Venture Pulse report highlighted investor interest in AI as being relatively robust in Asia. In particular, the sector drew attention during the first quarter of 2023 on the back of the global buzz generated by ChatGPT.

“AI start-ups that can demonstrate potential at industrial scale or in terms of commercial application and adoption – especially in the areas of advanced manufacturing, transportation, energy management, health tech and process optimisation and productivity – will attract investment dollars,” said Irene Chu, partner and head of the New Economy and Life Sciences division at the Hong Kong base of KPMG China.

She underlined that in light of the current tech talent shortage across Asia, the use of AI to improve productivity is more relevant and encouraged, than ever. But with curiosity, comes caution.

“We are excited about the prospect of generative AI as a transformative technology, but we are also cautious around its capabilities and potential negative ramifications,” said Purwana.

East Ventures has been active in the AI space since August last year, when it invested in the seed round of Bahasa.ai, which aspires to build a natural language processing and understanding engine for the Indonesian language. Since ChatGPT has come onto the scene, it has not completed any new investments in the generative AI space, but the segment is one that remains closely watched.

Levit views the space as the “next wave” – an area of tech that every company will need to consider moving forwards: “I have a feeling we will have to fight long and hard against the false dichotomy around AI-based versus non-AI-based businesses, similar to what we first saw with mobile phones; the offline to online transition; and B2B and B2C. The narrative will be stronger than substance in the short-term, but substance will be stronger than narrative in the long-run.”

To unlock its full potential, the region’s tech industry will need to find a new route to innovation, Purwana suggested.

While some view Southeast Asia as a pioneer in the tech space, he feels that “Southeast Asia will have to grow beyond being a ‘copycat market’ for tech, which is a significant gap to address”. 

However, he shared that it is reassuring to look at China.

“In the early days of its developing tech sector, China turned to the US for inspiration and duplication. But today, this is no longer the case, especially in fintech sector. In this arena, China is probably more advanced than the US,” Purwana added.

Perhaps one of the best illustrations of this point, is China’s success in leapfrogging the use of credit and debit cards to drive a digital payments revolution, via digital wallets and QR codes. Alibaba (through Alipay) and Tencent (through WeChat Pay) are two of the first-movers to gain status in one of the world’s largest and truly digital economies.

Hong Kong’s offer of the missing puzzle piece

The prospects for Southeast Asia’s start-up scene remain bullish. However, the money being deployed into VC funds largely comes from high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) and family offices. Asia’s deepest pockets – the institutional investor community – have yet to dip their toes in the start-up scene in a meaningful way, Amundsson noted.

For him, the vital, missing component is: the exit. Many of the region’s top tech companies prefer a US versus domestic listing, as the region lacks an obvious, successful IPO route for up-and-coming technology companies. However, Amundsson does see some opportunity in Hong Kong, which he considers to be further ahead of its Southeast Asian peers in this regard, and continues to advance the development of an attractive and liquid capital market.

On March 31st, new listing rules for specialist technology companies came into play in the special administrative region (SAR). The Chapter 18C regime extends to start-ups active in new economy industries such as AI, alternative energy and agritech. While this is set to attract more listings from outside the China region, analysts expect this only to materialise in the next three to five years.

“I am excited about the new 18C regime launched in Hong Kong because it covers sectors that are going to be transformative, with the potential to solve some of the most challenging problems we face, around climate change, food security and clean energy.  Despite the slowdown in IPO activity globally, the new regime offers an attractive platform for those innovative Southeast Asian start-ups that aspire to solve these global issues,” Chu said.

However, while the market capitalisation threshold remains high, it might be some time before these companies list. It also remains to be seen whether Hong Kong’s bourse provides a  realistic and viable route for Southeast Asia’s start-up community.

As Asean focusses on finding its next epicentre of growth, the region’s technology sector offers perhaps the greatest opportunity for investors, as it continues to navigate short-term challenges like the collapse of SVB and works to address concerns around the development of next-generation AI.

Reviewing the region’s potential, Lie concluded, “Most of emerging Southeast Asia is moving away from manufacturing towards the service industries, and this is where we’re going to see the adoption of technology that really drives growt

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Hong Kong and China interest in AI and regtech ‘palpable’ despite soft fintech funding: report | FinanceAsia

Fintech companies in Asia Pacific received $5.1 billion of funding in the first half of 2023, a further drop from $6.7 billion during the same period last year, a recent KPMG report has revealed.

The figure points to a “very soft” fintech funding landscape in the region, in contrast with $36.1 billion of funding in the Americas, and $11.2 billion in Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA), the study showed.

In terms of number of fintech funding deals, 432 were completed in the Apac region, compared with 1,011 in the Americas, and 702 in EMEA.

“The global fintech market has seen challenges, with a decline in both funding and deals,” Barnaby Robson, deal advisory partner at KPMG China told FinanceAsia.

“Public companies have changed materially, with entire industries trading at fractions of previous valuations. But founder expectations have not moved as fast, meaning private valuations are adjusting slowly as companies seek new funding,” he explained.

The report, Pulse of Fintech H1’23, aggregated data from global venture capital (VC), private equity (PE) and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) deals in 2023’s first half, and looked into various segments including payments, insurtech, regtech, cyber security, wealthtech and blockchain.

The largest fintech deal H1 2023 in the region was $1.5 billion raised by Chongqing Ant Consumer Finance, the consumer finance unit of China’s Ant Group, which faced Beijing’s pressure to restructure in compliance with regulatory limits.

“Fintech funding in China is very dry” outside of Chongqing Ant Consumer Finance’s deal, the report noted. Businesses and investors in China tend to prioritise post-pandemic recovery, waiting for outcomes from prior investments, it explained.

Other significant deals in Asia include $304 million raised by India-based Vistaar Finance, and $270 million raised by Kredivo Holdings in Singapore.

Rebound potential

Despite slowing deal activity and slashed valuation, the intrinsic value and potential of the fintech sector in Hong Kong, mainland China, and Asia in general, remained robust, Robson told FA.

Fintech firms in the area are increasingly looking at leveraging artificial intelligence-generated content (AIGC), the report identified.

“In mainland China, the focus on AI in insurtech, creditech and wealthtech is evident. Hong Kong, with its global connectivity, needs to navigate the growing challenges of dealing two different AI regimes and mainland China data onshoring rules. The diverse financial landscape and low productivity in emerging Asia, offers a fertile ground for AI-driven fintech innovations,” Robson detailed.

“AI’s potential to revolutionise fintech segments is undeniable.”

Despite the US and Europe being leaders in regtech, or regulatory technology, interest from Hong Kong and China is palpable, according to Robson.

“With the People’s Bank of China’s (PBOC) recent announcements and Hong Kong’s agile regulatory framework, it’s clear that the region is gearing up for a more transparent and efficient financial ecosystem,” he said.

China’s central bank released a set of draft administrative measures on data security management last month for public consultation, signalling the watchdog’s enhanced emphasis on data processing securities amid geopolitical tensions.

Many financial institutions are embracing regtech to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of addressing compliance and regulatory requirements, Robson noted.

In his view, the confluence of AI advancements, regulatory shifts, and a growing middle class could very likely help catalyse fintech funding in Hong Kong, mainland China as well as the broader Asia region.

But that would be possible only after “a more complete reset in multiples to get to where valuations reflect fundamentals, and market clearing prices exist”.

He pointed to late 2024 or 2025 as a likely timing for such a rebound, citing fintech being properly valued on a realistic discounted cash flow (DCF) or free cash flow (FCF) basis as a contributing element.

“It’s a matter of when, not if,”

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Krayon Digital and Sayfer partner to enhance Web3 security | FinanceAsia

Krayon Digital, a digital multi-party computation (MPC) wallet solutions provider to start-up and enterprise clients, recently announced its strategic partnership with Israeli blockchain security consulting company, Sayfer.

“The partnership between Krayon and Sayfer is the result of a shared ambition – to revolutionise the security landscape within digital asset management,” Hamilton Keats, CEO and co-founder of Krayon told FinanceAsia.

Typically, a cryptocurrency or digital asset wallet is paired with a single private key that authorises transactions. However, this means that if the private key is stolen or lost, it creates a single point of failure where all digital assets secured by the key are exposed to risk.

Krayon, on the other hand, provides digital wallet solutions based on MPC technology: a cryptographic protocol that enables multiple parties to contribute to a database and run computations on its basis in a secure manner, without disclosing their own input to others.

The implementation of MPC technology involves splitting private keys into pieces, or shards, that can be distributed among multiple trusted parties, such as different departments within an organisation or even different geographical locations, Keats explained.

Such deployment avoids a single party having full access to a whole private key, which greatly reduces the risk of unauthorised crypto asset access or theft.

The partnership with Sayfer will enable the development and implementation of “a comprehensive suite of [security] measures”, including end-to-end encryption, secure key generation, storage and recovery mechanisms, multi-factor authentication, and continuous security audits.

The collaboration roots from an initial all-round assessment on Krayon’s protocols, where both parties saw a lack of attention to private key management in the field, Keats told FA.

“We’ve seen so many people dealing with tens of millions of dollars [in digital wallets], but with no private key management or private key security involved,” he said.

“Our joint efforts will bring together Sayfer’s expertise in key management audits and Krayon’s cutting-edge MPC technology to deliver a secure and seamless experience for our clients,” Nir Duan, Sayfer’s CEO, commented in the release.

Blockchain and beyond

Discussing trends across the Web3 space, Keats pointed to asset tokenisation as the most exciting use of blockchain technology across Asia’s capital markets. “This revolutionary process will completely streamline global financial markets and enhance transparency.”

Although issues around security, regulatory compliance, and private key management remain some of the main challenges for the success of Web3, Keats is bullish on regulatory progress across the region.

He noted that key hubs, including Singapore and Hong Kong, are building friendly innovation framework to create regional sandboxes, and some financial institutions are seeking to tokenise their assets. These, Keats said, send promising signals of “a massive opportunity” for players building the digital asset space.

Looking ahead, Krayon aims to make MPC a more accessible and flexible solution available across the digital asset management world. The key to this lies in improving usability, which includes simplifying the complicated wallet set-up process, and offering flexibility in distribution adjustments, Keats told FA.

Embedding MPC wallet solutions into broader digital asset capabilities, such as a consumer-facing app built upon the same software development kit (SDK), is a long-term goal for the partnership.

As enterprises usually manage larger amount of asset than individual users, the ability to recover the losses, or to prevent insecurity in the first place, is crucial, Keats reiterated.

“Our ultimate goal is to offer individual clients the same level of services as we are able to offer start-ups and enterprises,” he concluded.

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

Return of the ‘Big State’ will be short-lived

Economists usually find plenty of ways to disagree about the true meaning of government economic policies.

The big innovation of the past 10-15 years was monetary, with the Bank of Japan at the forefront of what became a worldwide practice of money-creation and the mass-purchase of government securities by central banks.

Economists debated the ultimate purpose of this policy trend – was it anti-deflation, or aimed at rescuing banks and securities markets, or financing public investment? – but the trend itself was indisputable.

Now the big trend is industrial policy, with vast programs of public subsidies and investment, but strangely there is much less debate about it. President Joe Biden has led the way in the United States, which is why some call it “Bidenomics.”

Although the European Union actually got there first with its “Next Generation EU” fund that was set up during the Covid pandemic, America sees its program as bigger, better and more headline-grabbing – which is why the tempting slogan of “Bidenomics” has taken hold, following the earlier examples of Reaganomics and Abenomics.

What economists seem to agree on is that these big programs mean that what they call the Big State is back. This is epitomized in the United States by the Chips and Science Act, devoting US$52.7 billion to supporting the semiconductor industry, and the Inflation Reduction Act, under which more than $400 billion is being spent over the next 10 years on the energy transition and on infrastructure.

Joe Biden wants more things made in America. Image: Twitter

By “the Big State” is meant large-scale state intervention in industry – which also means favoring national producers at the expense of imported goods and services, which makes this policy trend also protectionist.

That protectionist aspect contributes to a widespread feeling that the era of globalization might be over. With America and the EU leading the way with big-spending industrial and infrastructure policies, it is assumed that other countries such as Japan and the United Kingdom will have to try to compete so as to stop their own firms and own production moving to where the biggest subsidies are on offer.

Thanks to that theory of competition between nations, the consensus among economists seems to be that this trend of big-spending industrial policies is here to stay – that, just as the big monetary policy trend lasted more than a decade, so will this one.

In support of that argument are two other factors: first, the fact that the battle against climate change and for the green energy transition is a long-term one, which will require public subsidies and investment if it is to succeed; and second, that the technological and military contest between the US and China is also a long-term reality that will perpetuate big-spending industrial policies designed to prevent Chinese dominance, whether military or economic.

To me, however, the idea of this as a long-term trend is both compelling and lacking in credibility. It is compelling because it is true that geopolitical competition and tensions, and the urgency of dealing with climate change, feel fundamental to our era.

But it is lacking in credibility for a simpler reason: Public subsidies and investment need somehow to be financed, and financing these ambitious industrial policies will be very difficult at a time of high levels of sovereign debt and rising interest rates.

The paradox of the previous, monetary-policy-dominated era was that when borrowing was ultra-cheap, few governments felt able to exploit it to finance big programs of public investment. Now that borrowing costs are rising, governments are nonetheless trying to finance costly programs of public investment.

Doing so would be sustainable only if those programs were to succeed in raising the long-term rate of economic growth and thus in raising tax revenues. It would be wonderful if they did have that long-term growth-boosting effect. But it is more likely that any positive effect on growth will be quite short-lived, as it is competing with the negative effects of rising borrowing costs.

Factory workers assemble and test fiber-optics systems in China. Photo: Wikimedia Commons/Ranveig

The era of big-state industrial policy feels to me as if it will actually prove quite short-lived, at least as a broad phenomenon. For example, political battles in the United States about the official ceiling on federal public debt make it hard to envisage that the Inflation Reduction Act could ever be repeated.

The smaller, geopolitical element to this industrial policy trend might well persist, since both technological export-controls and so-called “de-risking” from dependence on China are driven by politics and not economics. The larger, climate-related portion will also persist in some form, but electorates are always reluctant to vote for tax rises to pay for it.

Overall, the wider popularity of industrial policy runs up against the realities of high public debt. Now that it has been noticed and, by some at least, celebrated, the phenomenon is probably already peaking.

Currently an independent writer, lecturer and consultant on international affairsBill Emmott from 1993 to 2o06 was editor-in-chief of The Economist. 

This article was originally published in Japanese by Nikkei Business and in English by his Substack publication, Bill Emmott’s Global View. (Subscribe here for free to receive his posts.) It is republished by Asia Times with kind permission. Follow the author on Twitter @bill_emmott

Continue Reading

A new era for DCM? | FinanceAsia

The repercussions of recent black swan events are contributing to a new dealmaking landscape – one that continues to ebb and flow as geopolitical tensions rise and governments work to ensure that regional emissions fall.

As regulators respond to global inflation with interest rate hikes, market participants are adapting to the post-pandemic outlook, where the structural integrity of systemic lenders has been called into question; bank runs have been navigated; and a debt ceiling default, narrowly avoided.

“Volatility is the only constant,” Elaine He, head of Debt Capital Markets (DCM) Syndicate for Asia Pacific at Morgan Stanley, told FinanceAsia.

“Bond issuance has been slow as issuers wait on the sidelines because of uncertainty and the increasing rates environment,” Barclays’ head of Debt Origination, Avinash Thakur, motioned. “The biggest factor impacting dealmaking continues to be the US Federal Reserve’s tightening bias.”

“Even if there is a lot of liquidity in the market, the cost of borrowing is too high,” Singapore-based corporate practice partner at DLA Piper, Philip Lee, told FA.

“Most CFOs, CEOs or other corporate decision makers who are in their late 30s or early 40s, would not have even started their careers when interest rates were this high – in the late 1990s, or early 2000s. I suspect it will take some time for companies to adjust to this higher interest rate environment.”

But Sarah Ng, director for DCM at ANZ, holds some positivity amid current market uncertainty. She noted how recent headline events are influencing short-term market sentiment and shaping deal-focussed behaviour, for the better.

“We are seeing narrower open market windows. This has meant that issuers have had to adopt an opportunistic and nimble approach when accessing primary markets,” she offered.

“We did see a degree of caution and a flight to quality, especially post-Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Credit Suisse, but the sell-off was largely contained to specific bank capital products. What has been surprising, has been the speed of bounce-back in both primary and secondary market activities, with a robust pipeline of issuers and receptive investor base back in play,” she explained.

FA editorial board member and head of DCM for Asia Pacific at BNP Paribas, Manoj Agarwal, agreed that unexpected developments have made market activity very much “window-driven”.

“From an issuer perspective, being prepared and able to access markets at short notice, as and when market windows are optimal, has become important,” he said. 

Furthermore, he noted that market recovery has been much faster this year, compared to the protracted period of indecision brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Although the year has been peppered with volatility and disruption, market efficiency is also improving, helping to reduce the impact these events have on dealmaking,” he emphasised.

Going local

George Thimont, head of ESG Syndicate for Asia Pacific and leader of the regional syndicate (ex-Japan) at Crédit Agricole, observes three notable trends emerging amid the current, Asia-based dealmaking environment.

“Issuance is broadly down across the board – in spite of good demand from the investor community. From a sectoral perspective, the notable absentees are the corporates, and local market conditions in certain jurisdictions, such as South Korea, have offered good depth and pricing versus G3 currencies.”

Citing Bloomberg data, Agarwal noted that for Asia ex-Japan, 2023 year-to-date (YTD) G3 DCM volume as of mid-June was down by 35.4% year-on-year (YoY), with 2022 already down by 54% compared to the same period in 2021.

But he agreed that South Korea displays some optimism, given that its 2023 YTD deal volumes remain flat, compared to the same period in 2022.

In fact, some of the market’s larger institutions have been quite active overseas. In February, the Korea Development Bank (KDB) issued $2 billion in bonds via Singapore’s exchange (SGX) in what constituted one of the largest public market issuances by a Korean institution in recent years.

Debt from issuers such as sovereigns, supranationals and agencies (SSA) or state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has benefitted, managing director and head of Asia Pacific Debt Syndicate at Citi, Rishi Jalan, told FA

“We expect corporate issuance in the US dollar bond market to be a bit more robust in the second half of the year,” he explained. In the meantime, Jalan said that some issuers are selectively tapping local currency markets where financing terms are lower, such as in India, China and parts of Southeast Asia.

However, not everyone feels that Asia’s regional markets can cater to the demands of the significant dry powder at play.

“Most liquidity in the local currency market comes from the banking system,” Saurabh Dinakar, head of Fixed Income Capital Markets and Equity Linked Solutions for Asia Pacific at Morgan Stanley, told FA.

He is sceptical of the current capacity for local markets to meet the requirements of internationally minded issuers. However, he noted as an exception the samurai market, which he said had proven vibrant for some corporates with Japan-based businesses or assets.

“Larger long-term funding requirements can only be satisfied through the main offshore currencies, such as dollar securities,” he explained.

Turning to the regional initiatives that have been set up to encourage participation in Asia’s domestic markets such as Hong Kong’s Connect schemes – the most recent of which, Swap Connect, launched in May – Dinakar shared, “What we need to see is broader stability.… These developments are great, but for investors to get involved in a meaningful way, general risk-off sentiment needs to reverse.”

“There was huge optimism around reopening, post Covid-19. This has since faded as corporate earnings have disappointed and there has been no meaningful stimulus. The markets want to see policy stimulus and, as a result, corporate health improving. Performance across credit and equities will then follow.”

Sustainable momentum

One area of Asian activity that stands strong in the global arena, is ESG-related issuance.

In March, the International Capital Market Association (ICMA) published the third edition of its report on Asia’s international bond markets. The research highlighted that, in 2022, green, social, sustainability and sustainability-linked (GSSS) bonds accounted for 23% of total issuance in Asia – higher than the global ratio of 12%.

“Demand is still more than supply, and investors tend to be more buy and hold, so we’ve seen that sustainable bond issuance has been more resilient than the market as a whole,” shared Mushtaq Kapasi, managing director and chief representative for ICMA in Asia.

“ESG has come to form an integral part of the dealmaking conversation in Asia. Over 30 new ESG funds have launched here in 2023; the number of ESG-dedicated funds is up 4% YoY; and Asia makes up 11% of the global ESG fund flow as of 1Q23 – up from 5% a year ago,” said Morgan Stanley’s He. 

“The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) government recently came to market as the largest green bond issuer in Asia so far this year,” she added.

Discussing the close-to-$6 billion green bond issuance, Rocky Tung, FA editorial board member, director and head of Policy Research at the Financial Services Development Council (FSDC), shared that the competitive pricing contained a variety of durations and currencies that “help construct a more effective yield curve that will set the benchmark for other issuances – public and private – to come.”

This, he explained, would not only be conducive to the development of green and sustainable finance in the region, but would specifically enrich Hong Kong’s debt capital market.

“ESG-related bonds can provide issuers with an additional selling point to attract investors,” Mark Chan, partner at Clifford Chance, told FA.

“They can demonstrate the issuer’s commitment to fighting climate change for example…. Issuers with a social agenda, such as the likes of the Hong Kong Mortgage Corporation (HKMC), can highlight their mission and objectives by issuing social bonds to enhance the investment story.”

In October last year, HKMC achieved a world first through its inaugural issuance of a dual-tranche social facility comprising Hong Kong dollar and offshore renminbi tranches, which totalled $1.44 billion.

“We are also seeing more bespoke ESG bonds such as blue and orange structures,” Chan added, referring to recent deals that the firm had advised on, including the Impact Investment Exchange’s (IIX) $50 million bond offering under its Women’s Livelihood Bond (WLB) Series; and issuance by China Merchants Bank’s London branch, of a $400 million facility – the first blue floating-rate public note to be marketed globally.

FA editorial board member and head of sustainability for HSBC’s commercial banking franchise in Asia, Sunil Veetil, noted that while Asian issuance fell in most segments, green sukuk and social bonds helped sustain momentum.

“For green debt, energy was the most financed project category in Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam, accounting for more than 50% of allocation,” he shared, citing a report by the Climate Bonds Initiative (CBI).

“In Singapore, which remains the undisputed leader of sustainable finance in Southeast Asia, around 70% of green debt went to buildings, mainly for the construction of green buildings, and to a lesser extent, for retrofits and to improve energy efficiency.”

“There continues to be regulatory support for ESG bonds, including grants provided by the Asia-based stock exchanges to list green bonds,” added Jini Lee, partner, co-division head for finance, funds and restructuring (FFR) and regional leader at Ashurst. 

A boom for private credit

Crédit Agricole’s Thimont told FA that Asian credit has remained resilient through recent global risk events. Private markets and funds are emerging as alternative sources of capital for those corporates with weaker funding lines, DLA Piper’s Lee observed.

Indeed, the further retrenchment of banks from lending has provided an opportunity for private credit players to swoop in and fill an increasingly large void. Globally, the sector has grown to account for $1.4 trillion from $500 million in 2015 and Preqin estimates that it will reach $2.3 trillion by 2027.

Once a niche asset class, investors are drawn to private credit’s floating rate nature which moves with interest rates and offers portfolio diversification.

Andrew Tan, Asia Pacific CEO for US private credit player, Muzinich & Co, earlier told FA that private credit players aim for investment returns of around 6-8% above the benchmark rate in the current environment.

The firm’s sectoral peers, including KKR, have argued that institutional investors should consider allocating as much as 10% to private credit. Alongside Blackstone and Apollo, the US global investment firm has added to its Asian private credit capabilities in recent years, while new players, including Tokyo-headquartered Softbank, have recently entered the market. In May, media reported that the Japanese tech firm sought to launch a private credit fund targetting late-stage tech startups and low double-digit returns.

Elsewhere in Japan, Blackstone recently partnered with Daiwa Securities to launch a private credit fund in the retail space, targetting individual high net worth investors (HNWIs).

Unlike in the US, where non-bank lenders now outnumber traditional financiers, “Apac remains heavily banked, so we expect to see ample room for private debt to grow in the region,” Alex Vaulkhard, client portfolio manager within Barings’ Private Credit team told FA.

He sees particular opportunity to serve the private equity (PE) space. “Although PE activity has been a bit slower in 2023, we expect activity to return, which will increase lending opportunities for private debt.”

Asia accounts for roughly $90 billion or about 6.4% of the global private credit market, according to figures cited by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) that highlight the market’s growth potential.

The biggest vehicle in Asia to date is Hong Kong-headquartered PAG’s fourth pan-Asia fund which closed in December at $2.6 billion.

However, overcrowding in some markets – notably India, where investors have amassed since new insolvency and bankruptcy laws came into force from 2016 – has made lenders increasingly compete for deals and acquiesce to “covenant-lite” structures, where investor protection is reduced.

But Tan, who is currently fundraising for Muzinich’s debut Asia Pacific fund – a mid-market credit strategy with a $500 million target, believes this only to be a problem in more developed markets such as Australia and is unlikely to become an issue in the wider region.

“If anything, the trend is in the direction of more conservative structures with increased over-collateralisation and stricter covenant protection,” he told FA.

Fundamentally, seasoned private credit participants are aware of the importance of covenant protection, so their likelihood to compromise on this is low, he added.

With monetary policies tightening at one of the fastest rates in modern history and recession looming in several markets, a key challenge for private credit is borrowers’ ability to service their debts.

“There is no doubt that default rates will go up and I would be cautious of cashflow lends with little or no asset backing,” said Christian Brehm, CEO at Sydney-headquartered private debt manager, FC Capital, calling for adequate due diligence when evaluating opportunities in the current environment.

“We would not be surprised to see an increase in default rates, but these are more likely to occur in more cyclical industries or among borrowers who have taken on too much debt in recent years,” Vaulkhard opined.

The managers suggested a tougher fundraising environment ahead, as the performance of fixed income instruments improves to offer limited partners (LPs) attractive returns.

What’s next?

The banking sector’s evolving regulatory landscape is also contributing to Asia’s changing DCM outlook.

Initially proposed as consequence of the 2008 global financial crisis (GFC) and with renewed rigour on the back of recent adversity across the banking sector, new capital requirements are set to be rolled out in the US and Europe as a final phase of Basel III. Often dubbed “Basel IV” for their magnitude, market implementation was originally scheduled for January 2023, before being delayed by a year to support the operational capacity of banks and market supervisors in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Experts caution that while more stringent banking regulation will challenge Asia’s traditional lending mix, it will also offer opportunity.

“There is a big amount of regulatory capital to be rolled out following the new Basel III rules, which will impact the type of debt to be issued,” said Ashurst’s Lee.

“We have been speaking to issuers who have been anticipating this uptrend as well in the coming years and are building in this scenario in their mid- to long-term treasury planning,” she added.

“Although the implementation of the Basel III final reform package was postponed in jurisdictions such as Hong Kong, those subject to it will no doubt be grappling with the new capital requirements already,” said Clifford Chance’s Chan, noting how its introduction will likely impact banks’ risk-weighted asset (RWA) portfolios.

“Aspects such as the raising of the output floor could potentially see some banks try to charge more for their lending,” he said.

Hironobu Nakamura, FA editorial board member and chief investment officer at Mizuho and Dai-Ichi Life tie-up, Asset Management One Alternative Investments (AMOAI), agreed that the new Basel reforms will lead to more scrupulous risk assessment by lenders, but how this will affect banks’ portfolio construction more concretely, remains uncertain.

“A heavy return on risk asset (Rora) requirements will likely impact banks’ risk asset allocations, region to region. [But] it is quite early to determine whether Asia is risk-off or -on at this stage, from a bank portfolio perspective.”

FA editorial board member and AMTD Group chair, Calvin Choi, proposed that if lending were to become more expensive for global players, there could be upside for regional banks.

“Updated Basel rules will impact global banks operating onshore, adding costs and making them less able to use their balance sheets. Local banks won’t have this constraint, so they will win market share,” he shared.

However, he noted that  for those Asian banks that want to participate in overseas markets, business will become more costly and compliance-heavy. “It will keep more local banks local.”

“All of this will mean a higher cost of borrowing and less capital available to banks…. It will create opportunities for non-bank lenders such as non-banking financial institutions (NBFI), family offices and private funds to fill the gap,” said DLA Piper’s Lee.

“With stricter capital requirements under ‘Basel IV’, we anticipate that bank loan funding will become more expensive for issuers. As such, we could see a return to capital market funding from issuers who have hitherto heavily relied on loan markets this year,” said ANZ’s Ng.

Choi added that this may even lead to Asia’s bond markets being viewed as more competitive than their global counterparts.

“Overall, the DCM market has become slow and stagnated,” Nakamura observed. “However, there are areas where funding is continually needed,” he said, pointing to the energy transition space as well as digital transformation. 

What exactly the new regulatory environment will mean for Asia’s market participants amid macro volatility, rising interest rates and escalating geopolitical tensions, remains unclear. But the developing outlook could offer those able to structure more creative facilities, more business; drive the advancement of Asia’s local capital markets; and support the region’s wider efforts to transition to net zero.

Proponents of private credit remain optimistic.

“Capital raising might cool down in the short-term, but the true private debt lending market is about to kick off,” said Brehm.

“We believe that there is a lot of growth ahead,” Barings’ Vaulkhard stated, sharing that conditions are likely to improve for lenders this year, with spreads widening, leverage falling, and overall credit quality enhancing. 

“We are only at the start of a multi-year growth journey,” Tan concluded.  

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading

In-depth: Exploring Hong Kong and Indonesia’s strategic potential | FinanceAsia

Last week (July 26), Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited (HKEX) and the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) marking strategic collaboration aimed at strengthening ties and exploring mutually beneficial opportunities across both markets.

According to the announcements, the partnership will see the exchanges meet regularly to develop new capital market products, including exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and derivatives; enable cross-border listings; and promote sustainable finance across the region, through shared best practices and the development of carbon markets.  

The releases point to the benefits made available through enhanced cooperation, including access to the international connectivity and vibrance on offer via Hong Kong’s marketplace, as well as the talent, creativity and innovative characteristics of Indonesia’s “new economy” participants.

Discussing the news, Singapore-based Clifford Chance partner, Gareth Deiner, who specialises within the firm’s South and Southeast Asian capital markets practice, shared with FinanceAsia his take on the opportunity presented by forging a deeper connection with the market that is home to world’s largest nickel supply.

“The mutually beneficial aspect of this collaboration is that it offers access to a wide pool of North Asian institutional investors and therewith, an enhanced liquidity pool.”

Shanghai and Singapore-based Clifford Chance partner, Jean Thio, acknowledged the significant number of Indonesian conglomerates that operate outside of the domestic market and seek access to North Asia’s investor community.

She highlighted her work in 2022, advising on the spin-off IPO of Chinese dairy farm operator AustAsia Group, a subsidiary of Indonesian agribusiness, Japfa, as demonstrating this point.

“International issuers look to Hong Kong as a way of accessing international institutional capital. The new collaboration complements other regional initiatives, such as Stock Connect.”

Hong Kong and China’s central banking authorities announced in May the launch of the sixth iteration of the regional bilateral scheme, the northbound channel of Swap Connect. The initiative is the first derivatives mutual market access programme globally and opens up institutional entry to China and Hong Kong’s interbank interest rate swap markets.

In terms of the current trends permeating Indonesia’s capital markets, Deiner shared, “Historically, Indonesia’s future-facing minerals – cobalt, copper and nickel – would be exported. But now these are proving key elements of Indonesia’s onshore energy transition story, as they are core components used in the manufacture of wind turbines, solar panels and electric vehicles (EVs).”

“As such, Indonesia has implemented bans on the export of unprocessed nickel ore, in order to facilitate the development of the EV supply chain onshore.”

Deiner and his team advised the underwriters of Harita Nickel’s IDR9.7 trillion IPO on the IDX in April, which media attributed to being part of a government push to privatise state-owned enterprises (SOEs).

Amit Singh, Singapore-based partner and head of Linklaters’ South and Southeast Asia capital markets practice agreed that the newly formed “super-connection” opens the door to meaningful, increased liquidity for Indonesian companies.

“Hong Kong also gains a valuable link with the growing mining and supply chain powerhouse that Indonesia is developing into,” he told FA.

“Mining, minerals and other supply chain-focussed industries are driving Indonesia’s IPO boom in 2023,” Singh explained, pointing to his involvement in Merdeka Battery’s IDR9.2 trillion ($620 million) IPO in April. The PT Merdeka Copper Gold Tbk subsidiary owns one of the largest nickel reserves globally and has a portfolio of EV battery assets across the Sulawesi region.  

“This trend is likely to continue and grow in the upcoming years, and Hong Kong is clearly seeking to position itself closely with Indonesia and its burgeoning strengths in these areas.”

Dual listings

Tjahjadi Bunjamin, Jakarta-based managing partner and head of the finance practice at Herbert Smith Freehills (HSF) partner firm, Hiswara Bunjamin & Tandjung (HBT), agreed that the MoU means that Indonesia will obtain greater access to Chinese issuers and the related international investment base.

“This is particularly important given the dominant role of Chinese companies in the EV ecosystem.”

He explained to FA that the collaboration further enables the exploration of dual listings by both parties: “Both will benefit from a more coordinated approach to listing in the two jurisdictions, as well as more clarity on listing requirements for issuers and investors.”

“Dual listings and increased regulatory cooperation will accelerate the maturation of the Indonesian capital markets, allowing them to more quickly adapt as deal sizes and investor interest and scrutiny in the market widens,” Singh added.

David Dawborn, HSF partner and senior international counsel at HBT, noted that a challenge for the partnership will involve the fact that Indonesia’s capital markets system remains primarily focussed on basic equity and debt securities.

“It could benefit from new ideas and products available through Hong Kong’s capital markets system, which is more flexible and easier to navigate in many aspects.”

In prior discussions with FA, experts have commended Indonesian regulators for their efforts to make the market’s domestic exchange more accessible and attractive as a listing destination.

In late 2021, the Indonesian financial services authority, Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK), approved amendments to the listing regime to allow firms with multiple voting rites (MVR) to participate on the domestic exchange. The move signalled continued progress to bring Indonesia’s capital markets in line with other global exchanges, such as those of the US and Hong Kong, which have had dual class share frameworks in place since the 1980s.

Recent research by the Hong Kong Trade Development Council (HKTDC) citing Refinitiv data suggests that more than 70% and 25% of companies currently listed on IDX meet the minimum capital requirement for listing on Hong Kong’s GEM (which serves small and mid-sized issuers) and main board, respectively. “This implies that there is a huge potential pool of candidates for dual primary and secondary listing,” the report noted.

However, the research added that so far, “only three Indonesian companies domiciled in Indonesia are currently listed overseas, and none are listed in Hong Kong.”

Tech story

Poised to become the seventh largest global economy by 2030, Dawborn underlined Indonesia’s endeavours to become a regional leader for Southeast Asian capital markets, following its success as host of last year’s G20 summit, in Bali.

Already home to a variety of tech unicorns (companies valued at over $1 billion) including Blibli, Bukalapak, Traveloka and GoTo, Indonesia is fast-emerging as a Southeast Asian tech hub, with its internet economy expected to double in value to be worth $146 billion by 2025.

Experts suggest that Indonesia holds significant potential to elevate Asia’s prominence on the global tech stage.

“Where we are in the macroeconomic cycle, with interest rates at an all-time high following another bump by the Fed last week, the landscape is challenging – high interest rates are not the friend of the tech sector. But the minute that inflation starts to settle, I think we’re going to witness the next chapter of Indonesia’s tech story,” Deiner said.

“Traditionally, Southeast Asian companies have always thought of the US when it comes to tech, but the HKEX has worked to be increasingly accommodative for these firms and Hong Kong is starting to prove a very attractive listing venue for those active in biotech,” explained Clifford Chance’s Thio.

“So-called US stock orphan listings (where a company has no operations, investor relations or management in a particular market but chooses to list there) are becoming a real discussion point across the Asian IPO landscape. I agree that Hong Kong may become an increasingly compelling venue for tech firms. In doing so, it supports the regional sector growth story,” Deiner added.

The tech sector is also set to support Indonesia’s efforts in the sustainability space. The market published the first version of its green taxonomy in January 2022.

“The ESG frameworks and disclosure standards of listing venues have become a hot topic in the IPO execution process and in equity offering documents more generally, and the variation in ESG disclosure standards across different international markets is creating a degree of execution friction across transactions in different markets,” Deiner explained.

“I was interested to read that the exchanges highlighted ESG considerations in the MoU as this will hopefully present an opportunity for the two markets to converge on ESG standards.”

“If this leads to a greater uniformity in ESG disclosures across primary equity markets, this could really be a game changer for market activity, and would be a very exciting development to monitor,” he added.

“As Hong Kong already has more developed carbon related, ETF and derivative products and trading systems, Indonesia and the market’s investors will benefit from access to this knowhow and technology,” noted HBT’s Bunjamin.

Jakarta-based corporate partner and capital markets lead, Viska Kharisma, told FA that following the introduction of Indonesia’s Financial Services Omnibus Law in 2023, OJK has been considering marketing more types of offshore securities in Indonesia, including carbon-related instruments.

“We understand that OJK and IDX propose to issue a new carbon market trading regulation in the near future, which should facilitate access by international investors to carbon credit opportunities through Indonesian industrial and mineral companies,” she said.

Reflecting on the opportunity on offer as a result of the official partnership, Deiner shared, “Where there is a cross- or secondary listing as part of a primary offering on any two international exchanges, you’re going to have an element of friction between their respective listing standards and the requirements that one legal jurisdiction or one regulator will impose versus another – and in many ways, the art of dealmaking in large-scale equity capital market (ECM) transactions of this nature, involves getting these two pieces to fit.”

“There’s nothing particularly apparent that has created a roadblock between the markets until now, but then that’s why you have the MoU. Hopefully it will provide a robust basis to ensure that any future obstacles can be navigated or removed,” he concluded.

HKEX declined to comment beyond the press release. IDX, the Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (KADIN) and a number of Indonesian banks did not respond to requests for comment.

 

¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.

Continue Reading