BJT plays down budget bill concerns

The Bhumjaithai Party confirmed on Sunday that its MPs would not reject the 2026 macroeconomic year’s resources proposal, which is scheduled to be submitted for approval to the government and the House of Representatives later this month.

Bhumjaithai is a member of the state partnership, and its members hold various positions in various ministries that are involved in the budget bill’s creation. There is no justification for the group’s MPs to reject the expenses, which is crucial to addressing the country’s problems and promoting its growth, according to group representative Nan Boontida Somchai on Sunday.

The group made the announcement on Sunday in response to rumors that some Bhumjaithai MPs might plan to reject the resources costs because they disagree with Pheu Thai, the main opposition bloc in the government coalition. Their dissatisfaction with a report into vote-rigging in the Senate votes of last year.

Despite the information, influential members of the ruling party said they also anticipate Bhumjaithai to back the bill and that it is in the public’s best interest to do so.

Wisut Chainarun, the general government whip and Pheu Thai MP, announced that senior government figures may join on Tuesday to explore the bill. It will be examined by the case on May 20 before the Lower House will hear it from May 28 to May 30.

When asked about information that suggested Bhumjaithai may reject the bill, Mr. Wisut said Bhumjaithai, who is a significant part of the coalition, is unlikely to do so.

Don’t relate this to the topic of legislators, he said, citing reports that state Bhumjaithai MPs would ban the act as a protest against Pheu Thai’s meddling in the Department of Special Investigation’s ( DSI) investigation into alleged vote tampering in the last year’s Senate election.

A number of lawmakers apparently have ties to Bhumjaithai, according to reports that the DS I’s research has an impact.

According to Mr. Wisut,” that is a separate issue that should never be tied to the national budget because any difficulties in passing the budget costs may cause problems in distribution and negatively impact government agencies ‘ access to funds.”

Following Bhumjaithai secretary-general Chaichanok Chidchob’s charter that he disagreed with the government-sponsored leisure complex bill, which prompted Pheu Thai heavyweights to subject their alliance partner’s commitment, tensions have gotten worse between the two countries recently.

The events have argued over a number of issues over the past few months, including Pheu Thai’s effort to categorize marijuana as a narcotic despite Bhumjaithai’s support for decriminalization as its main policy. Additionally, key players in both parties ‘ land disputes have exacerbated the partners ‘ rift.

Anusorn Iamsa-ard, a member of the Pheu Thai list, downplayed the possibility that Bhumjaithai may not support the budget bill, which would result in the House being dissolved.

Before insisting that the state has the full backing of its coalition partners, he called the reviews” an attempt to create social condition.”

There are no justifications for a House’s dissolution, and all parties were informed that the application of all government policies, even monetary people, is in the public attention, according to Mr. Anusorn.

Any independent organization that conducts an investigation into the republic vote has nothing to do with the government, he claimed.

The authorities won’t engage in political maneuvers that could put the region’s future at risk, he said, before urging all parties to work together and concentrate on moving the country forth. The budget expenses is crucial to driving the country’s growth.

In another development, Ittiporn Boonpracong, the EC’s chairman, refrained from calling on the 53 senators to come forward with accusations of collusion with them during the alleged collusion that occurred during the last year’s Senate election.

He also refuted reports that the EC was being coerced and pressured into a specific investigation’s direction.

Wisut: A question of political etiquette

Nan, There’s no reason to support the bill.