EU-China in last gasp bid to avoid EV-driven trade war – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

China has suggested setting minimum prices for electric vehicles ( EVs ) China ships to the European Union in a negotiated move to stop the bloc’s plans to impose tariffs of 17 to 35.3 % on Chinese EVs.

The European Commission had planned to voting on the tariff proposals on September 25, but it was postponed without cause. The voting will take place within the year beginning September 30 according to Nikkei.

Wang Wentao, the Foreign minister of commerce, and Valdis Dombrovskis, the European Commission’s executive vice president and business commissioner, met in Brussels on September 19 to discuss the vote’s delay.

In a blog on X on September 19, Dombrovskis stated that” Both sides agreed to intensify efforts to find an efficient, legal, and WTO-compatible alternative to the power EV situation.” ” This without prejudice to the EU investigation and its deadlines” .&nbsp,

In a media briefing on Thursday ( September 26 ), He Yongqian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, stated that both China and the EU have unmistakably indicated political willingness to resolve disputes through consultations.

The two sides agreed to continue discussions over a “price responsibility deal” and totally commit to achieving a mutually satisfactory solution through friendly speech and sessions during the Wang-Dombrovskis deals, she said. &nbsp,

” Now, technical teams from both sides are positively discussing a flexible rate determination option, following the direction set during the deals”, she said. Before the final decision, they are attempting to reach a compromise on a remedy model.

She emphasized that while China is totally committed to protecting the interests of Chinese firms, it has the “utmost sincerity” to resolve disputes effectively through speech and consultations.

Some Chinese experts believe that some EU members who want to avoid a full-fledged trade war with China are interested in China’s request of a “price dedication agreement” and that its proposal is a good one. Nevertheless, they said, the present may not be enough to alter the EU’s tax choice. &nbsp,

Zheng Chunrong, director of the Center for German Research at the School of Foreign Studies Tongji University, told Beijing Daily in an interview that Spain has stated that China and the EU should never engage in a trade conflict while Germany’s position has also become more explicit. &nbsp,

” But, for an opposition message has never reached a level that may prevent the taxes”, he said. ” It’s great that the EU keeps its talks with China. But it’s hard to tell how things may develop”.

At least 15 nations, representing 65 % of the EU’s population, must support the proposed EV tariffs, according to qualified majority voting in the EU. If implemented, the taxes will last for at least five years.

12 out of 27 EU members voted in favor of the EC’s decision to impose temporary tariffs on Chinese EVs in a non-binding voting held in July. They included France, Spain and Italy. Four nations cast ballots opposed to it. The remaining 11 people, including Germany, abstained. &nbsp,

Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics ‘ School of International Trade and Economics, said,” It is very difficult to find enough Western countries to reject the EC’s anti-subsidy sensor effects.”

Cui claimed that they only make up 61.4 % of the Union population and can oppose the tariffs, perhaps if Spain, Italy, and all 11 of the 11 waiting nations joined hands. &nbsp,

Chinese EV manufacturers separately made a proposal to the EU in August to establish least minimum sales and sales quotas to stop the bloc’s EV markets from exploding. But, the EU rejected all these presents.

Our investigation focused on whether these offers may end the harm caused by the subsidies that were found in our investigations and whether these cost commitments could be properly monitored and enforced, according to a EC spokesperson on September 12. ” The Commission has concluded that none of the offers met these requirements” .&nbsp,

After this news, Wang traveled to Europe to make one final push to entrance the EC against the taxes. It’s also unclear, yet, whether his work will work to change Union minds. &nbsp, &nbsp,

One Hubei-based journalist opined that would be absurd for the EU to accept China’s “price dedication” proposal. &nbsp,

He said BYD has already priced its flagship Tang SUV at 72, 000 euros ( 563, 000 yuan ) in Europe for 2025 while the same model was priced at about 200, 000 yuan in China. &nbsp,

He claimed that in order to compete with Western EV manufacturers, the Tang design might need to be priced at 800,000 yuan in the EU. He claimed that requiring Chinese automakers to increase product prices would only harm Union customers ‘ interests. &nbsp,

Hostile trade actions are already in the works. China’s MoC launched anti-dumping investigations into exports of cheese from the EU in August and meat in June.

Last year, China imported 2.6 billion euros ( US$ 2.9 billion ) worth of pork products and 1.76 billion euros of dairy products from the EU. At the same time, China exported 438, 034 power EVs for 9.7 billion dollars to the Union over the same time. &nbsp,

Chinese EV manufacturers may pay more in total value than the EU’s producers of pork and dairy products, but they might be able to more easily withstand the pain given their higher profits. &nbsp,

Read: China targets EU meat in tit-for-tat business spit

Following Jeff Pao on X: &nbsp, @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

Japan’s Ishiba needs China to thrive to survive – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Japan — As Japan’s new prime minister sets out to promote development in Asia’s second-biggest business, Shigeru Ishiba is about to learn the hard way that it’s definitely up to China.

Washington, also, where authorities are making more efforts to prevent the US from experiencing the crisis economists have been anticipating for years. Beijing and Washington’s stances on stimulus may benefit Japan more than anything else Tokyo-based legislators might be able to acquiesce to in the months to come.

Ishiba, 67, will have an additional concern because his reign may last more than a year in power. Though Kishida’s been around for three ages, and coach Shinzo Abe lasted roughly eight from 2012 to 2020, Chinese chiefs tend to get 12 months to make their mark. And history shows most do n’t.

By October 2025, Japan must keep its next general election. The new government of Japan has a unique skewed economic trajectory, making it presently tick.

On the one hand, the prices Tokyo had been craving for 25 years has arrived. And the Bank of Japan is ultimately trying to restore a super-aggressive interest-rate program.

On the other, that really rising-price fluid is tanking home and business confidence. Japan is actually the country’s economic equivalent of the dog that hit the automobile as consumers avoid recession, which some people view as a secrecy tax cut.

Kishida, who became president in early October 2021, found this juggling act to be too much. Basically, Kishida’s dismal approval scores reflected political funding crises within his Liberal Democratic Party. In fact, it was an failing economy that ended his career quickly.

By putting foreign policy before economic reforms, Kishida himself gave himself no benefits. Problem is, did Ishiba, a previous defence minister, do the same?

Ishiba’s an old-school China bird who favors creating an” Eastern NATO”, a force that Xi Jinping’s government almost needs at the moment. He today has opportunity to lobby the area to create a barrier against Beijing’s interests.

Not that Tokyo’s divided political system is currently poised to pass legislation to reduce bureaucracy, release labour laws, start a business boom, empower women, or implement other reforms to improve national competitiveness.

Ishiba may understand this quickly enough. Which is why Tokyo is thus ensnared in Beijing and Washington activities.

This year, Chinese head Xi Jinping seemed to say, directly of course, that the nation’s No. 2 market is in difficulty.

Beijing announced drastic stimulus measures on Tuesday ( September 24 ) to help its economy, which is dealing with a growing property crisis. The People’s Bank of China announced its first continuous reduction in significant short-term prices and banks reserve needs since at least 2015.

This year, island stocks rose the most in the news since 2008. Additionally, according to PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng, the company’s statement that additional cash-only restrictions on institutions are coming indicate that the stock market may have a tailwind.

Some economists concur that this is only the start of China’s signal work. ” This is a step in the right direction”, says Julian Evans-Pritchard, head of China economics at Capital Economics. ” But it wo n’t likely be sufficient to initiate a growth turnaround without greater fiscal support,” he said.

The policy announcements for this week are more good than expected, according to economist Larry Hu of Macquarie Group, but this alone may not be enough to put an end to the longest negative streak since 1999. It’s obvious, he notes, there’s “rising necessity among best officials to fight recession in China”.

The signal storm, according to Scott Rubner, Goldman Sachs ‘ handling director for worldwide markets. ” I actually think this time is different for China”, he says. Being thin China, he notes, is the “largest discussion trade” in world markets. That implies a significant benefit.

Billionaire investment David Tepper tells CNBC he’s buying more of “everything” China-related then that Beijing is hitting the gas on signal. According to Tepper, founder of Appaloosa Management,” I did n’t know that what the Fed did last week would lead to China easing,” and that’s what I thought the Fed did.

Team Xi, process, huddled with the Communist Party’s 24-man Politburo, which pledged to make this year’s 5 % growth goal. A key emphasis is that the house market” quit declining”. This suggests more help, given that data showed a month-long decline in new home prices for the first time in a century.

Members of the Politburo reportedly focused on reducing the effects of the property sector, poor domestic consumption, and large youth unemployment.

According to the Xinhua news agency,” some new conditions and issues have arisen in the current running of the economy.” ” We may view the current economic situation fully, honestly and calmly, face difficulties firmly, and strengthen confidence”.

Chinese stocks are getting a raise, also, from reports that Xi’s inner sphere is being directed to” face up to difficulties, develop confidence, and earnestly increase the sense of responsibility and urgency of doing monetary work well”.

Reuters reports that Xi’s Ministry of Finance might soon issue 2 trillion yuan ( US$ 285 billion ) of special sovereign bonds. According to Bloomberg, Beijing is considering putting more than US$ 140 billion into the biggest state-run businesses. It would be the first capital injection in this way since the” Lehman shock” of 2008 was a success.

The sooner Beijing lowers the business, the better will be for Japan’s future, and the better chance Ishiba has of becoming prime minister in a year.

China is by far Japan ‘s&nbsp, biggest trading partner. When it comes to deflation, having the best customer for your goods is often beneficial to financial confidence.

The good news in Beijing is that” the speed and scope of coverage rollouts have exceeded our expectation,” according to Jing Liu, an analyst at HSBC Holdings. ” The sea has turned, be prepared for more strategic activities”.

In Washington, also, the Federal Reserve is now in rate-cut style. That, over time, may enjoy its unique benefits as US families buy more Chinese goods.

” In the US”, says analyst Louis Gave at Gavekal Research,” the world’s largest economy, the central bank is now easing monetary policy, and January 2025 will most likely see another round of fiscal stimulus”.

That is, he adds, “unless Kamala Harris wins the presidential poll but is saddled with a Republican-controlled House of Representatives which proceeds to strengthen state spending.”

In China, Gave documents,” the world’s second largest business, the government is presently easing monetary and fiscal policies and constantly looking to boost property prices. The two biggest economies in the world do n’t sound particularly deflationary if monetary and fiscal policies are both eased at once.

Average Chinese home prices slid 6.8 % in August month on month, following a 7.6 % decline in July.

According to Yue Su, an analyst for China at the Economist Intelligence Unit,” Bottom-out stability in the housing market will be a prerequisite for homeowners to take action and break the wait-and-see period.”

This suggests that the policy’s top goal is not to raise housing prices to bring about a success effect, but to motivate families to make purchases. This real house plan aims to lower the economy‘s strain.

The problem, of course, is what’s following from Team Xi. Beijing appears to be determined to unleash its bazooka signal quickly, according to Ting Lu, Nomura’s general China economist. Markets should value Beijing’s acknowledgment of the country’s difficult economic environment and its lack of success in a wholesale approach.

What significance does these efforts have for the Bank of Japan? The BOJ increased costs to the highest level since 2008 on July 31.

Since that time, BOJ Governor Kazuo Ueda has resisted the aggressive speech that came with that tightening proceed. The central banks was chastened in part by the violent response in the world markets and in part by Ueda being summoned to the congress by concerned politicians.

Here, Ishiba’s vote was deepen the plot. He supports the BOJ tightening more forcefully, warning that the poor renminbi is reducing both Chinese purchasing power and economic trust.

Over&nbsp, the&nbsp, next 11 years, &nbsp, the&nbsp, BOJ hoarded state bonds and stocks via exchange-traded resources. By 2018, &nbsp, the&nbsp, BOJ’s stability sheet&nbsp, topped&nbsp, the&nbsp, size&nbsp, of Japan’s annual gross domestic product.

The resulting fall in the renminbi killed&nbsp, the&nbsp, urgency&nbsp, for politicians to amount playing fields, boost productivity and increase competitiveness. It even took stress off corporate CEOs to invent, restructure and destroy.

On the flipside, it’s not like Japan’s sector is performing effectively amid slow home use. To promote GDP, Ishiba’s authorities must act quickly to put some huge transformation wins on the scoreboard.

That will enable him to ensure that his presidency is present for more than just a year. It will also confirm the investor optimism that is responsible for the Nikkei 225 Stock Average reaching its all-time peaks this time.

Over the past ten years, BOJ policies and steps have been significantly weakened to support business management, contributing to Japan’s share boom.

Investors are beginning to question whether underlying fundamentals support today’s noble stock valuations now that the first ingredient is in dispute. There are some necessary quick steps to convince the Warren Buffetts of the world that Japan should be rediscovering.

A strategic approach to the US poll results on November 5th is necessary. Many Tokyo authorities are up at night due to the threat of a Donald Trump 2.0 White House and an even more risky” Trump trade” this day. Ishiba’s young authorities will be most concerned about preparing for a Trump or Harris leadership.

Tokyo’s international coverage is likely to be in a state of suspended animation until the US president is resolved. There is a good chance of there being a lot of stability with the Kishida time if Democrat Harris wins.

If Trump, a Democrat, returns to the White House, Ishiba’s LDP may devise a strategy to reduce the credit damage to Japan’s business.

Trump is certain to establish additional tariffs on China and other countries. Additionally, he is almost certain to begin his romantic relationship with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, a rift that still perplexes the Tokyo creation.

Ishiba could undoubtedly improve the quality of Asiatic geopolitics if he took a more confrontational stance against China. Just as long as I can remember how many China’s ability to still lead in a year is based on him.

Observe William Pesek on X @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

Monetary policy remedies have gone awry – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

A new group of US millionaires revealed their desire for renting as opposed to owning homes on September 16 in the Wall Street Journal&nbsp title. The idea of the article has the ability to lead to a significant change in government and central bank policies that favor real estate in lending.

Central bankers are able to accomplish two things effectively. One is to maintain the value of a nation’s money. The other is to manage financial establishments. Since the US Federal Reserve was established in 1913, the dollar has lost 99 % of its getting strength in gold, which suggests that it has not performed so well on the primary matter. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The US Savings &amp, Loan problems, the Long Term Capital Management fiasco and the 2008 global financial crisis demonstrate that the Fed did not do well on the second consideration, either. &nbsp,

The mistake common of these three crises was the financial sector’s extension of too much credit to” junk” consumers,” junk” companies and” junk” countries, with two of the crises related directly to misguided real estate policies. &nbsp,

The Federal Reserve Act embraced the so-called” True Payments” theory in 1913. The doctrine stated that there can never be” too much” money if banks gave credit only against short-term commercial bills, backed by “real” transactions. &nbsp,

The Board holds that there is little chance that the funds created and distributed by the Federal Reserve Banks will be in extreme volume if it is only limited to effective uses, according to the Fed’s 10th Annual Report from 1923.

As the earth was then on the silver standard, the report did not mention that for the theory to operate, it needed an “outside” outlet serving as an “alarm signal”. Then, there could&nbsp, be extra liquidity, prices and crises – as however turned out to be the case.

John Law ( 1671-1729 ) came up with this doctrine, though his name is associated now with the” South Sea Bubble” .&nbsp, He sought a solution for the problem of how much currency and credit creation there can be without stoking inflation. &nbsp,

His answer was a “land-collateralized” word concern that drew on three principles: money’s purchasing power should be firm, issuing credit has anticipate&nbsp, “real” trade, and land should be the collateral.

His error was that he overlooked how increasing prices, particularly land prices, are raised, which falsely rationalizes more credit expansion and thus initiates a vicious cycle. &nbsp,

Adam Smith made the mistake and suggested using industrial paper as the collateral rather than subjective land-based collateral. He also recognized the need for specie ( gold ) convertibility under the” Real Bills” doctrine to limit the growth in the amount of money and protect the value of contracts. &nbsp, &nbsp,

With this second condition in place, the price level is already set, and there is no need for complicated and statistical ( mis)calculating of price indices.

Devaluation to silver is not a necessary condition for the” Real Payments” to work: responsibility for the price of silver becoming the “alarm signal” is plenty. The price of gold may indicate errors caused by either excessive or insufficient bank payment and currency. This philosophy was adapted from the Bretton Woods agreement. &nbsp,

It failed, however, because institutions did not enforce two of its crucial phrases: &nbsp, allowing for occasional depreciation and penalizing places accumulating extra reserves. Paul Volcker, a participant in the discussions over reneging on the Bretton Woods agreement, noted that it never went down well. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Here are some sketches of the financial crises in the US and Japan that illustrate how they came about as a result of false real estate assumptions. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The 2008 crisis began with the drastic reduction of real estate’s and bonds ‘ capital gains tax exemptions from 1977. Predictably, investment poured into real estate as it became more of an “asset class” than before, with neither the Fed nor the statistics bureaus noticing the implications. &nbsp,

Subsequently, Congress required banks to give loans to lower-income earners on the idea that home equity would offer them collateral. Subprime loans went from 2 % of total loans in 2002 to 30 % in 2006, accompanied by much fraud and no collateral-creation. &nbsp,

Banks packaged the loans as CDOs that rating agencies rated AAA &nbsp without doing enough due diligence. Investment banks, both in the US and around the world, bought them without doing due diligence either. These notes, which were the US’s largest capital export at the time, entice foreign investment.

Unsurprisingly, the loans started to default, and regulators made mistakes by altering the accounting standards for commercial and investment banks, resulting in significant write-offs. Real estate is solid collateral, but forget that if it is n’t backed by future incomes, it melts into thin air as a result of this series of events. &nbsp,

Japan’s decision to use “real estate” as its main collateral had its origins during the 1930s following the&nbsp, 1920s and 1930s crises both in the US and Europe and a large number of Japanese defaults in 1931. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The government established the Bond Issue Arrangement Committee ( BIAC ) to manage the collateral for both convertible and regular government bonds, which makes it illegal to issue corporate bonds without the support of real estate or specific government bonds. This requirement left the Japanese corporate bond market without a market for them, allowing the banks to take over the majority of corporate finance. &nbsp,

Only in 1979 was the rule relaxed, with Sears Roebuck Tokyo issuing the first uncollateralized bond since the 1930s. However, the rules continued to exclude financing to small and medium-sized companies that most needed to raise funds by issuing convertibles and warrants, thus limiting investment opportunities. &nbsp,

At the same time, well-established firms issued convertibles, turning them from net borrowers to net suppliers of funds to the banking system. Flush with funds, the banks lent against land – as it continued to be the approved collateral. &nbsp,

Thus, Japan entered the John Law mess. Land prices increased and, as large companies held more and more land as collateral, their stock prices rose. The Bank of Japan fueled the inflation by lowering interest rates from 5 % in 1985 to 2.5 % in 1987. &nbsp, &nbsp,

By the end of the boom, &nbsp, 10 % of corporations owned over 80 % of company-owned land in Tokyo. While loans to the real-property industry by banks made up 11.5 % of all their loans, the non-bank lending sector’s exposure to real estate was 36 % of its total loan portfolio. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The most notable example of this is the Rockefeller Center acquisition, which Japan also completed in foreign real estate. ( Mitsubishi lost$ 1.4 billion on the deal once the credit creation–land–stock spiral deflated. ) Japan did not heed Adam Smith’s lessons.

Additionally, it made mistakes worse by correcting what were monetary errors through a number of fiscal errors. Those errors included the imposing a 20 % withholding tax on savings, a capital-gains tax on equity sales, a security transfer tax, a 3 % consumption tax, a 6 % tax on new cars, &nbsp, and a 2.5 % surtax on corporate profits among others. &nbsp,

At the end of 1989, it introduced the Basic Land Law, which focused on suppressing land” speculation” – drastically raising capital gains taxes. The changes were complex, but they actually caused 20 % to 50 % of real estate capital gains taxes if individuals or businesses sold land before the ten-year holding period. The crash of 1991 in land and stock prices was thus hardly “irrational”.

In total, both crashes and crises were caused by labeling land as being “real” despite the fact that it frequently melted into thin air. A more stable financial future may require a more accurate understanding of the qualities of talent and capital, all being held accountable for performance, as opposed to policies encouraging people to hold onto immobile parcels of land. &nbsp,

The article draws on Brenner’s Force of Finance,” How the Financial Crisis Did Not Change the World”, and” Toward a New Bretton Woods Agreement”.

Continue Reading

Will West ignore or heed Putin’s latest nuclear blackmail? – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Vladimir Putin has made an apparent dramatic improvement to Russia’s atomic strategy. The Russian president responded to rumors that the West might loosen its limits on Ukraine’s ability to attack target inside Russia.

He informed his security council that if any condition attacked Russia with conventional arms, it might use nuclear weapons. According to him, “reliable knowledge about a huge release of aviation assault means and their passing of our position border” would serve as the catalyst for the launch of nuclear missiles against Ukraine or any of its allies.

It’s not yet known whether this will influence Ukraine’s American allies ‘ decisions regarding the use of its long-range weapons. However, the threat of using nuclear weapons has been one of the main themes in the recent public discussion regarding the Ukraine war.

The Soviet leadership has used a common tactic to intimidate people with nuclear weapons. Moscow has responded by referring to the destruction it might cause with its nuclear arsenal or by holding a chisel to tell the West of its presence whenever Ukraine receives fresh weapons from the West or is permitted to use Western weapons to attack Russian territory.

However, according to recent studies, Putin’s near experts are beginning to realize that these threats are getting worse as one after another of Moscow’s “red ranges” are ignored.

NATO nations are still holding onto a strict limit on their use despite providing Ukraine with the most sophisticated air defense systems and unpleasant missiles that may strike targets strong within Russia and possibly even sway the outcome of the conflict. It’s an indication that despite skepticism about Putin’s commitment to employ nuclear weapons, punishment remains powerful – in American thoughts, anyway.

The risk of “unacceptable damage” being done to an enemy serves as the basis for nuclear deterrence. Only if the attack thinks the danger is accompanied by the capacity and will to carry it out, is it reliable?

Nuclear weapons have typically been used to communicate nuclear messages through the publication of rules for how to use them. At the group’s conference in Madrid in June 2022, heads of state and federal adopted the organization’s recent strategic plan. The conditions under which NATO might need to use nuclear arms are really remote, it says.

However, the document claims that any NATO member state’s use of nuclear weapons had “fundamentally change” any conflict it was engaged in. The empire further cautions that:” The ability and resolve to impose expenses on an attack would be intolerable and far outweigh the benefits that any attack could hope to achieve.”

Russia, meanwhile, is reportedly updating its atomic theory in response to what it says is” American increase” in the war in Ukraine. The latest doctrine, which was established by a decree in 2020, allows Russia to use nuclear weapons to combat a regular assault that” threatens the existence of the state” or a nuclear attack launched by an opponent.

The latest speech by Putin is obviously the “draft” of a reworked nuclear theory. It undoubtedly gives the impression of lowering the bar for using nuclear arms.

Nuclear saber-rattling

In September 2022, the Belarusian leader publicly threatened to employ nuclear weapons in Ukraine’s issue. Following hastily arranged plebiscites, which were frequently viewed in the West as being manipulated, he was in charge of the conquest of four occupied Polish provinces.

He added that” the US is the only country in the world that half used nuclear weaponry, destroying the Chinese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.” Ironically, they created a law”.

He continued, claiming that the US and Britain had purposefully bombed a number of European cities to rubble during the Second World War. This, he insisted, had the” single aim, just like in the case of nuclear detonations in Japan, to fear our country and the entire world”.

But CIA director William Burns just said the West does not get Putin’s risks significantly:” Putin’s a drunk. He’s going to keep sword rumbling occasionally.

YouTube video

]embedded information]

CIA director Wiliam Burns and MI6 main Richatrd Moore in talk at an FT event, September 2024.

There was a time in the fall of 2022 when I thought there was a real danger of the use of tactical nuclear weapons, according to Burns, who spoke at a event hosted by the Financial Times on September 7:” I never thought we should be unduly frightened by that.”

At a conference in Turkey in November 2022, he claimed he had then received a text from US President Joe Biden to Sergey Naryshkin, the head of the Russian foreign intelligence services, to “make quite clear what the effects may be”

No indication of any preparations for the use of nuclear weapons has been found in US dish networks and other knowledge sources. Despite Russian states that the Russian forces have been alerted, this is true.

But Putin’s proxies have been eagerly putting out advertising messages to strengthen their president’s threats.

Alexander Mikhailov, the chairman of the Bureau of Military Political Analysis, just requested that Russia weapon wood mockups of London and Washington to create a nuclear strike so that it would “burn thus beautifully that it will frighten the earth.”

Vyacheslav Volodin, the speech of the lower house, warned that attacking Russia would launch a nuclear weapons attack and that Strasbourg’s European Parliament could only be reached by three-minute journey for a Russian nuclear missile.

So much Putin’s risks have been enough to limit the scope of American involvement. Whether the Russian government’s latest threat will be successful is now the issue.

Christoph Bluth is professor of global relations and Security, University of Bradford

This content was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading

Time to take Putin’s nuclear threats more seriously – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Since Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Vladimir Putin has spoken frequently about using nuclear arms.

However, the first interest and concern that the world’s media gave Putin when he first spoke on the subject in September 2022 appeared to have generally evaporated over the previous two years of conflict, perhaps as a result of his frequent threats to use Russia’s nuclear arsenal.

Putin has today issued his most vehement threat, warning that Russia would use regular weapons against any nation that attacked it. Volodymyr Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is trying to persuade his country’s European allies to help Ukraine to use the arms they have provided against target deep within Russia itself with this statement.

This has been a “red series” hitherto that Ukraine’s allies have been willing to mix. However, that may soon change, and Russia’s answer has been to repeat a nuclear response.

For those interested in the study of propaganda, Putin’s challenges appear to have moved from what American internet professor Dan Hallin called the” circle of genuine controversy”, where the authenticity of an speech is immediately debated by journalists, politicians and researchers, into the” circle of consensus”, where there is wide agreement about the meaning of the message. It is typically less focused because of this.

It is dangerous to make the assumption that Putin is n’t serious about using nuclear weapons. However, it gives a great opportunity to examine the public and political stances toward nuclear weapons in more depth.

The philosophy of radioactive danger

Most adults are aware of atomic weapons ‘ life and are aware of its effects. Very few people are simply unaware of them or their incredible strength. However, other than a passing thought, world death is also overwhelming to consider. As a result, we tend to concentrate on less severe future.

These standard protestations and self-deceptions affect political viewpoints, though. A blogger or other legislator frequently inquires from the head of a nation that is nuclear-armed about their readiness to push the nuclear button. They often say “yes”. When this question is asked in front of an audience, there is often passionate acclaim.

Perhaps the most powerful illustration of the paradox that underlies the risk of nuclear war is this response, which applauds a particular politician’s determination to bring about the end of the world.

The vote views the statement as a sign of leadership power rather than seeing it as the caring sign that a maniac has apparently maneuvered their way into large office and should be immediately removed.

Physiologically, it can be argued that the applause truly represents an undercurrent of relief that this large self-deception may continue.

‘ Worry advertising’ and verification bias

Formal advertising put a lot of emphasis on nuclear attack readiness and threat during the Cold War. The BBC film&nbsp, Threads&nbsp, first aired 40 years earlier, in September 1984, and depicted the aftereffects of a nuclear attack.

At a time when the threat of a nuclear war was also the subject of news media, movies, and even established literature, the public was incredibly alarmed.

Between 1974 and 1980, the UK authorities issued a paper entitled Protect and Survive, accompanied by small pictures. The BBC, in its public services position, even ran video software, including a 1980 version of Panorama called&nbsp, If The Bomb Drops.

US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger’s 1957 research &nbsp, Nuclear War and Foreign Policy&nbsp, caused concern by arguing that small-scale nuclear conflict using “battlefield” weapons may be achievable.

Cold War messages like these helped to put the public’s worries on the danger of a nuclear attack before any other worries. And probably, at that time, they were right to do so. But more than 30 years have passed since the end of the Cold War, and the importance within what is known as “fear advertising” then focuses on another challenges, such as extremism, epidemics and movement.

Putin’s nuclear threats serve as a case study on the crucial role that dread advertising plays in shaping what people are afraid of, in my opinion.

When viewed from the perspective of the greater history of the concern of the nuclear holocaust, it is obvious that social officials cannot rely on their comments to be taken seriously. They require a more energizing, friendly propaganda environment, similar to the one created during the Cold War.

Putin the “madman,” in his own words.

As the most recent in a long ( ish ) line of world leaders who have attempted to persuade the world public of their readiness to commit nuclear genocide, questions about how to interpret Putin’s nuclear attack threats ought to be posed.

Richard Nixon, for instance, used what was referred to as “madman” tactics when trying to convince individuals of his eagerness to push the button. Interesting is that American headlines’ more recent portrayals of Putin, Kim Jong Un, and other authoritarian rulers can really help them by downplaying the fact that they have lower military prowess than the NATO allies.

Do n’t think for a moment, though, that any of this discussion of propaganda increases or decreases the actual threat posed by nuclear weapons. In fact, there is a level of assurance discrimination among politicians, editors, and other public figures that the Cold War prevented nuclear war from occurring because it is unlikely to occur again.

But this ca n’t be guaranteed. It is possible that these conclusions are mistaken to be based on the potency of the advertising setting rather than the reality of the threat.

To accomplish this, it is important to keep in mind that the ability to press the button is well within the purview of the rational human brain. In 1945, US President Harry S. Truman made the switch press. Therefore, according to him, detailed accounts of the harm and destruction that Hiroshima was the victim of as a result of his choice.

Then he once more pressed the button to demolish Nagasaki.

Colin Alexander is older lecturer in social contacts, Nottingham Trent University

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading

US trains laser weapon at China without a strategic plan – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The US has deployed a light weapon-equipped warship to Japan, a proper, cutting-edge show of force amid rising hostilities with China.

This month, South China Morning Post (SCMP ) reported that the USS Preble, an Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer equipped with the advanced High Energy Laser with Integrated Optical-dazzler and Surveillance ( HELIOS ) laser weapon, has been forward-deployed to Japan’s Yokosuka naval base south of Tokyo.

The Preble is set to perform assessments of its HELIOS system—a high-energy light with integrated visual dazzler and surveillance—during its Pacific cross, according to the SCMP statement. By positioning its most effective units in the region, the rollout demonstrates US commitment to Japan’s protection and registers China’s growing maritime dominance.

The US Navy’s Navigation Plan 2024, which for the first day acknowledges the possibility of conflict with China by 2027, coincides with the implementation of the USS Preble, according to the SCMP report.

The 30-page report from Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Lisa Franchetti outlines two of the US’s top goals: boosting the US Navy’s role in the broader US shared battle technique and improving marine readiness.

The strategy emphasizes the importance of multi-domain activities and technological developments, as well as addressing repair backlogs, increasing the use of mechanical and autonomous systems, improving recruitment and retention of sailors, and strengthening system.

The plan aims to improve readiness and abilities of the US Navy by utilizing AI, robotics, and distributed coastal operations. It emphasizes the necessity to create for high-end fight and face challenges in the future.

A potent, scalable laser combined with optical dazzling and surveillance capabilities makes Lockheed Martin’s HELIOS a high-energy laser weapon system designed to combat unmanned aerial systems ( UAS ), small boats, and other threats.

According to Lockheed Martin, HELIOS aims to provide a 60-120-watt laser defense against underwater threats at a reasonable, adaptable, and accurate price. The US defense company claims that HELIOS’ integration with existing deliver systems facilitates smooth operation and improved contextual consciousness.

Aside from HELIOS, an August 2024 US Congressional Research Service ( CRS ) report mentions other US laser weapons projects, including the Solid State Laser Technology Maturation ( SSL-TM), Optical Dazzling Interdictor, Navy ( ODIN), Layered Laser Defense ( LLD ), and the High Energy Laser Counter-ASCM Program ( HELCAP ).

The War Zone notes in a December 2019 content that the SSL-TM weapons, now mounted on the USS Portland testbed, is a high-power 150-kilowatt light that shot down a helicopter during a 2020 evaluation and hit a boat in a 2021 test.

In a July 2022 Proceedings article, Brian O’Rourke points out that ODIN is meant to shield US ships from harassment by unmanned aerial systems ( UASs ). According to Defense One, eight US ships were armed with the ODIN light as of August 2024.

Naval News mentions in an April 2024 article that HELCAP, designed to defeat anti-ship cruise missiles ( ASCM) in a crossing flight path instead of missiles shot directly at a defending ship, is still under development. LCSs from the US Navy are also being developed and tested for the LLD.

According to the CRS report, the US Navy’s ship lasers face challenges in terms of technical limitations and success in adverse weather conditions. They have largely unlimited weapons supply and a significant cost advantage over anti-air missiles.

The US is not the only country using laser-armed ships. Asia Times reported in August 2024 that China has tremendously increased its maritime capabilities by installing a new light weapons program in its Model 071 marine transport dock, perhaps the Siming Shan.

Similar to US efforts, such as placing HELIOS aboard the USS Preble and other countries attempting to erect directed energy weapons on their warships.

China’s laser system, details of which remain undisclosed, is expected to enhance defense against unmanned aircraft and small boat swarms, potentially including dazzler capabilities to blind sensors and seekers.

China has already engaged in laser warfare, most recently in a standoff with Philippine forces in the South China Sea in February 2024, when a laser blast temporarily blinds Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) personnel aboard the BRP Malapascua.

However, despite these advancements, the US faces significant hurdles in making laser weapons a standard part of its warship’s armaments.

The US Navy faces significant difficulties in developing and deploying laser weapons for shipboard defense, according to Asia Times in January 2024.

Despite being hailed as the future of missile and drone defense, laser weapons have not been used by the US and its allies to combat Houthi drones and missiles in the Red Sea. Laser weapons projects have a tendency to deliver on time while overpromising.

Physical limitations, power requirements, and cooling requirements have all hampered the development of laser weapons. Meanwhile, the maxed-out Arleigh Burke-class destroyers are running out of space for upgrades, complicating the integration of new technologies like laser weapons.

The US Navy’s aging Ticonderoga-class cruisers are well past their planned service lives and, considering their age and limited combat capability, may not be worth upgrading with laser weapons.

The idea of putting so much capability in a few potentially vulnerable ships is a strategic concern, despite the announcement of the new DDG-X to replace Arleigh Burke and Ticonderoga ships ‘ promises of more real estate for laser weapons and their required subsystems.

Indeed, despite advancements in solid-state laser technology, the US Navy lacks a strategic plan for the widespread adoption of laser weapons.

Technological and maintenance issues, along with limited manufacturers for sensitive components, have reportedly plagued development programs. Progress has also been hampered by the insufficient commercial space for lasers with sufficient power.

The US Navy’s Navigation Plan 2024 is being criticized by Asia Times for having lagging shipbuilding and maintenance capabilities and having inflexible, centralized kill chains, which could expose flaws in a potential conflict.

The US Navy integrates AI and robotics to maintain its position of authority, but it struggles with skilled labor shortages and outdated procurement practices that emphasize large, high-cost warships, which prevent it from expanding its fleet.

To expand its fleet, the US is developing low-cost, autonomous drone boats to improve maritime capabilities in the Taiwan Strait. However, vulnerability to electronic warfare and cyberattacks, alongside a weak US drone manufacturing base and reliance on Chinese components, poses challenges to the effectiveness of these systems.

Continue Reading

Zelensky’s pleas for help drowned out by the Middle East – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Fighting is still pervasive on the front lines in Ukraine and the Kursk region of Russia, with renewed challenges to use its army if they are attacked. However, New York and Washington have just become the war’s political focal points.

The outcome of the fight depends heavily on the UN discussions and meetings that are scheduled between Volodymyr Zelensky, the leader of Ukraine, Joe Biden, the president of the United States, and Kamala Harris. However, it’s unlikely that they will be the decisive step in accelerating the pace of a Russian success.

At sessions at the UN General Assembly and Security Council, &nbsp, Zelensky appealed&nbsp, to world leaders to support his state and force Russia to create harmony with Ukraine. His strategy for accomplishing this is a subsequent global peace conference. After the team’s first efforts in Switzerland in June, which was unsuccessful, he now wants Russia to attend.

The two factors are still as distant as they are, however, with Zelensky pushing his ten-point serenity plan and Putin demanding that Ukraine acknowledge Russia’s annexation of Crimea and four locations on the island. So the likelihood of important negotiations is essentially nonexistent.

Zelensky has not stopped himself from promoting what he calls his “victory strategy” to the supporters of Ukraine.

From now until December, the prepare “envisages quick and concrete actions by our proper partners.” More American military assistance and the authorization to use longer-range American weapons against targets deeper inside Russia are likely to be among these practical steps.

The Western alliance has a polarized view of this latter point, with the US wary of its corporate value. This uncertainty will be exacerbated by Putin’s insistent use of his nuclear arsenal to counteract any American missiles crossing its borders.

Even if a more vocal Western support were immediately timely, it is unlikely that it would eliminate Ukraine’s and its allies ‘ other drawbacks on the battlefield and in the world. Russia’s ties to Iran, North Korea, and China have strengthened.

The Kremlin has relied on these nations to provide mission-critical weapons and technology, which has enabled it to continue its war effort in Ukraine.

Russia, thus far, has likewise maintained its advantage in numbers. Following Putin’s request to boost the Russian army’s combat forces by another 180 000 men, it appears to be determined to push this even further.

However, a continuous Russian weather campaign against Ukrainian system has also caused lasting harm, especially to the government’s power supply network. This is likely to include a particularly negative impact on Ukraine’s human population. It is likely to significantly lower confidence over the upcoming spring.

Other plans ( and priorities )

There is also some political momentum building up behind Brazil and China’s shared plan, which was first launched in May, as the debate at the UN this year have highlighted.

Brazil’s president, Luiz Inacio Lula de Torres, pushed the plan during his speech at the UN general assembly on September 24, since did China’s foreign minister, Wang Yi.

Like earlier proposals from China and Brazil individually, as well as from Indonesia, a group of American state and Saudi Arabia, the combined Brazilian-Chinese program calls for a peace along the existing forefront. Negotiations may then observe.

Rightly so, Ukraine fears that this would effectively number to Kiev renegadeing place that Russia had illegally annexed. Although it would n’t guarantee successful negotiations, it would give Russia time and space to regroup and reorganize its military in preparation for a likely escalation in the future.

None of this is appropriate to Ukraine and its supporters, Zelensky stated in a statement at the UN.

YouTube video

]embedded information]

Volodymyr Zelensky criticizes the Brazil-China schedule at the UN General Assembly.

Prior to the peace conference in Switzerland in June, China’s prior efforts to promote this joint action with Brazil did not go very far. This day, it might not even go that far.

However, Sudan’s civil conflict and the Middle East are now at the center of more attention and resources. Russia and its allies may be able to rally behind the Western-backed Russian plan for a second world peace conference because of the fact that this plan’s resurrection is already in place.

This is obviously a problem for Ukraine. With a keen eye on the global north, Selensky objected to the proposal, arguing that forcing Ukraine to give Russia territorial concessions would impose a repressive history of the Soviet Union.

Does Zelensky get Trumped in November?

Even though the odds are hardly ever in favor of Ukraine at the UN in New York, items did not turn out much better in terms of US local elections ahead of the November presidential elections.

Zelensky sparked the extremely short-fused Republican contender’s controverse by questioning whether Donald Trump actually has a reliable plan to end the war.

YouTube video

]embedded information]

Donald Trump takes objective at Volodymyr Zelensky.

Trump accuses Zelensky of refusing to agree to a package and raises questions about the viability of the war with Ukraine. In addition, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Donald Trump Jr. have written current viewpoint pieces for The Hill, an important social journal, that call for Ukraine to be pressured to reach a deal with Russia to stop nuclear escalation.

And J. D. Vance, Trump’s running mate, has made it abundantly clear that, if elected in November, he would continue to help the Ukraine. Therefore, it’s quite obvious that there is a very real chance that Washington might soon lose its position as Kyiv’s most significant global allies.

All of this explains the necessity behind Zelensky’s demands for more and more powerful American aid in the upcoming month as well as his appeal to the wider global community to support efforts to achieve only peace in Ukraine.

However, it also points out that Russia and its allies have already done much to thwart any progress toward a Russian defeat, both at the negotiation table and on the battlefield.

Stefan Wolff is professor of global surveillance, University of Birmingham

The Conversation has republished this post under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading

China unleashes welcome wave of market-friendly stimulus – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP ) Central Committee’s Politburo has called for powerful measures, including limiting the home supply and cutting mortgage rates, to end the free fall of home prices and meet the country’s 5 % annual economic growth target.

According to Beijing’s positive signs on the property industry, shares of the Hong Kong-listed Chinese builders rose on Thursday. &nbsp, Longfor Group gained 28.3 % to HK$ 11.78 ( US$ 1.51 ) while Sunac China Holdings was up 26.89 %. China Vanke Co Ltd surged 22.7 % to HK$ 5.73 while China Overseas Land &amp, Investment rose 15.7 % to HK$ 14.32.

The property stock rally boosted the broad Hang Seng Index, which closed up 4.2 % to 19, 924 points on Thursday, the highest in 15 months. The Shanghai Composite Index ended up 3.6 % at 3, 000 points. &nbsp,

Although the Chinese economy has been frequently steady this year, it is still necessary to take a comprehensive, achievement, and serene view of the current economic situation, face the challenges firmly, and maintain confidence, according to the Politburo meeting held on Thursday. &nbsp,

The meeting’s readout said the country if properly utilize existing policies, step up efforts to roll out progressive policies, make policy measures more focused and efficient, and strive to accomplish the targets and tasks for this year’s economic and social development.

” We should strengthen the counter-cyclical adjustment of our fiscal and monetary policies, ensure necessary fiscal expenditures, and do a good job in the’ three guarantees” ( people’s access to compulsory education, basic medical services and safe housing ) at the grassroots level,” the meeting said”. We may stop the property price reduction. ” &nbsp,

It recommended that the People’s Bank of China ( PBoC ) reduce reserve requirement ratios ( RRRs ), implement significant interest rate reductions, and add more property developers to the” White List” to make it easier for them to borrow from banks.

Additionally, it recommended that regional governments striktly regulate the number of newly constructed residential properties, reduce inventories of real estate, improve the quality of existing homes, and buy unused land from developers for fair prices.

Additionally, the meeting asked local governments to tweak their land, governmental, and economic policies to support property markets.

The PBoC announced its plans to lower borrowing costs and increase lending on Tuesday following the US Federal Reserve’s reduction of its key lending rate, which was 0.5 % to 4.7 % to 5 % on September 18. &nbsp,

Initially, the PBoC lowered RRRs by 50 basis points so that banks could provide an additional 1 trillion yuan ($ 143 billion ) of loans to borrowers. The 7-day reverse mortgage rate, which was cut to 1.7 % in July, was also reduced, but it was also lowered by 10 base points to 1.85 %. &nbsp,

There will be another Clo cut later this month, according to PBoC Governor Pan Gongsheng. He even signaled a 0.2-0.25 % cut in the prime loan rate but did not provide more information. &nbsp,

In a press presentation on September 5, Zhou Lan, the head of the PBoC’s economic policy office, stated that there are still some restrictions on cutting interest rates.

Some economists claim that the PBoC has little space to lower costs because China’s 10-year US Treasury relationship generates are also higher than China’s, which has resulted in significant cash flows from China over the past two years. &nbsp,

Long-term desire

According to the National Bureau of Statistics ( NBS ), prices of new homes in first-tier cities&nbsp, fell&nbsp, 4.2 % year-on-year in August. Home prices in Beijing, Guangzhou and Shenzhen declined 3.6 %, 10.1 % and 8.2 %, respectively, while those in Shanghai rose 4.9 %. &nbsp,

Among the 70 important Chinese cities, Shanghai and Xi’an were the only two places that saw a year-on-year boost in house prices last quarter. &nbsp,

In an article published on Tuesday, a Chinese house columnist who uses the name” Uncle Pang” claimed that house prices in the Tianhe city of Guangzhou have dropped 28 % from 65, 000 renminbi to 47, 000 renminbi per square metre over the past year.

He claimed that over the same time span, house prices in the Huangpu district of Guangzhou have decreased by 27 % from 30 000 to 22 000 renminbi per square metre. &nbsp,

He claimed that some home investors had previously assumed that home prices at desirable locations in premium cities would rise after a tiny correction. He claimed that it has not occurred because the years-long adjustment has previously given rise to a long-term marketplace expectation that prices will continue to decline. &nbsp,

Because the property markets in the Guangzhou capital city are very fanciful, he added that Guangzhou’s house prices are falling more than those in Beijing and Shenzhen. &nbsp,

After the PBoC slashed the one-year loan prime rate ( LPR ) by 10 basis points to 3.35 % on July 22, some state-owned banks in Guangzhou started offering mortgage rates as low as 3.1 %, Nanfang Daily reported. China Resources Bank officially began offering mortgage rates of 2.89 % in the late summer of this year. &nbsp,

” Except in top-tier places, there are generally no house restrictions in China today, but home prices also keep falling. Why? The only explanation is that individuals do not have funds to provide the markets,” a Guangdong-based author said in a new article.

” Some people have benefits but their money is declining, especially the younger labor, “he said”. Young people are frequently hit with pay cuts and poverty.

He claimed that homeowners pushed back on their plans to purchase bigger homes because they did n’t want to sell their current homes for low prices. He said traders have even adopted a wait-and-see method. &nbsp,

Read: China on the ears of a Fed price cut issue

Following Jeff Pao on X: &nbsp, @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

China’s 2bn bank injection to entice global investors – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The government’s announcement to invest a significant US$ 142 billion in its largest state banks could be a major turning point for international investors who have been cautious about China’s monetary prospects in recent years. &nbsp,

This shift, though not yet finalized, signals a significant shift in policy, one that could breathe new life into an business that’s been struggling to maintain speed. &nbsp,

For those who want to take a closer look at the long-term potential, this cash injections should be seen as a bearish sign even though many investors have resisted leaving China due to concerns about its economic decline, property market challenges, and regulatory crackdowns.

Economic development, which once constantly surpassed 6-7 %, has slowed to amounts that have left global investors questioning China’s position as the world’s progress website. &nbsp,

The current problems of the home business, which has previously been a major contributor to the government’s GDP, have exacerbated these problems. The decline of big designers, combined with a slump in consumer trust, has kept some traders on the outside.

Mega-injection

But, Beijing’s possible mega-injection into the state institutions represents a major shift in policy. This action may significantly increase China’s largest financial institutions ‘ ability to lend money to these areas, enabling them to network more money into these areas that are deprived of resources. &nbsp,

The Chinese authorities is essentially double down on its dedication to stimulate growth by concentrating on banks with strong cash levels that now exceed regulatory requirements. &nbsp,

This treatment is not just about saving the banks —it’s about reinforcing the overall economic system, which, in turn, strengthens the base of the broader market.

This potential treatment may be the first of its kind since the global financial crisis in 2008, when China also injected money into its businesses to maintain the system. &nbsp,

That action strengthened China’s ability to weather the global slump more successfully than many other countries, cementing its status as a vital force behind global growth. &nbsp,

Now, with global financial uncertainty once again on the rise, this latest action may include a similar impact on the country’s second-largest business.

Beijing is demonstrating its willingness to take a hands-on approach to addressing its economic challenges by introducing special royal bonds, which act as a form of cash injection. &nbsp,

This is especially crucial for global owners, who have been concerned about China’s ability to maintain its growth direction despite both domestic and international issues. &nbsp,

This treatment should send a clear message to those who have watched from the outside that China is ready to do whatever it takes to protect its economy, and that the inside potential for investors is important.

This shot, in addition to recent cuts to loan rates and important coverage rates, suggests that China is entering a new era of financial management, one that will concentrate on reinvigorating progress through monetary easing and fiscal stimulus. &nbsp,

These policies are likely to encourage consumer spending, bolster the housing market, and encourage business expansion. All of these developments are positive for global investors, especially those who want to capitalize on China’s enormous market potential.

Boost for equities

The market’s response to the news has been telling: Chinese equities, which have been under pressure for much of the year, posted solid gains as the possibility of further stimulus emerged. &nbsp,

This rally highlights the underlying confidence that remains in China’s long-term economic prospects. Investors are betting that this capital injection could be the first of a line of stimulus measures intended to revive growth and stabilize the economy.

For global investors, the opportunity is twofold. First, they can benefit from the short-term boost in Chinese equities as market sentiment improves. Second, they can position themselves for long-term growth as China’s banking system and broader economy recover and expand. &nbsp,

Of course, the risks of investing in China remain real. The country faces significant structural challenges, including its heavy reliance on debt-fuelled growth, a complex regulatory environment, demographic decline and geopolitical tensions with the West. &nbsp,

These risks have long been a part of the China story, and they are balanced by the potential for high returns, especially in a country where the government is actively supporting economic growth.

Continue Reading

New cells shatter solar energy efficiency records – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

In some places around the world, solar panels that are installed on rooftops and big energy farms are now commonplace. Even in the dark and gloomy UK, solar power is quickly emerging as a major player in the generation of electricity.

This boom in renewable is fuelled by two important advances. Second, scientists, engineers and those in business are learning how to make solar panel by the billions. Every manufacturing procedure is carefully planned to ensure that they are produced quite cheaply.

The panels ‘ strength conversion efficiency, which measures how much sunlight can be converted into electricity, has steadily increased, and this is the second and most important.

The higher the efficiency of solar panel, the cheaper the power. You might be asking yourself,” How effective is renewable energy be?” And will it affect our energy costs in any way?

About 20 to 22 % of photosynthesis is currently converted into electrical energy thanks to commercially available solar panel. Using a novel technologies called tandem solar cells, new study published in Nature has revealed that in the future, solar panel could achieve savings as high as 34 %. The results of the study demonstrate tandem solar cells’ outstanding strength conversion efficiency.

What are tandem solar cells?

Conventional solar cells are constructed using a second material to absorb sunshine. Now, almost all thermal panels are made from silicone – the same stuff at the core of computers. Silicon is a sophisticated and trustworthy stuff, but only about 29 % of its efficiency is achieved.

To get around this cap, scientists have turned to tandem solar cells, which bundle two renewable materials on top of one another to get more of the sun’s power.

A team of researchers at the energy giant LONGi reported a fresh combination solar cell that combines golden and mica materials in a fresh Nature paper. Owing to their increased sunlight harvest, the new perovskite-silicon parallel has achieved a world report 33.89 % performance.

Mica renewable materials, discovered less than two decades ago, have emerged as the perfect match to established golden systems. The key lies in their&nbsp, lighting intake tuneability. More effectively than golden, rovskite materials can get high-energy blue light.

In this way, strength losses are prevented and the overall effectiveness of the tandem increases. Other substances, called III-V electronics, have also been used in combination tissue and achieved higher efficiency. The issue is that they are expensive and difficult to create, but just tiny solar cells can be created when combined with focused lighting.

Perovskite solar cells are a huge investment by the medical community. They have maintained a phenomenal rate of development, increasing from 14 % to 26 % in just 10 years for a single cell in a lab.

These developments made it possible for them to be integrated into ultra-high-efficiency tandem solar cells, demonstrating a global power generation of billions of volts.

The cost of renewable electricity

The fresh record-breaking combination cells can get an extra 60 % of solar energy. This reduces installation costs and the amount of land ( or roof space ) needed for solar farms, resulting in less energy being produced.

Additionally, it means that owners of power plants did turn renewable energy into more money. However, consumers may not see a change in their electricity bills because of the way electricity prices are set in the UK. The real difference is when you consider top solar installations where the place needs to be properly utilized and the area is constrained.

Based on two important factors, the cost of top solar energy is determined. Second, the full price to install solar panels on your ceiling, and next, how much light they will make over their 25 years of operation.

Although installation costs are inexpensive, renewable energy generated at home has a slightly different return. You can use less power from the network, especially when it is expensive, and you can also offer some of your surplus electricity up to the network.

However, the grid operators will only bill you for a small amount of electricity, but often using a battery and storing it so you can use it at night is preferable. Based on average considerations for a typical American family, I calculated the amount of money that consumers would save from rooftop solar power, depending on the panels ‘ performance.

If we can improve panel efficiency from 22 % to 34 % without increasing the installation cost, savings in electricity bills will rise from £558ְ/year ( US$ 745 ) up to £709/year ($ 947 ). A 20 % bump in money savings that may create solar buildings extremely beautiful, even in white and cloudy Britain.

Solar panel manufacturing
The higher the efficiency of solar panels, the cheaper the resulting light. Photo: IM Imagery / Shutterstock via The Talk

So when will these new renewable panel be available?

As research continues, substantial efforts are being made to level up this technology and maintain its long-term sturdiness. The combination organisms that break records are produced in laboratories and are smaller than a mail stamp. It remains challenging to translate for high efficiency to square meters.

However, we are making headway. Oxford PV, a thermal company at the vanguard of mica technology, made the initial price of its previously developed combination solar panels earlier this month.

They are able to create strong, trusted solar panels by integrating two different renewable materials. While they are still far from 34 % efficiency, their work shows a promising way for next-generation solar cell.

The ecology of the materials used in combination solar panel is another factor. Some of the nutrients in solar panels can be very energy-consuming to extract and process.

Besides golden, perovskite solar cells require the elements lead, coal, salt and halogen as parts to make them work effectively. There is still plenty of research also needed to solve these problems because connecting perovskite and silicon even requires limited materials containing an component called indium.

Despite the difficulties, the scientific and industrial society is still working on parallel solar systems that can be used in almost anything, including cars, buildings, and airplanes.

A bright future for solar energy is emerging thanks to recent advances in high-efficiency perovskite-silicon parallel tissue, which will help ensure that renewable continues to play a more significant role in the global transition to renewable energy.

Julian Bonilla is interact professor of supplies, University of Oxford

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading