Move over CHIPS Act, Stargate is the future – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

The US$$ 500 billion Stargate AI system project, which was announced by US President Donald Trump, has sparked media coverage and stoked industry, deflecting attention from the less attractive details of TSMC’s initial chip factory’s opening, and suffocate the more contentious debate over the future of America’s high-tech restoration.

On January 21, the day after his inauguration, Donald Trump made an appearance with Oracle’s Larry Ellison, Softbank’s Masayoshi Son, and OpenAI’s Sam Altman to make an announcement that artificial intelligence will be the “largest AI system job by much in story… creating over 100, 000 National work about immediately,” as Trump put it. Given some of the responses it has generated, the film went “viral” – a suitable information.

In Abilene, Texas, 10 properties measuring half a million square foot are currently under construction, with additional 10 more on the drawing board, and additional ones will be constructed at locations that are being evaluated nationwide. These data locations may be full of machines equipped with Nvidia’s fresh Blackwell AI chips, which are made by Taiwan’s TSMC, the world’s top silicon manufacturer.

” I’m gonna support, a bit, through emergency pronouncements”, said Trump, “because we have an emergency, we have to get this thing built”.

” They have to make a lot of power, and we’ll make it possible for them to get that generation done pretty easily”, he added, “at their personal crops if they want”.

In other words, Trump intends to supersede power regulations that may put off the project, leading to a significant increase in power generation capacity driven by the purchase intentions of a select few big high-tech companies.

Oracle’s Ellison said,” Thank you, Mr President. We certainly couldn’t do this without you”. Altman and Son shared the sentiment. And they probably couldn’t, at least not as quickly and efficiently.

If Joe Biden or Kamala Harris had been attempting the project in the White House, it would likely have been hampered by attempts at social engineering and unionization of the workforce. For the same reason, Stargate is based in Texas, not California.

Masayoshi Son said,” We wouldn’t have decided, unless you won. Yesterday, we agreed. We signed. To achieve this, we would immediately begin deploying 100 billion dollars with the intention of making 500 billion dollars within the next four years, within your mandate.

As explained by OpenAI, the initial equity investments in Stargate will come from SoftBank, Oracle, OpenAI and MGX, the technology fund based in Abu Dhabi. The lead partners are SoftBank and OpenAI, with OpenAI acting as the company’s operational manager and SoftBank as its financial advisor. Softbank’s Son will be the project’s chairman.

Nvidia, Arm ( the British semiconductor design company owned primarily by Softbank ), Microsoft, Oracle and OpenAI are the project’s technology partners. Oracle, Nvidia and OpenAI will build and operate the computing system.

OpenAI has long-standing relationships with both Nvidia and Microsoft. In Japan, Softbank and Nvidia have partnered to set up a nationwide AI grid.

Following Trump to the podium, Ellison, Son and Altman talked about healthcare-related applications from AI-enabled cross-referencing of health records and procedures to cancer detection and treatment, including the development of mRNA cancer vaccines.

But there are other possibilities, including factory automation and national defense. The name Stargate, of course, is reminiscent of Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite company.

The stock market approves of the concept. Oracle’s share price was up 7.2 % on Tuesday and another 4.6 % in after-hours trading. The share price of Softbank Group increased by more than 10 % on Wednesday and by another 5 % on Thursday in Japan ( across the International Date Line ). The share prices of Nvidia, TSMC, Microsoft and server maker Super Micro also rose.

Stargate is pitched as a made-in-America-for-America project, but the Nvidia AI processors at the core of the data centers will be made by Taiwan’s TSMC, at first entirely in Taiwan, then partly in the US.

At its new factory in Arizona, where TSMC is most likely to manufacture integrated circuits, on January 10, TSMC began producing integrated circuits for Apple. AMD and Nvidia are likely to be its new customers. For the first time in our country’s history, our country’s leaders are producing cutting-edge four-nanometer chips on American soil, making American workers on par with Taiwan in terms of yield and quality, according to incoming commerce chief Gina Raimondo.

TSMC Chairman and CEO C C Wei, speaking to investors on the company’s 2024 earnings call on January 16, confirmed this:

” We were able to pull ahead the production schedule of our first fab in Arizona, building on the successful result of our earlier engineering wafer production. Our first fab, using N4 process technology and yield comparable to those of our fabs in Taiwan, has already entered high-volume production in 4Q ’24. We anticipate a smooth beginning of the manufacturing process because we are confident that our factories in Arizona and Taiwan will offer the same level of manufacturing quality and dependability.

Wei added that “our plans for the second fab and third fab in Arizona are also on track.” Based on the needs of our customers, these fabs will use even more advanced technologies like our N3, N2, and A16.

In plain English, this means that TSMC will be making 4nm chips in Arizona starting this year and progress to 3nm, 2nm and 1.6nm ( 16-angstrom ), probably by the end of the decade. In terms of 3nm production, TSMC is already ahead of Samsung and Intel, who are both likely to be 1 nm and smaller. TSMC currently makes Nvidia’s Blackwell AI processors using its 4nm process.

All of these process technologies were and are being developed and produced in Taiwan, close to the company’s R&amp, D, and where the procedure is well-established and the capacity is much larger. This suggests that regardless of any agreement Trump has with China, he won’t want to disrupt Stargate’s main production.

A retired Silicon Valley executive and advisor to the US government on the subject of high-tech competitiveness said,” The game with the current administration is zero-sum,” in response to the three executives ‘ praise for Trump.

And that it is given that Trump has already replaced and exceeded$ 500 billion in government funding after cutting more than$ 300 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act and Department of Energy loan programs under his administration, which were then replaced by$ 300 billion from the private sector.

A West Coast venture capitalist who is not a fan of Trump wrote in an email that” It’s all part of the mad scramble for more computing power and energy to fuel it… Remember Trump’s first term. He enjoys planning big announcements, which credit him with making investments that were already planned or that never occur. Everyone tries to ingratiate themselves with Dear Leader, but it’s all part of that. Because that’s what you have to do in an autocratic state” .&nbsp,

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, wrote on X,” They don’t actually have the money. SoftBank has well under$ 10 billion secured. I have that on good authority”. However, if there is one thing Son excels at, it’s raising money. In 2017, Softbank launched the Vision Fund, a technology-focused venture capital fund with more than$ 100 billion in capital – the world’s largest such fund at the time.

For Musk, whose xAI competes with OpenAI and has taken it to court, Stargate is a powerful new competitor. And perhaps worse than that, Ellison, Son and Altman – high-tech moguls like himself – now also have Trump’s ear.

If the build-out of Stargate’s data centers proceeds according to plan, Microsoft, Google and Amazon are likely to lose their first-mover advantage and oligopolistic profit margins in AI-related cloud computing. Oracle, which offers cloud computing services in 25 countries around the world, has a significant opportunity in this regard.

Another critic, physician and biochemist Robert Malone, has published an essay entitled” AI, mRNA, Cancer Vaccines and” Stargate”: Reality check. Curb your enthusiasm, and beware of grifters”.

He writes:” I can’t believe that we are being spoon-fed this hype from the likes of Oracle’s Larry Ellison… Having this guy lecture us on mRNA vaccines for cancer is over the top. &nbsp, This is so amazingly ( and dangerously ) naive that I can hardly believe I am hearing it”.

Maybe so, but Ellison, Son and Altman were delivering a pitch for AI infrastructure, not explaining the technology roadmaps of companies that will use their data centers. They may be overly optimistic, but they are genuinely interested in healthcare and think AI can contribute significantly to the analysis of sizable amounts of medical-related data.

Malone also criticizes “banking some brand-new” cancer moonshot” television programs named after science fiction TV shows.” So, is Stargate a wise use of money or a reckless boondoggle? In reality,$ 500 billion is nearly ten times the$ 52.7 billion in grants and loans provided by the CHIPS Act. Only time will tell.

Follow this writer on&nbsp, X: @ScottFo83517667

Continue Reading

Bank of Japan hikes rates with a wary eye on Trump – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Tokyo – Kazuo Ueda, the government of the Bank of Japan, is struggling to understand that a man who lives seven thousand miles away is in charge of making the decision.

US President Donald Trump ‘s&nbsp, business war&nbsp, risks are distracting the whole world market like a low-grade but prolonged pain. The throbbing wasn’t enough to derail this Friday’s ( January 24 ) rate hike in Japan, one that had been in the works for weeks.

The BOJ increased its benchmark rate by a third point to 0.5 %, its highest levels since 2008. The japanese gained as much as 0.7 % to the money to 155.01 in early day trading. Despite increasing three days in less than a month, the BOJ also maintains the lowest benchmark rate in the world, tied with the Swiss National Bank.

However, Ueda’s glass to, as his staff put it,” continue to raise the plan interest rate and adjust the degree of financial hotel” depends on its assumptions about the outlook being ruled out.

It’s the same verbiage that the BOJ used when it last tightened in July. That, nevertheless, was again when Tokyo politicians thought Trump 2.0 may never materialize.

Then, all bets are down as Trump threatens to wreck&nbsp, Asia’s 2025&nbsp, with a storm of taxes, charges that may surely bang Japan’s business.

For now, Trump is holding his flames on the 60 % income he&nbsp, threatened&nbsp, on Chinese products. No one is likely to be more amazed than Chinese leader Xi Jinping, whose country has been gearing up for Trump’s retaliation journey.

Trump is showing that his business war is still going by promising to establish 25 % taxes on American and Hispanic products on February 1.

Trump also seems to be firing a killed off Beijing’s spear. The concept, it seems, is that China can&nbsp, prevent tariffs&nbsp, if Xi’s Communist Party starts making great agreements.

As Trump told the audience in Davos this month:” All we want is justice. We simply want a level playing field. We don’t want to get benefits. We’ve been experiencing significant shortfalls with China. Joe Biden allowed it to “get out of hand.”

However, given that Trump is a Trump, Team Xi would need to win over Washington by promoting trade with China and the US to avoid tariffs, which some believe Xi would ever do.

Many investors are also worried about Trump’s imposing tariffs, which would likely stir the world’s largest trading country at the worst possible time.

The negative pressures that China carried into 2025 may get even worse if Trump’s policies walk a crucial development website: exports. Already, China ‘s&nbsp, property crisis&nbsp, and weak household demand have economists buzzing about a Japan-like “lost decade”.

It’s something&nbsp, officials in Tokyo&nbsp, know all too much about. Despite all the excitement over the BOJ’s decision to raise rates another step closer to zero, the benchmark’s previous peak of 0.5 %, 17 years ago, didn’t go so well.

Back then, Toshihiko&nbsp, Fukui was in Ueda’s chair. Fukui’s board managed to end quantitative easing in 2006 and start announcing official rates for the first time since 1999, when the BOJ initially reduced them to zero.

In 2007, he tightened further. But the recession that followed enraged the political establishment. By 2008, &nbsp, Fukui’s successor was resurrecting QE and pushing rates back to zero.

It’s an open question whether Ueda can avoid Fukui’s fate. Trump is likely to offer the solution in some way or another. As Trump begins&nbsp, tossing tariff after tariff&nbsp, at the globe, Japan’s export-reliant economy will be at the very center of the collateral-damage zone.

These are just indirect risks, to be precise. If Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba isn’t sufficiently subservient for Trump’s liking, Japan might face its own tariffs.

The 100 % taxes Trump plans for Mexico-made automobiles could easily come Japan’s way. Ishiba, for example, hasn’t even been able to secure a meeting with Trump, though&nbsp, Trump&nbsp, has made time for virtually every other world leader imaginable.

Japan could be in harm’s way even if Trump doesn’t slap huge taxes on China. &nbsp, Officially, Japanese lawmakers claim they’re ready to cooperate with the Trump 2.0 White House. In private, however, they worry Trump might strike a bilateral trade deal with Beijing that excludes Japan.

Either way, the&nbsp, BOJ’s path forward&nbsp, is a cloudy one.

” The outlook is subject to significant policy uncertainty at home and abroad — US President Trump’s promise of higher tariffs is bound to shake up global trade and supply chains”, says&nbsp, Stefan Angrick, head Japan economist at&nbsp, Moody’s Analytics.

Thing is, Japan has been here before. In 2008, the global financial crisis complicated the BOJ’s tightening plans. Today, &nbsp, US turbulence&nbsp, may again be standing in the way of the BOJ normalizing 25 years of zero rates.

Whether or not Ueda understands the yen’s and Japanese rate movements better than Trump’s.

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading

From innovation to production of new US defense systems – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

At all ranges of implementation, the US is in constant flux with global competition for significant security technologies. The US Department of Defense will implement new initiatives to increase the competitive range and level of British defence techniques.

The success of these initiatives will be evaluated by the rapid, better development that can outsmart the competition. In this regard, advanced manufacturing processes that create technology systems are of special value.

The issue is frequently delivering exceptional techniques within budget, but there is rarely a shortage of innovative ideas. Working within the restrictive technological and financial constraints of these programs calls for the skilled blending of numerous resources.

And the end result may be powerful systems that can be used in a variety of settings.

It has, of course, been done earlier. The remarkably successful NASA Apollo program, for instance, which brought the first people to the moon, is a perfect example. In response to the Soviet Union’s pioneering satellite systems, President John Kennedy launched the system.

Success came from a sizable pool of skills. And there were no buttons. Numerous cooperative programs forged a bridge between innovative research and pioneering professional development and production, which helped lead to the success of Apollo.

These well-executed cooperative programs enabled the transfer of novel ideas from facilities to practical use. These were not only ordinary goods; they had to conform to the strictest consistency requirements for spacecraft carrying astronauts.

The program’s extraordinary accomplishment was the rapid transition from ideas to space-qualified products that couldn’t fail without causing life to be lost.

I was involved in the creation and development of the solid-state microwave that served as the radio for the pilots ‘ landing on the moon to talk to the spacecraft that was orbiting the moon, and where they had to return and port once they reached the planet’s surface.

The system in the radio may not fail, and to maintain its reliability, fresh test and manufacturing techniques were developed. The sky landing vision was a flawless success for the micro television. It was all fresh, and individuals rose to the challenge.

This type of work was carried out frequently by many members. In this instance, the initial development was at a RCA&nbsp, labs where I worked, but the conversation game’s prime contractor did the full stereo design and production.

You never know where new thoughts will come from, so the purpose of this account is to emphasize the importance of including undiscovered entrepreneurs in engineering programs.

What made this example stand out as extraordinary is that my invention was the result of a conversation I had by chance with a NASA engineer to find out whether I needed a new device to remove a flawed one.

In a short period of time, NASA became aware that a trustworthy radio could be constructed, and revenue for my project almost arrived immediately. The soft transfer to a top-notch radio product manufacturer was what eventually made the new radio possible. This near connection is important.

What resources are available right now that will enable massive new defence projects? The most accomplished citizens work together, second, to put it another way. DARPA ( Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency ), which is funded by the Department of Defense, provides funding for technological studies in important areas.

The initiatives supported by DARPA have had amazing effects when supported by various organizations, including the success of artificial intelligence and the Internet.

The DARPA programs ‘ results are simply system enablers for military projects, which companies with the assets can use to fund weapons and systems production follow.

Now, there is a major concern. The number of top US defence companies has decreased from 51 to just five since the early 1990s. This means fewer assets involved in security plans, fewer entrepreneurs and less opposition.

Additionally, there are fewer business labs working for the DOD. The big corporate lab, like those of AT&amp, T, RCA and Xerox, have disappeared. Companies that once had a high level of entrepreneurs with significant innovative contributions have seen a drastic decline in number.

This issue is likely to prevent the development of significant new initiatives that require the highest level of technology. The answer is that more businesses may participate in the DoD purchasing method, while organizations like DARPA must continue to work together. And the best US skill may join.

I anticipate that new initiatives may require new businesses that value the development of high-performance technology under DoD contracts and the fact that such initiatives’ spin-offs will have significant effects on the sales of goods. This has been demonstrated over time, and it is likely to continue.

Henry Kressel is a technician, engineer, publisher and entrepreneur. He was in charge of directing the development of numerous significant, novel electronic equipment. He was the director of RCA Laboratories ‘ electronic research division and has long held private equity investments in technology businesses.

Continue Reading

Why China’s port play has Trump so up in arms – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Chinese President Xi Jinping and Colombian President Dina Boluarte met to actually inaugurate a new US$ 3.6 billion deepwater mega-port in Peru, called Chancay, on their way to the G20 conference in Rio de Janeiro in November.

China’s state-owned Cosco shipping giant had purchased a 60 % stake in the port for$ 1.6 billion, which gave the company exclusive use of the port for 60 years. Weeks later, the first fleet departed for Shanghai loaded with strawberries, bananas and materials.

China’s plan for a maritime Silk Road in the 21st century that may better join its manufacturing hubs with its global trading partners includes Chancay. The West is concerned about China’s growing influence over global transport routes because of the high investments in ships in many nations.

Donald Trump, the just re-elected US president, made clear these issues when he claimed that China was “operating” the Panama Canal and that the US intended to retake it. China does not run the river, nevertheless. Instead, a Hong Kong organization runs two ships on either side.

Port growth growth

The maritime Silk Road has a remarkable scope and scale. China has invested in 129 ships in lots of countries through its state-owned companies, mostly in the Global South. Seventeen of these ships have majority-Chinese rights.

According to one estimate, Taiwanese firms invested$ 11 billion in international port advancement from 2010–19. Leading Chinese companies today own direct stakes in stations where more than 27 % of the world’s container industry is currently conducted.

China has entered Latin America violently, becoming the country’s leading trading partner. Its interface approach has evidently signaled a long-term aim to get the exports important to its food and energy security: soybeans, corn, beef, iron ore, copper and battery-grade lithium.

Last season, for instance, Portos do Paraná, the Portuguese state-owned organization that functions as the port authority in the state of Paraná, signed a letter of intent with China Merchants Port Holdings to develop Paranaguá Container Terminal, the second-largest switch in South America. Due to the 22 stations scheduled to be auctioned before the close of 2025, China may participate in even more Portuguese ships.

In Africa, Chinese purchase grew from two ships in 2000 to 61 infrastructure in 30 countries by 2022. Additionally, the Belt and Road Initiative in Europe is led by Chinese companies that own two significant ports in Belgium and Greece, which are the so-called “dragon’s brain” of the program.

Hard-driving interface strategy

Xi’s goal of having a global economic hegemony is largely driven by its rise as a sea and delivery power.

For one, China requires steady access to important trading routes in order to continue meeting both the exports Beijing needs to keep its market strong and the need for Chinese exports abroad.

China can establish economic zones in other nations that grant terminal owners and operators unrestricted access to goods and products by controlling ports as well. Some feared that this might cause China to stifle the supply of some goods or even have an impact on the political or economic policies of various nations.

The metal and minerals needed to power China’s rise as a technology superpower are another important component of this technique. Beijing has focused its interface investments in those areas with the most important resources.

For example, China is the world’s largest supplier of copper ore, primarily from Chile, Peru and Mexico. It is also one of the country’s major lithium hydroxide manufacturers, primarily from Chile and Argentina. Additionally, its terminal agreements in Africa give it access to unique rocks and other nutrients.

Latin America’s expansion also helps to resolve China’s recent industry disputes with Europe. Additionally, it eliminates worries about potential US taxes Trump might impose on Chinese products.

Military problems

Washington is concerned about these actions because it makes sense that China is challenging US effect in its own neighborhood.

China maintains that its port geopolitics is market-oriented. However, it has established a naval base in Djibouti, a country in Africa that is carefully placed. Additionally, it is alleged that Equatorial Guinea is developing a new naval foundation.

According to a recent review by the Asia Society Policy Institute, plan experts believe China is seeking to “weaponize” the Belt and Road Initiative. One way it does this is by requiring that the business ships it invests in be able to serve as naval foundations as well.

Foreign businesses own a 23.5 % play in the west African port of Djibouti. &nbsp, Photo: Elias Messeret / AP

14 of the 17 ports where it holds a majority of the stakes have the potential to be used for marine purposes so much. These ports may then fulfill a dual purpose: they support the Taiwanese military’s logistic network and help Chinese naval vessels to travel farther away from home.

US officials worry that China might use its influence on private companies to stifle business during a time of conflict.

American response

While China’s assets are raising concerns, the West’s determination to invest in ships at this level is limited. The US International Development Finance Corporation, for example, has a little slower, comprehensive approach for its investments, which usually leads to better outcomes for both investors and host nations.

However, some Western companies are acquiring stakes in established and newly built ports in other countries, albeit not to the extent of Chinese enterprises.

The French shipping and logistics company CMA CGM’s global port development strategy, for example, includes investments in 60 terminals worldwide. In 2024, it acquired control over South America’s largest container terminal in the Port of Santos, Brazil.

Trump has threatened to impose tariffs as a means of limiting China’s position on the world stage. A member of his transition team’s advisor has suggested a 60 % tariff on any product passing through Peru’s Chancay port or any other Chinese-owned or controlled port in South America.

Rather than making nations reluctant to sign port deals with Beijing, however, this kind of action just erodes Washington’s regional influence. Additionally, China is likely to take retaliatory measures, such as outlawing the US’s export of crucial minerals.

Host nations like Peru and Brazil, meanwhile, are using the competition for port investment to their advantage. They are increasingly asserting their autonomy and adopting a strategy of using ports to “play everywhere” on the global stage, drawing attention from both the West and China.

Claudio Bozzi is lecturer in law, Deakin University

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trump already changing tack on ending Ukraine war – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The new US president, Donald Trump, has only been in business for a few days, but he has already changed his tune on the conflict in Ukraine. Trump has huge expressed his desire to end the war, and he even announced on the campaign trail that he could put an end to it within 24 hours of taking business.

Trump did not even mention Ukraine in his opening statement, and this has not occurred. But speaking to reporters immediately afterwards, Trump stated that the battle was costing Russia’s leader, Vladimir Putin, more than he was gaining from it.

” He can’t be thrilled, he’s not doing so well”, Trump said. He therefore criticized Putin’s management. ” Russia is bigger]than Ukraine], they have more troops to gain, but that’s no way to run a state”, Trump remarked.

The following morning, in a blog on his Truth Social page, Trump went yet further. ” If we don’t create a deal]to finish the war], and shortly, I have no other choice but to put great levels of income, taxes, and sanctions on something being sold by Russia to the US, and several other participating nations”.

Anyone who has been following the war in Ukraine may be aware that Trump’s president, Joe Biden, had been doing many of these things now. His presidency slapped numerous restrictions on important Russian businesses and individuals, and prohibited the transfer of nearly all of its goods.

But, is Trump then merely suggesting a progression of Biden’s plan? Russia appears to believe that. On Thursday, January 23, in response to Trump’s risks, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told Russian press,” we do not see any particular fresh parts here”.

Trump’s peace program

Research has shown that British commitments to foreign policy vary essentially from president to president, and that domestic policy does not change as much as domestic policy does. See, for example, the progression of Barack Obama’s Middle East plan during Trump’s first word. Trump maintained a sense of community while minimizing the US presence there.

But, Trump’s view to Ukraine does seem set to go further than Biden’s in two distinct ways. Second, Trump has set a revised target of 100 days for ending the war in Ukraine. And he has installed a special minister, Keith Kellogg, to deliver Russia and Ukraine to the negotiating tables.

Trump has nominated former US military commander public Keith Kellogg for the position of particular minister to Ukraine and Russia. Kellogg was a former national security adviser. &nbsp, Photo: Sarah SIlbiger / Pool / EPA via The Talk

Trump appears to want to transcend the predetermined standards that the Kremlin has already established regarding the problems of a peace. These include giving up Ukraine’s promises to Russia over Crimea and the four eastern regions, as well as a promise that Ukraine won’t join NATO.

On the surface, Trump appears to be sticking with Biden’s strategy of putting strain on Russia and keeping it a secret. Regardless of the outcome, the Trump administration’s top priority is not to assist Ukraine in winning the war, but to put an end to it.

Trump wants to make sure there is a peace before going over the specifics. Trump may then assert that he brought Ukraine to peace while generally abstaining from the negotiations to maintain it.

Next, Trump’s most recent claims suggest that by punishing nations that Russia nevertheless trades with, he is looking more than Biden. This will include places that have continued to be big buyers of Russian oil and natural gas, such as China and India, as well as Iran and North Korea, who have both provided defense aid to Russia.

Trump made it clear throughout his plan that he views taxes as a means of redressing the some injustices that the US has endured. And he has previously warned that if China and India don’t balance trade with the US, he will impose 100 % tariffs on imports from the” BRICS” group of countries. Therefore, sanctions against these nations may not seem so unlikely given their extended industry with Russia.

Claims like China and India could play a significant role in bringing about a lasting peace between Russia and Ukraine, according to Biden. Trump, on the other hand, hopes that risks did persuade China and India to enjoy a more active part in peace agreements.

Pictures of Trump, Putin and Xi side by side on a television screen.
Trump hopes that China and India’s risks of taxes will be enough to persuade them to play a significant part in peace negotiations. Image: EQRoy / Shutterstock via The Talk

Ukraine still has a lot to gain.

Trump’s transactional approach to international relations, according to Randall Schweller, a professor of political science at Ohio State University in the US, “marks a US that is less serious in managing its long-term connections than in making profits on short-term offers… even at the expense of historic friends.”

This method of negotiation is demonstrated by Trump, a billionaire businessman, in how he views business negotiations. According to Eugene B. Kogan, president of Harvard University, Trump wants to make people” a structured choice in negotiations: accept his offer or face his unpredictable ire.” When other parties accept Trump’s offer, he frequently faces retribution and can be expected to threaten retribution if they reject it.

Ukraine may end up being under the most pressure to agree to Trump’s terms because it has the most to lose. Given the number of soldiers who have died and the country’s nearly exhausted financial reserves, should Russia withdraw its troops today, Putin would lose out politically. However, this could be managed thanks to the Russian state’s strict control over dissent and the media.

Through NATO, Ukraine, on the other hand, seeks territorial stability and security assurances. In any negotiations, Ukraine is at odds with Russia because of this. Soon, we’ll see how a coercive negotiator like Trump can alter either party’s positions.

David J. Galbreath is professor of international security, University of Bath

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

China’s air-sea drone could rewrite the rules of naval warfare – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

According to researchers at Northwestern Polytechnical University ( NWPU) and the China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center ( CARDC ), which are cited in a South China Morning Post report, China has created the first drone that can launch from a submarine from the water, loop repeatedly between the sea and the sky, and eventually return to the same&nbsp, sub.

China has already developed this capability and potentially more than the Pentagon envisions for its own forces, according to the SCMP report, while the US military is considering sending submarines close to the Chinese coast to detach drones that swarm in the air and launch attacks on the People’s Liberation Army’s ( PLA ) fleet during a potential conflict over Taiwan.

The new Chinese air-to-sea aircraft, known as Feiyi, features a unique portable aircraft style that apparently enhances its concealment and life abilities. The Feiyi may manage marine quickly and do high-agility maneuvers in the air, making it suitable for sea reconnaissance, surveillance and strike missions, the SCMP report said.

Feiyi’s cutting-edge features, bolstered by China’s unparalleled aircraft production system and its growing skill in cross-media ammunition, signal a possible edge for China in future maritime conflicts involving drones with the US.

Also, the US Navy is testing the Naviator helicopter, an autonomous vehicle capable of flying and underground operations. The Naviator can seamlessly transition between air and water, which increases its deployment flexibility, and is designed for autonomous launch and recovery from unmanned underwater vehicles ( UUV).

The Naviator has more accurate GPS and physical position keep, a power-saving boat sentry mode, the ability to transport numerous sensors and payloads, and a quicker deployment than conventional underwater vehicles. The US Navy’s Orca Extra-Large Unmanned Undersea Vehicle (XLUUV) could be a member for the Naviator’s probable start system.

Its length and load volume surpass those of the majority of the current marine vehicles, making it suitable for a variety of mission types besides minelaying operations. Its diesel-electric engine system enables automatic operations for up to 30 days and 6, 000 nautical miles, although operational assessment is continuing to develop these capabilities, according to The War Zone.

These cross-media robots can destroy the enemy by launching swarm problems from a variety of domains and directions, probably overcoming the limitations of conventional and fast weapons.

Further, these developments may tie into the more prominent “dronification” of undersea tensions in the Taiwan Strait, South China Sea and Indian Ocean.

Exploring the role of UUVs in the Taiwan Strait, the Center for a New American Security ( CNAS ) mentions in a June 2024 report that UUVs play a vital role in enhancing China’s maritime surveillance and anti-access/area denial ( A2/AD ) capabilities.

These UUVs conduct covert intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance ( ISR ) operations, monitor naval activities, map the seabed and locate critical undersea infrastructure. Their independent operations also lower the risk of detection, which makes them successful in tense waters.

China is creating a multidomain surveillance network by integrating UUVs into its larger drone fleet, which increases its ability to disrupt communications and halt foreign intrusions. This action is in line with China’s plan to overcome its own shortcomings and strengthen its standing in a potential Taiwan conflict.

In the 2024 book” Navigating East Asian Maritime Conflicts: Technological Change, Environmental Challenges, Global and Regional Responses”, Henrik Hiim mentions that UUVs and Unmanned Surface Vehicles ( USV ) play a nuanced role in US-China undersea competition in the South China Sea.

In line with its efforts to make the South China Sea a protected base for its nuclear ballistic missile submarines ( SSBN), China uses UUVs to counter US nuclear attack submarines ( SSN) by raising maritime domain awareness.

The US uses Unmanned Maritime Systems ( UMS ) to support strategic anti-submarine warfare ( ASW) operations in the South China Sea, but its ability to do so is limited by China’s A2/AD environment’s endurance and vulnerability.

However, Hiim argues that while UMSs may not decisively alter the undersea power balance, they exacerbate maritime disputes, fueling US-China rivalry and intensifying the regional security dilemma.

In the Indian Ocean, the Center for Strategic and International Studies ( CSIS ) think tank mentions in a January 2024 report that China’s operations in the area are characterized by extensive dual-use research activities, blending scientific and military objectives.

The PLA leverages a vast fleet of civilian research vessels to gather critical data on water conditions, currents, and the seafloor, thereby enhancing its naval capabilities. These vessels, often owned by state-affiliated organizations with military ties, conduct surveys that support China’s strategic ambitions.

Notably, Chinese ships have engaged in active operations in the Indian Ocean, using cutting-edge underwater gliders and profiling floats to create a real-time ocean observation network. This information could be used to support the PLA Navy’s ( PLAN ) submarine operations there to counter India’s Bay of Bengal for its SSBNs.

In the wake of India’s ongoing border dispute with China in the Himalayas, analysts have suggested that the country could use its undersea nuclear deterrent as a backstop if its conventional military capabilities are undermined.

Continue Reading

Trump’s Paris Agreement withdrawal not such a bad thing – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

On his first time back in business as United States president, Donald Trump gave official notice of his nation’s return from the Paris Agreement – a crucial global treaty seeking to rein in climate change.

Before signing the attempt, Trump declared his causes to an area of cheering followers, describing the international agreement as an “unfair, one-sided Paris weather authority rip-off. ”

Of course, this is not the first day Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris deal – he did it in 2017, during his first term in office.

On one hand, Trump’s shift is a huge punch to work to global climate action. The US is the world’s second-biggest emission of greenhouse gas waste, after China. The state is vital to the international effort to curb climate change.

But given Trump’s weather for, it ’s actually better that the US excluded itself from international climate conversations while he is in power. That means, the rest of the world can get on with the task without Trump’s caustic effect.

This is not the first day Trump has withdrawn the US from the Paris offer.   Photo: Ben Curtis / AP via The Talk

A quick recap on the Paris Agreement

Signed by 196 countries in 2015, the Paris Agreement is the first comprehensive international agreement to combat climate change.

Its overall purpose is to maintain the increase of global heat to well below 2°C above pre-industrial ranges and undertake efforts to control the raise to 1. 5°C.

Experts say meeting the more optimistic 1. 5°C goal is important because crossing that threshold risks unleashing catastrophic climate change effects, for as more frequent and severe drought and wildfires.

Under the deal, each state may produce national plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to help achieve the global temperatures goals. These programs are known as “nationally determined contributions”.

What Trump’s removal methods

Under Trump’s next administration, the US was only out of the Paris package for four weeks, due to the time it took for the surrender to take effect. President Joe Biden rejoined the contract in early 2021.

This day, the US withdrawal may be established more immediately – after a year. Finally, the US will add Iran, Libya and Yemen as the only United Nations states no party to the contract.

The US is preserve participating as a celebration to the Paris deal until January 2026. That means it does try to negotiate at the COP30 climate change event in Brazil this time.

COP30 is a big deal. It is when each region is due to current its innovative nationally determined efforts. The US removal means it is unlikely to provide a new input to the conference – if it attends at all.

If the US display up, its presence would probably destabilize negotiations. That’s why removing Trump-backed diplomats from the climate talks going forwards is a good result.

If the US stayed in the camp under Trump, its diplomats may, for example, agitate to diminish any talks struck at the conference. We saw quite techniques from Saudi Arabia at COP29 in Baku. The fuel state constantly disrupted the talks and in one example, sought to change critical text in the agreement without full consultation.

With the US out of the way, the other parties to the Paris Agreement have a better chance of progressing climate negotiations.

At this stage, it does n’t appear other countries are preparing to follow Trump out the door. This is despite controversy at the COP29 talks when Argentinian president Javier Milei ordered his negotiators to withdraw only a few days in. Milei had previously described the climate emergency as a “socialist lie. ”

At this stage, Trump has not withdrawn from the Paris Agreement’s parent convention, the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. So after it withdraws from the Paris deal, the US can still attend COP meetings, but only as an observer.

With the US out of the way, other parties to the Paris agreement have a better chance of progress. Pictured: COP29 President Mukhtar Babayev, left, with an unnamed woman, listens during a closing session.   Photo: Rafiq Maqbool / AP via The Conversation

Onwards and upwards

Of course, there are downsides to the US withdrawal from the Paris deal.

Leaving the Paris Agreement means the US is no longer required to provide annual updates on its greenhouse gas emissions. This lack of transparency makes it harder to determine how the world is tracking on emissions reduction overall.

Under the Biden administration, the US contributed funding to help developing nations adopt clean energy and cope with climate change ( albeit delivering less than it promised ). Trump is expected to slash this funding. That will leave vulnerable nation-states in an even more precarious position.

While the US was technically only out of the Paris deal for a short period last time, the process was destabilizing. It weakened what was an unprecedented show of international solidarity and sent a damaging message about the importance of climate action.

Trump’s latest withdrawal is a similar blow to morale. It’s particularly galling for Americans fighting for climate action, and those struggling with its devastating effects – most recently, the unthinkable fires in Los Angeles.

But Trump’s withdrawal can easily be reversed by a new US president. And we can expect other parties to Paris, such as China and the European Union, to continue to play a leadership role, and others to fill the vacuum.

What’s more, as others have noted, Trump cannot derail global climate action. Investment in clean energy is now greater than in fossil fuels. When Trump last pulled out of Paris, many US state and local governments pressed ahead with climate policy; we can expect the same this time around.

And the vast majority of the rest of the world is still pursuing emissions reduction efforts.

So overall, the US exit from Paris is probably the best of a bunch of bad options. It mutes Trump’s capacity to destabilize international climate action, allowing others to step into the breach.

Rebekkah Markey-Towler is PhD Candidate, Melbourne Law School, and research fellow, Melbourne Climate Futures, The University of Melbourne

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trump’s Stargate a bold reach for AI’s next frontier – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

In one of his first moves as the 47th President of the United States, Donald Trump announced a new US$ 500 billion project called Stargate to accelerate the development of artificial intelligence ( AI ) in the US.

The job is a collaboration between three big tech companies – OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle. Trump called it “the largest AI infrastructure project by far in history” and said it would help keep “the future of technology ” in the US.

Tech businessman Elon Musk, however, had a different take, claiming without evidence on his system X that the project’s donors “don’t really have the money. ” X, which is not included in Stargate, is even working on developing AI and Musk is a foe to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

Alongside announcing Stargate, Trump even revoked an executive order signed by his father Joe Biden that was aimed at addressing and controlling AI challenges.

Seen together, these two techniques embody a culture prevalent in software development that can best be summed up by the word: “move fast and break things. ”

What is Stargate?

The US is now the world’s pioneer when it comes to AI advancement. The Stargate task will considerably extend this guide over different nations.

It will see a system of data centres built across the US. These centres will building massive computer machines required for running AI applications such as ChatGPT. These machines will operate 24/7 and may require significant amounts of electricity and water to work.

According to a speech by OpenAI, construction of new data locations as part of Stargate is currently underway in the US state of Texas:

[ W]e are evaluating potential sites across the country for more campuses as we finalise definitive agreements.

US President Donald Trump speaking at the White House alongside Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son, Oracle chief technology officer Larry Ellison and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.   Photo: Julia Demaree Nikhinson

An inadequate – but encouraging – order

The increased funding into AI growth by Trump is encouraging. It may help improve the many possible benefits of AI. For instance, AI may increase cancer patients ’ prognosis by quickly analyzing clinical information and detecting early signs of illness.

But Trump’s continuous renewal of Biden’s professional get on the “safe, safe and reliable development and use of AI” is deeply concerning. It could mean that any potential gains of Stargate are immediately trumped by its potential to exacerbate the existing affects of AI systems.

Yes, Biden’s get lacked critical technical details. But it was a tempting start towards developing safer and more responsible AI techniques. One big problem it was meant to address was tech firms collecting personal information for AI education without second obtaining acceptance.

AI techniques collect information from all over the internet. Even if data are readily available on the internet for individual use, it does not imply AI systems may use them for training. Moreover, when a picture or word is fed into an AI unit, it cannot be removed. There have been many instances of  artists suing Artificial craft generators  for  the unauthorised use  of their labor.

Another problem Biden’s get aimed to address was the risk of harm – especially to people from minority areas.

Most Artificial devices aim to increase accuracy for the majority. Without proper pattern, they can make really dangerous choices for a few.

For instance, in 2015, an image-recognition algorithm developed by Google immediately tagged pics of black individuals as “gorillas. ” This equal concern was later found in AI techniques of other organizations such as Yahoo and Apple, and remains unanswered a century later because these methods are so often incomprehensible actually to their creators.

This opacity makes it crucial to design AI systems correctly from the start. Problems can be deeply embedded in the AI system itself, worsening over time and becoming nearly impossible to fix.

As AI tools increasingly make important decisions, such as résumé screening, minorities are being even more disproportionately affected. For example, AI-powered face recognition software more commonly misidentifies black people and other people of color, which has led to false arrests and imprisonment.

YouTube video

[embedded content]

Faster, more powerful AI systems

Trump’s twin AI announcements in the first days of his second term as US president show his main focus in terms of AI – and that of the biggest tech companies in the world – is on developing ever faster, more powerful AI systems.

If we compare an AI system with a car, this is like developing the fastest car possible while ignoring crucial safety features like seat belts or airbags in order to keep it lighter and thus faster.

For both cars and AI, this approach could mean putting very dangerous machines into the hands of billions of people around the world.

Armin Chitizadeh is lecturer, School of Computer Science, University of Sydney

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Trump uncertainty and its measurement – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Subscribe now  with a one-month trial for only$ 1, then enjoy the first year at an exclusive rate of just$ 99.

Trump confusion and its dimension

David Goldman features stresses around the US budget deficit, rising true produces, and uncertainty surrounding President Trump’s proposed guidelines. Market uncertainty remains subdued, except in silver, which serves as a hedge against inflation and money volatility.

Trump’s tax order was force Europe into a lose-lose choice

Diego Faßnacht outlines the essential dilemma Europe may face under a minute Trump administration, where violent US trade policies may force the EU to choose between decoupling from China and coordinating with Washington or facing punishing tariffs.

Contradictory US messaging sky Ukraine harmony work

James Davis observes that while the new US leadership has expressed interest in ending the war in Ukraine, its approach lacks quality, with Moscow wary of contradictory information combining negotiation efforts with threats of harsher sanctions.

Movie changes the AI scenery

Scott Foster highlights the announcement of the$ 500 billion Stargate AI infrastructure project. With a finances roughly 10 times the CHIPS Act ’s$ 52. 7 billion, the initiative aims to develop 20 data centers over four years in a strong drive to cement US authority in AI.

Continue Reading

Trump’s China trade war plan keeps markets guessing – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Your shift, President Xi. This may be the important information from Donald Trump’s amazing reversal on large “day one ” tariffs on China.

The reprieve Trump appears to have granted  Asia’s biggest economy  is one Xi Jinping’s Communist Party certainly did n’t see coming. For weeks now, Trump and the gang of anti-China advisers he’s named to his new administration promised immediate 60 % tariffs as the centerpiece of a “shock-and-awe ” trade war.

No so quickly, it turns out. Taxes on Chinese goods are somewhat excluded from the storm of first-week executive orders. When pressed, Trump actually lowered his places. Whereas Canada and Mexico face 25 % levies by February 1, China might suffer a mere 10 %.

Chances are, this is Trump’s means of cajoling Xi to the dealing stand for a large Group of Two  business deal. To be sure, slow-walking China levies are aimed primarily at the share market.

Though Trump was n’t worry less about laws, standards or political politeness, he cares a great deal about Wall Street. Stories about stocks tumbling this year are the last thing the new US senator wants.

But Trump is also spoiling for an incredible clash with China, particularly once he realizes that Xi is n’t Shinzo Abe.

Beginning in December 2012, Japanese Prime Minister Abe pledged to revive an market hard being eclipsed by China. In the years that followed, Abe empowered the  Bank of Japan  to force its ultraloose guidelines into unknown territory and took steps to improve corporate governance.

Next came the Trump 1. 0 age, threatening trade war the likes of which Asia had never seen. Instantly, Abe snapped to focus to attempt to protect Asia’s No. 2 business from Trump’s taxes.

Following Trump’s impact vote win in November 2016, Abe made a run for New York. He was the first earth leader to visit Trump Tower to thank the man.

Abe did more than that, vouching for the “America First” leader in flowing words. “ I am convinced Mr. Trump is a leader in whom I may have great confidence ” and “a relationship of trust, ” Abe told investigators that day.

In the months and years that followed, Abe made a world splash  wining and dining  with Trump’s second White House group— including at Trump’s Florida sport team. On top of throwing praise, He gifted him premium golf equipment, including a US$ 3,755 motorist, among other extravagant gifts.

Abe was feted as a political Trump vehicle, credited for protecting Japan from the worst of the business conflict. One method Abe tamed Trump was acquiescing to a diplomatic trade deal in 2019. Abe’s genuine success was in running out the time on Trump 1. 0. By slow-walking on negotiations, Tokyo managed to achieve a “draw ” between the two nations.

At the end of the process, Japan effectively agreed to the same market-opening steps it had under the Barack Obama-led Trans-Pacific Partnership ( TPP ) pact that Trump scrapped.

Group Abe distracted Trump with greater market exposure for US meat, pork, and maize exporters. But the offer clearly did n’t include electrical products. Tokyo rejoiced.

“With typical hyperbole, President Trump declared the deal phenomenal, ” notes Matthew Goodman, who at the time led economic policy for the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “ But once again, President Trump … settled for a simple package. ”

You Xi pull off a comparable rearranging-of-the-deckchairs US business deal? The question is whether Xi’s group may even care.

After all, some earth leaders had a worse  2024  than Xi. China ’s home issue, weak home need, near-record youth unemployment and aging people have produced negative forces for seven consecutive rooms now.

The second-biggest market also saw an alarming increase in in-person demonstrations. And  China Inc.   is also dealing with the fallout from Xi’s tech-sector onslaught.

Xi, in other words, has some issues for which to reply. It is questionable his group would be glad to see the most prominent Chinese leader since Mao Zedong appearing to lose ground to Trump — or appearing to bow to Washington on the world stage.

But Xi even definitely knows that after a period of quiet, Trump will almost certainly purchase up the taxes he’s threatened — and perhaps even bigger types than he’s telegraphed. Trump’s leading patron, Tesla businessman Elon Musk, last month talked about the  needed for tariffs on Chinese energy cars.

“The Taiwanese car companies are the most economical car companies in the world, ” Musk told investors. “So, I think they will have major success outside of China depending on what kind of taxes or business restrictions are established. ” Musk has since walked backwards these remarks, but China has every reason to worry Trump might come after China ’s car market.

For today, Trump claims to have commissioned a broad overview of Washington ’s trade ties with China and other vital trading lovers. The White House, Team Trump says, will “investigate and treatment consistent trade deficits that damage our business and safety. ”

Such evaluations take occasion, of course. Times, in some cases. But Trump’s US Trade Representative company almost needs satellites to know that his 2018 cope with Xi was a failure. To Chad Bown at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the way in which the second Trump-Xi trade deal “fell little ” is the “anatomy of a dud. ”

As Bown sees it, “attempting to  maintain trade  — to join Trump’s goal of reducing the diplomatic trade imbalance— was self-defeating from the  begin. It did not help that neither China nor the United States was eager to de-escalate their painful price war. ”

Nor does that seem the path now as Trump surrounds himself with China secularists. They include assistant Peter Navarro, who co-wrote a text titled  “Death By China. ” And deal king Robert  Lighthizer, who’s signaled that Trump 2. 0 is considering a  currency devaluation ploy.

Yet US Treasury Secretary-nominee Scott Bessent, who’s considered less MAGA-ish than most Trump government takes, has taken to discussing China in dark conditions. During his subsequent confirmation reading, Bessent  said China had “the most uneven business in the history of the world ” and that it might be suffering a “severe recession/depression. ”

Bessent even segued to MAGA talking factors about Beijing’s presumably flooding the world with cheap products to finance its military passions. Commenting on Trump’s earlier deal, Bessent argued that “China has not made good on their [agriculture ] purchases ” and that the US will push Beijing to resume those purchases and perhaps add a “make-up provision. ”

But all this speaks to the great odds that Trump’s industry war may reemerge sooner rather than later. “If there’s any training for US-China ties from Trump 1. 0, it is that he is a fluctuation system and predicting what he will do is a sucker’s game, ” says lifelong China watcher  Bill  Bishop, who writes the Sinocism email.

Bishop notes that investors “had found some comfort in the fact that President Trump did not impose more tariffs on [ China ] on his first day in office, but they forget his earlier promise to impose 10 % tariffs, in addition to any other tariffs that may come on, because of fentanyl. He reiterated the 10 % tax hazard Tuesday. ”

The wait does purchase Xi a huge opportunity. While Trump is distracted with local exploits – from avenging his critics to overseeing a large imprisonment system for illegal residents to devising tax cuts – Xi’s team may expand efforts to reduce its trade surplus the natural way by increasing regional demand as a means of boosting import activity.

On the one hand, China ’s nearly US$ 1 trillion trade surplus proves that efforts by Trump 1. 0 and the West in general to alter the mechanics of world trade came up short. China ’s global manufacturing dominance has only grown since 2017, a fact Trump 2. 0 can verify with a mere Google search. Yet Xi has the power to alter these  global dynamics.

A vital first step would be to end the property crisis once and for all. The drip, drip, drip of bad news about housing demand and prices is deflating consumer prices and confidence simultaneously. Beijing’s slow response continues to inspire “Japanification ” chatter and have some on Wall Street debating if China is “uninvestable. ”

On Monday, Fitch Ratings downgraded homebuilder  China Vanke Co. , a reminder that default risks continue to hover over the sector. The move “reflects a deterioration in China Vanke’s sales and cash generation, which is eroding its liquidity buffer against large capital market debt maturities in 2025,” says Fitch analyst  Rebecca Tang.

Trouble is, Vanke’s challenges are hardly unique. The extreme downward  pressure on the yuan, meantime ,  could increase default risks as offshore debt payments become harder to make. This tug of war is limiting the People’s Bank of China ’s latitude to cut interest rates.

Xi could take steps to accelerate China ’s pivot toward increased domestic demand-led growth, reducing Trump 2. 0’s argument that Beijing is n’t sharing its 5 % rate of annual output globally.

At the moment, “China’s  economy is showing signs of revival, led by industrial output and exports, ” says Frederic Neumann, chief Asia  economist at  HSBC.

Yet a trade war would put these drivers in harm’s way. What’s needed are large and robust social safety nets to encourage  households  to spend more and save less. Xi and Premier Li Qiang talk often about doing so, but little has been achieved to transform China ’s consumption dynamics.

The drop in “spending on property by roughly half since the peak in 2021 represents a huge drop in  domestic demand, which cannot be easily replaced by more spending on consumer goods or government investment, ” says economist Duncan Wrigley at Pantheon Macroeconomics.

Only top-down policy shifts in Beijing could jumpstart household demand and halt the deflationary pressures making headlines. At the same time, international funds are still waiting on moves to strengthen capital markets, improve corporate transparency, reduce the dominance of state-owned enterprises and make more space for startups to disrupt the economy.

This will require considerable political will in Beijing – and patience on the part of investors. Though markets crave major retooling, they don’t often afford Team Xi the space and time needed to execute them.

Moves to repair, change or tweak China ’s engines are certain to depress growth somewhat. Markets, though, tend to react badly when upgrades soften growth.

This paradox has carried over into 2025. The slow pace of reform in recent years is catching up with Xi’s government, and markets are reacting badly. Mainland stocks began 2025 with their  weakest start since 2016. That has Beijing rolling out measures to stabilize equities.

Among them is boosting how much pensions can invest in listed Chinese companies as investors brace for the second Trump administration. It’s part of a Beijing directive is to “steady the stock market, and clear bottlenecks for the introduction of mid-to-long-term capital, ” according to the China Securities Regulatory Commission.

Yet nothing might steady Chinese markets faster than knowing how or when Trump might tax Beijing– and by how much. Until traders get an answer, 2025 is sure to make market volatility great again.  

Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek

Continue Reading