Bolen C (Page 6)

Dr. Maximilian Krah is one of the most important figures in Germany’s liberal group, the Other für Deutschland. He addressed Asia Times in response to accusations that AfD and the present a menace to European Jews. David P. Goldman, the assistant director of Asia Times, and I spoke with him in German for a brief period of time.

Asia Times: Dr. Krah, &nbsp, the leader of the Central Council of German Jews, Josef Schuster, had this to state on November 29:” If a group like the Other für Deutschland were to have responsibility for governing Germany, one would have to beg in all seriousness whether Hebrew living in Germany &nbsp, were&nbsp, also feasible. I have looked at every blog on the&nbsp, AfD&nbsp, site concerning Jews and the State of Israel, and without exception they defend Israel’s right to exist and reject racism in Germany. How do you discuss this gap?

Krah: &nbsp, I believe&nbsp, that Schuster is just stuck in a universe that no longer exists. &nbsp, There&nbsp, is no question that, generally speaking, &nbsp, antisemitism&nbsp, was common on the right, while nowadays it is at home on the left. That was genuine in Germany. We see that in Hungary, also. &nbsp, The aged Hungarian appropriate was racist, but that was a long time ago. &nbsp, Today ‘s&nbsp, Viktor Orban is no longer racist, and we&nbsp, see the same thing&nbsp, all&nbsp, over the world.

This has a lot to do with Israel. In 1967, Israel faced opponents who were all armed by Moscow. The Free World’s next wish in the Middle East at the time was Israel. Intelligent liberals in&nbsp, the USA and Western Europe realized that it is absolutely pointless to continue to think of Immigrants as socialists, because&nbsp, they were in fact&nbsp, the only ones fighting socialists, and items have been changing since then. I believe that Schuster is&nbsp, an honorable gentleman, but he is also very&nbsp, out of date, &nbsp, and has not yet &nbsp, grasped&nbsp, that&nbsp, racism has migrated&nbsp, from the right to the left. He claims that we were still in the 1960s. He has veered off from right to left, and he appears to be implying that we will spend another 60 times together. That is unfortunate, &nbsp, but I didn’t alter it. Because people are aware without a doubt that what he is saying is incorrect, no one takes him seriously again.

AT: When I look at the German political environment, I note that Viktor Orban is Israel’s best companion in Europe. Orban quickly invited Netanyahu to Budapest as a host of the Hungarian position when he was charged by the International Criminal Court. Geert Wilders, the head of Holland’s Freedom Party, went so far as to identify the German right-wing events as” German Zionists. Is there any racism left over from the German right?

Krah: &nbsp, There’s always something, and I haven’t set my hand in the fire to exclude that chance. There is no hatred at all at the amount of the group leaders and the plan makers, though. &nbsp, The reality&nbsp, has changed entirely, and for that reason no one holds onto this century-old&nbsp, crazy..

The remaining has embraced hatred, &nbsp, for two factors. Second, Israel is then a strong supporter of the United States, and it is a business market rather than a socialist job: It is anything but communism, where everyone is supposed to live in a community. The next issue, of course, is the remaining ‘s&nbsp, strong&nbsp, aid for emigration. For them, the refugee is a hobby. They want to see the greatest conceivable emigration, especially from the Middle East and North Africa. These are Muslims who are very angry to Israel and, consequently, usually pretty anti-Semitic. The remaining gets tied up in the immigration issue, and refuses to address the issue of immigrant hatred. For these reasons hatred is at home on the left, while none of the leading characters on the right&nbsp, has been affected.

AT: Jewish people in Europe are currently concerned about their physical health. There have been racist demonstrations, attacks on churches and attack against individual Jews. Where does all of this come from? Have&nbsp, their&nbsp, been any problems than can be ascribed to the appropriate wing of European politics?

Krah: There is not a single attack on Jewish institutions that comes from the right, despite the fact that all of these attacks are perpetrated by refugees or by left-wing extreme terrorist organizations affiliated with them. A lone offender wanted to attack a church in Halle. He was never a right-winger&nbsp, but an isolated person who had a computer full of ridiculous ideas but&nbsp, was in no way connected to the&nbsp, AfD&nbsp, or to&nbsp, any&nbsp, right-wing activity. There is not a single attack that is in any way associated with&nbsp, organizations&nbsp, on the political right. And&nbsp, that applies&nbsp, not just in Germany, &nbsp, but&nbsp, across&nbsp, all of Europe. We do not protect synagogues or&nbsp, other&nbsp, Jewish institutions from&nbsp, the&nbsp, political&nbsp, right. We protect them&nbsp, from&nbsp, al-Qaeda, from Islamist violence and from left-wing extremists.

AT: Could you elaborate on the political leaders of Europe who support more Near Eastern immigrants?

Krah: As of now, we are talking about all the politicians who opened the border, for example Angela Merkel, who is a Christian Democrat, that is, from the political center. The only ones who want to close the border are &nbsp, the right. But the Greens, the Social Democrats, the Liberals] Free Democratic Party ] and the Christian Democrats all support open borders, and open borders in Europe means immigration rom Afghanistan, from Syria, from Algeria and from sub-Saharan Africa – that is, from countries that are shaped by Islam, and therefore have problems with the State of Israel and with Jews in general. Only the right wants to close the borders. All the others want to keep them open, some very wide, others a little less, but they all concur, and for this reason it is obvious that they are all to blame for the rise in anti-Semitism. &nbsp,

AT: &nbsp, The&nbsp, AfD, of course, opposes this. &nbsp,

Krah: &nbsp, There is a&nbsp, study out of&nbsp, Denmark about where immigration is economically useful or harmful. &nbsp, immigration from Afghanistan and Syria&nbsp, does not help either economically&nbsp, or culturally. That doesn’t mean that there aren’t individual success stories among these migrants, but in the big picture it is damaging economically as well as culturally. It is particularly bad for the&nbsp, sitiuation&nbsp, of European Jews, who have come under increasing threat.

AT: There is&nbsp, an organization of Jewish members of&nbsp, the AFD. Tell us about this.

Krah: &nbsp, It ‘s&nbsp, is&nbsp, a small group &nbsp, of&nbsp, Jews who are not left-wingers. But in Germany, &nbsp, most Jews are &nbsp, on the&nbsp, left or in the&nbsp, center. That’s understandable for historical reasons, there are very few German Jews left. Many&nbsp, of the Jews living in Germany todays&nbsp, immigrated from the former Soviet Union in the 90s. &nbsp,

AT: &nbsp, You are a committed Christian. The” civilizational” parties of Europe who view Christianity as a pillar of the character of Europe are largely unrepentant toward Jews. Can you elaborate on the Jewish contribution to European civilization from a personal perspective?

Krah: There is&nbsp, a&nbsp, renowned&nbsp, German-Jewish&nbsp, symbiosis. That&nbsp, has something to do with the fact&nbsp, that both&nbsp, the Germans and the Jews had the idea that social advancement was achieved through education. &nbsp, How did one become part of the middle class in Germany? &nbsp, The German’&nbsp, socialization&nbsp, mechanism&nbsp, was the university. Unfortunately, &nbsp, our universities no longer do this, but&nbsp, classically speaking, the Germans&nbsp, achieved&nbsp, success&nbsp, through&nbsp, education and that is exactly what we have in common with the Jews. In the 19th century, the Jews had no power&nbsp, and&nbsp, no influence, but what they&nbsp, had was a high&nbsp, intelligence. &nbsp, If you look at the universities of the&nbsp, German&nbsp, Empire, 20 % &nbsp, of the&nbsp, professors&nbsp, were Jewish, although the&nbsp, Jewish population was 2 % of the total. &nbsp, I believe that over 50 % of the Nobel Prizes that we received were awarded]to Jews]. That was &nbsp, our&nbsp, golden age&nbsp, of&nbsp, German-Jewish symbiosis. &nbsp, That was &nbsp, was &nbsp, then destroyed by the Nazis and that also destroyed the Germans intellectually That is&nbsp, an&nbsp, undisputed&nbsp, fact. If you look at the time of the founder of the empire, Bismarck, his favorite poet was Heinrich Heine. &nbsp, The Nazis tore down Heine’s monuments and&nbsp, banned the recitation of his poems.

The perfection of the classical style in German music was achieved by&nbsp, Felix&nbsp, Mendelssohn Bartholdy, who&nbsp, also&nbsp, brought&nbsp, Bach back into&nbsp, public &nbsp, awareness. &nbsp, And, again, the Nazis ripped down the Mendelssohn monument in Leipzig. Without the Jewish contribution, there would not be a German culture. And I would add that the language of&nbsp, the&nbsp, European Jews, namely Yiddish, is a German dialect.

Judaism&nbsp, was &nbsp, a cultural force&nbsp, in Europe more&nbsp, than&nbsp, a&nbsp, religious one. Jews like Mendelssohn-Bartholdy&nbsp,, Heinrich&nbsp, Heine or&nbsp, Einstein were Reform Jews who had come out of the ghettos and contributed to the social, political and&nbsp, cultural life of Germany and Europe. &nbsp, No&nbsp, they are &nbsp, are &nbsp, no longer there. &nbsp, So&nbsp, Europe is now intellectually uninteresting. &nbsp, It lacks the curiosity, the impulse to learn that the Jews contributed.

The most crucial role was in this exchange between Europe and the Jews. I regret that Mr. Schuster&nbsp, wants to defend the status quo, rather than becoming involved in the process of change that is coming to Europe. &nbsp, Schuster&nbsp, enjoys&nbsp, the&nbsp, privileges&nbsp, that he has &nbsp, been accorded&nbsp, from the&nbsp, Federal&nbsp, Republic&nbsp, of Germany. But&nbsp, apart from the fact that he&nbsp, is&nbsp, against antisemitism, where is the intellectual input from the Central Council of Jews? There is none. Where is the intellectual curiosity, the creativity, that Jews brought to Germany? What is his future view, exactly? &nbsp, This is a pity. Because, regrettably, we are at an impasse in Germany, the political right will need to look into negotiating with Jews in Israel and the United States.

Continue Reading

After Hezbollah was defeated by Israeli activities in Lebanon in September and Donald Trump’s election as Republican presidential candidate in the US in early November, simple changes have occurred in Sino-Russian relations. &nbsp,

Some Chinese observers believe that the Assad regime’s fall on Syria, a staunch supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin, even widened the gap between political interests between China and Russia. &nbsp,

According to all these instances, Dmitry Medvedev, president of the United Russia party and deputy president of Russia’s Security Council, visited Beijing on December 12.

Medvedev was reportedly met with Chinese President Xi Jinping and given a notice signed by Putin. The letter, according to the statement, expressed Putin’s joy over a new visit to China on the situation of the 75th anniversary of the People’s Republic of China’s formation of diplomatic relations with Russia. &nbsp,

However, according to Chinese experts, Medvedev’s most recent meeting with Liu Jianchao, a top Chinese diplomat and current head of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP ) International Department, should be watched. &nbsp,

Medvedev stated to Liu during their meeting that” Russia is ready to begin negotiations with Ukraine if Kyiv takes into account the challenges of today and the recommendations made by Putin.”

According to some observers, Medvedev’s talk suggests that Beijing is only interested in maintaining its trade relations with Europe in the Trump 2.0 time while Putin is reluctant to engage in a ceasefire discussion with Kyiv.

A Hebei-based author called” Bo Ge” says in an article published on December 12 that Medvedev’s remark showed that Moscow wants to “maintain its democracy and seek to achieve powerful connection in specific matters” in Russia-China relationships. &nbsp,

Although China and Russia have cooperated on some strength and anti-terrorism issues, he claims that their corporate interests are drastically different in terms of geopolitical problems related to Middle Eastern and European security concerns. Medvedev’s most recent excursion to Beijing has failed to break the tense relationship between Russia and China.

A Henan-based journalist using the moniker” A book retailer in the sea” published an article with the subject” China and Russia didn’t form an alliance, Medvedev has made a decision” on December 12.

He claims that the Syria and Ukraine troubles were discussed at the Liu-Medvedev meet. He claims that the lack of complete control over the new Syrian government could encourage the growth of violence and ultimately harm China’s hobbies in the Middle East. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Before possible peace negotiations are started by US President-elect Donald Trump, who will take office in the White House on January 20th, the author claims that Putin may have requested a raise in proper cooperation between China and Russia. &nbsp,

He reiterates Beijing’s approach that China and Russia does not form an alliance.

Southwestern Silk Road&nbsp,

Beijing will keep an eye on Syria’s political condition, according to some Chinese critics, but it is only doing it for the sake of keeping an eye on Russia, not to aid Russia. &nbsp,

” Some folks think the decline of Assad’s regime did hurt China’s passions, but really the affair is a great opportunity for China”, a Hong Kong-based blogger writes in an article. ” China’s interests will be hurt only if Syria becomes chaotic” .&nbsp,

He claims that Bashar al-Assad, the former leader of Syria, failed for many years in his efforts to boost the local market and stop anti-government forces and ISIS. This made China unable to finish the Southern Silk Road, which connects China and Europe via Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Iran, Iraq, and Syria. &nbsp,

He points out that China’s complete direct purchase in Syria was just US$ 13.24 million at the end of 2022, which is a significant drop from the$ 300 billion figure that bloggers have claimed. &nbsp, &nbsp,

” By offering humanitarian aid, China may establish a good relation with the new Palestinian state”, he says. China and Syria can cooperate economically, while China does support the restoration projects it.

A Beijing-based contributor says setting up the Northen Silk Road to join China and Europe via Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus and Poland may not be a smart choice for Beijing.

” For then it’s certainly a question of passing through Russia as Sino-Russia connections are good”, he says. What about the need to get assistance from Russia one time? He adds that Poland may not be a trustworthy business partner as well.

He claims that Turkey does go through China’s Southeastern Silk Road, but the Middle East nation will likely request a sizable sum of money from Beijing. Then, he says, Syria is a new opportunity for China to construct its Silk Road.

Sino-Russia bilateral deal

In the first 10 weeks of this year, the bilateral trade between China and Russia grew 2.8 % year-on-year to US$ 202 billion, according to the Chinese traditions. Nevertheless, the number dropped 5 % year-on-year to US$ 20.5 billion in November.

China’s exports to Russia also fell 10.5 % year-on-year in November after growing 24.4 % in October.

Due to this, in September, China approved the Rules on Civil-Military Dual-Use Products after G7 countries raised fears in April about Chinese firms ‘ shipments of weapons parts to Russia. In order to avoid US sanctions, the nation earlier this year urged local financial institutions to stop accepting payments from Russia in the renminbi. &nbsp,

As Beijing keeps Moscow at arm’s length, the customs department of Russia’s eastern city of Vladivostok has imposed a 55.65 % tariff on China-made furniture parts since autumn. &nbsp,

The Russian Ministry of Industry and Trade made a plan to gradually increase its “recycling fee” for auto buyers by 70-85 % from current levels by 2030, according to the Ministry of Industry and Trade. The fee, which is seen as another form of tariff targeting Chinese vehicles, will increase by 10-20 % from the beginning of 2025. &nbsp,

Read: First salvo of a Russia-China trade war

Continue Reading

Syria continues to experience a storm of joy and trust in its second year, helped by pleasant scares from its new de facto leader, Ahmad al-Sharaa, previously al-Jolani.

He claimed over the weekend that the Islamist Iran program is to blame for the Middle East and that he favors politics over Israel as a means of resolution. And while the hardships of government will surely complicated, and may even undermine, Sharaa’s journey toward his reported goals, his start has been nothing short of superb.

To know Sharaa’s thinking, one does parse his various statements, from when he beat competing military factions to emerge on top in Idlib, therefore from his time as the north province’s ruler and, secondly, from his media availabilities since the rebels, generally Islamists, swept the part of Syria that had been under the control of the Assad dynasty since 1972.

While governing Idlib, Sharaa’s cabinet tried, in January, to pass and enforce a social engineering law, with 128 articles, that was supposed to impose a strict code on public space and behavior. The law also forbids the sale and consumption of alcohol, established a strict Islamic dress code for girls in schools, and outlaws such cliched social behaviors as smoking ( including the well-known hookahs in coffeeshops ) and fortunetelling.

The law created a stir, and that might have prompted its authors to put it on hold. Sharag tried to defend it by selling it as a law that “favored preaching Islam over imposing it,” but he did not appear to be firmly in favor of it.

Sharaa demonstrated one of the key concepts that distinguished him from Islamist rulers while defending it. He said,” If we scare people into believing in Islam, they will pretend to be Muslims when we show up and stop believing when we leave.”

Saudi Crown Prince Muhammad Bin Salman reached the conclusion that Sharaa was aware of the usefulness of religious coercion, and he began implementing it in 2015, accelerating Saudi Arabia’s social liberalization.

During his rule of Idlib, Sharaa praised his team’s ability to run a government that succeeded in collecting taxes, balancing its books, reconstructing damaged infrastructure, and providing adequate services, from trash collection and supply of water and electricity to management of public schools and colleges. Since Assad fled to Moscow and his regime fell, Sharaa has been promising the rest of Syria with this success, ever since he assumed control of the situation.

He appears to have given up on Islamist populism that promises to end all forms of jihad, liberation, and warring against non-Muslims, especially Israel because he has a plan and because he has faith in his ability to make Syria a successful state.

Sharaa claimed in his earliest media interviews that he had joined Al-Qaeda because he was still young and immature at the time and that his opinions have evolved and changed since. Additionally, he claimed to believe in pluralism and democracy.

Both men erected behind them two flags: the Syrian revolution and the jihadist flag of their Hayat Tahrir al-Sham ( HTS ) militia, just like in the first appearance of Sharaa’s Idlib Prime Minister Muhammad Bashir as the head of a transitional Syrian cabinet. On social media, the HTS flag sparked a stir. The next day, Syria’s new rulers nixed their faction’s flag and stuck to the Syria one only. Sharaa and his lieutenants had a plan, but they also listened.

Sharaa’s most encouraging statements, so far, have come during his meeting, over the weekend, with Arab journalists, in which he said that Syria under him had no problem with the Iranian people, but only with the “dangerous project” of the Iran regime. He added that Syria would not choose to fight Israel, that Israel’s attacks on Syria are no longer justified ( since there are no longer any Iranian militias ), and that he would instead seek diplomatic solutions to any issues involving the Jewish state.

Sharaa also appeared unwavering in opposition to the Iranian “project,” and she also sounded unwavering in support of the Iranian model of encouraging the formation of armed non-state militias that would allow a” spiritual leader” to impose rule over the typically weaker government, leading to the formation of failed states in Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen.

Sharaa stated that he intended to end all militias and forge a consensus among the Syrian government to be the only sovereign who has the authority to use violence when necessary.

He argued that while Syria’s new rulers could have attacked Russian installations there, he would have preferred to turn the page. Washington and London are both now in contact with Sharaa.

Syria’s future is still in danger of a catastrophe. The government of all of Syria might prove much more difficult than administering just one of its provinces, and it might also lead to a deterioration in the public’s opinion of Sharaa and the new rulers, which could lead to them starting an Islamist populist movement by rekindling national fervor and engaging in bloody wars.

We must take Sharaa and his guys for what they are meant to do and keep a cautious outlook while aiding them in creating a new Syria and offering them advice whenever we believe they are heading in the wrong direction.

Hussain Abdul-Hussain works for the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies ( FDD ) as a researcher. Follow him on X @hahussain

Continue Reading

Yoon Suk Yeol’s dramatic decision to declare martial law the past year, which the opposition has called a self-coup effort, was up for a narrow vote on December 14 in the National Assembly of South Korea. The voting was 204 to 85, with 3 nays and 8 irrelevant votes.

” Now the National Assembly voted in favor of President Yoon’s prosecution. As Yoon was suspended from his post as president, National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik said,” It is a selection made on behalf of the promises we made as the person’s representative to defend the constitution.

” People’s life are what make republic possible. We may move ahead. We hope people’s lives are immediately stabilized”, Woo added.

The Constitutional Court of South Korea has 180 days to premeditated the senate activity. Yoon joins President Park Geun-hye and former President Roh Moo-hyun in impeachment by Seoul’s congressional tree, which is the second time in South Korean history. The latter’s prosecution action was dismissed by the courtroom after 63 times, while the author’s senate was confirmed after 93 days.

Yoon was charged with “unconstitutionally declaring martial law” and oppressing the National Assembly by the prosecution action on Saturday. Additionally, it criticized the President for attempting to detain powerful figures and defrauding the National Election Commission.

Yoon refuted these claims in a televised address on December 12 and claimed to have declared martial law to alert the general public of the opponent’s “legislative dictatorship.” Yoon railed at the criticism events, calling them pro-North Asian, anti-state causes.

The future of Yoon and his management

With Yoon’s prosecution action passed, Prime Minister Han Duck-soo may assume the role of Acting President until the Court’s ultimate decision.

” In these tough times, I will do my best to maintain the state”, said the prime minister after Yoon was impeached by the government. &nbsp, &nbsp,

But, Prime Minister Han also faces a probe by the authorities for his part in Yoon’s martial law order.

The Democrat Party, South Korea’s largest opposition party, stated that it has no intention of impeaching Han Han but may do the activity in the future. According to Democratic Party spokesman Hwang Jung-ah,” There are many domestic disputes related to the senate of Prime Minister Han Duck-soo.” However, we may arrive at a decision taking into account various local circumstances.

However, Yoon’s impeachment trial faces administrative barriers. Six justices are now serving on the nine-person section of Seoul’s Constitutional Court, with three retiring in October. At least seven judges must be present to premeditated an impeachment action, and six must make a decision in favor of upholding the movement, according to the law.

By the end of this month, the Democrat Party said it would make recommendations for judges to the board. The visit of a Constitutional Court fairness requires the President’s confirmation—in this circumstance exercised by Prime Minister Han.

Nonetheless, experts say this concept is essentially be bypassed.

According to South Korean attorney Lee Ju-ha,” the provision requiring the consideration of at least seven justices was briefly suspended in October during a trial to oust Korea’s communications commissioner.” The necessity is now that” all six must rule in favor of the motion.”

Lee predicted that the Constitutional Court would most likely support the impeachment, saying that Yoon “invaded the National Assembly with trained soldiers”” the whole military law declaration process was illegal and unlawful.

He continued,” The President has a legal duty to defend the Vietnamese people’s civil rights and incomes.” But the]martial rules ] order entirely violated the constitution, rule of law, polity, and the structure of governance”.

” That is more than enough cause to be impeached”.

If Yoon’s senate is confirmed by the Constitutional Court, South Korea will have 60 days to choose a new leader. According to a poll conducted on December 8th, 52 % of South Koreans favored Democratic Party candidate Lee Jae-myung for the upcoming presidency. Han Dong-hoon, the head of the ruling party, slipped behind with 9 %.

Who is Lee Jae-myung?

Lee, a trained politician, has previously held two legislative office positions. Lee ran against Yoon in the 2022 National Elections, losing by a margin of only 0.73 %–the smallest in North Korean history.

Lee, a mill laborer-turned-politician, is considered by his followers as a powerful liberal force who can issue Korea’s established organizations. Lee urged radical changes to Korea’s welfare systems during his most recent presidential campaign, including a 200, 000 Korean won ($ 139.99 ) stipend for each child under the age of 17, a loan of 100 million Korean won ($ 9 ) for newlyweds, and a half-adequate reduction of public university tuition costs.

However, Lee’s laws towards North Korea emphasis on cooperation and peaceful interaction. In 2022, Lee vowed to relieve sanctions on North Korea and to develop new inter-Korean jobs. &nbsp,

His opinions on North Korea closely resemble those of former senator Moon Jae-in, who met with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un in 2018 to negotiate a defense truce. In 2023, President Yoon canceled the contract.

But, Lee’s political opinions may prove an obstacle to South Korea’s empire with the United States. Lee is a vocal critic of Yoon’s political stances toward Japan, calling for” a perfect reshuffle” regarding South Korea’s military participation with Japan.

US President-elect Donald Trump’s advisers have told South Korean and Japanese leaders that the Trump administration will continue to support Biden-era efforts to strengthen three-way relationships, according to Reuters. Such initiatives may be hampered by the establishment of a new democratic administration under Lee’s leadership in Seoul.

On December 13, DP Representative Kang Sun-woo stated that the Democrat Party “is committed tofostering a productive and forward-looking connection with Japan.” Cooperation among South Korea, the US, and Japan is vital”.

Optimism and hope

Despite this deepening political upheaval, South Koreans on the roads rejoiced at Yoon’s prosecution.

When Assembly Speaker Woo appeared on a big screen declaring Yoon impeached, presentations in front of the National Assembly immediately turned into festivity scenes.

Demonstrants danced to K-pop songs while holding light pieces high in the air. Some embraced one another and shed tears.

” I was but joyful. This effect was made by the people, for the people”, said 26-year-old Kim Ye-sol. ” I nearly cried”.

The protester’s slogans switched from “impeach Yoon Suk Yeol”! to “arrest Yoon Suk Yeol,” the thief!

As the regional authorities make an even more urgent case against the suspended President, Yoon’s imprisonment is becoming more likely.

Following the vote, DP head Lee Jae-myung said this was a win for the individuals. ” We have proved that it is the individuals who own this nation”, Lee said.

Yoon’s business said,” President Yoon Suk Yeol may do his best for the people, until the very finish”.

Continue Reading

The US Army’s Black Eagle hypersonic missile has only blazed earlier years of delays with a deafening launch, indicating a bold new wave in the country’s fight for long-range accuracy firepower against China and Russia.

This month, The War Zone reported that the US Army properly test-fired its Black Eagle fast missile from a trailer-based app at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, Florida. After years of delays brought on by launcher issues, the test represents a major milestone.

The test, conducted by the US Army’s Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (RCCTO ) and the US Navy Strategic Systems Programs, involved the Long Range Hypersonic Weapon ( LRHW), also known as the common All Up Round ( AUR) missile.

The statement notes that the weapon, which the US Navy plans to deploy on Zumwalt-class ships and Block V Virginia-class boats, achieved rapid frequencies exceeding Mach 5.

The War Zone says that various aircraft, including NASA’s WB-57F and the Missile Defense Agency’s ( MDA ) HALO jets, observed the test, demonstrating the missile’s capability to reach target distances at hypersonic speeds.

Additionally, the report mentions that US Army Secretary Christine Wormuth and US Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro both stressed the importance of the test in furthering the US government’s fast features.

According to the report, this powerful launch signals progress toward developing the Black Eagle system, with the first fully functional LRHW battery anticipated by fiscal year 2025. It further explains that the development of hypersonic arms is essential for maintaining US defense superiority, especially in potential problems in the Pacific.

As the US Army shifts from lengthy combat operations in the Middle East to battling China in the Pacific and Russia in Europe, it must face the daunting process of reinventing itself in response to the near-peer challenges. Capabilities providing long-range precision fires ( LRPF), such as LRHW, are critical to this transformation.

The US Army’s push for LRPF capabilities, notably hypersonic weapons, is driven by the need to counter adversaries like China and Russia, who have developed advanced anti-access/area-denial ( A2/AD ) systems. These features make it possible to launch conflict cuts that are beyond the capabilities of these techniques.

According to Asia Times, the US is building a missile walls across the Pacific to counteract China’s military expansion, with an emphasis on LRPF from land-based weapon devices like the Typhon.

Capable of launching Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles with ranges from 500 to 1, 800 kilometers, the Typhon bridges a gap between the shorter-range Precision Strike Missile ( 482 kilometers ) and the Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (2, 776 kilometers ).

The program seeks to establish a system of missile launch locations in the First Island Chain, encompassing Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines, to strengthen counter-A2/AD features vis-à-vis China.

But, the plan faces major barriers, especially alliance opposition to hosting US weapon systems. While Japan appears most willing, different countries, including the Philippines, Thailand and South Korea, are wary of possible social backlash and economic retaliation from China.

Despite these challenges, the US has begun stationing Typhon missiles in the Philippines, albeit under the pretext of training exercises, to prevent triggering local escalations. This strategy shifts to a circular, flexible force deployment strategy rather than a fixed base deployment.

The initiative, according to critics, could lead to a missile-armed conflict with China, whose impressive weapon army, including the DF-26″ Guam Killer,” highlights the growing intensity of the US-China geopolitical rivalry.

Apart from building a Pacific weapon walls, Asia Times mentioned this month that the US Navy is transforming the USS Zumwalt, a US$ 4 billion guided-missile warship, into a fast weapons software to counter China’s growing maritime skills.

In order to replace its inactive gun system, the ship is being retrofitted with missile tubes, which will enable it to launch hypersonic glide vehicles ( HGV ) at seven to eight times the speed of sound.

This development work, part of the US Navy’s Conventional Prompt Strike ( CPS) program developed with the US Army, aims to enhance the Zumwalt’s operational power by allowing quickly, efficiency cuts from greater distance.

The program reflects the urgent want to tackle rising risks from China’s Model 055 cruisers and Russia’s military nuclear-armed vessels. Despite Zumwalt’s sophisticated systems, including electric propulsion and cunning design, the group has faced criticism for its higher costs and potential risks.

By 2027 or 2028, the US Navy intends to examine the fast program aboard the Zumwalt. The action is a part of a wider plan to keep the navy safe despite disruptions and overcash costs in other initiatives.

However, a US Congressional Research Service ( CRS ) report this month mentions several critical challenges for the US in developing, producing, testing and deploying hypersonic weapons.

Technological difficulty, according to the report, poses a substantial challenge because fast systems require cutting-edge components that can endure extreme temperatures and pressures. Production bottlenecks are caused by manufacturing these innovative materials at a scale.

According to the CRS record, additional difficulties are presented by the precision needed for transforming guidance, navigation, and control systems with aerodynamic shaping.

Also, it mentions that screening constraints have hindered development. Fast flight tests are expensive, logistically complex, and limited by the presence of particular exam ranges and facilities. This bottleneck slows down development and allows for iterative design.

Further, the CRS report says these weapons must be integrated into existing military infrastructure, requiring storage, handling, and launch system modifications. It makes note of the fact that deployment timelines have been further hampered by delays in these areas.

Additionally, the report mentions that slow decision-making has been exacerbated by bureaucratic and budgetary constraints, which have contributed to the technical and logistical difficulties. Collectively, these factors create a protracted timeline for the operational deployment of US hypersonic capabilities.

In a July 2024 article for National Defense Magazine, Josh Luckenbaugh mentions that China has invested heavily in developing and testing these systems over the past 20 years as a leader in the development of hypersonic weapons.

Luckenbaugh highlights China’s extensive research and development infrastructure, including numerous wind tunnels dedicated to hypersonic systems. He contrasts this by pointing out that since the Cold War, US facilities and expertise have declined, with the majority of testing capabilities now being held by academic institutions.

Although Luckenbaugh mentions efforts are being made to rehabilitate this expertise through collaborations between academia and the US Department of Defense ( DOD ), the US has so far not deployed a single hypersonic weapon.

Continue Reading