Bolen C (Page 47)

You may shut down the Biden Administration’s flailing German nut gallery, President Trump, for the sake of dealing with the clutter in Ukraine. Your friends and allies in Europe want to bear the cost of their own protection, but they don’t want to waste any of the money and run the risk of World War III in Ukraine. Getting a quick peace in Ukraine, a conflict that no reasonable European would want to fight, and allow the New Right’s sovereigntist parties to uproot the globalist Left. Contrary to the Brussels progressives cowering behind the skirts of Mother America, they believe in their states and may fight for their protection.

Without an arrangement to keep Ukraine balanced and out of NATO, the conflict didn’t end. The Deep State will try to persuade you that Russia is bleeding up and prepared to slide, and that NATO cannot afford to rear down on a potential Ukraine account. The opposite is true: Europe’s capacity to defend itself depends on the restoration of populism and the rise of the right-wing sovereigntist events. Freeze the conflict and grant a political victory to European revolutionaries whose motto is” Make Europe Great Again.”

A&nbsp, new poll&nbsp, found most Germans probably doesn’t fight to defend their region, and that two-fifths doesn’t battle under any circumstances. Most impressive is the break by party involvement. The most fervent supporter of the Ukraine War was Germany’s Green Party, but only 9 % of its supporters, the lowest percentage of any group by party affiliation, said they would personally take up arms to defend their nation. Led by the foolish, malapropism-prone Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock, the Greens behave like the European branch of the Biden State Department.

Supporters of the Alternative für Deutschland ( AfD ), the conservative upstart party currently polling at 20 % of the vote, made up the majority of those who were ready to fight for their country. In a&nbsp, more recent poll, 68 % of AfD members said they would defend their country” with a weapon in their hand” if Germany were attacked, compared to just 22 % of Green Party supporters.

The Washington Blob confuses the “let’s you and him fight” war celebration with the sovereigntists who are willing to stand up for their nation but don’t want to see anything wrong with the Blob’s failed attempt to invade Ukraine.

The Continental war party pledged both their life nor their sacred pride ( they don’t have any ), but rather their careers, base grants, scholarships, and consulting gigs on the Ukraine War. They began their careers with the dual goal of expanding NATO to the Soviet border and mocking Western institutions as federal organizations.

The nationalist wave that started last year with Geert Wilders ‘ unexpected victory in the Netherlands hit Western liberals hard. It continued through previous September’s state elections in Germany, the regional elections in the Czech Republic, the Freedom Party’s first-place end in Austria, and the decline of the European state. But even so, the country’s liberals may struggle to the last Ukrainian to keep their social protections.

Western liberals are aware that their symbolic heads will roll if their substitute war breaks out. They have no action other than to maintain the conflict going as long as possible. And they are doing it by attempting to discredit Americans with a focused propaganda campaign. The American Ministry of Defense and the Pentagon, for instance, allege that Russia has taken 600, 000 deaths in the Ukraine War, and is losing 1, 000 to 2, 000 men a day in the current battle. The 600,000-plus figure was also spotted in a Trump social media post next week.

The most extensive databases on Russian casualties, &nbsp, Mediazona, counts 82, 000 Russian killed, which it calculated by scraping data from death presentations and social media posts. The number may rise to 120, 000 if a quantitative analysis of excess deaths were used. Assuming three crippled for every man killed, Russian deaths are good anywhere between 246, 000 and 360, 000.

A senior US official who tracks Ukrainian battle casualties observes:

Ukrainian casualties from separate sources are not as closely monitored as Russian deaths, but anecdotal reports and works on graves suggest that the number is higher than those from Kyiv, London, or Washington, DC, according to empirical reports. Estimates run between 105, 000 and 160, 000 KIA (killed in action ). Using the same ratios for KIA to WIA, this places total Ukrainian casualties at between 105, 000 KIA, and 365, 000 WIA ( wounded in action ), or 470, 000 total casualties, to 160, 000 KIA and 640, 000 WIA, or 800, 000 total casualties.

During the course of the war, Russia experienced about 9, 000 causalities. More than 100, 000 Russian soldiers face&nbsp, formal charges of abandonment, and the real number is twice that. According to NATO knowledge sources, forty-twenty-eight thousand Ukrainians have been killed or injured while defending&nbsp, an intrusion into Russian place close to Kursk, and the nation has now lost half of the place it gained in the August 2024 attack.

The events that make up Europe’s sovereigntist celebrations are aware of this and want to end the conflict right away. The AfD supports a negotiated option and wants to stop arms sales to Ukraine. It is labeled as a neo-Nazi homage by the establishment push, and it has been quarantined by tradition parties with a small portion of its voting base. The Greens, represented by Annalena Baerbock and Economics Minister Robert Habeck, are surprisingly Germany’s most vocal war eagles. Though they didn’t battle for their own country, they want to fight the war to the last Ukrainian.

Next February, President-elect Trump told a South Carolina march, “NATO was busted until I came on,” sending ripples through the German Establishment. I said,’ Everybody’s gonna earn.’ They said,’ Well, if we don’t give, are you still going to protect us?’ I said,’ Totally never.’ They don’t believe the answer”.

Trump claimed that “one of the leaders of a large state” once inquired whether the US had also support Ukraine if Russia invaded the country, even if they “don’t pay.”

” No, I do not protect you”, Trump recalled. In truth, I would encourage them to accomplish whatever they please. You got to pay. You got to pay your payments”.

That sparked a frenzy of protests against Trump, who was accused of inviting Russia to attack Western Europe. But that’s not what he said: Trump maintained that Europe may justify itself. It used to. In 1989 Germany fielded 12 battle-ready groups, 3, 000 primary challenge tank, and a fierce soldier army that may remain off the Warsaw Pact. It doesn’t have a second battle-ready sector today. And Angela Merkel’s government eliminated recruitment in 2011 at the top of post-Cold War confidence.

The single German social group that explicitly supports reviving it is the AfD, which is in Germany. Its location papers, obtainable on the party site, says:

Military support is virtuous services. It should not be understood as a violation of a citizen’s fundamental rights initially, but as a civic duty to defend peace and security and ensure the stability of our nation’s politics. Conscription has had a significant impact on this relationship in just a few times because the federal army should be established in society.

The AfD, like the ruling parties of Hungary, Slovakia and Serbia, is never afraid of fighting. Because the Ukraine War is meaningless and insurmountable, it opposes it. Germany’s Greens, by contrast, &nbsp, oppose enlistment — in Germany, that is. They’re all for enlistment in Ukraine. However, Germany’s Social Democrats and Christian Democrats believe it might be wise to revisit the concept of conscription in the near future, but they didn’t say anything at the moment or in any important time frame.

Some Brussels hawks have floated the idea of&nbsp, German conscription&nbsp, to provide men for Ukraine, a request denounced by Hungary’s Foreign Minister, who declared,” We do not like Hungarian young folks dragged into the Ukrainian-Russian battle front. This is not our conflict”. Another issue is the regional recruitment to protect the nation’s borders.

Maligned as an extremist border party, the AfD stands to receive 20 % of the ballot in Germany’s February 23 regional elections. In three Eastern European states that held the elections in September, its candidates received about 30 % of the votes. Olaf Scholz’s Social Democrats are running at just 17 % of the vote, and the Greens, who had 20 % of the vote in Germany’s last national election, are at just 11.5 %. The AfD supports strict immigration handles, tax breaks, and the end of the Ukrainian War right away. Its perspective of Ukraine is the same as that of Hungary’s Viktor Orban, whom Trump has consulted frequently.

The AfD is the most popular gathering among Germany’s 18-24 year-olds. Its concept is that being German is acceptable. Maximilian Krah, a part of the European Parliament who is currently running for a Bundestag chair, delivered that information on TikTok. ” One in three young German gentlemen doesn’t include a girl. Are you one of them”? he asked in one picture. ” Don’t watch movie, don’t vote for the Greens, get out into the new air…. True men have principles, real people are patriots — and that’s how you find a girl”.

True gentlemen, the AfD claims, are willing to defend their land. If the United States wants companions instead of toys, it may consider them among Europe’s sovereigntist events.

Continue Reading

After the release of the annual China Military Power Report ( CMPR ) by the US Department of Defense, Beijing has criticized Washington for spreading a” China threat” narrative.

The People’s Liberation Army ( PLA ) is prioritizing the development of artificial intelligence ( AI ) capabilities because it thinks AI is influencing the next wave of military affairs, according to the most recent CMPR. The statement said that, by 2030, the PLA expects to subject a range of “algorithmic war” and “network-centric war” features operating at different rates of human-machine connectivity.

” Analytic war” is characterized by the use of AI-related approaches in real-world operating conditions. It intends to reduce the number of warfighters who are in danger, quicken decision-making in time-sensitive activities, and operate when and where people are unable to do so. &nbsp,

” Network-centric warfare”, which is different from the traditional platform-centric war, highlights the use of information technology in fights. The US Department of Defense was the first to adopt the phrase in the 1990s. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The CMPR report also said the Chinese defense industry and universities are developing quantum imaging, navigation and radar applications to enhance intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ( ISR ) capabilities, including position, navigation and timing ( PNT ). &nbsp,

Judging from the buildout of China’s classical communication system, it said, the PLA does leverage integrated quantum networks and quantum important distribution to promote command, control and communications systems.

” This statement, like the ones we’ve seen before, lays much focus on facts. According to Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, the” China threat” narrative is filled with discrimination and intended to intensify the United States ‘ desire to maintain military dominance.

We urge the US to abandon its dominant and Cold War mentality, view China’s strategic intentions and defense development objectively and rationally, and quit issuing this kind of irresponsible reports year after year, he said. &nbsp,

He argued that Washington should ensure that what it does contributes to a stable relationship between the two forces and nations.

” The statement speculated on and smeared China’s nuclear power and hyped up the’ China risk ‘ rhetoric”, Zhang Junshe, a Taiwanese military analyst, told the Global Times in an interview. ” But at the same period, it took the trouble to share the PLA’s deficits in long-range administrative support and additional capabilities”.

He claimed that the US military was judging other people by their own standards because it believes China may use aircraft carriers in the South China Sea in a dominant manner, similar to what US aircraft carriers have been doing globally. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Energy plan

In the event of a protracted military conflict in the Western Pacific, the People’s Republic of China ( PRC ) would likely have to meet the demand for hydrocarbons from its civil and industrial populations. &nbsp,

The PRC may become cut off from a sizable portion of its oil exports if a military fight consisted of a naval blockade, according to the report. ” The PRC’s interest in ensuring trusted, cost-effective and various oil sources to support its economic growth drives its overseas power opportunities”.

According to Zhang,” This new portion of the CMPR demonstrates that the US will launch military strikes against China in the Western Pacific in the future, launch offensives against China’s electricity supply lines, and attempt to shut China’s electricity supply off.” ” This is something that deserves our attention”.

Lü Xiang, a research fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said China’s defense buildup is defense, not unpleasant and aggressive. He claimed that the US views the PLA as a” risk” because it can fight when it interferes with China-related matters in the region.

According to Xin Qiang, assistant director of the Center for American Studies at Fudan University, US officials and military-industrial complicated members are making fictitious foes to increase martial spending so they can profit from it. &nbsp,

Taiwan concerns

The CMPR cited fraud and a lack of real-world fight experience as some of the PLA’s flaws. &nbsp,

A senior US defence official told the media in a lecture on December 16 that while the US does not believe a war in the Taiwan Strait is immediate or unavoidable, it is not possible that the Chinese army will be able to invade Taiwan by 2027. &nbsp,

” We have punishment currently that’s true and solid. The standard noted that Chinese President Xi Jinping has reiterated his commitment to the 2027 step for modernizing the PRC’s military forces.” We’re doing a lot to keep it that way. &nbsp,

We take note of the fact that the PLA’s significant fraud issues, which are still unsolved, was” slow them down” in the development of 2027 capabilities and beyond. In terms of the probable effects of corruption on the PLA’s ability to reach those goals, I believe that’s our opinion.

Separately, the cheerful US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in an event on December 18 that Taiwan is “everyone’s company” as a crisis over Taiwan may include global repercussions.

” China says every time the word Taiwan comes up: Do not even notice it, it is no one’s business but our own”, he said. ” What we have been able to do is to open the eyes of almost the entire world to the fact that, no, fundamentally] Taiwan ] is everyone’s business.

He claimed that Taiwan supplies 70 % of the country’s semiconductors, and that the waters that surround the area account for the majority of international shipping. &nbsp,

“A Pentagon official said the PLA lacks the ability to liberate Taiwan but the official failed to prove the deficiencies of the Chinese army,” Bi Dianlong, a Chinese columnist specializing in Taiwan concerns, says in an article published on December 20. “It’s now a US report comparing the military between China and the US. In the eyes of Americans, even if the PLA cannot catch up with the US army, they are at least in a similar range.” 

The Americans don’t feel that mainland China would actually take action, according to Bi, who said that they don’t consider the PLA can occupy Taiwan. More than 100 vessels have lately been deployed as part of the PLA’s drilling in the first area network. This demonstrates that we are determined to bring Taiwan together.

It’s unclear whether the US do help Taiwan if a war breaks out in the Taiwan Strait. &nbsp,

An unknown Chinese official told AFP that Beijing sent about 60 vessels and 30 coast guard ships to the region from the southeastern islands of Japan to the South China Sea on December 11. &nbsp,

The Chinese military’s sea training, the biggest in recent years, came after Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te had a two-day US stay in Hawaii during his Pacific journey in early December. &nbsp,

Read: Second salvo of a Russia-China trade conflict

Continue Reading

After a three-year hiatus, India just resumed its diplomatic presence in Pyongyang. This shift, occurring in the context of North Korea’s growing military features and its strengthening partnerships with Russia, China and Iran, underscores India’s expanding foreign policy objectives.

It even complies with India’s” Act East” strategy and serves as a reflection of its larger strategic goals in Northeast Asia and above. However, the decision has repercussions for India’s placement within BRICS and its growing effect in global politics.

India’s relationship with North Korea, officially known as the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea ( DPRK), has been shaped by a complex mix of historical, ideological and geopolitical factors. India maintained diplomatic relations with both North and South Korea during the Cold War, demonstrating its non-aligned approach. Although the relationship with North Korea was not particularly near, India has occasionally provided support to Pyongyang through business, primarily in the form of food and medical supplies.

Relations, however, have been strained at times according to North Korea’s nuclear development activities. North Korea’s nuclear assessments and missile launches have been constantly condemned by India, which supports international efforts to reunify the Korean Peninsula. Despite these difficulties, India has maintained a level of cooperation, acknowledging the crucial role that speech and politics play in promoting regional stability.

The Indian Embassy’s reopening in Pyongyang is a crucial step in world politics. This Hindu   move appears to have been influenced by a number of new factors. In order to boost economic and geopolitical assistance, India’s” Act East” plan emphasizes strengthening ties with countries in East and Southeast Asia. Although North Korea is not a standard companion in this context, working with Pyongyang gives India a greater role in provincial affairs. This proposal also demonstrates India’s commitment to maintaining balance in the Asian Peninsula, a crucial region in Asia.

Regional and global security are in considerable danger as a result of North Korea’s advancements in missile technology and nuclear abilities. By maintaining a diplomatic presence in Pyongyang, India may acquire valuable insights into the military developments of North Korea and the growing security cooperation between Russia, China, and Iran. This data is crucial for India’s strategic planning, especially in reducing the chance that hostile technologies will reach its hostile claims.

India is given an additional proper motivation by North Korea’s near ties with Russia and China, two key people in the BRICS, to engage in Pyongyang. India may strengthen its position within the BRICS by fostering relations with North Korea, embracing this relationship to counter Western influence, and proclaim its position as a mediator in international conflicts. This relationship is in line with the broader goals of the BRICS, which are to promote multipolarity and promote growth in the Worldwide South.

Relevance for India’s regional and global plan

India has long expressed concern about North Korea’s close ties to hostile nations, especially those that pose strategic threats to India’s regional security. India is better talk its positions on pressing issues to the North Korean authority by maintaining political presence there.

This occurrence gives people the chance to talk and offers a chance to understand India’s position on issues of shared interest and concern. Establishing these communication channels plays a significant role in developing a deeper understanding of India’s protection objectives within the political framework of North Korea.

Additionally, this proposal gives India a unique opportunity to establish personal relationships with North Korean officials, which is essential for fostering trust and reciprocity. These ties can be a powerful barrier, reducing the likelihood that North Korea may give India’s adversaries arms or highly sensitive technology.

This proper awareness supports India’s wider devotion to non-proliferation, strengthening its efforts to stop the spread of nuclear and missile technologies while advancing its dreams to take a leading position in international arms control initiatives. By establishing itself as a key player in the promotion of stability and security in the region and past, India positions itself as a more active participant in North Korea’s political landscape.

India has a greater chance of gaining more proper leverage from its interactions with other big powers and important regional players by cooperating with North Korea. India benefits from fostering discourse with Pyongyang in addition to strengthening its collaborations with South Korea and Japan, both of which are crucial allies in the Indo-Pacific, as well as positioning itself as a responsible and strategic global professional.

India’s relationship with North Korea might offer as a testament to its ability to act as a stabilizing and balancing force in the region, promoting peace and lowering conflicts. This strategy aligns with India’s larger international policy goal of inciting a unipolar world order. By maintaining communication with countries across the spectrum, including those that are perceived as isolated or adversarial by others, this engagement would even demonstrate India’s political flexibility and its ability to navigate complicated geopolitical landscapes.

Also, India’s outreach to Pyongyang may enable it establish a distinct role in bridging the different interests of local stakeholders. For example, China’s partnership with North Korea centers on maintaining balance and strategic depth while South Korea and Japan emphasize denuclearization and protection. India, by maintaining a healthy discourse with Pyongyang, was subtly affect the integration of these interests, fostering a more cooperative atmosphere in the region.

From an economic standpoint, engaging North Korea could even open pathways for low-scale economic relations, technical assistance or social exchanges, further building India’s soft energy. These initiatives would need to be carefully calibrated to ensure they don’t offend international laws but still have long-term strategic benefits.

India’s constructive dialogue with North Korea could strengthen its political arsenal, strengthen its position as a stabilizing strength, and bolster its dedication to regional peace and development, all while strengthening and complementing its strategic alliances with South Korea, Japan, and other Indo-Pacific people.

In addition, India is uniquely positioned to contribute to efforts to bolstering peace on the Korean Peninsula because of its close ties with both North and South Korea. With the possibility of renewed peace talks under a future US administration, such as a second Trump presidency, India could act as a neutral mediator, leveraging its diplomatic ties to foster dialogue and confidence-building measures between the two Koreas.

Although North Korea’s economy remains isolated and heavily sanctioned, there is potential for limited economic and humanitarian cooperation. India’s expertise in agriculture and healthcare and its previous experience with providing humanitarian aid may provide opportunities for constructive dialogue. These initiatives could also promote mutual respect and trust between the two countries.

Challenges and&nbsp, new opportunities

India’s diplomatic outreach is impacted by North Korea, which also presents significant challenges and opportunities for it. Although working with Pyongyang can increase India’s strategic leverage, it must be done with caution and precision in order to navigate the complexity of both the global and regional landscapes.

Due to its nuclear weapons program, North Korea continues to be subject to stringent international sanctions. India’s engagement must strictly adhere to these restrictions in order to prevent the global community, particularly the United States and other major powers, from repercussions. India’s actions will need to align with its commitments to upholding international law and ensuring non-proliferation.

The secretive structure of North Korea poses a significant threat to ongoing diplomatic relations. India will need to be careful to ensure that its outreach does not unintentionally conflict with its strategic goals or have unintended effects.

India’s expanding cooperation with South Korea is a key component of its wider Indo-Pacific strategy and a fundamental component of its” Act East” strategy. South Korea remains deeply concerned about Pyongyang’s actions, particularly its nuclear ambitions and military provocations. India’s ties to North Korea must be carefully balanced in order to maintain their strong and expanding ties.

As the world’s largest democracy, India has a firm commitment to democratic values and institutions. This foundation limits the scope of India’s dialogue with North Korea, a country with a vastly different political system, without jeopardizing its democratic principles or its alliances with other world-leading democracies like the United States, Japan, South Korea, and Israel.

India can use its diplomatic standing and historical non-aligned position to promote peace and dialogue on the Korean Peninsula. By engaging with both North and South Korea, India can contribute to confidence-building measures and support efforts toward denuclearization.

With strong relations with both Koreas, China, and Russia, India is uniquely positioned to build long-term strategic partnerships in Northeast Asia. This engagement promotes India’s strategy of playing a significant role in regional and global affairs, making Asia more stable and secure.

India’s foreign policy priorities have shifted significantly with the decision to reopen its embassy in Pyongyang. By engaging with North Korea, India aims to enhance its regional influence, address proliferation concerns, and navigate the complex dynamics of major power relations. Given North Korea’s strategic alignment with Russia and China, this diplomatic outreach further strengthens India’s position within the BRICS, highlighting the value of proactive engagement with Pyongyang.

India’s renewed diplomatic efforts are poised to safeguard its interests on the Korean Peninsula and strengthen its influence in the region as a result of significant political shifts in South Korea.

Continue Reading

There’s an old saying in North Korean politicians: rightists fall from fraud, while leftists collapse from section. Recently, however, these jobs appear to possess reversed.

Lee Jae-myung, the spokesman for the left-wing Democratic Party, is the subject of five individual trials involving allegations of corruption and believe breaches. He was found guilty of breaking election laws in November, which had, if upheld, prevent him from running for president in the upcoming vote. Cho Kuk, another important leftist politician, just lost his parliamentary seats after the world’s top prosecutor upheld his two-year jail sentence for bribery. Lee’s and Cho’s ladies have been convicted, both of misusing a business credit cards and scientific fraud.

Contrastingly, the impeachment of President Yoon Sok Yeol’s story highlights how determined conservatives are to protect their leader, even at the expense of significant division within the more conventional wing.

Numerous rumors have been circulating that 12 People Power Party ( PPP ) lawmakers gathered to support the motion following the anonymous vote on December 14 to remove Yoon. Three people abstained, and eight votes were invalidated. Assuming all criticism people endorsed the prosecution, 23 ruling party politicians diverged from their group’s official position of non-impeachment.

PPP Chairman Han Dong-hoon, who reversed his first position to recommend for Yoon’s prosecution, has since resigned amid the fallout from the latest issue – or, more accurately, Han was deposed by older members of his celebration.

As if this conflict weren’t enough, the ruling party is now using such terms as” rebels” to strike the few who defied group guidelines.

Pro-Yoon liberals ‘ antipathy to Han has strong roots. The now-resigned group president, once Yoon’s closest friend, generally adopted a vital attitude toward the government’s growing list of scandals, urging the chief executive to place his house in order. This rankled Yoon’s staunchest centurions.

The ruling group’s creation launched an offensive in July when Han took over as leader with unwavering support after serving for several decades as interim leader. The group’s “aristocratic clique”, as one journalist described the party, refused to let an observer like Han direct without resistance. Forging a coherent coalition was almost impossible for the beginner party chair due to persistent uncooperativeness and inner tensions.

However, outside the political arena, pro-Yoon Influencers and supporters unleashed a barrage of unsubstantiated and malignant rumors to destroy Han’s position. Frustrated by the continuous smear campaign, Han, at one place, consulted the president about disparaging strikes against him– to no avail.

Of course, Han is partly to blame for his regular flip-flopping posts, including his management of the latest tumult. But, no matter what Han did, the pro-Yoon party was determined to oppose him. The group’s top parliamentarians quickly moved to remove their main after Yoon’s impeachment motion was passed last week, as if waiting for the right moment.

Efforts to take and pity those who voted for Yoon’s prosecution are even intensifying. One PPP senator went so far as to call them “weasels who stabbed]the leader ] in the back”. Hong Jun-pyo, Mayor of Daegu and a dominant PPP part, has boldly demanded their ejection from the group.

There hasn’t been much reflection or important work to connect the ruling party in the awake of Yoon’s frequently criticized martial law gambit. Amid the ongoing infighting, the party’s approval ratings have plunged to 25.7 %, a record low since Yoon assumed office in May 2022. Almost 8, 000 people withdrew their PPP members between December 4 and December 15, according to the paper Kyunghyang.

The Pro-Yoon party is still operating as usual despite the waning people assistance and the looming uncertainty over Yoon’s life. The ruling group’s formation looks relieved to have suddenly toppled Han, replacing him with a familiar face, Kweon Seong-dong. The party’s another crusaders appear extremely pleased, shifting their focus to removing the disloyal members.

For political purges mirror the situations during former traditional President Park Geun-hye’s prosecution, as though they’d been lifted from the same rulebook.

A swath of lawmakers from the ruling Saenuri Party ( predecessor to PPP ) supported Park’s impeachership by parliament in December 2016. What ensued was a bitter clash between pro-Park and anti-Park factions, ultimately leading to numerous party defections.

The Constitutional Court officially removed Park from office in March. In May, a crucial election for president was held, allowing Moon Jae-in to retake the presidency. Those who were” selectively” labeled anti-Park were ruthlessly attacked and marginalized from mainstream politics.

The ruling PPP is expected to elect a new interim leader and move into emergency committee mode after weeks of unrest and self-inflicted wounds. Most likely, someone from the establishment or a person who is easily controlled by it will be chosen. The party may attempt to eject the 12 or 23 “betrayers” in an effort to consolidate control behind Yoon as he prepares for a constitutional court ruling, with some senior members reportedly maneuvering in the background.

A deeper analysis of the party’s faltering state and a commitment to bridging its internal divides are glaringly absent from the mainstream right-wing discourse. It appears that conservatives in South Korea have learned little from the most recent impeachment scandal, which almost destroyed their political existence.

Unabhängig of who may succeed him, the next president will resurrect a divided country. The cycle of blame and short-term turf war will persist. But for the pro-Yoon conservatives, without meaningful introspection and readiness to prioritize unity over factionalism, the same destructive patterns will continue to shape their future.

Continue Reading

China’s bold move to develop cutting-edge robots, balloons, and next-generation hit vehicles, which raises the stakes for US weapon security, signs a major shift in global military might.

This quarter, the War Zone reported that China has conducted assessments of fast uncrewed air cars, launching them from drones and high-altitude bubbles. New images and images were referenced in the report.

According to the War Zone, the cars related to the MD-22 fast military aircraft idea revealed in 2022 were released from a TB-001 helicopter and a high-altitude bubble. The report says the MD-19, MD-21, and MD-2 vehicles, featuring wedge-shaped fuselages, delta wings and twin vertical tails, were tested by the Institute of Mechanics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences ( IMCAS ) and the Guangdong Aerodynamic Research Academy ( GARA ).

The MD-19, which had retractable landing gear, was reported to have made an appearance on a airport after launch, according to The War Zone. The engine systems remain vague, but the models suggest advanced high-speed vehicles like dual-mode ramjets or scramjets. According to the report, these tests demonstrate China’s continued investment in fast technologies to strengthen its military capabilities.

The report notes that the vehicles could be used for kinetic strikes or for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ( ISR ) missions. They are said to bolster China’s dedication to developing its fast capabilities, which pose major technical challenges and proper implications for worldwide security.

With these different air-based launchers, China has additional tactical options when it uses fast weapons to launch attacks from a variety of platforms and in different directions and altitudes.

For example, in February 2023, Asia Times noted that China had unveiled its emerging fast arms triad, comprising water, air and land-based systems, considerably enhancing its normal punishment capabilities against the US and Taiwan.

The YJ-21 hypersonic anti-ship weapon, capable of velocity up to Mach 10, was tested from a Kind 055 ship, highlighting its operating flexibility and endurance. The missile’s introduction marks a pivotal evolution in China’s anti-access/area denial ( A2/AD ) strategy, with its speed rendering current shipboard defense systems ineffective.

The air-launched variant, carried by the H-6 strategic bomber, extends the missile’s range, posing a threat to US bases and warships in the Pacific. Additionally, the land-based DF-17 missile, capable of extreme maneuvers and speeds up to Mach 5, complements the triad, enhancing China’s ability to “box in” Taiwan with long-range precision strikes.

Multiple hypersonic attacks coming from various directions can make it harder for the US to defend Taiwan’s key bases, such as those in Guam and Okinawa. Simultaneous launches from land, sea, and air platforms can overwhelm missile defense systems. By saturating different layers of an adversary’s defense, China can increase the likelihood of penetrating critical targets.

The US’s most recent ballistic missile intercept test from Guam, according to Asia Times, highlights the island’s strategic significance and the challenges it faces in missile defense. A Standard Missile-3 Block IIA intercepting a medium-range ballistic missile was the subject of the test, which was conducted by the US Missile Defense Agency ( MDA ). This marked a significant step forward in the development of the Aegis Guam System.

However, Guam’s defense infrastructure faces several hurdles. The island’s limited land space and mountainous terrain complicate the deployment of missile defense systems, while the integration of multiple systems, such as Aegis Ashore, Terminal High Altitude Area Defense ( THAAD ) and Patriot, poses risks of uncoordinated responses during saturation attacks involving ballistic, cruise, and hypersonic missiles.

Additionally, the reliance on fixed sensor-to-shooter links may limit adaptability against next-generation threats, including multi-domain attacks combining cyber, electronic, and kinetic strikes. The finite number of interceptors per system also raises concerns about sustaining defense during large-scale, multi-axis attacks. These issues are made even more difficult by the interceptor missile supply chain and by outdated production capabilities.

The time between launch detection and impact is significantly shorter at hypersonic speeds. Multi-platform launches add to the complexity, making threats from various domains simultaneously unavoidable, and preventing defenders from responding quickly.

Evan Montgomery and Toshi Yoshihara make the observation in a 2023 Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments ( CSBA ) report that hypersonic weapons are changing the US’s strategy against China by reducing the chance of unintended escalation and altering the conventional military balance.

Montgomery and Yoshihara point out that hypersonic weapons introduce greater ambiguity because of their speed, unpredictable flight paths, and shorter detection windows, in contrast to conventional ballistic missiles.

This situation might require a “launch-on-warning” posture. In such a situation, second-strike capabilities and missile defense systems must be ready to respond right away when a potential threat is identified without waiting for confirmation whether the incoming missile is a nuclear or conventional one.

Further, Montgomery and Yoshihara claim that China’s use of hypersonic weapons could increase regional precision attacks, giving the impression that Chinese threats are credible in a Taiwan emergency.

Asia Times reported this month that the US’s effort to defeat China with a long-range precision missile was marked by the recent US Army test of the Dark Eagle hypersonic missile.

The Dark Eagle system’s successful launch signals progress. By the end of the 2025 fiscal year, the first long-range hypersonic weapon ( LRHW) battery will be complete. The missile is also slated for deployment on Zumwalt-class destroyers and Block V Virginia-class submarines.

Montgomery and Yoshihara are cautioned that US deployment of hypersonic strike capabilities could threaten China’s strategic nuclear arsenal, increasing the risk of disarming its nuclear forces in response to these developments. They claim that China might consider launching a preemptive nuclear strike to avoid disarmament if it believes its nuclear arsenal is vulnerable.

By extension, Montgomery and Yoshihara point out that US reliance on hypersonics could also lead to China using theater nuclear weapons to coerce US allies like Japan to maintain neutrality in a crisis.

A US Congressional Research Service ( CRS ) report from this month mentions that the US is facing significant challenges in developing hypersonic weapons as the debates over mission requirements, cost, and production scale grow.

The US Department of Defense ( DoD ) has not yet formalized mission requirements or established a program of record, which is in part due to uncertainty about the weapons ‘ strategic role, according to the report. According to the report, DoD officials have different opinions on production objectives, with some favoring large-scale deployments to deterrence and others favoring low inventories due to high costs. Additionally, it raises doubts about how many hypersonic weapons the DoD can actually acquire.

Additionally, the report mentions that the US Congress has pressed for clarity on mission sets, cost analysis, and required enabling technologies, such as space-based sensors and autonomous command systems.

The report points out that while hypersonic weapons have the potential to penetrate adversary A2/AD zones, they may not be as resilient as current systems, such as ballistic missiles with maneuvering warheads.

Continue Reading

Five years ago this month, on Monday, December 30, 2019, Carlos Ghosn shocked the world by making a dramatic exit from Japan to his home state of Lebanon. &nbsp, Studies that he was in Lebanon made it to the French press around 9: 30 am GMT and then, shortly after, around the world.

The once renowned chief executive of the empire of Renault, Nissan, and Mitsubishi Motors is nevertheless fighting to get his name out, while Nissan’s firm situation has deteriorated once more, as advertising accounts suggest the manufacturer may be going bankrupt.

Ghosn, in an exclusive meeting with Asia Times, said he doesn’t think bankruptcy is good. ” But they need cash and they need expenditure”, he said. ” Management has no idea how to move things around.

He doesn’t think that an ally with Honda Motor Co., a style of current press coverage, does materialize”. There might be a invasion, in my opinion. The Chinese government may decide it didn’t allow Nissan to collapse. But as you know, a takeover is not an empire. The acquisition is only a takeover, which also implies that the business that is in charge will act in its own way and dispose of assets it does not have. That does occur, “he said.

Consider that Honda has never been able to form an alliance and is strongly separate. They’ve bragged over the years that they’re the little man going only against Toyota.”

Another issue is that Honda hasn’t been a market leader in its mechanical sector. Even in the United States, which is its main market, Honda’s market share is less than 10 %. In Europe, it is&nbsp, less than 1 %. In Japan– where it is now the fourth-leading product, up one area from second the preceding year – it&nbsp, also accounts for only 11 % of the market, nearly intact.

However, its revenue ratio in the first half of the current fiscal year, April to September, is only&nbsp, 3.6 %, well down on the list of global manufacturers.

Things fell apart at Nissan post-Ghos n

Nissan’s running profit fell 90 % during the same time to&nbsp, 32.9 billion yen. Its operating profit margin is now&nbsp, 0.5 %. More significantly, auto sales this year are expected to drop to 3.4 million, along from 5.7 million in fiscal 2017 and 5.5 million units in governmental 2018, the final two years Ghosn was in command.

” Honestly, a lot of people have asked me how is it that after I left, whatever collapsed, “he said”. But not only did I left. Many more individuals departed with me. Ghosn originally estimated about a dozen. And these were persons who had grown up in the organization.”

He singled out José Muñoz, who in November became the CEO of Hyundai Motor Co”. Muñoz was one of the most appealing skills at Nissan, “he said”. Some weeks after my imprisonment, he left.”

Muñoz, who spent five years in Tennessee as head of Nissan’s North American operation, left Nissan on&nbsp, January 11, 2019, &nbsp, two months after Ghos n’s arrest. The US adviser, a native of Tennessee, had warned him against traveling to Japan after being summoned to do so.

Muñoz joined Hyundai three months later in&nbsp, April 2019 as key international operating officer. He had been chosen to serve as Nissan’s future senator in 2018.

If 30 times younger, do sign on for a Nissan correct

” Personally, I don’t think that this is mission impossible,” Ghos n said of Nissan’s current plight”, but it will be difficult for them. I can tell you that if someone had offered to help me turn Nissan near for me when I was 30 years younger. However, you must locate the right individuals with the right perspective on the sector. Clearly, the business in 2024 is not the same as the market in 1999. The problems are diverse.”

Ghosn doesn’t give information of how he might go about fixing Nissan”. Before making a diagnosis of the situation, I always make a plan. For the last six years, a lot of damage has been inflicted on the business. I would need to reevaluate the circumstances, including who is to blame and where the injury is occurring.

” When I arrived in Japan in March 1999, I didn’t have a plan in mind”, he said. It took me three weeks to assess the situation and come up with a strategy. But I didn’t do it alone. I created it with the input of numerous individuals inside Nissan. &nbsp,

” I’m convinced that a lot of individuals inside Nissan are frightened and feeling helpless, “he added”. Why did we accomplish this? What happened to our business? Why is this business a scourge to behold?

” No one really great is going to visit a group of officials. &nbsp, They didn’t. &nbsp, They said that the empire was working. It wasn’t. They claimed Nissan would continue to grow. They claimed for the past six years that my administration had caused all the problems at Nissan, despite the fact that I had never had any issues in charge. After I left, all the issues started. &nbsp,

They can’t continue to hold people accountable for something that occurred six years ago. This is their own doing.”

In terms of Renault, the business that bought a play in Nissan and sent Ghosn to move it, they are back where they were until 1999, which is a little French business with a European focus. &nbsp, They got out from China. They got out from Russia. They left from anywhere, and they are still doing so with a market presence and level not very similar to what they were before the empire, he said.

When I asked him whether Nissan can be a person suddenly in electric vehicles, Ghosn replied:” Travel on, they’re looking for life now. They didn’t seem to upgrade or innovate. They’re only looking for money. It’s pretty simple thing they’re doing, and they don’t understand how to do it. These people are panicking.”

Ghosn added that Nissan apparently has been attacked by Effissimo Capital Management and Oasis Management Group, two hostile wall money. He added that he physically believes Nissan will hit the wall and the results this time will be much worse than in 1999 and that these could be another cause of problems.

He warned that faith is the biggest issue moving ahead. You didn’t own an empire without trust. If the Japanese hadn’t trusted me in 1999, I don’t have turned them about. Without faith, we would never have been able to stay in Japan for 19 times. Trust&nbsp, &nbsp, is the base of everything. When partnerships is breached, the decline is nearby.

They are now attempting to create a drama that demonstrates to the people that they are creating a novel or that the empire has been modified. It’s all bullshit”, he said.

Living in Beirut

Ghosn is at ease in Beirut, even though his life isn’t the same as it was when he used his personal-use corporate jet to fly between five opulent homes and apartments on three continents, mainly for running alliances. &nbsp,

He’s not the only criminal in the home. The judge handling his case allegedly asked her husband about a crime she allegedly committed while Carole, a double federal National and Lebanese, was evasive in responding to his wife’s questions. She was interviewed on&nbsp, April 11, 2019, a&nbsp, year after prosecution raided their Tokyo room and took her mobile and her Syrian card. &nbsp, She would be charged 10 months later, &nbsp, eight days after Ghos n’s escape and the day before his Beirut press conference, with making false statements in that April meeting.

While not discussing the details of Carole’s situation, Ghosn reported, as he’s done in the past, that one of his investigators at the Tokyo Detention House warned him that if he didn’t repent” We are going to be looking outside. We’re going to include your partner, we’re going to involve your children, we’re going to include your friends, and we’re going to discover things. &nbsp,

” This was all taped,” Ghos n said”, and the tapes are in the hands of the prosecutor’s business.”

For this review, we asked Ghosn if, after Israel’s two-month bombing battle, he could also walk carefully from his house to sit out in a cafe.

” No trouble, “he said”. Definitely nothing. Despite the nation suffering a bit, the war didn’t have a significant impact on us. Luckily, we live in an region which avoided any war behavior. But we’ve been great. We’re hopeful that the peace holds even though it’s not perfect. But so far it’s holding.”

He continued,” His kids can visit him without any limits.” They can occur whenever they want, “he said. In fact, Ghos n’s children will be in Lebanon for a family Christmas vacation.

When questioned about his home in Beirut’s special Ashrafieh neighborhood and whether he had been expelled as per media reports, he responded,” I’m in the same house, but little. This legitimate challenge will take a very long time. I am aware that I have been kicked out of my house in response to numerous explosive comments in the press. They’re not accurate. I am still in the exact home. It’s going to take many, several times before this issue is resolved “in judge.

Ghosn has challenged Nissan’s says of possession of the house through a Beirut-based company, Phoinos Investments SAL, on the premise that the manufacturer owes him money. When he escaped from Japan, Nissan froze his goods, including wealth in the firm’s retirement account. The property officially is valued at$ 19 million.

However, &nbsp, Ghosn, then 70, continues his battle to have his popularity cleared. Despite the fact that the majority of legitimate strategies have been blocked in Japan, France, and the US, he has never given up.

Concerning the European situation, he said:” European prosecutors issued an arrest warrant in&nbsp, April 2022&nbsp, and asked me to go to France, ignoring the fact that there is now a red see on me from the Japanese, which forbids me to keep Lebanon,” said Ghosn.

” I didn’t go. As a result, we don’t know the details of what the prosecutors are planning. Which means: It may take another year for us to learn the specifics. It’s not a very complicated case, but we still don’t know what the charges will be.”

I was asked if the allegations relate to his business dealings with Suhail Bahwan, the founder and former chairman of Suhail Bahwan Automobiles LLC in Oman.

” Without getting into details, “he replied”, the prosecutors are trying to establish that money from Renault or Nissan” &nbsp, — media reports indicate&nbsp, 15 million euros &nbsp, —” came to me. That’s the&nbsp, case&nbsp, that the French prosecutors are making. There is no case if Renault or Nissan don’t send me any money. And there is no case, “he said.

Asked about a British Virgin Islands case, involving a super-yacht, in which he was ordered to pay millions of dollars in damages, Ghosn said:” We’re appealing. I’m being pressured to spend money by Nissan. ” Litigating” is very expensive and obviously they’re using Nissan’s money. I’m using my own. We didn’t try to defend ourselves because I can’t leave Lebanon. I believe our appeal case is very strong.

Concerning his criminal complaint and case against Nissan in Lebanon, in which he is seeking$ 1 billion in damages and he has identified 11 Nissan executives, he replied:” Justice is working. It’s slow because of the situation of the country, but I’m still fighting on the Lebanon case. Obviously, that means I have many things at work in Lebanon against Nissan.”

He said,” I am not going to talk too much about it,” and when asked if he would like to discuss his situation in Lebanon further because his name is on the Interpol red notice list, he said,” I am not going to talk too much.” But I don’t consider the battle over.”

Continue Reading