Southeast Asia has its reasons for pivoting to BRICS – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The sudden reversal of Southeast Asia toward the BRICS countries is a major game-changer that some in Washington anticipated.

In recent days, Malaysia extensive its interests to visit Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. Thailand and Vietnam are even interested in joining the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, which is a group of nations.

In Indonesia, there’s growing recognition that Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia and another” International South” countries have a place in vying to join this burgeoning international business.

Anwar Ibrahim, the prime minister, made the declaration in an interview with Chinese media prior to Li Qiang’s attend to Malaysia, announcing his intention to re-join the union, which has grown by a whopping 2 % in the last year. That dynamic is luring the Global South countries, primarily because it provides access to funding and a political movement that is unconstrained by Washington’s influence. &nbsp,

Joe Biden, the US senator, might find the South Asian stumbling block particularly troubling. Since the Biden time, a provincial shield has been built to counteract China’s growing influence and attempts to replace the US dollars in trade and finance.

Relationships between the US and some ASEAN people are clearly deteriorating. This, at a time when&nbsp, Saudi Arabia&nbsp, is looking to step out the “petrodollar”. As China, Russia, and Iran square off against old partnerships, Riyadh is intensifying de-dollarization work.

” A gradual reform of the international financial environment may be afoot, giving way to a planet in which more local economies can be used for international purchases“, says analyst&nbsp, Hung Tran at the Atlantic Council’s Geoeconomics Center. The money would continue to be important but without its enormous influence, which would be complemented by currencies like the Taiwanese renminbi, the euros, and the Chinese yen in a way that’s proportionate to the global footprint of their economies.

Tran points out that “in this environment, how Saudi Arabia approaches the consists continues to be a significant predictor of the economic coming.”

Malaysia’s excursion tells the story. Anwar Ibrahim, the prime minister, made a world impact by supporting Western finance. That was in the late 1990s, when Anwar’s liberal tendencies clashed with Mahathir Mohamad’s stances.

Mahathir shut Anwar down. The door was opened to Deputy Premier Anwar, who was afterwards imprisoned. Anwar’s efforts to improve competition and establish equal using fields were even reversed. Capital controls were imposed by Mahathir and Malaysia Inc. were circling the vehicles.

Then it’s Anwar who’s turning away from the Adam Smith- encouraged guidelines he once championed — and toward the&nbsp, BRICS.

” We have made our plan apparent and we have made our choice”, Anwar tells Chinese internet outlet&nbsp, Guancha. The proper process will begin immediately, according to the statement. As far as the Global South is concerned, we are totally supportive”.

Anwar gave a shoutout to Argentine President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who is determined to end the economy’s dominance.

” Last month, Malaysia had the highest expenditure ever, but the money was also attacked”, Anwar explains. ” Well, it has eased in the past few months. But it does n’t make sense, it goes against basic economic principles”.

Anwar documents that the question is: Why? He claims that” a coin that is completely outside the two nations ‘ business structure and useless in terms of economic activities in the country has become prominent merely because it is used as an international money.”

Among the many reasons for Anwar’s ideological reversal is China’s emergence on the global scene, providing a regional growth engine. Another: the” Western narrative” surrounding events like Hamas’s October 7 attack on Israel.

After their meeting in Beijing on March 31, 2023, Malaysian leader Anwar Ibrahim addressed Chinese President Xi Jinping in positive terms. Image: Facebook / Anwar Ibrahim

” People keep talking about October 7, which annoys me”, Anwar says. Do you want to obliterate 70 years of history by repeating one event? This is the Western narrative. You see, this is the problem with the West. They want to control the conversation, but because they are no longer a colonial power and independent nations should be free to express themselves, we can no longer accept it.

In late May, Thailand announced it’s applying for&nbsp, BRICS&nbsp, inclusion in part to boost its presence on the world stage. If approved, Bangkok would likely become the first ASEAN economy added.

According to Nikorndej Balankura, a spokesman for the foreign ministry,” Thailand believes that BRICS has an important role to play in strengthening the multilateral system and economic cooperation between countries in the Global South, which aligns with our national interests.” ” As for economic and political benefits, joining BRICS would reinforce Thailand’s role on the global stage, and strengthen its international cooperation with emerging economies, especially in trade, investment and food and energy security”.

Thailand’s bid, according to Soumya Bhowmick, an associate fellow at the Observer Research Foundation think tank, supports Beijing’s wider strategic objectives of boosting its economic influence in Southeast Asia.

” For China”, Bhowmick notes,” Thailand’s membership represents an extension of its regional influence, complementing its Belt and Road Initiative. This is in line with China’s strategic goals of fostering stronger economic ties and the creation of new infrastructure in Southeast Asia.

The first BRIC grouping was created in 2001 by Goldman Sachs economist Jim O’Neill. The members formally joined forces in 2009; A year later, they added the” S” when South Africa joined. In 2023, the BRICS doubled in size by luring more&nbsp, Global South&nbsp, nations.

Today, BRICS nations account for half the world’s population and two- fifths of trade, including top energy producers and importers. &nbsp, BRICS nations also account for 38 % of global petroleum imports, led by China and India. &nbsp,

The grouping could give the Global South a greater voice in international affairs and challenge the domination of existing institutions, according to Daniel Azevedo, an analyst at Boston Consulting Group.

BRICS , Azevedo adds,” creates a forum that, at minimum, gives&nbsp, emerging markets&nbsp, the opportunity to align on global topics and new opportunities to promote mutual&nbsp, economic development &nbsp, and growth. And it’s evolving steadily”.

Azevedo notes that as the BRICS build political and&nbsp, financial institutions&nbsp, and a payment mechanism for executing transactions,” there are important potential implications for the future of&nbsp, energy&nbsp, trade, international finance, global supply chains, monetary policy and technological research”.

Global companies will need to take these new geopolitical and economic realities into their investment strategies, according to Azevedo. They ought to also improve their ability to take advantage of opportunities and reduce risk.

The BRICS have n’t always demonstrated their viability as a bloc. Five core nations are present, with nothing else in common besides some economists ‘ imagination. The BRICS frequently seem to be focused solely on improving access to China’s rapidly expanding economy and doing little else.

Paul McNamara, investment director at GAM&nbsp, Investments, speaks for many when he observes that the&nbsp, BRICS&nbsp, is still an acronym in search of cohesive economic argument. Would most current global elites care about the BRICS without China at the core, asks McNamara?

As such, says Ian Bremmer, president of Eurasia Group, the “impotence of&nbsp, BRICS”&nbsp, makes joining the group” a low- stakes gambit with some potential upside. It may help Thailand, which is its biggest trading partner and most worrying military threat, win over China. But, if not, what has Bangkok really lost”?

Vietnam traveled to Russia earlier this month to take part in the BRICS summit. According to Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Nguyen Minh Hang, Hanoi is eager to collaborate with like-minded developing nations.

At a time when political dysfunction is at its worst, and all this is happening amid deteriorating American finances. As the national debt approaches US$ 35 trillion – on the way to&nbsp, US$ 50 trillion&nbsp, – Biden’s Democrats and Donald Trump’s Republicans are barely on speaking terms.

This is not appropriate for either investing in government funding in the short run or making necessary upgrades to promote innovation and productivity over the long run. Additionally, it implies the threat of a second Capitol Hill insurrection similar to the one that occurred on January 6, 2021.

That event played a direct role in the August 2023 move by Fitch Ratings to revoke Washington’s AAA credit grade. Extreme polarization, explains Fitch analyst Richard Francis, “was something that we highlighted because it just is a reflection of the deterioration in governance, it’s one of many”.

The key is now how Moody’s Investors Service, which still assigns Washington AAA, responds to the chaos caused by Trump’s campaign promises to win back control. And as Biden attempts to overthrow Trump, Biden uses new trade sanctions.

This puts US Treasury securities in a high degree of risk. Japan and China alone have US government debt totaling$ 2 trillion. Any sudden run on the dollar could trigger a fire sale, sending US yields skyrocketing.

The Federal Reserve’s reluctance to lower interest rates as was widely anticipated increases the chance of a policy error in this regard. One of the most well-known Fed errors in history was missing the subprime crisis ‘ level of distress in credit markets in 2007.

As Fed Chairman Jerome Powell’s team prolongs the “higher for longer” era for yields, developing economies are increasingly in harm’s way. That’s especially so as the dollar’s surge hoovers up global capital.

These worries fall under the umbrella of the broader BRICS’s plan to pool more than US$ 100 billion in foreign currency to absorb financial shocks. Members can use the funds in emergencies, preventing them from visiting the International Monetary Fund. Since 2015, the bank that the BRICS created has approved tens of billions of dollars of loans for infrastructure, transportation and water.

The&nbsp, BRICS currency &nbsp, project has been gaining traction since mid- 2022, when the 14th BRICS Summit was held in Beijing. Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, stated there that the BRICS were developing a “new global reserve currency” and were willing to expand its use.

Brazil’s Lula&nbsp, also has thrown his support behind a BRICS monetary unit. Why ca n’t a bank like the BRICS bank use a currency to finance trade between Brazil and China, as well as Brazil and all other BRICS nations? he asks. Who made the decision to use the dollar as the reserve currency following the end of gold parity?

President of Brazil, Lula da Silva. Photo: Editora Brasil 247

Fernando Haddad, Lula’s finance minister, has been making a point about the more prevalent use of local currencies in bilateral trade instruments like credit receipts. The focus, he says, must be phasing out the use of a third currency.

The benefit is that trade transactions are resolved in the currency of a non-membership-based nation, he claims.

Economist Vikram Rai of TD Bank points out that” there is great potential for regionally dominant currencies and a multipolar international regime to emerge,” with the roles being “filled now by the dollar shared with the euro, a more open yuan, future central bank digital currencies, and possibly other options we have yet to see” within the next ten or two.

Analysts at Moody’s warn that the Americans going overboard on tariffs, concerns about default and weakening institutions are threatening the dollar ‘s&nbsp, reserve currency status.

” The greatest near- term danger to the dollar’s position stems from the risk of confidence- sapping policy mistakes by the US authorities themselves, like a US default on its debt for example”, Moody’s argues. The dollar’s global role is threatened by weak institutions and a political pivot toward protectionism.

It’s difficult to believe that America could lose much more than just the economic plot as Southeast Asia increasingly leans toward the BRICS.

Continue Reading

Why did Pentagon chief phone Russian counterpart? – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Russian Defense Minister Andrew Belousov received a phone call from US Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, on June 25. It was started by Austin and was the first interaction between the US and Russian defence leaders in more than a year. &nbsp, Was the conversation important?

Very little is known about the call’s material. The Pentagon and the Russian Ministry of Defense have both provided small accounts, but they differ from one another in terms of their reporting.

US display

Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov and US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin ( left ). Image: RFE / RL

According to the Pentagon Austin emphasized the “importance of maintaining lines of communication” .&nbsp, This came after a US ATACMS missile hit a beach in Sevastopol, Crimea.

In the midst of the harm the US Ambassador to Moscow, Lynne Tracy, was summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry. &nbsp, According to news reports the Russians&nbsp, fully warned the ambassador&nbsp, that retribution would follow from the Crimea harm.

Russian military bloggers reported that the Russians shot over a US Global Hawk helicopter over the Black Sea after that. However, the US said that its drone supposedly&nbsp, involved in the targeting, identified as an RQ- 4 Global Hawk, had returned safely to Sigonella ( Sicily ). &nbsp,

Russia has only had a very limited amount of communication with the US, with the exception of possible marketplaces of social prisoners. The National position has generally been to remove Russia and to engage in no dialogue about Ukraine or other security issues.

Ukraine launched two aircraft attacks on Russian tactical early warning radar channels prior to the Crimea attack. Such attacks would have necessitated US/NATO targeting, including avoidance strategies, to deter Russian air threats. The Russians rely on land-based radars to warn air defenses designed to capture ballistic missiles, in contrast to the US, which has dish early alert capabilities. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Antennas of the Pluton deep-space communications difficult close to Yevpatoria on the Crimean Peninsula in the year 1980.

On the same day as the assault on the Sevastopol Beach ( June 23 ) four ATACMS rockets were fired at the NIP- 16&nbsp, Center for Long- Range Space Communications&nbsp, sensor base, in Vitino, Crimea. &nbsp, According to russianspaceweb.com,

The Pluton deep-space communications complex, which was communicate with spacecraft up to a staggering 300 million meters, was intended to house NIP- 16. Such a potential would be sufficient to guide operations out of Mars ‘ trajectory. The Pluton antennas were created to get and interpret monitoring from spacecraft, monitor trajectories, and give commands. The similar complex could also be employed to eject radio waves from Mars and Venus ‘ faces.

The Russian Ministry of Defense is in charge of NIP- 16 at Vitino. It’s not known whether it participates in the conflict in Ukraine or whether it is a part of Russia’s early warning system. &nbsp, According to satellite pictures, the Vitino basic appears to have survived the Russian invasion.

Destroyed energy monitoring place. Photo: Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant’s Telegram network

The Russian military shelled a radioactivity monitoring place close to the Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant, the largest service in Europe, on June 26, the day after the Austin visit. &nbsp, The attack targeted a tracking depot in Velikaya Znamenka, a community around 15 km north of the atomic facility​. &nbsp, The surveillance place was destroyed in the assault. &nbsp, The Velikaya Znamenka&nbsp, place is one of a group of like stations used to screen possible radiation leaks. Ukraine has threatened the nuclear power station for some time.

Russian display

The Russian display is not about maintaining communications. The Russians reported that Belousov and Austin “exchanged views on the situation around Ukraine.”

​Belousov, according to the Russian Defense Ministry, &nbsp, ​”pointed to the danger of further escalation of the situation in connection with the ongoing supply of US weapons to the Armed Forces of Ukraine ​” .&nbsp, The Ministry added:” Other issues were also discussed”.

​Discussing the” situation&nbsp, around &nbsp, Ukraine” could be a reference to US Black Sea operations supporting Ukraine’s attacks on Crimea and on Russian territory, although that is only speculation. &nbsp,

It is obvious that the Soviet emphasis in the conversation&nbsp, was on increase and a potentially bigger battle. &nbsp, Austin’s focus on “maintaining ranges of communications” is evidently ironical, as there are no major lines of communications and the US Defense Department, along with the rest of the US state, has maintained a plan of isolating Russia and not engaging in any helpful speech.

Time will tell whether this was just a igniting exercise by Austin in response to Russian threats of retaliation or a serious attempt to make more valuable contacts with Russia.

Stephen Bryen served as the Near East Subcommittee of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee&nbsp and as the assistant undersecretary of security for coverage. &nbsp,

This&nbsp, post was first published on his&nbsp, Weapons and Strategy&nbsp, Substack and is republished with authority.

Continue Reading

A space quad: Russia, China, North Korea and Iran – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

A growing risk to global surveillance has been identified by the US as a growing threat by the four-way authoritarian plane quasi-alliance that is approving of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran.

This month, Air &amp, Space Forces Magazine reports that General Stephen Whiting, chief of the United States Space Command ( USSPACECOM), expressed concern over those four states’ increasing cooperation in place.

Whiting emphasized in particular the effectiveness of diplomatic ties between Russia and each of the different three countries as Russia seeks support for its conflict in Ukraine, according to the newspaper.

In this image released on Thursday, Feb. 29, 2024, the Soyuz- 2.1b jet blows off at the Vostochny Cosmodrome outside the town of Tsiolkovsky, about 200 kilometers ( 125 miles ) from the town of Blagoveshchensk in the far northeast Amur place, Russia. An Egyptian dish and 18 Russian satellites were placed in orbit by the Russian Soyuz jet. Photo: Roscosmos Space Corporation

Air &amp, Space Forces notes numerous examples of area participation among the four, citing

  • a Russian jet launching an Egyptian dish,
  • ideas for a Russo- Foreign solar nuclear power plant, and
  • a defence alliance between Russia and North Korea, which may benefit North Korea’s area and missile features.

The newspaper mentions that US authorities have also noticed that China has supported Russia’s increase in arms production by producing Egyptian and North Korean weapons in Ukraine. It points out that this expanding partnership complicates the now contentious space debate, where the US has reported Russia deploying a counter-space weapon co-planar to a US national security satellite, which hints at functional intent.

According to Air & Space Forces, the US has compared Soviet actions to “nesting mannequin” satellites that can launch dynamic arms. Meanwhile, it says, US Space Force ( USSF ) leaders have described China’s rapid expansion in space capabilities – including counter- space technologies and support for terrestrial forces – as “breathtakingly fast”.

Space participation adds another factor to a powerful four- way logical relationship connecting Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, a relationshiop that presently covers weapons sales, energy, and finance.

Despite having greatly different systems of government, Russia and Iran are both in the same boat as Iran when it comes to imposing sanctions, creating a convenient alliance between the two monarchies.

Iran’s use of a Russian Soyuz spacecraft to launch the Khayyam telescope from Kazakhstan’s Baikonur Cosmodrome in August 2022, according to Asia Times, is a major development in its space-based military abilities and strengthens its strategic relationship with Russia.

Khayyam can be used for martial purposes, such as monitoring and surveillance, which may increase Iran’s deterrent against enemies like the US and Israel.

The build is a result of Iran’s growing self-sufficientness in place systems and its cooperation with Russia, which is looking for new clients for its storage system in the face of American sanctions.

Russia is looking to Iran for weapons sales to boost its combative work. Iran also sees this condition as a chance to win support from a leading strength and nuclear technology company.

Iran does had seized a unique prospect from the Ukraine War to become a key component of Russia’s war effort. This advantage could increase Iran’s influence over Russia, which might allow it to ask for funding for its nuclear and missile programs, modernize its military, and secure Russian support for the International North-South Transport Corridor ( INSTC ), a multi-mode freight-moving network that is thought to be a way for Iran and Russia to avoid sanctions.

Also, the Ukraine War has brought Russia and North Korea closer in a logical relationship. In January 2024, the Asia Times reported that Russia had targeted Ukraine with North Vietnamese nuclear weapons.

Declassified US intelligence indicates that Russia plans to use North Korean short-range ballistic missiles ( SRBM ) and launched them in December 2023 and January 2024. The weapons in question, possibly the KN- 23 and KN- 24, are similar to Russia’s Iskander- M and the US MGM- 140 Army Tactical Missile System ( ATACMS ).

North Korea may be backing Russia’s war efforts because it thinks that a Russian victory in Ukraine had laid a precedent for the relief of US sanctions on its sluggish economy. Russia’s reliance on China for both economic and political aid may be lessened.

Likewise, Russia and North Korea have revived a Cold War- time common security agreement. Both countries are expected to provide military support to one another in the event of war, according to the agreement, which was made public during Russian President Vladimir Putin’s attend to North Korea this month.

During a drafting meeting, Kim Jong Un and Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, change documents. They came to an agreement at a summit that included a pledge of mutual support if either land was attacked as both countries were dealing with growing hostilities with the West. Photo: Kremlin share / Kristina Kormilitsyna, Sputnik

The New York Times ‘ article mentions that the agreement has detrimental effects on global efforts to stop North Korea’s missile and nuclear weapons plans. According to the news, the agreement between Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong-un is seen as a tactical clash with the US, South Korea, and Japan‘s political partnership. Additionally, it is noted that the pact raises the possibility that South Korea and Japan does get nuclear weapons.

In addition, extremely heavy ties with Russia can allow Iran and North Korea’s to enhance their missile technologies separately.

While the earth had been focusing on North Korean and Iranian aid for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Iran’s involvement in the region had slipped under the radar, according to Asia Times in January 2024.

A secret UN report in 2020 revealed that North Korea and Iran had resumed their long-range missile growth work. According to the report, the exchange of crucial components from that year was a part of this renewed assistance.

Iran’s Khorramshahr weapon, initially launched in 2017, is similar to North Korea’s weapon known otherwise as Musudan or Hwasong- 10. Iran’s purchase of those weapons was reported in 2005. Iran’s search for a high-performance North Vietnamese propulsion system has been under US surveillance since 2010.

Also, Iran’s Shahab- 3 weapon may get based on North Korea’s Nodong weapon, and Iran’s place launch vehicles show similarities with North Korea’s Hwasong- 14 missiles.

China’s economic and industrial power has played a key role in keeping Russia upright in the conflict in Ukraine and maintaining the heavily regulated Russian economy, but its support for Moscow is more complex, perhaps not because it wants to discover Russia win or lose.

A circumstance in which Russia wins and prompts the decline of American support for Ukraine was reported in September 2023, which could result in a package that reopens Russian power exports to Europe. Withdrawing American sanctions would open Russia from relying on China for both economic and diplomatic help.

If Ukraine were to defeat Russia and reclaim a sizable percentage of its occupied territories while causing significant losses to the Russian army, it would highlight the effects of American military support and sanctions, setting a precedence that China may find unpleasant in the case of Taiwan.

The most advantageous scenario for China would probably be a Korean War-style armistice to end the Ukraine War. By continuing to rely on China, it would ensure its continued influence over Russia. In this scenario, China would have a greater influence over Russia’s energy exports, disputed territories in the Russian Far East, competition for influence in Central Asia, and weapons sales.

Continue Reading

Will next Iran president make nicer with the West? – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Tehran does have a chance to hit reset on foreign policy issues following years of growing hawkishness. In fact, the degree to which the candidates does pivot to a greater engagement with the West has been a crucial strategy problem.

The country’s highest religious and political authority, the supreme leader, is the final arbitrator of disputes with global powers, but the president of Iran has influence in a political system with multiple political centers.

The presidential election comes as Iran grapple with significant interconnected local, regional, and global issues, which was forced by President Ebrahim Raisi’s dying in a May 2024 plane accident. The UA and UK’s most recent round of sanctions were levied by the government’s market in April 2024 after Iran launched a clear strike against Israel.

Sanctions are n’t the West’s only way to apply pressure on Tehran. Cyber war, soft power and martial could are also at countries ‘ disposal. However, Iran’s activities have continued uninterrupted in recent years, including funding proxy extremist groups, avoiding restrictions through China and Russia, and advancing its regional nuclear and missile plans.

As specialists on US international policy and Iran, we think this raises a crucial issue: Are the efforts of the US and its allies to deter Iran having any impact? And could the West have the chance to alter its position in the political business?

The boundaries of politics

The US and Iran have n’t established diplomatic relations since 1979, when the Islamic Revolution occurred. But that does n’t mean that there are no diplomatic efforts. In reality, there are illegal programs, such as the US working through the Swiss state.

However, at the best days, US diplomatic relations with Iran are tense. They are prone to disturbance when the US or Iran assume management, and their situation has only become worse as Iran’s ties to China and Russia have improved.

The end result has been a discordant political approach when it comes to how the US and the West frequently handle Iran.

This is a byproduct, in element, of China expanding its economic and geopolitical relations to Tehran and increasing its influence in the Middle East. Likewise, Russia has strengthened military, political and economic links with Iran.

Iran does n’t feel compelled to agree with the US and its allies regarding security interests because of this, which has lessened the impact of Western diplomacy.

The Trump administration abandoned the nuclear disarmament deal in 2018, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as a perfect case. European rulers have tried to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, but they were unsuccessful in obtaining Iranian assistance after President Donald Trump resigned from the deal.

Despite this lack of progress, the US and Iran also have lines of communication. In an evident effort to halt US interests in the region, the US made clear to Tehran that it had not been involved in the operation following Israel’s attack on an Iranian Embassy substance in Syria.

Yet, Iran has little opportunity to discuss given the inconsistent, unexpected policies of US leadership.

A pending US-Saudi security agreement may also push Iran further away from its Western allies and China and Russia into their orbits.

In the end, the US and Europe have two objectives: to stop Iran from developing nuclear weapons and lessen Middle Eastern issue that is sponsored by Iran.

But, to meeting, both targets seem obscure with Iran’s continued, uninterrupted uranium enrichment and its problems throughout the Middle East constantly taking place.

In the past, Iran gave politics a prospect out of concern that Western hawks who oppose Iran’s nuclear program might not be as fond of showing some determination.

A new revolutionary Iranian chairman might win over the opposition for bringing diplomats to the table of negotiations. However, it may probably have the highest leader’s blessing.

In any case, the next president appears to be more likely to become a hard-liner than the high head. And while the Iranians perhaps feel more diplomatic pressure from both domestic and international allies, they could as well veto existing policy.

Peddling sweet energy

The US and its supporters have turned to various means of pressure on Iran as confidence in finding a diplomatic solution is declining.

American intelligence agencies have carried out a number of cyberattacks and information efforts to undermine Iran’s leaders and their local plans.

For instance, in 2010 a combined U.S. Israel digital operation called Stuxnet hacked the Iranian Natanz nuclear material enrichment facility, degrading and preventing regular centrifuge operations while alerting operators to their normal course of operation.

In response to Iran’s failure to address US safety concerns about nuclear proliferation and its anti-West activities in the area, these businesses continue to this day.

Tehran also engages in virtual warfare. A US statement warned Iran’s use of extreme cyberattacks to attain its policy objectives in a US report from 2023. They include the use of state-sponsored intermediaries to install heinous ransomware and malware.

The Persian election comes amid local unrest, giving the West another means of putting pressure on Tehran: anti-regime propaganda.

Independent radio and news networks supported by the US and its Western allies have targeted the Persian public with anti-Iran government messages and intensified local protests in an effort to lower public support for the current government and stoke unhappiness among the Iranian population.

Falling back on punishment

Iran’s presidential hopefuls have generally promised to retaliate against Western propaganda. According to these efforts, the prospects appear to be sensitive to the sanctions ‘ significant effects on middle-class people, particularly in Iran.

For a variety of factors, the US and Europe have recently increased sanctions against Iran. The European Union imposed a number of sanctions on Iran as a result of its repressive reaction to the protests in 2022 following the death of a younger woman, Mahsa Jina Amini, in police custody. The US and UK most recently used restrictions in April to stifle Iran from bringing drones into Russia and escalating the Middle East conflict.

Punishment, such as those leveraged during the United States ‘ maximum pressure campaign during Trump’s president, have certainly placed some stress on Iran’s economic systems and business. You can see their effect in the government’s high inflation rates and financial recession.

However, some experts claim that Iran’s political efforts have been undermined by the promotion.

Others contend that sanctions have failed because of how Russia and China have aided in providing pleasure by granting Iran access to their businesses.

Although sanctions have clearly weakened Iran’s market, their ability to contribute to the overall goal of bringing Iran back to the table of negotiations, especially in terms of its nuclear programme and local activities, is less certain.

Turning to defense methods?

The US has shown a growing commitment to turn to military action to counter Iranian-backed groups since October 7, 2023, when Hamas insurgents launched a surprise attack on Israel.

In retaliation for a previous drone attack by an Iranian-backed party that claimed the lives of three US support members in Jordan, the US and UK conducted the most notable strikes in February.

To date, Western attacks have had a more metaphorical impact by reducing actions supported by Iran. But they demonstrate the US and its supporters ‘ military can.

In recent years, politics, sanctions and gentle authority have failed to convince Iran’s rulers back to the table. Iran’s fresh president may also continue down the path of withdrawal, but doing so dangers inviting the West to improve its deterrence answer.

Daniel P. Colletti is an American political science professor at the United States Military Academy West Point, while Nakissa Jahanbani is an alternative professor at Penn State.

The Conversation has republished this essay under a Creative Commons license. Read the original content.

Continue Reading

South Korean officials naive about data sovereignty – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Data are regarded as a crucial aspect of information technology and artificial intelligence. Data independence is gaining more and more of a place in the world as more superpowers and thick powers compete to become the forefront of AI and IT services.

Data independence refers to the notion that a nation’s and its citizens ‘ data should also be under their power, just as national sovereignty does so. This implies that governments and citizens or consumers should be able to choose when, where, how, and why their information are used.

With the use of AI and the web becoming more commonplace, more and more people are putting more emphasis on making sure that the ownership of data is determined by the country and its citizens. Therefore, countries have recently focused more on strengthening information sovereignty and restricting and evaluating access to data based on different types of data and international companies.

Without distinguishing colleagues from enemies, data sovereignty is lacking.

On June 30, 2021, Didi Chuxing, often referred to as” the Chinese Uber”, proceeded with its IPO on the New York Stock Exchange, raising$ 4.4 billion despite strong opposition from Chinese authorities. The officials had urged a pause because they worried that sensitive personal and regional data may be contained in the Offering documents.

By July 2022, Chinese authorities imposed a great of$ 1.19 billion on Didi Chuxing for violating security laws, leading to the company’s volunteer withdrawal. In response to these concerns, China enacted the Three Data Laws to regulate online information control. The three are who.

  • Cybersecurity Law,
  • Data protection legislation and regulations
  • Personal Information Protection Law

To protect information independence, these laws established regulations like the Security Assessment Measures for Cross-Border Data Transfer, which mandate federal evaluations for the transfer of crucial data abroad.

China’s steps against major software and its data sovereignty measures have received criticism in the West for having a negative impact on businesses, including the US and Europe. However, similar measures were immediately adopted in these areas.

For example, the US Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act, which was signed into law by US President Joe Biden last month, requires TikTok’s family business, Chinese business ByteDance, to sell its US businesses within 360 time or face a ban due to concerns that the Chinese government might have access to people ‘ personal information.

Prior to this, President Biden had signed an executive order in February to protect Americans ‘ sensitive data, such as biometric, health, and location information, from adversarial nations like China.

Additionally, countries such as Australia, the UK, and the European Union have banned TikTok on government devices and strongly recommend its removal from personal devices.

Europe also has been proactive in addressing data sovereignty. The General Data Protection Regulation, which governs the transfer of data to third parties and countries unless otherwise authorized by the EU, was put into effect in 2018. Additionally, it grants individuals the ability to access and delete their personal data.

The Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act, which were signed into law this year, were both more recent efforts to stop foreign big tech platforms like Google, Meta, and Apple from dominating the market, fundamentally aimed at protecting domestic businesses.

Missing Korea’s data sovereignty

In the neighboring economies of South Korea, data privacy and location restrictions are in place. This pattern is evident in the recent Naver Line conflict between Korea and Japan. The Japanese government pressured Naver to transfer its 50 % share of the joint venture Line to its partner, Japan’s SoftBank, due to fears that data from Line Yahoo, used by most Japanese, could be transferred to the Korean company Naver. This demand comes after an information leak from Naver Cloud, which runs the Line messenging service that is most popular among Japanese consumers.

The issue began last November when Line Yahoo’s servers were attacked, resulting in the leak of over 440, 000 personal data records. The Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications then issued administrative instructions to Line Yahoo on March 5 and April 16 to safeguard the security of communications. This response highlights Japan’s growing concern about data sovereignty and the use of data outside their purview.

Meanwhile, the Korean government focused solely on opposing the forced sale of Naver’s shares, pledging to “firmly and strongly respond” to these measures. However, this reaction did not address the broader issue of data sovereignty protection.

In contrast to other major nations ‘ efforts to prevent foreign companies from gathering and obtaining data, Korea’s response seems overly complacent. The Korean government still views data sovereignty protection merely as personal information protection, which is the main argument.

The current Personal Information Protection Act explicitly states in Article 1, Paragraph 1, that” the purpose of this law is to protect individuals ‘ freedom and rights by stipulating matters relating to the processing and protection of personal information and, furthermore, to realize the dignity and value of individuals.”

It also briefly and vaguely states in Article 14 Paragraph 2 that the state is required to formulate policies for the transfer of personal information abroad and that it must obtain the information subject’s consent when doing so, without giving an explicit description of its territorial scope.

These limitations indicate that the Korean government continues to view data sovereignty protection with a narrow lens rather than as a matter of national security and a geopolitical issue. The PIPA falls short of the comprehensive measures required to safeguard national data sovereignty in an increasingly interconnected digital world by failing to address the broader implications of data transfers and lacking a clear extraterritorial application.

An Australian think tank recently discovered that Chinese state-controlled propaganda organizations are frequently linked to the collection of data from Chinese businesses, including the shopping and gaming apps AliExpress and Temu.

Relevant Korean ministries, such as the Ministry of Science and ICT and the Personal Information Protection Commission, have only mentioned observing how user data from Chinese online retailers is collected and used, which seems unrelated to the seriousness of the situation.

While other nations put in place measures to restrict where data can be collected and to prevent foreign companies from doing it, Korea still believes that as long as foreign companies properly manage collected personal information and protect against cyberattacks in accordance with PIPA, it is not a major issue.

This suggests that Korea may not fully comprehend how collected and used citizens ‘ data are used by foreign companies operating there. South Korea should take stronger measures to safeguard crucial data for economic security and actively change strict legislative guidelines that cover extraterritorial scope.

Seunghwan ( Shane ) Kim&nbsp, ( seunghwankim619@gmail.com ) is a researcher at the Korea Foundation.

This article, first published by Pacific Forum, is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

China mulls tax, fiscal reforms as land sales fall – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Next month, the Chinese government is expected to release taxes and fiscal reforms that will allow local governments to look into fresh tax sources to make up for lost property sales revenue. &nbsp,

The reforms may become announced during or after the Chinese Communist Party’s next plenary session of the latest Central Committee’s 2022- 2027 name.

The Second Plenum typically sets the program for China’s economic plan for the long term, which is attended by about 200 CPC Central Committee members and 200 officials and military leaders every five years. It was supposed to have taken place in November, but it was postponed, allegedly as a result of a summertime officers change at the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

( Many outsiders are unfamiliar with the Chinese Communist system of government. ) A CCP National Congress is held every five times and draws 2000 people together. The last one occurred in 2022, in October. Then the central committee ( 200 people ) holds the First Plenum. In the next month, there are the Second and Third Plenum on peronnel and financial issues, both. They are followed by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Plenum and then the cycle begins anew with the next Central Committee’s installation. )

Recently, the nation’s future income and fiscal reforms have been covered in state media. Instead of relying heavily on home activities, they claim the Chinese market will concentrate on boosting local consumption and high-value manufacturing in the coming decade. &nbsp,

Local governments were criticized by the National Audit Office for failing to properly apply the key government’s macroeconomic policies in a report released on Tuesday. It recommended that regional governments put more effort into tax collection, expense control, support of state-owned businesses, and regional debt risk management.

In the first five months of this year, local governments ‘ revenue from land sales fell 14 % to 1.28 trillion yuan ( US$ 176 billion ) from the same period of last year, according to the Ministry of Finance. &nbsp,

Next month, China’s area sales revenue plummeted to 5.8 trillion yuan from the 2021 apex of 8.7 trillion renminbi. &nbsp,

The decrease in land sales typically occurs after a decline in home purchases, according to Luo Zhiheng, president of Yuekai Securities ‘ Research Institute. He claimed that such circumstances will eventually adversely impact local governments ‘ land sales, which could drop by 1.1 trillion yuan or 19 % to 4.7 trillion yuan in 2024 from last year. &nbsp,

Consumption income

In a statement released on June 19, Goldman Sachs reported that China might be considering changing its second plenum’s consumption taxes. &nbsp,

Instead of collecting the tax from exporters and importers, the Chinese govt is anticipated to enhance its consumption tax base and increase prices. The regional governments may receive a portion of the revenue from the central government.

Last year, the central government raised 1.6 trillion yuan in consumption taxes, which is generally levied on marijuana, delicate oil, cars and alcohol. The tax represents about 9 % of the country’s total tax revenue. &nbsp,

Reuters reported on June 22 that the upcoming revenue reform will help local institutions keep more of their tax dollars to help them with their debt issues. It claimed the move will help address a decades-old tax revenue imbalance because local governments ‘ fiscal revenues made up 54 % of the country’s total but their expenditures made up 86 %.

Caixin.com added that China will try to increase total tax profits while lowering the stress on companies in an essay published on Monday. It said local governments may reduce rely on the main government’s money.

In a statement at the side’s monthly Central Economic Work Conference last December, CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping stated that a fresh round of governmental and tax reform was necessary to support China’s high-quality growth and development. &nbsp,

Dismissing stories

On March 24, Finance Minister Lan Fo’an announced that his administration would support the development of the country’s corporate initiatives involving development, technological improvements, and future business. &nbsp,

But on March 28, the Finance Ministry in a speech urged the central government’s departments and local governments to cut costs for officials ‘ foods, trips, travel, meetings and events while spending more on strategic initiatives. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Meanwhile, the public’s attention has fallen on the government’s recent efforts to collect outstanding taxes from businesses. &nbsp,

Different listed companies have reported that the State Taxation Administration has told them to pay taxes they have missed for decades over the past few months. According to media reports, the requested amount ranges from several million to fifty million yuan per company. &nbsp,

Some internet users claimed that the central government wants to review and recover the unpaid taxes from the previous 20 to 30 years. They also cited the recent establishment of special teams under local governments ‘ police forces to collect outstanding taxes. &nbsp,

The State Taxation Administration stated on June 18 that it had no idea how to “review tax payments for the past three decades.” In fact, local governments set up their tax enforcement teams in order to comply with a 2016 policy, it claimed, adding that citizens should n’t spread rumors.

It’s good for the State Taxation Administration to clarify, according to a columnist for the Jinan Daily Newspaper Group. However, he added that officials should always explain their policies, as any miscommunications will harm people’s confidence in the Chinese economy. &nbsp,

Read: Analysts: China’s property stock surge unsustainable

Follow Jeff Pao on X: &nbsp, @jeffpao3

Continue Reading

US upgrading long-serving B-52 to take on China – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The US is gearing up the long finger of its corporate airpower against a close-knit struggle with China in the Pacific by turning the ancient B-52 bomb into a cutting-edge warplane.

The US is planning major upgrades to its long-serving B-52 bomb, according to The War Zone’s report this month. These improvements may alter the bomb from the Cold War into a warplane capable of flying for a millennium after its first flight.

The B- 52 upgrades include fresh engines, a modern aircraft, AESA sensor, updated avionics, improved pylons, digital warfare enhancements and superior weapons. Upgraded B- 52s, designated the B- 52J, may be in support until the 2050s, serving alongside the B- 21 Raider.

The War Zone notes that fresh engines may significantly reduce the cost of maintenance, enhance the trip period between sorties, and offer a variety of administrative benefits when discussing the specifics of the B- 52J improve package. The Rolls-Royce F130 is the candidate for the turbine swap, according to the document.

The War Zone says the B- 52J may be upgraded with the AN/APG- 79 sensor, providing greater variety, fidelity, countermeasure resistance, positional awareness, electronic warfare capabilities and air- to- air surveillance and tracking. The B-52J will be able to follow moving water and surface targets and provide guidance for connected weapons traveling long distances thanks to the radar.

The B-52J’s targeting seed may be slaved to the new sensor, and vice versa, which will aid in physical specific recognition. It further explains that the B- 52J’s lengthy loitering period and payload flexibility work well with the new radar for surveillance and reconnaissance missions.

Regarding connectivity, The War Zone reports that the B- 52J will feature enhanced satellite communication, improved GPS, Link 16 datalinks and advanced communication suites for networked battlefield integration, enabling it to strike targets beyond the range of its sensors.

For armaments, The War Zone states that the US Air Force plans to arm the B- 52J with hypersonic weapons to engage high- priority, time- sensitive targets at standoff ranges. The B-52J’s weapons payload, which includes precision-guided bombs, naval mines, stealthy air-launched cruise missiles, swarming drones, and long-range air-to-air missiles, could be significantly increased by new underwing pylons and internal rotary missile launchers.

In explaining the B- 52’s longevity, Jeff Schogol notes in an April 2019 article for The National Interest that, unlike fighters, the B- 52 does not need to perform high- G maneuvers. According to Schogol, many B-52s worked for the US Strategic Air Command ( SAC ) during the Cold War, which meant they did n’t fly as many missions. These circumstances most likely preserved their airframe integrity to outlast their successors, the B- 1 Lancer and B- 2 Spirit.

Additionally, according to Asia Times, the B- 1 supersonic bomber was supposed to partially replace the B-52, but maintenance issues have limited its capabilities and prevented it from retiring before it is too late.

Due to the decline in close air support missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, the B-1 fleet’s ability to engage in low-altitude supersonic flight is constrained. This restriction reduces the main goal of the aircraft’s development, which was to launch a supersonic bomber to attack Soviet air defenses. As a result, the B- 1 fleet is scheduled to be decommissioned in 2036.

The B-2 stealth bomber was built to operate at low subsonic speeds and avoid detection by Soviet air defenses. However, due to cost concerns, the US capped production of the B- 2 at just 21 planes and halted production in 2020, in stark contrast to the 76 current- generation B- 52Hs in service. At$ 2 billion per plane, it was deemed too expensive to restart B- 2 production.

In a May 2024 TNI article, Peter Suciu points out that the B- 21 may be limited by a low production rate and limited numbers, but the B-52’s non-sealed design may restrict its use in disputed airspace.

Suciu points out that whereas the USAF anticipates 24 to 30 B-21s to be operational by the early 2030s, older bombers like the B-52 and B- 1 had a much higher annual production rate of 20 aircraft. He makes the point that the B- 21 might not be available in sufficient numbers as soon as possible.

In accordance with that, the B-52J may experience delays akin to those on the B- 21. The B-52J is facing a three-year delay, which is pushing its initial operational capability to 2033, according to a US Government Accountability Office ( GAO ) report released this month.

According to the GAO report, the delay is brought on by funding inefficiencies affecting the B-52 commercial engine replacement program, which wo n’t receive a critical design review and contract until August 2025. It mentions that additional delays are linked to the B- 52 Radar Modernization Program, which experienced a 12.6 % cost increase from its 2021 estimate. The cost now totals$ 2.58 billion.

Despite those setbacks, the GAO report notes that the AGM- 181 long-range standoff missile, which is designed to replace the B-52’s AGM- 86B ALCM, is making progress toward reaching its 2030 initial operational capability.

Additionally, China’s rapidly advancing air defense capabilities may limit the longevity of upgraded B- 52Js. According to an interactive map released by the Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative ( AMTI), China has all of the South China Sea and its neighbors within the reach of bombers, fighters, and surface-to-air missile ( SAM ) sites.

AMTI says that from Woody Island, Subi Reef and Mischief Reef China can launch J- 10 and J- 11 fighter jets and H- 6K bombers, with those features defended by long- range HQ- 9 SAM sites.

A Chinese fighter over the South China Sea came within 10 feet of a US B-52 bomber in October 2023. The fighter was carrying out a risky maneuver that almost sparked a collision. That action might give a hint about China’s strategy in battling other stealthy aircraft like the upgraded US B-52Js.

The South China Morning Post reported this month that China is planning to unveil its H- 20 stealth bomber, which is the US’s takeover of the B-2 and B-21, to prevent being left behind in bomber modernization.

The H- 20 is still secluded and has no confirmed launch date despite persistent rumors of its imminent readiness, according to the newspaper.

According to the SCMP, the H- 20 is anticipated to have a flying wing structure, a hard- to- detect coating and the capacity to transport both regular and nuclear weapons over a distance of at least 8, 500 kilometers. It also adds that the H- 20 will form the air- based leg of China’s nuclear triad.

The H- 20 is said to be in place of the aging H- 6 strategic bomber, which struggles to compete with contemporary US and Russian models like the supersonic Tu- 160, stealth B- 2 and long-serving B- 52.

Continue Reading

Xi’s purges cutting PLA political clout down to size  – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The People’s Liberation Army, after the frontrunner of Chinese politics, is once again being purged following the sacking of the defense minister last year, at least nine generals, and many senior military industry executives.

President Xi Jinping has pledged to “enhance the tool for punishing new types of corruption and buried problem” and to improve top army guidance.

In a statement reported by China’s position broadcast on June 19, Xi said:” Cadre at all levels, particularly older army, had show unity and have the courage to set aside their fame and introduce their deficiencies. They must greatly personal- reflect”. They had “make honest rectifications, and resolve issues at the root of their thinking”.

Xi introduced a significant transformation that significantly altered the PLA’s structure in 2015 to improve its conflict capability shortly after taking office. The control system was flattened and reorganized, giving more power to the group.

The number of military regions ( dividing PLA command over China ) was reduced from seven to five” theater commands” with joint rule over the ground, naval, air and rocket forces. This change sought to improve offensive air and naval capabilities by shifting the concept of operations from generally ground-oriented defense to cellular, coordinated movements.

Soldiers and tactical and commissioned officers were dispersed around to tear loyalty links in the chain of control and increase the PLA’s rely on its top management. Models were dismantled and reassembled.

Nevertheless, it appears that this reform did not work preferably. Rumor has it that an investigation started last season following a bubble fight study found that a lot of the corporate jet technology did not work well or at all.

A Chinese spy balloon was spotted above a US military base in early 2023, igniting a strong sense of suspicion in the country about a potential Chinese surprise attack. US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken canceled a trip to Beijing as a result of this incident. China later began an investigation, possibly leading to the dismissals of Foreign Affairs Minister Qin Gang and Defense Minister Li Shangfu, after initially underestimating the alarm.

The three-day conference that ended on June 19 marked the first of its kind since 2014, when Xi held a military-political work conference in Gutian on the anniversary of the December 1929 meeting that consolidated Mao’s influence over the Red Army, the PLA’s precursor, in the same year.

In the following decade, Mao seized control of the Party through his influence over the Red Army. Unlike its Soviet counterpart, the Chinese Communist Party was primarily an army spin- off. After the Soviets gained control of Moscow, they had to establish an army to combat the loyalists of the Czar. The Chinese party struggled to gain control from the countryside after its urban insurrection.

The 2014 conference provided the first framework for the 2015 military reform. There are similarities and differences between PLA ties from previous parties here.

During the Cultural Revolution, the PLA was mainly protected from Mao’s political upheavals. The army was not punished and purged, as the majority of civil servants were. It remained the savior of Chinese politics for decades. The head of the military, Marshal Ye Jianying, engineered the coup to arrest the radical” Gang of Four” in 1976 after Mao’s death. That paved the way for Deng Xiaoping’s return to power.

Failed reform?

The 2015 PLA restructuring was in line with some reformer generals ‘ ideas. In exchange for a transformative change and a modern, combat-ready apparatus, the army relinquished its old political authority. It was also meant to alter the party- military’s relationship.

Xi Jinping is the chairman of the PLA Central Commission, and his first public career job was as assistant to Geng Biao, head of military intelligence and a close friend of his father, Xi Zhongxun, then minister of defense.

The most recent purge demonstrates that the reform did not succeed as planned. Still, last year’s dismissals and this conference demonstrate Xi’s clout over the military. Both events took place without any public outcry.

This may indicate that Xi has succeeded in overthrowing the People’s Republic of China as the first leader to overthrow the party’s rule over the military, changing the course of history.

Even so, the PLA still has political duties. The military’s duties extend to the entire Chinese territory, which is divided into five geographically distinct regions, creating additional political cohesion alongside civilian administration.

Moreover, Xi is the one person who sits at the top of the military commission, the party and the civil government. That allows him, in theory, to play the military against the party or the party against the military if necessary.

Therefore, a new power structure appears to be emerging in which Xi serves as the sole supporter of the entire architecture.

Additionally, it is noteworthy that the meeting took place just days before the party plenum, which had been delayed for a while, in July. The plenum is said to focus on economic reforms, but it might have broader implications given the military conference.

The long-running and brutal war in Ukraine, combined with rising regional tensions and US-related tensions, may have been a wake-up call for China, indicating that a conflict may not be in vain and that Beijing should be prepared.

A conflict could completely or partially stymie Chinese exports to G7 nations, which are currently a major source of surplus, and have an impact on its sprawling middle class. The Ukraine fighting also showed the new importance of hybrid warfare, with propaganda, espionage, and firing cannons all part of one scheme.

Since the end of the conflict with Vietnam, the PLA has n’t engaged in a war in 45 years. Dong Jun, the new defense minister, is a member of the navy, which is the only PLA branch with extensive active experience and is known for its global missions and patrols in the South China Sea.

Francesco Sisci, an analyst and commentator on politics with over 30 years of experience in Asia, is the director of Appia Institute, which originally published this article. It is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

Israel-Hezbollah escalation could pull in Iran, US – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Mass human evacuations and common death, damage, and destruction have been the result of months of constant exchanges between Israel and Lebanon’s violent team Hezbollah.

Since first June, the assault has gotten worse, with more and more heated rhetoric coming out. Both attributes have acknowledged the good severe effects of the tit-for-tat problems from escalating into a full-blown war. The question is whether this flimsy confinement will carry in the future.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made the foreboding suggestion on June 23 that more of the region’s soldiers would soon be freed up and moved to the northeast to fight Hezbollah in menacing language. In order to prepare for a potential conflict with Hezbollah, Israel was moving Iron Dome chargers from the south to the north, according to a CNN report a few days before.

As a researcher on Lebanon and Israel, I have closely followed their respective local patterns.

What is in danger is significant, and the consequences I think far outweigh the continuous Israel-Hamas issue. The conflict between Hezbollah and Israel has revealed the fundamental truth: the conflict in Gaza is also a conflict over dominant energy in the Middle East in many ways. It further increases the US’s exposure to this potential darkness, which has compelled Washington to intensify diplomatic efforts to halt Israel-Hezbollah hostilities.

Regional relationships

Saudi Arabia and the Gulf state, Iran’s local competitors, are closely monitoring how Iran uses the growing crime on the Lebanon-Israel border and the Gaza conflict to expand its regional interests. Russia, supported by Iran in its war against Ukraine, is watching, also, viewing this issue as a means to undermine the United States.

In its fight for local identity with Iran, Israel, in contrast, approaches the developing problems on the country’s northeastern border from a position of greater frailty. Critics have accused Israel’s extreme right-wing state of lacking in corporate thinking regarding the current conflict’s objectives.

For proper blindness, they argue, disregards Israel’s needed to maintain good relationships with its regional and global allies, first and foremost with the United States.

Israel’s management could have used the battle to develop its connection with majority-Sunni states in the Middle East and draw on its empire with the US to ensure local assistance for the Jewish state, instead of devastating Gaza following the October 7 massacres by Palestinian militants.

However, Israel’s steadfast refusal to discuss creative political engagement with the Palestinians has a major impact on its ties to regional actors who otherwise would be willing to support the Jewish state of Iran.

Prospective for US- Iran turmoil

Iran and its proxies had probably ignite the whole region if Israel and Hezbollah launched a full-fledged war. It might also force the US to engage directly with Tehran, which is a terrible circumstance that President Joe Biden has been attempting to avoid since October 7.

A battle with Hezbollah may convince the US to provide practical fight support, as it did in April in retaliatory attacks by Iran and its proxies on Israel, in contrast to the war against Hamas, in which American support for Israel is restricted to diplomacy and arms supply.

Hezbollah’s secretary general, Hasan Nasrallah, threatened Cyprus by stating that his organization would target the island if Israel and Israel cooperated with Israel during the conflict. Hezbollah has even extended the geographic range of the conflict.

Washington is undoubtedly concerned about the repercussions of the growing fighting between Israel and Hezbollah. The US has been trying to come to an Israeli-Lebanese agreement since the beginning of the Gaza war, which would require the removal of Hezbollah’s forces from the border zone and their replacement with international forces and the Lebanese army.

Israel and Lebanon would form a boundary commission in exchange, as the American proposal suggests, to address Lebanese and Israeli grievances over the location of their shared boundary line once and for all.

Any deal made with Hezbollah is becoming more difficult as the Hezbollah-Israel attrition war continues.

The pressure on the north and the conservative and religious sectors to go to war with Hezbollah is growing in Israel. According to recent polls, the majority of Israeli Jews favor the IDF or Israel Defense Forces fighting Hezbollah” with full force.”

The IDF, on the other hand, is sending mixed messages. The decision to go to war is quickly approaching, according to its spokesman. Meanwhile, senior generals, including the chief of staff, have noted that after nine months of fighting, the IDF is overly stretched and worn out, and the opening of a front against Hezbollah cannot occur before the army is reenergized and regrouped.

Israel at a vulnerable moment

In terms of Netanyahu, the once aloof and risk-averse political realist is now taking the chance of a situation that could result in the country’s total strategic defeat, undermining the security and viability of an Israel that is integrated into regional politics. Since January, there has been a lot of concern that Netanyahu could force Israel into a full-fledged conflict with Hezbollah if he believes that a full-fledged conflict would serve his own preconceived notions. We might be getting closer to the truth about this apprehension.

Hezbollah, on the other hand, continues its pressure on Israel, increasing the gamble of full conflagration, recognizing that Israel is potentially at its most vulnerable moment– perhaps since the 1948 war.

Even with the continued economic and political downturn in Lebanon, the continuation of this attrition war is paying off, given Iran and Hezbollah’s long-term strategic objectives of eradicating Israel.

The Americans have been working hard to find diplomatic solutions to this crisis along with the French, who was the country’s former colonial master and creator. Hezbollah has stated from the beginning that it will stop its cross-border attacks in Gaza if and when a cease-fire agreement is reached.

However, neither the Hamas or Israel leadership seem particularly eager to get there at this point. Instead, it appears that the scenario Hamas hoped would materialize after October 7: that Israel’s allies in the so-called Axis of Resistance would join the conflict and launch an offensive against Israel on multiple fronts, is only more likely.

In short, the Lebanon- Israel border is at present a combustible front at risk of explosion.

Of course, Israel and Hezbollah may continue to cooperate in a similar way that the US and the Soviet Union were halted by mutually assured destruction ( MAD ) during the Cold War. Additionally, aggressive efforts are being made by US-led initiatives to tamp down the flames.

However, without any significant diplomatic breakthrough, the situation will undoubtedly continue to worsen and could lead to a war that will be even more deadly than the one that has been occurring since October 7.

At the University of Notre Dame, Asher Kaufman is the head of history and peace studies.

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Putin’s mutual defense treaty with Kim may backfire – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, lists very few nations on his current list of available global travel sites. He made the wise decision to travel to Pyongyang so that he could be feted as a friend despot and receive comfort from isolation and sanctions-imposed isolation.

However, if the South Korean government follows through on its commitment to backfill US and Polish stockpiles, Putin’s decision to mark a complete common security agreement with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un might end up being an own-goal rather than a corporate breakthrough.

Putin good envisioned a rise in South Asian numbness regarding open military aid for Ukraine while expanding the range and varieties of Northern Korean weapons that were available for Russia’s war work.

In recent months, North Korea and Russia have heightened their stance on perceived US colonialism as well as Russia’s actions to put an end to the UN Panel of Experts ‘ investigation and recommendation of international sanctions for North Korean violations of majority UN resolutions involving its nuclear and missile development activities.

At a press conference on May 9th, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol reiterated his desire to keep ties with Russia” as soft as possible” and reiterated South Korea’s plan of never giving Ukraine military equipment immediately.

Regarding South Korea’s credibility as a partner with similar goals, the facetious ties that existed prior to the Kim-Putin mountain sparked a lot of inquiries from EU and British political representatives, with whom I spoke a week beforehand to Putin’s attend.

My interlocutors specifically brought up Europe’s desire to ensure South Korea’s support for Ukraine and its sorrow with South Korea’s rhetorical support, which was mainly weak in comparison to that of Japan. The United States should have put more pressure on South Korea to become more in line with the West in the fight against the war in Ukraine, the Western participants questioned.

The statement of a North Korea-Russian mutual defense treaty suggests that South Korea’s first response may help to quell Western concerns by stoking the Yoon administration’s desire to support Ukraine in essential areas like anti-missile systems and immediate munition supplies.

Following the announcement, South Korea’s memorandum to the Soviet ambassador to South Korea, Georgy Zinoviev, demanded that Russia cut off military ties with North Korea. Putin also issued a public notice that it would be a “very great error” if South Korea carried out its threat to provide munitions directly to Ukraine.

The signing of the common defense pact, which North Korea and Russia may want to exploit, has a big impact, according to Putin’s ambiguous comment: the Korean Peninsula’s reconnection risks are related to the wider geopolitical environment and worldwide geopolitical rivalries.

As a result, North Korean actions against Russia will need to consider the possibility that Russia will launch retaliation by expanding the scope and breadth of military cooperation with North Korea, including the use of cutting-edge satellite and ballistic missile technology.

However, one possible reason for Russia’s drafting of the joint defense agreement with North Korea is to encourage the development of a subsequent front for a military conflict outside of Ukraine, both as a means of inciting South Korea’s caution regarding the export of defense equipment to Ukraine and as a pretext for a wider conflict that might have an impact on US global military strategy.

The Yoon administration will have to bridge these obstacles by closing the gap in perspective and approach with like-minded Western allies and by enhancing US- Japan- North Korean military cohesion in response to tighter North Korea- Russia ties. In this respect, the schedule of Putin’s visit to Pyongyang may welcome interest and a unified response from NATO’s 75th anniversary celebrations in Washington, DC, and from the American, Japanese, and South Korean officials on the outside of those discussions.

Scott Snyder is author of&nbsp, The US- South Korea Alliance: Why It May Fail and Why It Must Not. The Korea Economic Institute of America (KEI ) is led by him as president and CEO. This article was KEI’s original publication. It is republished with permission.

The Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, a public corporation established by the Republic of Korea, is a registered trademark of KEI as an agent of the FARA.

Continue Reading