Bolen C (Page 199)

Hezbollah, a Lebanese armed group, lately made videos that show images from one of its robots flying over Haifa and the surrounding area.

In an effort to persuade Palestinian political rulers to rescind their agreement with Israel, Hezbollah released the video soon after American special envoy Amos Hochstein visited Beirut.

Hezbollah released images of its drones, the Hudhud ( Hoopoe ), that highlight strategic military and civilian infrastructure inside Israel following Hochstein’s visit.

The following morning, the group’s director- standard, Hassan Nasrallah, gave a speech where he reiterated that Hezbollah has the ability to build targeted strikes somewhere in Israel.

The helicopter footage provides proof of Hezbollah’s growing technical skills. It appears to be intended to counteract Jewish threats to invade Lebanon and convey the message that Hezbollah has the ability to seriously harm Israel in the event of a full-fledged conflict.

Usage of robots

Hezbollah has been attacking Israeli military installations along the Lebanon-Israel frontier since October 2023 in response to Israel’s assault on Gaza.

The Israeli army has launched attacks and shelled a number of southern Lebanoni regions. Tens of thousands of people on both sides of the border have been forced to flee the place, killing hundreds of people, most of them Palestinian.

According to Jewish media reports, the army made the decision not to take down Hezbollah’s helicopter. Israel cited issue over casualties in the human world as justification for this choice. However, according to military analysts, failing to catch enemy drones during a conflict indicates insufficient detection abilities.

A foreign military aircraft flying over a country would generally be neutralized right away to reduce any security threat, possibly by targeting it over water or underpopulated places.

Technological developments are enabling Hezbollah, and the broader Axis of Resistance, to issue Israel’s air supremacy and its ability to maintain full control over the stars.

This includes the development of strong weapons and the ability to capture or kill Jewish robots, like those used in surveillance operations over Lebanon, such as the Hermes 450 and Skylark.

But, this also raises additional risks for Lebanon because Hezbollah might increase the number of weapons it releases.

Common punishment

Over the years, tit-for-tat attempts have been made to identify common punishment in clashes between Israel and Hezbollah. Hezbollah has recently bombed Jewish military installations and shot down Israeli robots.

Since October 2023, Israel has conducted proactive and retaliatory attacks in Lebanon, targeting users of Hamas and Hezbollah, particularly in southwestern Lebanon. In June, Israel targeted Taleb Sami Abdallah, a crucial Hezbollah chief on the Lebanese- Jewish before.

Following this assault, Hezbollah intensified its unpleasant, launching missiles that caused fires in Israel. According to Eid al-Adha celebrations, the trip that followed remained largely peaceful.

]embedded information]

Israel has also taken security measures to hinder Hezbollah problems by preventing the use of GPS tracking and location-based apps like Google Maps, which Israel claims are used to combat drones, weapons, and different technologies used by Hezbollah and other armed parties. This demonstrates Israel’s will to keep developing defenses against risks that might arise.

But, while groups like Hezbollah have significantly adopted advanced systems, they also rely on more fundamental approaches to escape detection. Nasrallah previously spoke to Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, about Hezbollah’s use of such techniques in an interview.

The Iron Dome

Since its most recent conflict with Israel in 2006, Hezbollah has significantly expanded its military and scientific arsenal, and it would probably pose a greater threat to Israel’s martial in a wider conflict.

Hezbollah asserted recently that it had destroyed an Iron Dome device, but the Israeli army claimed it had no idea what the launchers had been doing.

Iron Dome is meant to protect Israel from robots and short-range missiles launched by armed groups. It uses radar to track incoming priorities and interceptor missiles to kill them, and it has batteries spread throughout the nation.

Despite Israel’s praise of Iron Dome’s high intercept level, US officials have warned that the system may be completely resurrected by a full-fledged conflict with Hezbollah.

Psychological battle

Hezbollah is conscious that it is doubtful that Israel would exercise caution in its political and military objectives.

This is demonstrated by the Israeli military maneuvers like the Dahiya Doctrine, which calls for the extensive destruction of human system, and the assault of Gaza. Around 95, 000 people have already been forced to flee southern Lebanon as a result of Jewish strikes and war challenges.

Hezbollah demonstrates its eagerness to confront Israel head-on by provoking Israel. The question remains: does Hezbollah really possess this ability or is it bluffing?

Nasrallah made a point about the group’s potential and said it has not yet revealed the full scope of its features in his statement. His comments form piece of Hezbollah’s approach in the internal conflict with Israel, and the latest escalation represents a considerable development.

Hezbollah is trying to control the pace of the clashes, which is frustrating the residents of northern Israel by implying that it is imposing its conditions on the area and that it is controlling the situation.

This psychological conflict appears to be having a real impact, leading Israeli leaders to avoid overreacting and raising Israelis ‘ growing concern about the inability of their government to control the situation. Since October 2023, more than 96 000 Israelis have eluded the north.

According to the Israeli military, “operational plans for an offensive in Lebanon” have been approved. However, despite Israel’s undeniable military superiority over Hezbollah, its actions so far indicate it acknowledges the dangers a wider war could bring. Israeli officials have warned that a full-blown war might seriously damage infrastructure like the electricity supply.

The Israeli army has n’t engaged in a significant conflict in a while, and it appears to be getting more and more bogged down in Gaza. Meanwhile, Hezbollah has spent much of the last decade fighting in Syria, providing its fighters with battle experience. Furthermore, if the war does escalate, Hezbollah allies in Iran, Iraq and Yemen could become even more involved.

Ultimately, Hezbollah knows Israel is much stronger. However, it is communicating that any conflagration would also be devastating for Israel through psychological warfare.

Everyone involved must exercise restraint, as required. The fighting and destruction must end in order to protect the well-being of the people in the area who are suffering from the devastation of this conflict.

Hamas cannot be destroyed, according to Israel’s military spokesman, who stated that it is impossible to do so by using weapons to annihilate an idea. The same applies to Hezbollah. A peace that upholds the security and dignity of all people can only be reached at the negotiating table.

Emilie El Khoury is Postdoctoral fellow at Queen’s University’s Centre for International Policy and Defence ( CIDP ), Queen’s University, Ontario

This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Eight months after the rebel offensive dealt a surprise hammer blow to the coup-installed State Administration Council ( SAC ) military regime, operation 1027 has resumed in northern Myanmar.

The Three Brotherhood Alliance ( TMA ), a rebel coalition made up of the ethnic Kokang Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army ( MNDAA ), Arakan Army ( AA ), and Ta’ang National Liberation Army ( TNLA ), hit multiple targets in Shan state on October 27, 2023.

They were joined by insurgent allies from the Mandalay People’s Defense Force ( PDF), the Bama People’s Liberation Army ( BPLA ) and factions of the communist People’s Liberation Army ( PLA ).

The 3BA seized 18 cities and 36 military installations, including battalion-sized ones and Military Operations Command 16, in the course of more than four weeks of fierce battle. The insurgent operation killed some hundred Myanmar Army troops and compelled over 4, 000 soldiers, including some major generals, to retreat.

Additionally, most of the land north of Lashio to the Chinese border was taken, as well as essential Shan state borders cities. Most significantly, the MNDAA recaptured Laukkai area on the China borders, which the rebels had lost to the Myanmar Army in 2009.

By all records, Operation 1027 has reinvigorated and emboldened the pro- SAC weight. Comparable escalations were reported throughout the nation in the weeks following the shock offensive.

Those combined Karenni and anti-coup File forces captured the most attention during Operation 1111 in Kayah position. After in November, the AA announced that 1027 was being extended to Rakhine State. Similar to, if not more serious, AA’s following military victories in Rakhine overshadowed the operation’s initial phase in the north.

Militants have since taken control of Rakhine position and Paletwa Township in neighboring Chin condition, with some even capturing the country’s Thandwe airport due to the AA’s military operations.

Operation 0307 was launched in the north by the insurgent Kachin Independence Army (KIA ) in early March and has since accelerated steadily throughout Kachin and the state’s northern border.

After China brokered the” Haigeng Agreement” in January, fighting started to wane in northern Shan state. As an apparent peace, the deal was largely ineffective, with numerous SAC breaches in the form of airstrikes and ordnance bombardments. The TNLA resumed its side of Operation 1027 on June 25 as a result of these breaches of the agreement.

Naungkhio on the Mandalay- Lashio roadway, way between the military base of Pyin U Lwin and the Goteik Viaduct, has recently been taken over by the TNLA. Additionally, there has been intense battle in the northeast of Kyaukme. In response to numerous aircraft and strikes on TNLA camps in the town, Naungkhio’s seizure was ordered.

Since October, SAC forces have been unable to move troops up the main highway, but they have managed to move items for many days around Lashio, where the government’s Northeastern Command is headquartered, as well as the Shan state city of Hispaw to the north. In Mogok and Mong Mit, the military is even strengthening its forces.

On the eight- month celebration of 1027, it is worthwhile considering eight essential lessons: four good and four warning for the anti- SAC opposition. The first is operating security’s significance. The first victory of 1027 owed mostly to its recipient surprise.

That the unpleasant itself, plus the movement of troops and equipment over a long period, caught the SAC off- protect illustrates the limitations of its field intelligence, both people and signals. It is obvious that keeping attack plans to “need to know” inner circles is effective.

The second concerns planning and logistics. Clearly, the offensive was meticulously organized and phased.

Nyo Twan Awng, the deputy commander of the AA, claimed that the alliance had been “preparing for almost five years to launch this large-scale operation” in the best analysis of 1027 so far, which was released by the Myanmar Peace Monitor in April. With the adequate preparations for this operation, we were able to plan it secretly. In Operation 1027, we were able to carry out attacks in a strategic, collective, surprised and synchronized manner”.

There is merit to this: the 3BA staged a “mini- 1027” in 2019 in the same area as the current fighting. That the alliance could assemble the correct force structure, arms and ammunition, and conduct tactical training on attacking specific targets, illustrates a level of strategic maturity.

The third lesson emphasizes the power of productive alliance-building. In just 15 years, the 3BA has grown from the runt of the ethnic armed organization ( EAO ) litter to the rebellion’s top dog which many PDFs are striving to emulate.

The three main members of the alliance have been successful in some ways, if not most of them are natural antagonists. The AA has no real claim to territory in Shan state, and the MNDAA and the TNLA seek to control contiguous territory ( even though tensions have grown between the two in recent months ).

The 3BA initially struggled to support post-coup resistance, but it has since benefited from the training and arming of the Mandalay PDF and other anti-coup proxies.

The fourth lesson, an intangible element of any war, concerns plain serendipity. As the old saying goes, “luck is where preparation meets opportunity”.

Operation 1027 was launched at a time when China was trying to stop the scam organizations that had spread along its border with Myanmar. It was evident that the 3BA had some support to launch the operation when it did.

Having said that, it is equally important for the alliance to learn from mistakes and difficulties that pre-exist or have developed as a result of the 1027. To the alliance’s detriment and risk of extinction, some of the cautionary lessons from the operation have been suppressed or downplayed.

The first concern is the devastating disparity in firepower between the military and its ruthless use of the armed advantage, including through its grotesque massacre of civilians.

The SAC has increasingly attacked cities that have been destroyed by the resistance since 1027 with airstrikes, heavy artillery, naval bombardment, and drone strikes. The SAC regime has deployed both” counterforce” and” countervalue” targeting to the extent that the distinction between combatant and civilian has fundamentally broken down.

The National Unity Government ( NUG) has made a complete failure to assume a more prominent leadership position in the anti-SAC war of national liberation. A Shan intellectual quipped soon after 1027 “you know the NUG was not involved for two reasons: one, it was a surprise and two, it was a success”.

Claiming an unwarranted leadership role in 1027 further dented the exiled government’s credibility. The unfortunate NUG actually only had Kawlin, a Sagaing town, to show for its limited role in 1027.

However, SAC forces recaptured the town several weeks later and essentially destroyed it. Nor have the gains of 1027 been matched by progress in the crucial Anya theater in the country’s central region, which is still chaotic, competitive and increasingly out of the NUG’s influence.

The administration’s enormous challenge has been reflected in the third incident after a military victory. EAOs with a long history of “governing” populations and territory, with established and capable” civilian” departments and usually robust civil society networks, are fully cognizant of the challenges of keeping towns functioning after seizure.

But for a group like the 3BA’s TNLA, the fast and major expansion of the territory it now operationally controls since 1027 has come with grave responsibilities of how to administer towns with little experience and limited resources for water, electricity, livelihoods, law and order, transport, education and health.

Even though some of the regions of the Karen and Kachin states are accustomed to insurgent-led administration, these experienced organizations are responding to urgent humanitarian needs as the territory under their control grows. By some estimates, Myanmar now has as many as three million displaced civilians.

The Karenni Interim Executive Council (KIEC ) has a legal system in place, but it also benefits from having a relatively small territory. Northern Shan state’s dynamics are much more enraging.

In addition, 1027 has revealed inter-group tensions between EAOs in northern Shan state, particularly between the Kachin and Ta’ang, long-standing territorial dispute, and issues involving local populations ‘ treatment by each armed group, including over the controversial issue of forced recruitment.

Unresolved conflicts between armed Shan groups and 3BA members could divert attention and resources from sustained combat against the SAC.

The United Wa State Army ( UWSA ), which hosts numerous 3BA leaders as well as EAO and NUG leaders, is perceived as expansionist, adding to the tensions. A more thorough understanding of the causes of internecine tensions must counteract the claim that 1027 demonstrated unprecedented “unity.”

Another overarching lesson from 1027 is the folly of prediction. Nearly all commentators made up their minds prematurely about the SAC’s imminent demise and a collapsed military across the country.

Some now discredited outfits were irresponsibly rash to predict” three to six months” of imminent large-scale, coordinated urban attacks on SAC positions and to the fact that various “tipping points” toward regime collapse had already been reached.

Longer forecasts of conflict and more accurate depiction of the multiple challenges that will arise from an insurgent military victory will result from careful and honest analysis over jingoistic triumphalism.

As Operation 1027 moves into its next stage, its leaders and strategists will have to carefully consider the lessons learned from October 2023 and adapt their strategies and plans for the most likely still-unfinished battle ahead.

David Scott Mathieson is an independent analyst who studies human rights, conflict, and human rights in Myanmar.

Continue Reading

The Ukraine conflict may end in a capitulation, not in a brokered offer. That gives me an idea of where the conflict is going and why the events are unable to reach a compromise.

The latest blemish in the missing negotiating story is a declaration&nbsp, in the form of an exam given by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the&nbsp, Philadelphia Inquirer. &nbsp, &nbsp,

In the interview, Zelensky said there&nbsp, ca n’t be direct negotiations&nbsp, between Ukraine and Russia but there could be indirect negotiations through a third party. In Zelensky’s proposed situation, the third group may serve as an entity and any offer will only be with the middleman, no between Russia or Ukraine. The UN had play this role, according to Zellensky.

The Zelensky plan is a non-starter for a number of factors, but the most important being that all conflicting states must come to an agreement before the issue can be resolved. &nbsp,

There is no hope of a third party implementing any deal, as the failed Minsk agreements ( 2014, 2015 ) proved. In a hybrid case, Russia, Ukraine, and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe ( OSCE ) signed the deal. &nbsp,

The OSCE proved incapable and willing to try to impose the Minsk accords, and Ukraine refused to follow through on the agreement. Germany and France both supported the agreement, but neither was officially required to do so in any way. &nbsp,

Zelensky’s “proposal” really is just another ruse to distract criticism of Ukraine for not wanting a negotiation with Russia. Zelensky is being kept out of the negotiating table by three powerful troops. &nbsp,

The most crucial aspect is that any agreements with Russia are opposed by the two major Anglo-Saxon players in NATO, specifically the US and the UK. The US has tried everything, including imposing sanctions and diplomatic methods, to halt any discussions with Russia on anything other than slave exchanges. &nbsp, &nbsp,

The second reason is Ukrainian policy, sponsored by Zelensky, prohibiting agreements with Russia. If Zelensky requested them to do so, the Verkhovna Rada ( Ukraine’s parliament ), which is likely to do so, could rescind the legislation in a split second. &nbsp,

Zelensky absolutely controls the Ukrainian legislature, has arrested or exiled opposition lawmakers, and controls the media and other multimedia. Zelensky’s iron fist means that he wo n’t personally allow direct negotiations.

Zelensky even has signed&nbsp, a order prohibiting any negotiations&nbsp, with Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin.

The second reason relates to stress on Zelensky from difficult- right nationalists, including particularly the neo- Nazi Azov brigade. The best captain of Kiev’s troops in the Kharkov region, Lieutenant General Yuri Sodol, was fired, providing strong evidence for this.

Sodol was &nbsp, accused by Azov regiment leaders&nbsp, of killing more Russians than the Russians in the Kharkov wars. Zelensky obliged them by firing Sodol after Azov sent their concept to the Rada.

Since Sodol’s departure, Ukraine’s situation has worsened along the full line of contact. &nbsp, Russian war costs are extremely large, with as many as 2, 000 killed and wounded on some nights.

The Russians have stepped up their attacks with FAB fly bombs, including the monster&nbsp, FAB- 3000&nbsp, which only hit a Russian military command center in the Donbas town of&nbsp, New York&nbsp, and apparently killed 60 or more Russian military personnel.

Because Zelensky’s term of office expired in May, according to the Russians, he is no longer a feasible communicating partner. Since Zelensky served his name, there is some misunderstanding about the legal system in Ukraine, but experts from both inside and outside the country believe that the country’s leaders may be elevated to the position of the Rada. &nbsp, &nbsp,

Ruslan Stefanchuk, the speech of the Rada, is becoming more socially active, despite his opposition to Zelensky’s continued rule.

However, given the battle situation, the Russians no uncertainty determine that the time may soon arrive when the Russian army either collapses or surrenders, or both. &nbsp,

In either case, Russia will need to choose a temporary military command to replace the Russian authorities in some way. That would enable the Russians to come up with a surrender plan for a new government.

NATO’s extended involvement in Ukraine would be difficult if the army of Ukraine surrendered and there was agreement with a Russia-appointed government.

When NATO understands what happened and why, that could lead to a security discourse between NATO and Russia. However, loading NATO with has- been political leaders like Marc Rutte does no bode well for the future of the empire. &nbsp,

The crucial message for NATO if the Russians win in Ukraine is that the security alliance may prevent expanding and look for a more robust relationship with Russia in Europe, as seems to be more and more probable.

Stephen Bryen is Asia Times ‘ senior correspondent. He also served as the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s staff director and its deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. &nbsp,

This&nbsp, article&nbsp, was first published on his&nbsp, Weapons and Strategy&nbsp, Substack and is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

A new RAND statement emphasizes China’s growing tactical maneuvers and risk tolerance, which are both extreme steps in a fight against US dominance in the space industry.

The People’s Liberation Army ( PLA )’s perspectives on space-based escalation over the past two decades are examined in the RAND report, which examines open-source Chinese defense literature.

It asserts that China’s leaders anticipate violent potential strategies, including the expanding military of space, from the US as a dominating but declining power.

According to the report, the PLA’s strategy includes both coercion and deterrence, a military combination that seeks to force adversaries to follow their political goals or face a damaging space-based war.

The statement outlines the PLA’s developing views on area- based escalation. These viewpoints reflect a growing wish to openly influence the rapidly changing geopolitical environment. First, the PLA’s tactical thinking was generally theoretical, focusing on discord prevention.

RAND mentions that the PLA switched its place operations strategy in 2013 and put a focus on defense vs. military escalation in order to achieve social goals.

It outlines a four- move increase rope involving demonstrating area power, space martial exercises, disposition of space forces and space strikes. The goal of the plan is to entice competitors into obedience while avoiding full-fledged issue.

According to the report, the PLA’s perception of the US as a declining power probable to resort to military has a significant impact on the move toward higher threat tolerance in space. Additionally, it asserts that the PLA’s growing risk tolerance in place has been influenced by Chinese President Xi Jinping’s control. &nbsp,

RAND advises that US officials may anticipate rapid decisions made in the face of communication gaps and refrain from requesting the PLA’s assistance in space crises. It advises the US Space Force ( USSF ) to get ready for hostile PLA operations in space, even during wartime.

China may make its space-power known by conducting low-intensity tests of superior space technology, usually during periods of peace or when there is a crisis, to demonstrate its ability and solve without engaging in conflict.

Asia Times reported that China’s small spacecraft spent 276 days in trajectory after its August 2022 release, and that in May 2023, it landed on an unknown airport in the Gobi Desert.

China’s spacecraft may have made an appearance at the Lop Nur nuclear test site, which has previously been used for spaceplane recovery, or at the Dingxin Test and Training Base, where the PLA-Air Force ( PLA-AF ) regularly conducts large-scale exercises.

The situation was hailed as a prominent achievement in the country’s space program by Chinese state media.

LeoLabs, a personal space services firm, reported the same month that China’s little spaceplane had carried out numerous maneuvers and docking missions while traveling in space with a different smaller object.

The Financial Times (FT ) reported in October 2021 that China launched a hypersonic missile with nuclear capability that circled the globe before heading its way.

The check, which was not publicly disclosed and apparently caught US intelligence off guard, demonstrated China’s major advancement in fast technology, according to FT. Studies indicated the weapon missed its mark by “only” 38 km.

According to the FT statement, hypersonic glide automobiles can evade US missile defense systems because of their flexibility and lower path.

The hypersonic missile test came at a time when conflicts between the US and China grew and China’s military operations were still continued close to Taiwan.

China portrayed the hypersonic missile test as a daily place car test for aircraft reuse, despite the US’s concerns about China’s growing defense capabilities, which it claims contribute to regional and global volatility.

China can likewise carefully position its area forces for possible offensive operations. This strategy includes launching and maneuvering storage assets to make people feel as though they are in immediate danger and urging adversaries to reevaluate their actions.

In a February 2023 Breaking Defense content, Sam Bresnick points out that China is now the second-largest area power behind the US thanks to its accelerated growth in the space industry, which included a significant increase in satellite launch over the past five years.

Bresnick information that the PLA has integrated these spacecraft into its military philosophy, enhancing transportation, security, communication and missile warning devices capabilities.

He adds that China’s focus on satellite resilience – through proliferation, orbital diversification and rapid launch ability – has established a robust space architecture, potentially more resilient than the US’s.

He also makes the point that China’s ability to launch space launches ( TRSL ) quickly surpasses that of the US, which must be done in order for the US to maintain its strategic advantage in space.

China’s space escalation strategy has the potential to launch sporadic, targeted strikes on crucial space assets like command and control nodes. By demonstrating the ability and willingness to escalate, such actions would coerce adversaries like the US into abandoning their goals.

In a June 2024 article for the China Aerospace Studies Institute ( CASI), David Chen mentions that China’s Shenlong spaceplane is capable of extended orbital presence and quick redeployment, signaling strategic intent by maneuvering and deploying payloads like rendezvous and proximity operations ( RPO)-capable microsatellites.

Chen points out that China can perform offensive maneuvers against adversaries with the aid of its RPO missions from 2020 to 2023, which will enable it to disable or capture enemy satellites.

He adds that there is another crucial aspect of cyber-electronic warfare, with China developing systems to intercept and hack enemy communications and GPS satellites. China is a formidable adversary in space warfare, according to Chen as he goes on to say that these efforts, combined with the potential deployment of directed energy weapons, pose a number of threats to space-based command and control nodes.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies ( CSIS ) think tank asserts in its Space Threat Assessment 2024 that China considers its space and counter-space capabilities to be essential to its national security strategy when evaluating China’s expanding space capabilities.

It points out that China’s desire to use counter-space systems to deter and counter foreign involvement in regional conflicts, such as the potential for a war with the US in the Taiwan Strait, is the driving force behind this emphasis.

Continue Reading

Samsung employees in South Korea staged their first ever strike on June 7th, led by the Nationwide Samsung Electronics Union ( NSEU). This traditional celebration involved nearly 28, 000 union people, representing about one- five of Samsung’s labor in South Korea.

The attack targeted Samsung’s device division, which manufactures a variety of vital components such as RAM, NAND display chips, USB sticks, SD cards, Exynos processors, cameras sensors, modems, NFC chips, and power/display controllers.

The motion highlighted deep-rooted issues with unionization at Samsung, indicating a major shift in the organization’s labor dynamics. Union users posted obvious notices detailing their grievances and demands on Samsung service doors throughout the hit.

Lee Hyun- kuk, evil president of the National Samsung Electronics Union, described this motion as “largely metaphorical, but it’s a beginning”. He made it clear that the union has emergency plans for upcoming scares if management does n’t file its problems. Additionally, he further stated that a general attack could be planned out entirely, underscoring the union’s unwavering support for their needs.

The union is pushing for a 6.5 % salary hike, in contrast to the company’s proposed 5.1 % raise, as well as an additional day of annual leave and a more transparent approach to calculating bonuses. Prizes are particularly crucial because they account for a sizable portion of an employee’s salary.

In 2023, the method for calculating prizes, which takes into account both running revenue and cost of capital, resulted in no payouts being paid to employees. According to the coalition, operating profit should be the only factor in bonuses. In the first quarter of this year, Samsung’s device department reported a profit of US$ 1.4 billion.

Samsung Group has consistently opposed labor negotiations, leading to policies that demand lower wages, little benefits, and extended work time.

In December 2013, the Korean Metal Workers ‘ Union ( KMWU), supported by theIndustriALL Global Union, revealed widespread violations of workers ‘ rights within Samsung. These violations included studies of kidnapping and physical assault on union leaders, as well as management-focused education programs intended to stop union creation.

Samsung’s reputation in the world IT sector is even hampered by its labor-intensive working environment, which entails long days and a reliance on precarious employment arrangements. The company positively discourages unionized vulnerable employees from joining unions and makes pressure on them to disengage from their delegate organizations.

This practice involves paying union members lower wages and monitoring them closely, which raises important honest questions about how Samsung treats its workforce in the technology sector.

Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd’s labor structure reveals major discrepancies because it is structured. Highly paid professionals and those involved in research and development are essential for creativity and product creation.

In the middle level are experienced tradespeople and manufacturing staff needed for production but frequently encountered difficult conditions at Samsung’s world businesses, including those in South Korea.

At the lower end of Samsung’s work order are workers employed by companies and subcontractors, a team for whom Samsung denies duty despite their important part in the company’s operations.

The intensive work environment at Samsung became clear during the 2012 Samsung vs. Apple trademark test, which exposed stringent working conditions for research and development staff. The strenuous nature of the job, including the long workdays that had an impact on one’s personal well-being and family life, was brilliantly depicted in the testimony of key designer Wang Jee-yuen.

Women make up the majority of Samsung’s skilled workforce, generally coming from smaller towns to function in semiconductor labs. They endure lengthy swings, rotating schedule and coverage to harmful substances.

Samsung is not the only company to exploit its employees. According to research, today’s phone workers are abused 25 times more than textile staff in 19th-century England. The iPhone workers ‘ incredibly high exploitation rate is 2 458 %.

This results in employees producing the goods that increase the company’s profits, but only a small portion of their day’s earnings are paid for it.

Amazon, a significant company in the US, is famous for its hard working conditions. As part of their daily task risks, Amazon employees encounter natural stress, workplace accidents, and mental health issues.

The business makes use of innovative surveillance systems to carefully monitor employee behavior. Although Amazon claims that these measures improve safety, employees frequently feel pressured to move at an exceptionally rapid pace in order to meet productivity goals.

Secondly, Amazon has actively opposed labor attempts among its workforce. The business spent$ 4.2 million on professionals in 2021 to dissuade employees from joining organizations.

However, with the establishment of the Amazon Labor Union ( ALU), which would be the first union at an Amazon US facility, workers made a significant breakthrough on April 1, 2022. This success was the result of a year-long battle against Amazon’s aggressive techniques against unions, and it attracted the support of engaged workers and administrators at the Staten Island warehouse.

In 2011, employees at the Maruti- Suzuki Manesar IMT plant in India applied to record a new coalition, the Maruti Suzuki Employees Union ( MSEU), in Chandigarh. Management reportedly pressured employees to sign paperwork pledging not to visit the MSEU after learning about this initiative.

In reply, 3, 000 staff launched a sit- in attack on June 4, 2011, at the Manesar Plant, demanding acknowledgment of the MSEU. To further strain the workers, control fired 11 employees, including MSEU business bearers, on June 6 of that year, accusing them of inciting the attack.

Maruti Suzuki has changed its workforce strategy over time by reducing the number of contract workers working in precarious conditions while keeping a smaller core of permanent employees.

These labor movements demonstrate the ongoing global fight of workers against exploitation by powerful corporations. They stress the difficulties and unfair treatment that the workers are subject to and the need for systemic reform to ensure fair treatment and the equitable distribution of the profits from their labor.

Pranjal Pandey, a journalist and editor based in Delhi, has edited seven books that cover a variety of topics for LeftWord. On NewsClick, you can read more about his journalistic contributions. in.

This article was produced by Globetrotter and is licensed for publication.

Continue Reading

Second, Biden, then Macron, and then the terrible Rishi Sunak, who arrived the following week. Japan’s Kishida, Germany’s Scholz and Canada’s Trudeau remain in office only because the election cycle does n’t require them to assay the voters.

Every big American nation’s federal is falling or had collapse if it had to hold elections, for the first time since contemporary European states were defined by the Treaty of Westphalia. What social plague has beenfalling the West’s leaders, leading to a widening turnout for all of their voters?

There is a straightforward justification for the social damage of the West’s governments: All of them consented to an agenda that their voters rejected because it had harmed the quality of their lives. Naturally and instantly, the citizens of the West are rising up to reject their leaders.

The harm to the country’s social class is amazing.

In the first round of the snap poll that Macron called following the tragic European Parliament poll of June 9, the second results from France show that Emmanuel Macron’s center-based balloon party drew only a five of the vote. Le Pen’s National Rally, tendentiously labeled the “extreme right” by the media echo chamber, came in at 34 % while the leftist coalition garnered 28 %.

72 % of Americans, meanwhile, think that Joseph Biden is n’t mentally fit to be president ( the other 28 % presumably includes a large number of dementia victims ). 56 % of Americans disapprove of his achievement.

In the European Parliament elections on June 9th, the three events that make up the German governing coalition collectively received only 30 % of the voting. The country’s second- largest party, the Alternative für Deutschland ( AfD ), has 16 % of the vote, enough to force itself into a coalition that the formerly mainstream parties have sworn never to consider.

Fumio Kishida, the prime minister of Japan, has a 13 % approval rating and won only twelfth of the vote in his own party. With a 28 % approval rating, Canada’s Justin Trudeau appears to be the leper with the most fingers.

What is the objective that the West’s voters have rejected? After the fall of Socialism in 1990, America’s aristocracy had the resources to frog-marge the rest of the industrialized world into its strategy.

The first is a worldwide partnership expanding NATO to the border between Russia and Ukraine in order to remove and weaken Russia. That is exactly what led to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as Donald Trump declared on June 21.

In March 2022, Biden promised that sanctions may reduce the Soviet economy in half, rather, Russia’s economy has grown and is now larger than Japan’s, according to the World Bank, and Moscow has the upper hand in a grinding war of attrition. The rise in support for other German parties on June 9 was essentially a peace vote because the war is incredibly unpopular in Europe.

The next was a global partnership that prioritized business output over the climate change agenda. In the US, the Biden presidency hobbled the removal of oils. US petroleum exports doubled under the Trump administration, but now they have only little recovered to their previous high after a sharp decline.

After the Merkel state acceded to the Green Party plan and shut down the nation’s nuclear power plants, the Ukraine war in Germany prevented Germany from getting cheap Russian energy. Electricity prices played a significant role in the recent three-year prices cycle.

The fourth deal addressed the declining population of industrialized countries. In the case of Europe, all the leaders of the big European nations agreed that they would take large numbers of immigrants from developing nations to their west, Middle Eastern Muslims and sub-Saharan Africans, and Central Americans in the case of the United States.

This is not quite the” Great Replacement Theory” of conspiracy theory idea. Even so, it comes near: The elite had envisioned a new international melting pot of ethnic admixture that would diluted and devalue the West’s cultures.

Immigration is by far the most significant of these three because it implies the reconfiguration of social and economic life in the industrialized world and the deterioration of the country’s base.

The nationalist uprising against this worldwide agreement, led by Viktor Orban in Hungary and Donald Trump in the US, was unavoidable. The leaders will also use their swords against themselves for this problem.

In order to support the left-wing National Front, Macron’s leading Gabriel Attal ordered individuals in his party’s third-place candidates to retreat from the second round of voting on July 7 in the midst of yesterday’s election disaster, favoring the republican right over the extraordinary left.

According to Le Monde, Jean-Luc Mélenchon, the leader of the radical left party La France Insoumise ( LFI), called on left-wing candidates who placed third but still qualified for the second round to withdraw to support the better-placed candidate to defeat the RN. No one vote, no one chair more for the RN,’ he said”.

The socialists, after all, are globalists of a unique line, with some serious objections to financial control by aristocracy but extremely angry to national independence. The most important issue is the breaking of national boundaries, national cultures, and national populations in the great wave of migration that they have done a lot to encourage, and globalists of Macron’s ( or Angela Merkel’s, or Rishi Sunak’s ) stripe agree with the socialists.

France is now 8 % to 10 % Muslim, according to the Pew Survey, it will be 18 % Muslim by 2050 in a high migration scenario while Germany will have a 20 % Muslim population. Migrants are the main political parties ‘ constituents, which aligns the socialist returned with the bourgeois center.

The centre- kept empire of anguish cannot govern France, to be sure. A split-off from the traditional Left (” Die Linke” ) led by Sahra Wagenknecht is currently polling with 9 % of the federal vote, which is unfavorable. The Wagenknecht group, which has won some votes from the AfD, now accounts for 17 % of the total, combines traditional socialist politics with a strong anti-immigration stance.

It’s not yet clear whether the National Rally’s despair alliance with the former investment banker Macron may prevent the National Rally from winning the July 7 square or not.

Maybe France will just go into conflict rather than sputter away around a nationalist government. Germany will have a protracted wait before its future national vote, which will take place at the end of 2025, with the AfD leading by large profits in the state elections scheduled for September 1.

British politics, however, is in conflict after Biden’s breathtaking display of memory in his conversation with Trump on June 27. Democrats cannot survive without Biden as a member, which makes Trump’s election very likely, just as they cannot live without him.

And Trump has no use for the international mission that the British aristocracy imposed on the earth after 1990. The information coming from Washington is: You’re on your own and it’s every person for himself.

Spengler is channeled by David P. Goldman. Following him on X at @davidpgoldman

Continue Reading