Attacks have consequences: Israel responds to Yemen – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Hodeida, Yemen, a dock operated by Houthi jihadists is burning. Israel
bombed a sizable arms storage that.

The Houthis, who were good targeting the US Consulate right next to the shore, were responsible for the drone attack in Tel Aviv. The helicopter missed by about 1, 000 legs and rather hit an apartment building, killing a 50-year-old gentleman and wounding eight people.

By no means was it the first Houthi attack on US property in the area. It was, nevertheless, a show of growing boldness on the part of the jihadists.

The second lesson is that a failure to reach your enemies with the fear of retaliation eventually leads to an increase in their behavior. Despite the Houthis ‘ persistent attacks on Saudi oil infrastructure and civilian infrastructure, one of President Joe Biden’s primary responsibilities in business was to reduce the terrorist designation from them.

Over the past three and a half decades, they have gotten worse without worry of US or Saudi attacks. The Houthis have reduced traffic in the Suez Canal by 66 percent since 2023 and almost made the Red Sea utterly impenetrable thanks to longer-range robots and weapons.

In a attack to seize Persian arms en route to the Houthis in the Red Sea in January, two American soldiers lost their lives. Instead of punishment, or exacting a amount, or instilling concern, the US and allied boats in the Red Sea generally tried to shoot down the drones and weapons. &nbsp, In only a few cases has the US tried to knock out release places and, just last week, Houthi scanners.

In other words, there was no reason for the Houthis to quit.

It is n’t as if the US military did n’t understand the attacks and the stakes. General Erik Kurilla, the USCENTCOM captain and a normal user to Israel, was there just before the invasion, meeting with Israeli army and intelligence officers. Kurilla reportedly wrote to US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, saying the Houthis ‘ e-campaign was a failure, though it has not been freely confirmed. He reportedly blamed dread of local retribution on American officials for their inability to support larger operations.
escalation.

Kurilla more stated in the letter, it is reported, that if this were allowed to continue, British service members may die. He is, of course, correctly. A Houthi weapon or helicopter would almost certainly destroy more British sailors or drop a US warship.

Austin, apparently not having read Kurilla’s statement, put out a statement following the attack:

I spoke with Yoav Gallant, the Jewish defence minister, nowadays and expressed my condolences for the Jewish national who was killed and other injured in the assault. There are presently not reported injuries or deaths for US workers despite the blast occurring close to our US Embassy Branch Office. I reaffirmed that our responsibility to Israel’s surveillance and right to self-defense remains impenetrable.

Jack Lew, the US embassy to Israel, used the same phrase. ” Shocked by the vicious Houthi drone attack in Tel Aviv this day. We extend our apologies to the deceased’s home. Our US Embassy Branch Office staff members are all secure, thank you.

    Read,” It was n’t about us. It was n’t aimed at us. We wo n’t do anything about it. If Israel wants to do something, OK. But it’s not us”.

    That legislation is peace. Bend through and allow Iran to wreak havoc in the Persian Gulf and Middle East. &nbsp, Simply why Biden has sold out to Iran is anyone’s guess. It does n’t
    problem. The administration has advised Israel to follow the US’s instructions and has advised them against acting against Iran or Persian proxies, including the Houthis, Hezbollah, or Hamas, and will not use Russian proxies to attack Russia.

    Properly, Israel has determined its unique characteristics for action. That is the next lesson. &nbsp, If the Houthis want a conflict with Israel, they had much think hard about the consequences. &nbsp, Israeli warplanes have ( minimally ) destroyed a significant part of the port of Hodeida, the entry point for Iranian weapons and launch site for those weapons.

    Now there is a lot of talk about “proportionality” in war, &nbsp, a one-way-street reasoning that says you should do no more than your army does. &nbsp, It is a crazy idea, especially in the violent atmosphere of the Middle East.

    If you practice fairness, you assure potential loss. Israel has once more established its own rules for dealing with the Houthi war, and it appears to have severely affected Houthiland. The Houthis did continue to strike Israel and the United States, but they are unlikely to give up. Israel should n’t be required to perform this task alone.

    That raises the issue of the foolish, affected Biden presidency and its loss to protect America’s interests and/or its allies. The development of a weak and frightened America is a terrible tradition, ignoring the outcome of the upcoming National election. &nbsp, More body will be on the arms of the Biden administration.

    Continue Reading

    Trump remains stubbornly wrong on Taiwan – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    While America’s Republican Party deals toughness on China and support for Taiwan, its presidential candidate has just&nbsp, described&nbsp, with more precision than ever his private inclination to allow China win Taiwan. &nbsp, Although a reputation for having a” transactional” view of foreign policy precedes him, Trump’s recent comments about Taiwan are jarring.

    In a statement released by Joe Biden, who has repeatedly stated that he will give American forces to help protect Taiwan in the event of a PRC strike, Joe Biden has strained the US plan of” strategic confusion.” &nbsp, Trump has strained that legislation in the same way. Trump explained to us why he thought US intervention would be a bad idea despite not saying he would n’t send the US military to help Taiwan. &nbsp,

    David P. Goldman&nbsp, wrote&nbsp, in&nbsp, Asia Times&nbsp, on July 18 thatTrump simply” spoke common sense” .&nbsp, Hardly. &nbsp,

    What Trump said has five crucial flaws. &nbsp,

    First, he said” Taiwan should pay us for defense”, adding that” they’re immensely wealthy” .&nbsp, He compared the US role to that of an “insurance company”.

    Trump seems to be using Taiwan censure in a different way from what he does to Japan and South Korea. &nbsp, The USA is bound by contracts to support the latter two, and Trump has long&nbsp, said&nbsp, they are free-riders that may give all of the cost of hosting US foundations plus an additional advanced.

    But Taiwan is n’t a free-rider. Taipei pays for the arms it purchases from the USA, according to wikipedia. Taiwan is not a US ally, hosts no US bases, and does n’t even have a firm belief that US forces will intervene when necessary. The idea that Taiwan may give the US for a non-commitment is ironic. No sane man would purchase a plan like that from an actual plan company, sadly.

    The following bad thought is that Taiwan” took” America’s semiconductor manufacturing company. When Trump was asked if he would wage a war against China to defend Taiwan, he responded that” they did get about 100 % of our chip business.”

    This was not a one-off. &nbsp, In an August 2023&nbsp, interview, Trump’s first response to the same question was” Taiwan did take all of our chip business” .&nbsp, When that interviewer asked about the consequences of China capturing Taiwan’s semiconductor fabs, Trump agreed that would be bad. &nbsp,” But”, he said, “remember this: Taiwan took — intelligent, beautiful — they took our business apart. &nbsp, We may include stopped them”.

    According to Trump, his perception that Taiwan harmed US companies in an important business market may be the most important factor in deciding whether or not to protect Taiwan against a Chinese military attack. It would be more accurate to say that American CEOs decided to offshoot production to Taiwan’s TSMC, which had a sophisticated business model and highly qualified professionals ready to put in long hours for relatively low pay.

    Taiwan won the top spot in the chip industry by effectively competing in a free marketplace. This is not a valid justification for allowing Taiwan to be taken over by the PRC.

    Second, Trump’s statements reveal a disregard for the less tangible and longer-term advantages of supporting Taiwan, even with the settlement of insurance premiums. Taiwan is a shining example of political reform and a beacon of hope for oppressed societies, especially in mainland China, under a democratic federal that upholds universal human rights and international legislation.

    The initial island chain, which is located in Taiwan, may create choke points that would prevent China from from getting into the northern Pacific Ocean during a conflict. &nbsp, Unlike the PRC state, Taiwan is&nbsp, transparent&nbsp, about epidemics of infectious disease, which however are expected in the future, and is a vital part of an effective global health early-warning program. &nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

    On the other hand, a hostile Taiwanese government would stoke Japan’s concern that its nautical supply routes and western territories were in jeopardy. &nbsp, And US withdrawal of Taiwan to spontaneous integration would signal to the Asia-Pacific place a remarkable decline, if not the finish, of US leadership in the region. Washington had thus lose its influence over the area in ways that are both advantageous to American economic interests and US security.

    Fourth, Trump implied that the PRC could easily subdue Taiwan by force because China is close to Taiwan while the United States is “9, 500 miles away” .&nbsp, ( Taiwan is actually 6, 700 miles from the US west coast and 7, 950 miles from the US east coast. )

    ” They had just attack it”, he said. &nbsp,” They is actually just send shell” .&nbsp, Assuming Trump meant “missiles”, it’s true that the Army had pepper essential government structures and military equipment with bombs. &nbsp, Missile strikes, however, do n’t win a war if the Taipei government does not choose to surrender. &nbsp,

    An American president should not and should not say that he thinks it would be too difficult for the US military to stop China from annexing Taiwan by force. Even with its advantages, capturing Taiwan would be extremely difficult and risky for the PRC, and the economic turmoil brought on by the war could put the Chinese Communist Party under serious threat of control.

    China failed to seize Taiwan in most of its iterations of a well-designed series of Taiwan Strait war games managed by the Center for Strategic and International Studies in 2023. Even if PRC observers believed that Trump intended to let the Chinese and Russians “do whatever the hell they want,” the defeatist statements could make war more likely.

    Finally, Trump said the reason the PRC does n’t attempt to violently annex Taiwan is “because they do n’t want to lose all those chip plants” .&nbsp, To Trump, Taiwan means semiconductors.

    But to the PRC leadership, Taiwan has profound historical and political significance. It serves as a reminder of how incomplete the Communist victory in the Chinese Civil War was and how much more important is the piece that Xi needed to achieve his “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”

    Taiwan’s semiconductor factories would have little to no impact on Beijing’s decision to launch an attack, which would depend more on the PRC government’s decision to accept the possibility of Taiwan joining the PRC peacefully had been permanently closed. &nbsp, This has been the situation since before TSMC was founded.

    Some additional context makes Trump’s comments more ominous. According to reports, Trump believes that China is much more significant than Taiwan. &nbsp, John Bolton, who served as national security advisor in the Trump Administration, &nbsp, wrote&nbsp, that” One of Trump’s favorite comparisons was to point to the tip of one of his Sharpies and say,` This is Taiwan,’ then point to the historic]and large ] Resolute Desk in the Oval Office and say,` This is China.'”

    Trump admires Xi Jinping. &nbsp, Even after the US-China acrimony during the pandemic, Trump&nbsp, says&nbsp, Xi is” smart, brilliant” and” I like President Xi a lot” .&nbsp, Trump very much wants an economic agreement that would reduce China’s trade deficit with the US, something Trump has complained about repeatedly. &nbsp, The&nbsp, much-hyped&nbsp,” Phase One” bilateral trade deal of 2019 was an&nbsp, unsuccessful&nbsp, attempt.

    Perhaps Trump’s most recent statements are just some spooky love, a deception that would spooky Taiwan by increasing its defense spending. It’s not out of the question that Trump might try to negotiate a new megadeal with his friend Xi using Taiwan as a bargaining chip. If so, it would make sense for Trump to psychologically prepare his followers by promoting Taiwan as an unworthy and indefensible nation.

    Asia affairs analyst Grant Newsham, who strongly supports the US preparing to defend Taiwan in the event of war with China, &nbsp, said&nbsp, of Trump’s comments,” The language is a little odd … but Mr. Trump will have some good advisors around him. &nbsp, He’ll get this right”.

    Consider, however, that when he was president, Trump sat through four years of meetings with senior officials – such as&nbsp, Mike Pompeo, &nbsp, Elbridge Colby, &nbsp, Matt Pottinger, &nbsp, Mark Esper&nbsp, and&nbsp, Robert C. O’Brien– who strongly supported defending Taiwan. &nbsp, They seem to have influenced him little on this issue.

    A similar disconnect between the commander in chief and his top foreign policy advisors would likely be present in another Trump term. &nbsp, Project 2025, the blueprint for a second Trump Administration written by a Trump-aligned think tank, &nbsp, says&nbsp,” US defense planning should focus on China and, in particular, the effective denial defense of Taiwan” .&nbsp, But it is the US president, not the advisors, who decides whether or not to send US forces into a foreign conflict.

    Denny Roy is a senior felllow at the East-West Center in Honolulu.

    Continue Reading

    The second shooter theory gains momentum – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    In my initial evaluation of the Butler, Pennsylvania attempted murder of former president Donald Trump, I made mention of the possibility of a second shooter. &nbsp,

    More tones have been heard about the possibility of a second sniper since my article was published next Monday, July 15th. The FBI and the Secret Service continue to insist that there was only one shooter and have not done anything to look into Thomas Crooks, the 20-year-old gunman who was shot by a Secret Service rifle.

    The deceased Crooks &nbsp had no social media presence, no slogans, and no other records that could give any explanation as to why he planned for an invasion.

    Although there is conflicting information on whether he was the area of abuse in high college, most of that is way exaggerated, as his high school counselor&nbsp, has made apparent. &nbsp, High class counseling, at least the good people, are very attentive to the needs of their students. I am aware of this because my youngest child is a skilled and compassionate high school counselor.

    In any case, Crooks was graduating two years prior to the firing and was on his way to getting ready to pursue his education.

    Another problem with Crooks ‘ home setting is that it is typically being swept under the rug. &nbsp, Crooks lived at home with his relatives, both of whom are licensed cultural employees. My eldest child is also a social contractor with experience and license. She may identify a person who has been traumatized from ten thousand miles away, having served as an infantry officer and specialist in family problems and PTSD.

    Was the parents never be aware that the younger Crooks were having a problem? &nbsp, It is n’t possible for at least two reasons.

    The first refers to the distribution of bomb-making supplies to their house, with deals marked “hazardous materials”. Because Crooks worked during the day, one of the parents was most likely to pick up the plans. &nbsp, Were they wondering? ( I would not want something with the label “hazardous” delivered to my house, and I would ask if it had been one of my children who placed the order for it to be in the box or package. )

    The second has to do with Crooks ‘ father’s reported phone to the police because he allegedly worried about a problem. &nbsp, This was a person who evidently went to a weapon range pretty frequently, and going on Saturday would not be out of the common. &nbsp, Maybe they could not reach him by smartphone, although we do not realize that. &nbsp, What difficulty were they worried about?

    Obviously we do n’t know enough to render an actual judgement, but something is n’t right here.

    A picture that depicts the location of a second shooter ( Twitter )

    Crooks allegedly had three encrypted “foreign” accounts, but we do n’t know what they were. &nbsp, One implies the FBI is trying to figure that up, but right then we may explain why people, let alone Crooks, did have three secured international accounts. Were these records hid cash transfers or additional incriminating information?

    However, eyewitness accounts that claim that the shots came from two different directions ( and we are not talking about the shot or the shots fired by the Secret Service snipers ) support the argument for a second shooter. Some have made an effort to explain the shootings, and there is footage of at least two shots striking a wall on Trump’s quit. &nbsp, Testimony say that the position is bad for those photos to had come from Crooks’s AR-15. The water tower, which is much further away than Crooks ‘ top area, is a good candidate for an alternate area.

    We are unable to provide information on how several shell casings were discovered on the roof or how many rounds were fired by Crooks. &nbsp, His body was found with three bullet clips nearby ( presumably fully loaded, though we do n’t know ). &nbsp, These videos are presumed to be 30-round videos, which are legitimate and popular in Pennsylvania. ( A few state limit weapons videos to 10 sessions. The dawn of the shooting, allegedly, a gunman purchased 50 rounds of ammunition from a gun store, but that would not load his weapon’s three clips plus the clip that was already there.

    We have no information&nbsp, if spent guns were found and collected by the FBI or law enforcement. &nbsp, Ballistic&nbsp, knowledge could prove to be important in determining if only one tool was used.

    There is music of the intended execution. According to preliminary analysis, there were eight pictures, and possibly a ninth, which could have been Crooks ‘ final round. The sound is relatively ambiguous and calls for laboratory analysis, but there is less conclusive evidence that up to 15 shells were involved.

    The water building might have served as a target for a minute shooter.

    The FBI has one of the best criminal facilities in the world in Quantico, Virginia. &nbsp, It is state of the art, or perhaps beyond. &nbsp, Has the information been taken it? &nbsp, Has the chain of custody been adequately maintained?

    Given the utter sloppiness and cumulative&nbsp, incompetence of the Secret Service and local law enforcement assets in Butler, we do n’t know how the aftermath of the shooting was managed, if it was. &nbsp, For instance, there is no proof that eyewitnesses&nbsp, were carefully interviewed, or even if any of them were queried.

    Also the area&nbsp, was cleared and no effort was made to ask individuals to be for questioning. &nbsp, Nor is there any proof of systematic&nbsp, information gathering.

    The “rush to decision” to use Mark Lane’s popular guide title, is very awful and suggestive of a cover up.

    Worse still, Trump’s life is still in danger, and there is no reason to think someone wo n’t try to kill him once more.

    Stephen Bryen served as the Near East Subcommittee of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee&nbsp and as the deputy undersecretary of defense for policy. &nbsp,

    This&nbsp, article was first published on his&nbsp, Weapons and Strategy&nbsp, Substack and is republished with permission.

    Continue Reading

    US rhetoric of self-destruction? – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    The spread of conspiracy theories and facetious violence in these American votes are both a double-edged sword, which is a common issue.

    However, the attempt at former president Donald Trump and the very crazy interpretations given in the heat of the moment– and that will undoubtedly continue to spread – is the result of this atmosphere.

    It is a Pandora’s package that has been opened which should instead be closed that, right or wrong, the significant problems of the primaries are four:

    1. Public purchase. Folks, the middle class, feeling that violence is increasing.
    2. Immigration.
    3. Inflation.
    4. Some people believe there is a concern with the British decision-making method, which is too slow and very troublesome.

    On all of these four elements, Trump is powerful. If not for the January 6, 2021 event– whether you call it an uprising, a wild opposition, or an attempted revolt – if there were no attempt to deny the legality of President Joe Biden’s vote, today, perhaps, Trump would have the wind in his sails for his re-election.

    Trump’s claims on all these four concerns seem stronger than Biden’s. Biden and the Democrats dispute these problems, but they are always questionable. For instance:

    • There’s prices but there’s economic development.
    • Immigration is present, but because of the economy’s expansion, there are also labour scarcity.
    • Violence may be a matter of view because records may reveal one thing and the other.
    • Although the system is tedious, faults that may complicate things are avoided.

    But, the key reasoning against Trump is his aggressive language, his plan to reform the British “deep state”, and to transform America through nationalist rhetoric.

    If we removed this nationalist language now, Trump’s chances of being re-elected would be much higher.

    Therefore, it is in Trump’s best attention to decrease the tone and totally change his approach, to quit with this populist rhetoric, evidently abandon conspiracy theories and move to the center. Here are the undecided, those who might make a last-minute decision and support Biden, not because they are convinced of Biden’s plan but because they fear Trump’s extreme agenda.

    This might aid in the regaining of American unification. If it does n’t, then the legitimacy of the democratic process is in jeopardy. If the elections have a negative impact on both prospects, the outcome depends on their willingness to take a step back.

    In the 1960s and 1970s, America was swamped by harsh demonstrations. There were Russian incursions, the Black Panthers, and the killings of Martin Luther King, Robert Kennedy, and John Kennedy.

    It was a much more harsh and unpleasant situation than it is now. Even then, despite these assassinations, the British establishment – the northern part of America – found cohesion, which helped to conquer the episode of the Vietnam War and to change the Cold War around.

    Today, from an external perspective with an eye from Italy, but mainly from China, where I have been for many years, society is divided but not to the levels of violence of the 1960s and 1970s.

    However, the division at the top seems more dramatic and dangerous. Presidential candidates, in this case, Trump, are still disputing whether they lost the 2020 elections or not, casting a shadow over all American institutions.

    If one election is questioned, the next and the one after that will also be suspected. Therefore, the entire institution of the American system is distrusted, including Trump’s future possible election.

    If Trump were elected tomorrow, doubts would remain, just as doubts abound about the 2020 elections and the same would happen in 2024. Thus, it is a double-edged sword. Therefore, it would be beneficial for everyone to reclaim their social and intellectual harmony.

    The Roman Republic was founded on the choice of two consuls, who alternatedly ruled each day. At the end of the day, one would eventually surpass the other. This forced the two to coordinate.

    The American democratic system, with its division of powers, obligates or should obligate candidates to coordinate. The illegitimacy of one means one’s own illegitimacy, so if Trump declares Biden illegitimate, it casts doubt on Trump as well.

    What is essential at this moment, more than ever, is to save the American institution at all costs. Its “deep state” may not function perfectly, but it has been, so far, the guarantee of relative stability in the current world. If this fails, not only will America fail, but everything will fail.

    Russia and China would have issues because of the profound instability of the United States, which would have unanticipated consequences, or the externalization of internal contradictions, which would cause more frequent wars and conflicts. Today, it might be against Russia, and tomorrow, it might be against China, who knows what else?

    This opens up a hazardous scenario. With René Girard, the favorite philosopher of Peter Thiel, the new vice presidential candidate’s mentor, we can say there has been an attempt at sacrifice, blood has been drawn from Trump’s ear.

    We can and should expect positive outcomes from violence. As long as the American system prevails, who wins is not necessary.

    Words and future diplomacy

    Easy rhetoric can be dangerously extended abroad, not just domestic politics. Trump reportedly threatened to withdraw Taiwan’s support from China if it did n’t pay more for its defense last week. Taipei’s stock exchange crashed.

    It is about the quality of the substance and how you present it. Words like nomina nuda tenemus and a bug can be found in the middle of the Middle Ages, as scholastic monks would say. Words carry meaning.

    To be very practical, if the narrative is kept simple, nations in Europe or Asia might decide to strike a deal with Russia or China, which demand less protection money.

    And then, what will the US do? Accept it? Start a conflict with the former allies who are now under the control of the powerful Americans who want to strike a deal with?

    There are signs of this. Ursula von der Leyen, the re-elected EU president, has suggested creating a vice president of the Commission on Defense.

    They might indicate that you are becoming more cautious about potential heart-changes or pushes in the US. After all, Russia, the EU’s main threat, is an economic midget. If the EU were to put its weight into it, it might soon have an army to annihilate Russia until Vladivostok itself without the US.

    Despite the official rhetoric, Beijing itself did n’t want to break the delicate balance between Trump’s statements and the confusion sown by them. Taiwan is now scared: will the People’s Republic of China ( PRC ) push to bend Taiwan’s wobbling domestic consensus?

    Or will the US try to correct the misunderstanding by pushing the boundaries of strategic uncertainty, causing the PRC to lose face, and causing things to veer off track?

    In Taiwan, there are people who, rightly or wrongly, believe the US betrayed the KMT after World War II by failing to back it against the Communists. They also believe that the US once more betrayed the KMT when it cozied up with the PRC during the Cold War.

    These people believed Beijing to be more trustworthy than Washington because they made a lot of money with China. Therefore, they contend that concluding a deal with Beijing is preferable to having it done by Washington directly.

    This would have repercussions throughout Asia. Theoretically, it opens up opportunities for China, but it also might lead to Japan, Vietnam, and India forming an anti-China alliance independent of the US.

    It’s not the case that, without the US, Asian countries will just surrender to China. It’s much more complicated. Why should Japan be the only country that was historically never invaded by China? India remains the same, and Vietnam has fought northern invaders for a long time.

    Together, these three nations have a larger population and comparable economic and technological prowess to rival China. In theory, they could manage without the US.

    Alternative regional defense geometries are restrained by the US as an alliance. Its presence is beneficial in the EU, Asia, Russia, or China, where it might otherwise encounter a more bellicose environment.

    Trump has now opened the door to fresh ideas in the area and around the world. Can the bottle be refilled with the genie? And if so, how?

    Grand bargains

    Trump is said to want to sacrifice smaller states in favor of a Yalta-like grand bargain with China and Russia.

    If so, it would unleash a time of chaos. Many smaller nations would attempt to strike their own deals with Russians or Chinese people. Many nations may experience uprisings and uprisings as well.

    The situation is significantly different from the one in Yalta in 1944, when the US, USSR, and Great Britain divided the world between themselves just before Germany and Japan’s collapse. Then, the US got more than it started with, this time, it would get much less.

    Without its current empire, what could the US be like? In Asia, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam, India, and Indonesia, unwilling to be peddled to China, could turn against the US and the grand bargain.

    Trump’s statement on Taiwan has a grain of truth. Your independence and commitment to independence are demonstrated by the way you spend your money on your defense and by deploying your people. If the US pays for your fights, many may misunderstand—do n’t you want your independence? Do you think that the US is the real enemy? Each nation should make a decision.

    The US can help a nation, but it is wrong to start a war instead. As has happened in previous years in many areas with an overbearing US army presence, the national soldiers can soon accept that their problems are with the Americans, not the enemy. The US can look like a colonial power, which it is n’t. From there, many things can go wrong.

    The key to understanding each nation is the same: unite yourself and come together. However, stating this underscores the US’s sense of responsibility and freedom. It is about global security, of which America is a necessary fulcrum.

    However, ignoring the world’s worries and worries weakens everyone, starting with the US, which has the most to lose.

    Appia Institute first published this essay, and it has since been republished. Read the original here.

    Continue Reading

    Beijing highlights self-reliance at Third Plenum – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    A five-year plan that aims to modernize Chinese industries and advance economic reforms was adopted as the third plenary session of the 20th Chinese Communist Party (CCP ) Central Committee’s (CCP ) Central Committee’s ) third session came to an end on Thursday ( July 18 ). &nbsp,

    During the four-day Third Plenum, about 200 CCP Central Committee people approved the” Resolution on More Deepening Reform Comprehensively to Advance Chinese Modernization” during the session. &nbsp,

    A full of 165 different Central Committee people and some administrative officials, academics, experts and other State representatives also attended the chamber. At the time of Friday ( July 19 ), a full version of the resolution’s official version was not made public, but CCP officials gave more details at a press conference.

    ” The quality, with financial structural reform as the spear, fully plans reforms in several fields and features”, Tang Fangyu, deputy head of the CPC Central Committee Policy Research Office, said at a press briefing on Friday. ” The resolution puts forwards more than 300 important reform measures, all of which involve changes on the levels of devices, procedures and institutions”.

    Tang argued that China’s modernization process has many difficult issues that necessitate more extensive reforms to better adapt the interactions between production and productive forces, the superstructure to the financial foundation, and national governance to interpersonal development. &nbsp,

    According to Han Wenxiu, senior deputy director of the Office of the Central Committee for Financial and Economic Affairs, China will accelerate efforts to create a high-standard industry program, which is still a significant transformation challenge for the nation.

    He stated that efforts will be made to create a unified national industry, including the creation of a federal included technology and data business, a national power industry, and a unified urban-rural property market.

    The CCP stated in the Third Plenum’s communiquéique on Thursday that the overall goals of the further deepening of complete reform were to remain enhancing and developing socialism with Chinese traits and modernizing China’s technique and power for management. &nbsp,

    ” By 2035, we will have finished building a high-standard socialist market economy in all respects, more improved the structure of socialism with Chinese characteristics, usually modernized our structure and capacity for governance, and generally realized communist modernization”, the communique said.

    The People’s Republic of China will have completed the reform tasks set forth in the resolution by the time its 80th anniversary in 2029, and China will have complete modern socialist nationhood by the middle of this century.

    Beware of foreign ideologies.

    The communique and the resolution came after Qiushi, the CCP’s official theoretical journal, published an article on July 15 titled” Must maintain self-confidence and self-reliance”.

    China must continue to be unwavering in its convictions of Marxism and socialism with Chinese characteristics, according to the article, which is a collection of previous speeches by CCP General Secretary Xi Jinping. It said China should not” swallow foreign ideas without digesting them”, or” Shi Yang Bu Hua” in Mandarin. &nbsp,

    Xi used the phrase in a speech about Marxism in November 2015. Xi said at the time that China should incorporate Western economic and financial knowledge into its Marxist political economics principles and methodology. &nbsp,

    He argued that foreign knowledge that can spur China on its production and the market should be absorbed, but that information that reflects the nature and value of capitalist ideology should not be copied there.

    In other CCP articles,” Shi Yang Bu Hua” was used to remind readers that China should learn from its own cultural, political, and legal systems without becoming completely Westernized. &nbsp, &nbsp,

    Hung Yao-Nan, a political scientist at Tamkang University, stated in a panel discussion held on Thursday in Taiwan that Xi’s call for socialist modernization demonstrates how he rejects the West’s market economy and political systems, which he claimed have developed over the past 400 to 500 years.

    Hung said Xi still believes that the world is experiencing “major changes unseen in a century” and that Western civilization is expanding while China’s is growing despite recent economic setbacks.

    Ming Chu-cheng, a professor at National Taiwan University’s Department of Political Science, claimed that Xi’s economic reforms reverse those taken by former Chinese president Deng Xiaoping, who promoted decentralization and promoted flexibility in economic policies.

    Ming claimed that while Xi claims to support a “market economy,” he actually does the opposite by strengthening the authority of state-owned enterprises in the Chinese economy.

    Xi over-praised

    When Qiushi published Xi’s article on July 15, the official Xinhua News Agency also published a commentary praising Xi as China’s” supreme reformist”, a title higher than Deng’s “architect of China’s economic reforms”.

    According to the Xinhua article, Xi is another outstanding reformer on the same mission to modernize China, but that the top leaders each faced different circumstances. &nbsp,

    It said when Deng started the country’s liberalizing reforms, China’s GDP per capita was less than US$ 200, when Xi took office as CCP General Secretary in 2012, China was already the world’s second-largest economy with a GDP per capita of over$ 6, 000. However, it said some of China’s advantages, such as low labor costs, are now diminishing. &nbsp,

    ” The easy and joyful reforms have already been completed. Delicious meats have been eaten and the remains are all bones”, Xi was quoted saying in the article, with “bones” alluding to more difficult economic reforms. &nbsp,

    The article praised Xi for having doubled China’s GDP since 2012, a period over which he has overseen more than 2, 000 reform measures. The article was removed from China’s highly censored internet on July 16 for unknown reasons. It’s still available on overseas websites, however. &nbsp, &nbsp,

    Some commentators claimed that the article was politically incorrect because it exaggerated Xi’s economic accomplishments while the Chinese public believed the current state of the economy.

    As China faces many challenges, including a slowing economy, a property crisis and foreign technology blocks, it’s not appropriate to publish an article to praise Xi now, Yuan Juzheng, a professor at the Department of Philosophy, National Taiwan University, said in a TV program. &nbsp,

    Read: China mulls tax, fiscal reforms as land sales fall

    Follow Jeff Pao on X: &nbsp, @jeffpao3

    Continue Reading

    US scrambling to restock missiles for possible Taiwan war – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    By leveraging the production capacities of critical allies like Japan and Australia, the US Navy’s novel, affordable sea hit weapons program aims to recharge dangerously depleted stockpiles of long-range strike munitions in a possible Taiwan conflict.

    The US Navy has begun a search for industry input on a novel medium-range maritime strike weapon, the” Coalition Affordable Maritime Strike Weapon System” ( CAMS ), according to a report released this month from Breaking Defense, with plans to start production by the year 2027.

    Breaking Defense says the July 16 call shows a need for an affordable, widely sellable tool system deployed across several domains—air, floor and sub-surface. This program addresses the declining returns that some coalition partners are facing in maintaining and modernizing their mid-range maritime strike capabilities.

    According to the Breaking Defense report, CAMS is designed to strike targets at a minimum of 140 nautical miles, with adaptability for launches from aircraft’s vertical launch systems (VLS ) and at altitudes up to 40, 000 feet.

    It mentions that the US Navy intends to develop a system that will cost about US$ 1.5 million per product and have a production capacity of at least 250 rounds per year.

    According to Breaking Defense, the program aims to leverage global interest and increase the capacity for collective defense use of munitions production while the specific coalition nations that are interested in CAMS remain unnamed.

    The Ukraine war has shown that large-scale industrial wars of attrition are here to stay, with the industrial capacity to manufacture and replenish precision-guided munitions ( PGM ) a key strategic-level decisive factor.

    Seth Jones warns that the US may face a munitions shortfall in a potential conflict with China, especially for long-range PGMs, in a report from January 2023 for the Center for Strategic and International Studies ( CSIS ) think tank. Jonese points out that this might prevent the US from continuing to fight in the Taiwan Strait.

    Jones raises questions about the preparation of the US defence industrial base as the country reports that China’s price of acquiring high-end arms techniques is said to be five to six times faster than the US.

    He highlights that it can take two years to replace certain missile types, such as the Patriot PAC-2/PAC-3, Tomahawk Block V, Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missile ( JASSM) and Precision Strike Missile ( PSM).

    Jones mentions that CSIS war game suggest that in a three-week issue, the US may destroy over 5, 000 long-range weapons, with critical shortfalls occurring within the first year.

    Further, according to a US Congressional Research Service ( CRS ) report from October 2023, significant consolidation in the US defense sector may have weakened competition, potentially leading to higher costs and less innovation.

    According to the CRS report, reliance on a small number of manufacturers, particularly for sophisticated devices like PGMs, raises the possibility of offer disruption and national security concerns.

    Additionally, it asserts that the US relies on foreign sources for corporate and crucial elements, which could prevent the production and distribution of precision-guided weapons in times of issue.

    In response to potential output bottlenecks in US PGM, the US has considered co-production with friends like Japan and Australia.

    The US Department of Defense ( DOD ) reported in March 2024 that the US is working with allies to increase defense production capabilities.

    According to the statement, US Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Supportment William LaPlante cited the Ukraine conflict as a turning point for increased global cooperation in producing crucial weapons before the US Senate Appropriations Committee’s Defense Subcommittee.

    The US&nbsp, according to the DOD, is expanding this cooperative model to include PSM munitions and the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System ( GMLRS ), with plans to collaborate with Japan to create missile defense interceptors.

    It notes that this strategic move aims to protect allied security industrial bases, particularly in response to Russia’s increased military investing, estimated now at 7 % of GDP, and China’s boom in military result under its military-civil integration development strategy.

    In a March 2024 New York Times article, Damien Cave reported that the US is partnering with Australia to ramp up the production of precision-guided munitions.

    Cave mentions that US and Australian defense companies are working together to create artillery shells and guided missiles, like the GMLRS, in accordance with US DOD specifications.

    He asserts that these weapons will replenish US stockpiles and be accessible for sale to allies, noting that US munitions stockpiles have been stretched by the conflict in Ukraine and Gaza.

    Cave points out that the former’s expansive interior houses Australian production facilities for US munitions, with the Benalla munitions factory and Mulwala explosives factory playing important roles.

    However, Japan’s and Australia’s defense industries are struggling to increase PGM production due to their small, aging workforces and lack of production bases.

    Valerie Insinna mentions that Japan’s defense sector is dealing with an aging workforce and a shrinking supply chain in a June 2024 Breaking Defense article.

    In order to address those issues, Insinna points out that the” Act on Enhancing Defense Production and Technology Bases” ( also known as the” Act on Enhancing Defense Production and Technology Bases ) is being revived in Japan.

    The law encourages advancements in manufacturing productivity and cybersecurity, and rewards achievement of goals.

    However, Insinna points out that these reforms may be too little, too late in the current volatile strategic landscape. She adds that the Japanese defense sector faces additional challenges, such as labor shortages brought on by an aging population and the need to incorporate cutting-edge technologies like robotics and AI.

    Gordon Arthur claims in a Defense News article this month that Australia’s domestic small and medium enterprises ( SMEs ) are hampered by the government’s preference for large foreign contractors like Lockheed over domestic small and medium enterprises ( SMEs ).

    Arthur points out that Australia does n’t have a clear path for the gradual transition of PGM production from large contractors like Lockheed to Australian SMEs.

    He notices that there are more and more calls for the Australian government to support SMEs ‘ capacity-building initiatives. Additionally, he points out the strategic need for an indigenous defense sector that can deal with upcoming conflicts.

    Continue Reading

    Geriatric US politics reminder of USSR waning years – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    On February 25, 1985, Russian people went to the polls for one-party regional elections, and as usual, top officials cast ballots in people.

    Konstantin Chernenko, the general director of the Communist Party of the USSR, made a public ballot-casting announcement, as was typical for senior Russian leaders, even if only on live television. Because he had been out of the public gaze for two months, his performance was carefully anticipated.

    He was shown at a Kremlin voting stop, presumably. Surrounded by federal officials and magazine photography, he stood up and leaned on an secretary. He looked haggard. He mumbled a few welcome. Instead of reassuring citizens that the USSR was in good hands the telecast created an unsettling mix global: Who, exactly, is in charge of the huge, one-party, nuclear-armed condition?

    In 2024, the United States, basically an open political structure in which such a scene could never take place, is facing a similar, if somewhat drawn-out episode over its leader’s health. Joe Biden, a clearly frail and perplexed president, made a clumsy appearance at a discussion next month with his political rival, former president Donald Trump. Since then, his self-awareness as a worthy leader has disintegrated, according to beneficial media reports and public statements from members of his party.

    Former supporters, who want him to be replaced in the poll, are now putting him under assault.

    The comparison to the defunct USSR has been drawn between the Biden situation and the frail Communist leaders of the 1980s, Chernenko being the last of three ill top officials to pass away in office.

    Harold James, a Princeton University historian, wrote an essay titled” Slow Soviet America” four years ago, describing the US as in a period of Communist political decay. ” If it was n’t obvious already, the whole world now knows that the US lacks any strategic orientation or cohesive executive leadership”, James wrote.

    Last month, liberal pundit Niall Ferguson offered an upgrade. He outlined US weaknesses in the Soviet Union, including being overburdened by international obligations, having an outdated defense, falling education and health standards, and having low economic productivity in a heavily indebted world.

    ” Could you tell me about another innovative world where living standards declined, mortality levels rose, where 100, 000 people a month die of addictions? I may just think of one another case, and that’s the Soviet Union”? Ferguson asked. &nbsp,

    The Soviet-comparison is supported by the generations of the most influential figures when they passed away. Leonid Brezhnev, 82, had been sick for at least two centuries. His son, Yuri Andropov, was merely 68, but died after paying just 15 months in office after suffering severe brain issues. &nbsp,

    Chernenko had long bouts of heart problems, heart disease, and liver cirrhosis, and had only been alive for two weeks when he visited the Potemkin ballot box. He had only been alive for 11 months.

    Biden, age 81, passed away on Tuesday with Covid for the next moment. Trump is 78.

    The mysterious USSR regularly kept its officials ‘ health information secret. Their deaths, when announced, frequently led to intrigue and cruel power struggles. After Josef Stalin’s death in 1953, Nikita Khrushchev eliminated his best enemy, secret police captain Laventriy Beria, by having him executed for treason. The day of Chernenko’s next public look, a dapper Mikhail Gorbachev even appeared on TV at a real vote field, in the presence of Russian and foreign writers. He had already been signing off on government decrees in Chernenko’s name.

    Intrigue is a hallmark of efforts to halt Biden’s unsuccessful bid for the presidency and his refusal to support both. His geriatric conditions were kept out of the news by news organizations that had favored him over Donald Trump in the presidential election in 2020 prior to the debate.

    Some of the same outlets demanded that he leave the reelection stage after the debate was over. A broadcaster acknowledged Biden’s mental health was in decline two years prior to the notorious debate performance in an odd admission to CNN, the news network.

    ” This is one of those, you know, it’s the classic open secret”, said longtime CNN political reporter Chuck Todd. Everyone was afraid to talk about it because it’s the story everyone knows and it’s the one they were afraid to share it with.

    After the debacle, Biden went on a whirlwind tour of political rallies and radio and television appearances. He promised to run and triumph.

    Verbal missteps marred his performances. He introduced Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as his arch-enemy Russian President Vladimir Putin at the NATO summit he hosted in Washington. ” And now I want to hand it over to the president of Ukraine, who has as much courage as he has determination”, Biden intoned. ” Ladies and gentlemen, President Putin”.

    He also referred to his own Vice President, Kamala Harris, as” Vice President Trump”.

    Public statements and unidentified leaks to newspapers and television reveal the political assault on Biden by his own Democratic Party. Biden has been asked to leave the campaign by at least 20 congressional members and two senators. It’s a complicated request.

    Biden has already surpassed his party’s threshold in nomination races to claim victory at the Democratic Party’s upcoming convention. In order to start the convention, Biden would have to ban his supporters from casting ballots. Will his current vice president resign and leave the Biden voters behind? Her supporters are already warning party leaders against trying to oust her in favor of someone else.

    A number of media leaks have revealed efforts by senior party officials to persuade Biden to leave. The role of former Congressional leader Nancy Pelosi is at the forefront of these reports. Biden and she have been discussing leaving.

    Pelosi is a legendary fundraiser for Democratic candidates, so her efforts reflect the opinion of skeptical, rich backers of the party.

    There has n’t been any public skepticism from Biden about whether or not he’s willing to drop out, though some of the most recent reports suggest that.

    The president stated in his most recent interview that he would only resign if doctors told him, adding that “age can impart a little wisdom.” Presumably, that should mean Pelosi and her advice win the wisdom contest. After all, she is 84 years old.

    Continue Reading

    China’s Third Plenum vagueness misses the moment  – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    President Xi Jinping’s Communist Party delivered a number of the proper messages to wary investors concerned about the state of Asia’s largest economy at this year’s Second Plenum meeting, including pledges to “unswervingly stimulate” the private sector.

    But Xi’s team&nbsp, picked a difficult time to keep international investors guessing about&nbsp, how&nbsp, it plans to revive a US$ 17 trillion economy&nbsp, facing a&nbsp, quadfecta&nbsp, of troubles at house. And at a time when Chinese imports are being blocked by the West’s ever-increasing walls.

    True, Xi’s gathering generally waits several times before offering more detailed ideas about retooling. Later this month, businesses hope to learn more after China’s 24-member Politburo enacts.

    However, if ever there was a time to break with convention, it’s today. Xi did n’t hold the event in 2018, heightening expectations for clear economic smoke signals. Amid intense international confusion, the usual flow, drip, drip disclosure plan failed to study the intensity of the day.

    With the eyes of the world on the five-yearly approach program, Xi’s internal circle had an excellent opportunity to reset the reform tale. There was no better time to explain how Beijing will stop the&nbsp, home problems, maintain regional government finances, boost consumer demand and tackle mounting statistical challenges.

    What investors got instead were vague pledges of “high-quality development”,” Chinese-style modernization” ,&nbsp, “innovative vitality” &nbsp, and “actively expanding domestic demand”.

    In fact, this is a make-or-break time for China’s partnership with foreign funds. Although it’s nice to hear rumors about supply-side updates and about increasing domestic demand, more quality is required. The rebalancing of Chinese expansion engines has never been more important as the US and Europe’s strategy is to restore global trade wars.

    ” China’s administration has promised to continue fully deepening reformation in a wide range of areas”, says Julian Evans-Prichard, China scholar at Capital Economics. There are” a few indicators” that the recently concluded Third Plenum represents a significant shift in policymaking.

    Chinese companies dropped on Friday as a result of Xi’s disappointment with his party’s lack of specifics regarding revamping plans. The MSCI China&nbsp, Index&nbsp, fell as much as 1.6 %, while the nation’s Hong Kong-listed equities dropped more than 2 %.

    There were indeed enabling pivots, especially surrounding&nbsp, sustainability. Belinda Schäpe, a policy analyst for China at the Center for Research on Energy and Clean Air, says that the communication” for the first time mentions coal lowering.” ” This elevates China’s commitment to reducing emissions and tackling climate change&nbsp, to a new level”.

    Tianchen Xu at the Economist Intelligence Unit says that “innovation and efficiency improvements top all priorities, about quickly, amid the magnificent scenery of US-China rivalry”. Mostly, though, the Third Plenum appears to mark” a continuation of existing policy tweaks”, Xu notes.

    Many will argue that the Global South’s rise mutes the indirect effects of the new tariffs from Washington and Brussels. And, to some extent, that’s true. However, much of the Global South would also suffer significant blows as the world heads in the direction of” a trade war on all fronts,” as Gavekal Dragonomics analyst Yanmei Xie puts it.

    Xi ca n’t control who wins the US election&nbsp, on November 5. &nbsp, But whether it’s Joe Biden dictating trade policies or a Donald Trump 2.0 White House, 2025 is already littered with potential economic landmines. All the more reason for Xi and Li Qiang to take bold action right away to fix China’s fundamental flaws and advance its innovative game.

    It’s not like the economic environment will likely change significantly after six months. There’s little doubt, Xie adds, that a “new spirit of mercantilism is abroad in the US, with Donald Trump’s Republican Party proposing a ‘ baseline tariff’ on all goods imports, as well as targeted higher tariffs on imports from China, should it capture the White House”.

    Trump’s pick for vice president, US Senator JD Vance, said this week that” together we will protect the wages of&nbsp, American workers&nbsp, and stop the Chinese Communist Party from building their middle class on the backs of American citizens”.

    Vance is a staunch supporter of revoking China’s “most favored nation” trade status. Trump, in contrast, has previously remarked in interviews that he may soon begin a second term in office in 2025. Vance, too.

    As Trump tells Bloomberg:” I think manufacturing is a big deal, and everybody that runs for office says you’ll never manufacture again. We have currency problems, as you know. Currency. When I was president, I fought very strongly and hard with President Xi and with] Japanese leader ] Shinzo Abe. &nbsp, So we have a big currency problem because the depth of the currency now in terms of strong dollar/weak yen, weak yuan, is massive”.

    How a&nbsp, Trump-Vance team&nbsp, might proceed is an open question. The Federal Reserve should be abolished, according to the” Project 2025″ plan that Republicans are considering. That, in theory, could allow Trump’s White House to set US interest rates. Or might Trump try to create a new” Plaza Accord” that will require Beijing and Tokyo to accept more favorable exchange rates?

    Trump, remember, has talked openly about defaulting on US public debt as a negotiating tactic. Or reversing some of the debt that China holds as a form of retaliation. At present, Beijing holds about US$ 770 billion of US Treasury securities.

    Moody’s Investors Service may revoke Washington’s most recent AAA credit rating because of the mere whiff of such policies being considered. That, at a moment when the US national debt is hitting US$ 35 trillion, could shoulder-check trade-reliant economies through the Global South.

    This is just another reason why Xi and Li need to “roll up their sleeves.” To put real life on the backs of reform pledges, both past and present, rather than just to batten down the hatches.

    It’s unclear if Xi had intended to signal a change in his current outlook on state-led development and ally concerns among Chinese and foreign investors. Many people find it hard to resist the Third Plenum outline because it resembles the current course.

    ” Investment-led growth has peaked in China, as the&nbsp, financial system&nbsp, can no longer generate the same pace of credit expansion as in the past decade”, says&nbsp, Logan&nbsp, Wright, director of China&nbsp, markets&nbsp, research at Rhodium Group. ” With this source of growth drying up, household consumption growth will be the single most significant determinant of China’s long-term economic trajectory and growth rate.”

    Wright explains that a highly unequal distribution of income and low levels of household income restrict household consumption in China.

    ” Fiscal transfers from the state to lower-income households would catalyze additional spending, as would a more progressive distribution of income”, he says. ” Reducing savings rates alone is unlikely to boost overall spending significantly, given the low levels of savings among lower-income households”.

    Later this month, after the Politburo confab, Xi’s inner circle would be wise to offer specific policy shifts and timelines for implementation.

    After all, expectations were quite high heading into this week. It’s the first Third Plenum of the party’s 20th Central Committee since 2013. Xi delayed the last one, which would’ve convened five years ago.

    The event comes as&nbsp, China&nbsp, grew just 4.7 % year on year in the first quarter. A year-long property slump, a population decline, and investors worry that Xi may be more concerned with top-down control than creating new economic energy from the ground up as Beijing struggles with its worst deflationary run since 1999.

    A flurry of news leaks in state media as the week began set the stage for disruptive steps to grow the private sector, boost local authorities ‘ income through tax cuts, liberalize the “hukou” system for local registration, and boost mainland competition in the artificial intelligence space.

    A number of bigger-picture questions remain unanswered, including the status of more assertive efforts to remove bad assets from property developers ‘ balance sheets to prevent defaults, establishing more vibrant capital markets, creating social safety nets to encourage households to save and spend more, and the fate of internet platforms unsure about the regulatory outlook.

    Investors are well-versed in the opacity of senior party officials. What’s needed, though, is policy clarity — and&nbsp, the sooner the better.

    Party magazine Qiushi quoted Xi as saying that “forging Chinese modernization requires staying independent and maintaining self-reliance.” We must continue to advance our country and our country with our own resources, as well as keep a firm understanding of China’s development and progress.

    Words with which few could quibble. But also phrases devoid of the&nbsp, how, when, where&nbsp, questions that continue to surround the&nbsp, Xiconomics&nbsp, era now into its 14th year.

    ” In 2013 expectations were very high for that Third Plenum, the communique came out and was disappointing, then a few days later the full resolution was released, and people got excited that there was a lot more substance to the reform plans” ,&nbsp, says longtime China watcher Bill Bishop, who writes the Sinocism newsletter. I’m not sure if a similar dynamic will occur this time.

    But, Bishop adds,” those still hoping for any change of course will likely be disappointed. The leadership believes they are heading in the right direction, and the communique again reveals how far the reform process has advanced in a comprehensive way since the 2013 Third Plenum.

    There still seems to be a conflict between policies aimed at increasing economic security and expanding the supply-side of the economy, according to Evans-Pritchard of Capital Economics, and those aimed at increasing market forces ‘ influence and rebalancing growth toward consumption.

    Wherever things lie, policy-wise, Xi’s inner circle would be wise to match the barrage of slogans emanating from Beijing with details and timelines. The sooner the better.

    Continue Reading

    Russia has upper hand in ground war – but not at sea – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    A significant time in the sea conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been witnessed in the last few days. On Monday, July 15, Ukraine’s military official, Dmytro Pletenchuk, claimed:” The final police send of the Black Sea fleet of the Russian Federation is bolting from our Crimea only today. Consider this day”.

    This historic achievement serves as a reminder of Ukraine’s ongoing victory on the sea front of the conflict. While Kyiv’s floor soldiers continue to struggle and lose ground at points along the field, especially in the south of Ukraine, it’s a different tale at water.

    Russia’s Black Sea fleet has been unable to make a significant contribution to the conflict despite having a sizable quantitative benefits when it first started it. Moscow has lost command of the Black Sea, while also Crimea’s ports– including Sevastopol, usually a symbol of Russia’s energy – can no longer be seen as secure bases for its warships.

    A depleted Black Sea fleet

    There are only a few smaller patrol boats in Ukraine, and there are no major surface warships or submarines operating. With the aid of missiles and maritime drones, But Kyiv has developed a verifiable capability to use long-distance missiles to destroy Russian warships, as far ahead as Crimea. It serves as a lesson in the evolving nature of coastal battle and the growing power of asymmetrical weapons, or weapons that are much less expensive to produce than the destroyers they are destroying.

    Due to the fact that warships are among Russia’s most costly military assets and have a recruitment cycle that can last for decades, it poses a major issue for the country. Additionally, Turkey’s application of the Montreux Convention prevents the Black Sea fleet of Vladimir Putin’s exhausted fleet from being boosted by warships from Russia’s another fleets. This is the law that governs naval traffic through Turkey’s Bosphorus and Dardanelles straits, including that all allies ca n’t move warships through these straits.

    Moscow has no choice but to defend its remaining ships in the Black Sea, which explains the numerous “redeployments” further apart from Crimea – in certain, to the dock of Novorossiysk.

    Diminishing operating choices

    Some operational options are now out of the question because Russian surface warships ca n’t operate safely, especially in close proximity to Ukraine, such as starting an amphibious assault on Odesa. Also providing transportation to soldiers on land is proving a problem, while Moscow’s eventual loss to embargo Ukraine – in particular, its grain exports – has been instrumental in sustaining Ukraine’s business.

    Russia’s Kilo-class boats are also relatively safe when underground, and are able to establish Kalibr cruise rockets against goals in Ukraine. However, it is unlikely these submarines will be crucial for Russia’s heat strategy against Ukraine’s energy and human infrastructures, given their limited unpleasant threat compared with Ukraine’s resilience to damage. However, they can only contribute a small amount to the overall threat posed by Ukrainian air defense systems by Russia.

    At a symbolic level, Ukraine’s successes at sea constitute a political blow for Putin. Crimea is central to the president’s narrative of Russia’s revival as a “great power” that, on the domestic front, is a pillar of his regime.

    Meanwhile, Ukraine’s frequent victories over the Black Sea fleet are raising morale, at a time when it has become increasingly difficult to motivate Ukrainian soldiers who have been fighting on the front lines without witnessing” concrete” advances. In the context of a protracted war of attrition, the symbolic value of these successes should not be understated.

    Crimea as a breaking point?

    Russia has focused on the land, where it has consistently been gaining incremental amounts over the past 12 months or more. Yet Ukraine’s constant successes at sea are meaningful. They kick off a trend that began in April 2022 with the sinking of the cruise ship Moskva and later in July 2022 with Snake Island being recaptured. At least 27 Russian naval vessels have been seriously damaged or destroyed by Ukraine overall.

    These successful attacks should be understood in the wider strategic, operational, and tactical evolution of the Crimea conflict, not just as a victory over Russia’s naval forces.

    ISW map showing redeployment of Black Sea Fleet from Crimea to Russian mainland.
    By December 2023, Russia had abandoned most of its naval assets in Crimea. Institute for Research on War

    Pressures on Crimea are strategically important. Kyiv is aiming its sights on naval assets, airstrips, air defense systems, as well as transportation infrastructure, including the Kerch bridge, a crucial gateway for Moscow’s entry into the peninsula. These attacks have been boosted by the use of West-supplied long-range missiles.

    This forces Russia to almost operate on two fronts, forcing it to do so because the loss of Crimea, or even a significant setback there, would be disastrous both militarily and politically.

    On the mainland of eastern Ukraine, particularly in the Donbas region, Russia has a massive numerical advantage. Russia is becoming more and more aggressive in Crimea, where Ukraine can use a flexible strategy and make the most of asymmetric technologies. And these successes in the Black Sea and Crimea can divert Russia’s resources and attention away from the land front.

    Ukraine’s “victory at sea” will not directly help its forces on the ground– at least, not for now. However, any significant breakthrough, such as if Kyiv was able to finally end the Kerch bridge, could have a significant impact on the outcome of the conflict.

    Basil Germond is a professor of international security in the Department of Politics, Philosophy and Religion, Lancaster University.

    This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

    Continue Reading

    Africa’s population boom: challenges, opportunities – Asia Times

    By:
    On:
    In: Asia

    Africa’s population may continue to rise swiftly over the next few decades, mainly in the Sahel. While this pattern has both perks and downsides, it has a substantial impact on global operations. Specifically, Africa’s demographic increase may be among the factors behind local issues, food vulnerability and unrestrained movement.

    The data are emphatic: by 2050, Africa’s entire population may increase to about 2.5 billion, an impressive get compared with 1.36 billion inhabitants in 2023. In less than 80 times, one out of every two children abroad will be African.

    The good news is that the higher proportion of people in the workforce benefits American nations and the rest of the world. However, a larger proportion of young people puts added social and security risks and economic burdens on institutions.

    The problem is that many African countries may struggle to meet their meal manufacturing goals as a result of the population growth. Nigeria and Ethiopia are currently the top two countries in the world with the highest number of children who are malnourished. Four of the top five are located in Africa right now.

    Despite one five of Africa’s people being undernourished, the area is not any closer to achieving the goal of eradicating poverty. On average, African governments allocate just 3.8 % of their budgets to crops, while some have cut their spending in recent years.

    Africa: peninsula of hope and melancholy

    ” Looking at Africa requires diversity and knowledge of living conditions that are fundamentally different from Europe”, Rudolf G. Adam, a security analyst at the Liechtenstein-based GIS, told this writer.

    ” Africa is giant. The Arabic-Islamic North and the South have a lot of variations. The length between Cairo and Johannesburg is the same as Beijing and Ankara.

    ” To grasp Africa, both relative and absolute numbers issue, above all the relation to Europe. In 1950, Europe ( excluding Ukraine and Turkey ) had about 400 million people, Africa 100 million. Now, these images read 500 million and 1.000 million. In 2050, they will be 500 million and about 2.500 million. That implies: A relation of 4: 1 is changing into 1: 5 within one decade. Migrant pressure is bound to fall, “he said.

    Nigeria will have about 400 million people in 2050, which is more than the US; however, there could be 650 million in 2100, making it the third-most populous nation after China and India, with about 700 per square km, making that number nearly twice as many people as Haiti. Does this create comparable social and political conditions?

    ” Africa has fantastic success and abject poverty. Money disparity is one of the main problems in many countries”, the professional continued.

    ” Population development is very unevenly distributed. South Africa, accounting for about 40 % of the productivity of the entire continent, has a shrinking population – a terrible consequence of AIDS ( as has Botswana ). The highest development costs are in countries with weak economy and delicate surroundings, especially in the Sahel zone”, Adam added.

    Problems and violence

    As of 2023, sub-Saharan Africa was considered to be the world’s violence hotspot, accounting for around 50 % of all victims killed in the previous month. Radical aggressive organizations that are active in the Sahel are getting more powerful, threatening to infect Africa.

    Among the most dangerous ones are the Islamic State-Sahel Province, the Islamic State in the West American Province, and Jama’at Nasr al-Islam al Muslimin. The latter was labeled by the Economist in 2022 as the country’s fastest-growing terrorist party.

    Although populations are seen as a supplementary issue, aggressive conflict is more likely to result in African countries with faster population growth. According to the UN experts, hunger, thirst, and unemployment create a conducive environment for the growth of criminal organizations.

    The selection of kids by terrorists is of particular concern. Children make up more than half of the entire people in each of the nations affected by the Boko Haram attacks.

    Unregulated migration

    Migration is a significant source of labor, which benefits both the sponsor and the countries of origin. The latter benefit financially as foreign workers help to fill workers gaps, while the latter profit from remittances sent by immigrants.

    In the meantime, despite all the drawbacks, movement can cause significant hazards. The number of illegal African refugees has been steadily rising in recent years, according to the Africa Center record.

    The majority of refugees are one, young Africans who are primarily moving to urban areas on the continent. However, a part of these choose Europe and the Middle East as sites. According to the 2024 World Migration Report, there have been more than two more Africans residing outside the region since 1990, with Europe witnessing the biggest improve.

    What to do

    The universe is aware of the problem, and some powerful efforts are now live. West African nations established the Ouagadougou Partnership ( OP) in 2011 to advance family planning. 1.18 million more African girls have used contemporary contraception in the last ten years thanks to the OP work.

    Women’s autonomy and gender equality are another appealing field of work. This approach kills two birds with one rock, which is what makes it so intriguing. On the one hand, a greater number of educated working women refers to the country’s economic growth, on the other, compelled women usually have fewer children.

    According to Adam, “if the developed world wants American countries to foliage and to stop an always rising and excessive exodus, it will need to get more engaged directly to create green, interesting perspectives for the idealistic to stay and to build a better future for themselves and for their countries.” ” At the moment, Africa is still looked upon as a cheap reservoir from which to meet outside demands: food, minerals, energy, and qualified personnel ( doctors )”.

    ” Better birth control may be a key to wealth and social stability”, the professional noted. ” For Europe, the future of the Sahel area will be important. At the moment, Russia and China seem to be gaining a hold it. Africa deserves more attention. It is great time to give it more prominence worldwide. That requires, above all, looking at the globe with a separating eye”.

    Continue Reading