With allies distracted, Assad’s regime finally falls in Syria – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

A key moment in Middle Eastern modern history is witnessed by the sudden and unexpected fall of Damascus, the capital of Syria, to Sunni opposition forces.

Since the onset of common protests in 2011, Bashar al-Assad’s government had endured more than a decade of rebellion, civil war, and international restrictions. However, it fell apart in a remarkable short amount of time.

Regional powers are scrambling to evaluate the consequences and its broader implications as a result of this unexpected turn of events, with the criticism advance without considerable battles or opposition.

This significant development signs a reshuffling of regional energy dynamics. Additionally, it raises questions about Syria’s prospects and the part that its neighbors and international partners play in regulating the post-Assad environment.

What does Syria’s potential keep?

With the fall of the Assad regime, Syria is then divided and divided between three strongholds, each with a different objective and additional supporters:

1. Arab opposition forces, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham: These organizations, supported by Turkey, today control northern Syria, extending from the northern border with Turkey to the southern border with Jordan.

The Sunni groups have a history of domestic conflicts, which may prevent them from forming a coherent state or maintaining long-term stability despite their common religious identification.

The opposition groups range from previous Islamic State and al-Qaeda jihadists to liberal organizations like the Arab National Army, which split from Assad’s military following the rebellion in 2011.

2. Kurdish causes: The Kurdish organizations have control over the territory in northern Syria, which borders Turkey in the northern and Iraq in the south. The United States, which has built martial installations in the area, continues to support them. This help runs the risk of escalating tenses with Turkey, which views Kurdish enslavement as a threat to its geographical dignity.

3. Syrian causes: Pro-Assad Alawite factions, generally situated in the southern regions of northern Syria, maintain robust ties with Iran, Iraq and Lebanon’s Hezbollah violent party. These areas may function as a redoubt for remnants of Assad-aligned organizations after the opponent’s acquisition, perpetuating religious divides.

Given Syria’s current severe divisions and turmoil, as well as the absence of a consensus-building mediator, indicate that there may be more instability and conflict in the future.

How will this affect the place?

The big Middle Eastern players have important implications from the Assad regime’s swift demise.

The Sunni insurgent troops, with solid Greek support, capitalized on a time of risk in Syria. Russia and Iran, along with their ongoing conflict with Israel, were the Assad administration’s friends, who were preoccupied with their ongoing issue. The rebels had a proper opportunity to advance quickly across Syria to Damascus, the country’s money.

Turkey has been successfully occupying a section of northern Syria where its government has been fighting Arab Kurdish forces. Turkey is anticipated to increase its political and military impact in Syria today, with the support of its Arab opposition supporters, creating more difficulties for the Kurdish majority fighting for its independence.

Israel is also in a better placement on a strategic level. The fall of Assad disrupts the so-called” shaft of weight”, comprised of Iran, Syria and Tehran’s substitute organizations like Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Iran’s crucial defense provide lines to Hezbollah are likely to be severed, isolating the militant group, and good weakened even more.

Also, the division of Syria into ethnic and religious groups may lessen Israel’s regional focus, making it easier for it to pursue its larger strategic objectives. After Israel agreed to a peace with Hezbollah last month, for example, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu&nbsp, emphasized&nbsp, a change in focus to combating the” Egyptian risk”.

Iran, however, has the most to lose. Assad was a vital ally in Iran’s local substitute system. And Hamas and Hezbollah, Israel’s various partners, have now suffered significant harm, and the collapse of his government comes as a result. Iran’s local influence has now been greatly diminished, leaving it more susceptible to direct issue with Israel.

Syria’s division even poses major security threats to its neighboring nations, Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. Migrant flows, cross-border murder and sectarian tensions are likely to rise. Turkey is now home to more than 3 million Palestinian refugees, many of whom it anticipates returning home today that Assad’s government has been overthrown.

This volatility may only make their delicate political and economic conditions worse for Iraq and Lebanon. In the name of autonomy, the Balkanization of Syria was entice different ethnic and religious groups to fight against local administrations. This could lead to regional fight being sown down and continued conflict.

While many Syria have hailed Assad’s drop, it’s still to be seen how much their lives will improve. Restrictions are unlikely to be lifted in Syria because there isn’t a unified and globally recognized government there.

This will put pressure on the now devasted Arab market, aggravate the humanitarian problems, and possibly stoke extremism.

Ali Mamouri is exploration brother of Middle East Research, Deakin University

The Conversation has republished this post under a Creative Commons license. Read the original post.

Continue Reading

Yoon coup a gift to foes at home, bad for solidarity with Japan, US – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

Koreans and the rest of the world were caught off guard by Yoon Suk Yeol’s surprising coup attempt. The declaration of martial law shocked Koreans and sent ripples through Washington and Tokyo despite the country’s harsh social conflict between progressives and conservatives.

Korea appeared to be on the verge of a possible violent conflict between the armed forces and a large number of activists for a few hours. The establishment of political organisations achieved a swift and comforting victory.

The rejection of civil community, the media, and even the liberal Peoples Power gathering to bow down to threats of repression echoed the National Assembly’s unanimous decision to overturn the military law declaration outside the building.

The ambiguous course of the upcoming months tempers the festival of democracy. Yoon is attempting to reach a pose of rebellion, hoping he may live.

On Saturday night, the National Assembly voted to remove the president from office, with protesters blocking the pavements of Seoul. The opposition plans to try again, but the ruling party politicians walked out on the matter, preventing the two-thirds majority voting that would be necessary for the impeachment. No matter what the result, Yoon’s law is effectively over.

Democratic party chief Lee Jae-myung will probably win if an early presidential election is held, after Yoon lost the previous battle by less than one percent.

Why President Yoon took this huge risk with seemingly little preparation and the only support of a select group of close allies still unresolved, not the least of which is why. How much was the martial ready to back Yoon’s rebellion? Why was Washington, which has invested so much in the achievement of the Yoon state, caught off guard?

What seems more obvious is that the Progressive Democratic Party’s replacement of Yoon may actually alter important aspects of South Korea’s foreign and security policies, starting with those with Japan and China, the United States, and North Korea.

One crucial section of the senate decision that the National Assembly was given evidence of contained hints at what might be on the progressive agenda. The resolution included this indictment of the government’s foreign policy, along with the serious crimes against Yoon that were most likely an illegitimate attempt to use the martial law rules.

” In inclusion, under the guise of so-called’ value diplomacy,’ Yoon has neglected political balance, antagonizing North Korea, China, and Russia, adhering to a ridiculous Japan-centered foreign policy and appointing Pro-Japan individuals to essential government positions, thus causing isolation in Northeast Asia and triggering a crisis of war, abandoning his duty to protect regional security and the people”.

This is interpreted by seasoned observers of Korean politics as a sign of how forward-thinking foreign policy will be both after Yoon leaves and if Lee Jae-myung is elected president.

” Now the opposition party has even more incentive to do a wholesale cleansing of all Yoon policies, including foreign policy”, Benjamin Engel, a visiting professor at Seoul’s Dankook University, told Toyo Keizai Online.

” If a normal democratic transition had taken place, we might have had a slightly healthier discussion about the benefits and drawbacks of what Yoon’s foreign policy accomplished and what needs to be preserved or revised.” That won’t happen now”.

Relations with Japan are at the top of the progressive target list, as the impeachment resolution makes clear. Yoon’s outreach to Japan has received a lot of criticism from the Democratic party, who claims that South Korea has repeatedly made concessions to Japan regarding issues from wartime history, such as the forced laborers, without receiving much in return.

Although there is a lot of public support for improving relations with Japan, Yoon’s ignominious demise may have tarnished that effort.

” If the opposition party grasps power, current Korea-Japan relations will go through a very rough time, as well as Korea-US relations”, predicts a former senior South Korean official who remains very engaged in Japan policy. In particular, the progress made in building trilateral security cooperation between Japan, Korea and the US” will no longer be viable”.

The opposition Democratic Party’s most powerful supporters continue to support positive relations with Japan, but they also stress the need to win the Korean public’s support and encourage Japan to be more forthcoming.

” The administration’s unilateral foreign policy approach has failed to build political momentum”, National Assembly member Wi Sung-lac, a former diplomat and close foreign policy advisor to former presidential candidate Lee, told this writer. ” Public opinion continues to decline, particularly regarding historical issues like Japan’s refusal to apologize and its denial of forced labor.”

Wi pledged that if the Democrats return to power, the” stance that Korea-Japan cooperation is necessary will remain unchanged”. But he added,” the pace of progress will depend on Japan’s response. If Japan responds constructively, there is significant potential for improving bilateral relations, though the speed and intensity of that improvement will vary”.

The potential change in Seoul’s government challenges Shigeru Ishiba’s government. As part of preparations to mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations, the prime minister had been making plans for a trip to South Korea in January. Ishiba has been more willing to address issues involving Japan’s colonial and military past than he has personally been about maintaining close ties with Korea.

At the least, this effort will have to deal with months of political uncertainty. A progressive government will eventually emerge and want to halt Korea-Japan’s ties. And that may be compounded by the return of Donald Trump, who does not share the Biden administration’s commitment to creating more durable trilateral cooperation.

” Now, the Japanese government must prepare for a perfect storm”, says Tobias Harris, the head of the Japan Foresight consulting firm.

Japan will have a US president who not only favors bilateral multilateral negotiations but also has shown little interest in strengthening trilateral cooperation. The swing to the left could happen in Tokyo in 2025 instead of 2027.

Progressives have also objected to US attempts to impose a de facto China containment strategy, as the impeachment resolution suggests. If Trump pushes hard in this direction, and makes demands on the alliance such as higher defense cost sharing, he may meet some resistance.

” But since the US-to-South Korea alliance is so well-liked, I don’t see Lee or another progressive trying to undermine it,” says Engels. Trump will give that a major impetus, according to Trump.

Lee, Engels says,” will be more neutral, I think, in US-China competition. However, even liberals are limited in how far they can travel from China. The general public in South Korea will oppose it.

An attempt to resume diplomatic contact with Kim Jong Un and North Korea might be a potential area of convergence between Trump and a progressive administration. Moon Jae-in’s progressive government supported Trump’s first administration’s efforts to reach a deal with Kim. It’s not entirely clear whether North Koreans will be interested in continuing this effort, even if the party will change in Seoul.

” Their current line is that the South is the enemy nation no matter who is in charge”, Fyodor Tertitskiy, an expert on North Korea and a Lecturer at Korea University, told Toyo Keizai Online.

” The previous left administration failed to deliver anything substantial for them– so it seems they (or, rather, Kim personally ) have lost any hope in South Korea. Having said that, I think they would definitely prefer the Democrats to People’s Power, since at least the left would be far less aggressive, and maybe even deferential in their policy towards Pyongyang”.

Indeed, Yoon has led a sharply anti-Communist turn in South Korea. In his declaration of martial law, he claimed to be assisting pro-North Korean forces that were attempting to overthrow the South Korean government.

In ultra-conservative circles, where Yoon was viewed as their savior, these views have been permeated for a while. But Yoon’s attempt to point the finger at Communists” will backfire and undermine his leadership”, says the former senior official.

For now, Yoon clings to power in Seoul. The former senior official describes him as having” a seige mentality because of recent all-out political attacks against him and his wife from the opposition party and even from within his own ruling party.”

Yoon’s desperation, sadly, may end up destroying one of the most significant achievements of his troubled time in office, the restoration of relations with Japan and the beginnings of serious cooperation.

At Stanford, Danel Sneider teaches on international policy.

This article was first published by The Oriental Economist. It is republished with permission.

Continue Reading

Yoon survives impeachment but Korea’s crisis far from over – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

After his ruling party’s boycott of Saturday’s ( December 7 ) vote, South Korea’s National Assembly failed to receive the 200 votes needed to remove President Yoon Suk Yeol. However, the government’s unexpected political crisis is still ongoing, as opposition politicians have pledged to file a new prosecution petition in the coming days.

Before today’s prosecution vote, rumor-busting members of the ruling People’s Power Party walked out of the parliamentary chamber, putting an end to the speculation that Yoon might be in trouble with his surprise decision to impose martial legislation this month, which he retracted after about six days.

Yoon stated in a televised address on December 3 that he would impose martial law to overthrow “pro-North Vietnamese and anti-government makes.” Then Yoon imposed a ban on all National Assembly activities and deployed military forces to detain key opposition figures and seized control of the legislature.

But, lawmakers defied the order and finally convened to voting down the military law order universally. The president’s deposed order was afterwards called an illegal self-coup effort by six opposition parties, who later filed an senate motion against him.

Even though at least two of its legislators had already indicated they would vote against the group’s collection as of December 6, the People’s Power Party formally declared its opposition to impeachment.

Yoon’s next unexpected regional address, delivered a few hours before the prosecution vote, consolidated the group’s rank and file. Yoon expressed his deep regret in a small talk,” I apologize to all South Koreans who were surprised by the military law.”

“I’ll give my gathering the rest of my term and all the steps I need to maintain the nation.” Our party and the government may assume responsibility for progressing up, Yoon continued, suggesting that he would delegate some of his political duties to the party.

A protester marches against the principal entrance of the National Assembly on December 7 and posts a banner urging Yoon Suk Yeol’s senate. Photo: Kim Jung-yeop

Yoon’s group is then expected to have a bigger influence on how the nation is run, which may or may not help give the People’s Power Party’s waning legitimacy to be a minority group in the government. His apologies even provided a pretext for the ruling party to rebel against popular opinion.

Ruling group chief&nbsp, Han Dong-hoon&nbsp, held a meeting with Prime Minister&nbsp, Han Duck-soo&nbsp, shortly after Yoon’s talk, at which they were expected to had sketched out how the government would run following the vote.

However, over one million South Koreans gathered in front of the National Assembly in freezing temperatures to require Yoon’s prosecution. The majority of voters predicted that Yoon may lose in the election.

” I think there will be politicians who vote against group ranges”, a 43-year-old rebel Kim Young-ae told Asia Times. Yoon is demonstrating his stubbornness when he needs to move over. I hope the ruling group gets a morality”.

Another prototype, Kim Dong-yoon, said, “people are now walking on the road to success. We are making history by presiding over the crimes against the traitor Yoon Suk Yeol and his fans.

But, as the ruling party users walked out, making the vote debate, desire and enthusiasm turned to despair. Some protesters sobbed and yelled profanity at the floor, while others yelled at one another in protest. The majority of them appeared confused and drained.

Is the ruling party definitely a people’s group? asked 28-year-old Park Seo-yeon. They “illegally boycotted the ballot to serve their interests,” the statement read.

Some took issue with the Women’s Power Party’s approach of opposing prosecution.

” There are so many people gathered around. They ought to exercise some dignity and at least ballot. They are disrespecting the citizens and the congressional branch”, said 33-year-old Song Yoo-min.

After the ruling party lawmakers left the chambers, unhappy activists surrounded the 1.4 square-kilometer National Assembly, properly blocking them in. Some protesters stormed the Person’s Power Party’s primary business, where they locked antlers with local law enforcement.

Lee Jae-myung, head of the Democratic Party, the world’s largest opposition party, called the People’s Power Party a” treacherous and illegal group” and vowed to introduce the prosecution movement again on December 11.

Lee stated in a press conference that his party do” consistently introduce the prosecution motion each month” in the hopes that the ruling party may experience more tension each time it casts a ballot against it.

The ruling party claimed that the impeachment would have “paralyzed government operations and suspended a constitutional government.” Instead, it suggested other ways to hold the president accountable for his martial law decree, including a potential constitutional amendment to shorten the term.

Meanwhile, Prime Minister Han’s role in government is projected to increase significantly. Han stated in a press release that he would do everything in his power to make sure” this situation is resolved as soon as possible and that people’s lives are kept stable.”

Han, the leader of the ruling party, added,” I will work with the prime minister to provide for the public.” Under the country’s constitution, the prime minister’s role is to assist the president and direct the ministries following orders from the president.

However, experts expressed concern that South Korea’s already polarized society will become even more divided if the impeachment process is unreliable.

At a symposium held on December 6th, Ahn Doo-hwan, a professor of political science at Seoul National University, said,” The impeachment process can further polarize South Korean society.”

” Korea’s conservative]ruling ] party cannot settle on a new ideology to rally around. That is why they bring in outside celebrities]like Yoon ] to garner the public’s support. And sometimes that backfires”, Ahn added.

In front of the National Assembly on December 7, protesters demonstrate and wave flags in support of Yoon Suk Yeol’s impeachment. Photo: Kim Jung-yeop

Another SNU professor, Kang Won-taek, said,” Yoon is no longer in a position to lead the government”.

The symposium’s seven political experts all agreed that Yoon’s martial law was unconstitutional and illegal. However, no one could come to an agreement on how South Korea could emerge from this political unrest as a resilient democracy.

The only thing that seems certain right now is that as South Korea’s political crisis develops, the streets of Seoul will be rife with protesters.

Lee Seung-ku is a Seoul-based freelance journalist.

Continue Reading

Australia’s nuclear sub plan sinking on multiple fronts – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

A poor US manufacturing base, uncertainty from a second Trump administration, and a reluctance to share nuclear technology are the reasons Australia’s nuclear underwater interests are under attack by the AUKUS security agreement.

US SSNs could serve Australian and US SSN missions in the region, according to a report released by the US Congressional Research Service ( CRS ) in October.

Such an arrangement would be similar to existing ones between the US and some of its NATO and other allies on significant naval assets such as aircraft carriers, large surface combatants, SSNs, amphibious warfare ships and non-naval capabilities such as nuclear weapons, space-based capabilities and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ( ISR ).

There are a number of other options for planned SSNs for Australia, according to the CRS report. These include forwards cycles of US and UK SSNs to Australia, three to five US SSN operations outside of Australia, or Australia spending money that were originally intended for SSNs in other assets, such as B-21 bombers and another long-range hit plane.

The report discusses additional variations of these options, including the possibility that Australia would continue investing in US and indigenous underwater construction capacity while American SSNs continue to build their Asian SSNs.

Another change that the report mentions is that Australia was continue investing in other martial resources to support a US-Australia division of labor while US SSNs may continue to perform American SSN missions continuously.

The CRS record warns that if Australia’s SSN plans under AUKUS reach a cost-death circular, it could decrease Australia’s money for other military features, adversely impacting Australia’s barrier capabilities versus China.

Contrary to the site’s earlier hype enthusiasm, the CRS record may indicate a major change of heart for AUKUS regarding SSNs for Australia.

One of these factors might be a sagging US submarine construction base. A 2023 US Congressional Budget Office ( CBO ) report mentions that the US faces significant challenges in its submarine production base, directly impacting the AUKUS’s submarine-sharing goals.

According to the CBO report, US submarine production struggles with cost overruns, construction delays, and missed deadlines. It notes that this is compounded by a 50 % projected increase in submarine construction workload over the next decade, as the US Navy aims to produce five types of submarines simultaneously, including Virginia-class, SSN ( X ) and Columbia-class nuclear ballistic missile submarines ( SSBN).

The report says the high cost of implementing the US Navy’s 2024 shipbuilding plan, driven by surging submarine expenses, exacerbates these issues. It proposes that submarine construction will surpass historical funding levels, putting the AUKUS’s goal of having SSNs by the 2030s in jeopardizing.

Uncertainty over a second US Trump administration’s stance on AUKUS has compounded doubts about Australia’s SSN acquisition ambition.

David Andrews mentions Donald Trump’s return to the White House in a November 2024 article for The Conversation that raised significant questions about the AUKUS agreement‘s future. Andrews points out that the Australian government has expressed concern that Trump may attempt to renegotiate or revoke the deal.

He mentions that this concern stems from Trump’s history of demanding greater financial contributions from allies, as seen in South Korea, Japan, and NATO, with AUKUS possibly being subjected to similar demands. According to Andrews, the AUKUS agreement allows any party to withdraw with a 12-month notice, which depends on political will.

In keeping with that, Australian Greens defense spokesperson David Shoebridge stated in August 2024 that AUKUS places the US and UK above responsibility. According to Shoebridge, the agreement includes numerous exit clauses that allow the US and UK to back out of Australia without receiving compensation and hold Australia accountable in the event that the formers ‘ SSN technology fails.

Vice Admiral Jonathan Mead, the head of the AUKUS submarine program, was reportedly contacted by ABC News in July 2024 to ask if Australia would be reimbursed if the US didn’t deliver nuclear-powered submarines as part of the AUKUS agreement.

Senator Shoebridge allegedly inquired about the US$ 4.7 billion ( US$$ 3.3 billion ) payment during an Australian Senate estimates hearing in order to find out whether there is a refund clause. Mead reiterated the US’s commitment to providing two Virginia-class submarines by the early 2030s, but he avoided addressing the implausible issue of non-delivery.

Andrews notes bipartisan support for AUKUS in the US Congress, but Trump’s unpredictable foreign policy approach and potential demands for more Australian contributions raise questions about the stability of the agreement.

Australia’s refusal to cooperate with the US and the UK on nuclear power may also serve as a stumbling block to its SSN ambitions, which will prevent the construction of the nuclear infrastructure required to run SSNs.

ABC News reported in November 2024 that Australia has declined to join a UK and US-led pact to accelerate civilian nuclear energy development, citing the technology’s inapplicability to the country.

Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles stated in the report that developing nuclear energy would be Australia’s most expensive option for electricity because the nation lacks a civilian nuclear industry. It states that the UK and the US had initially anticipated Australia to sign the deal, but the Australian government ultimately backed it, focusing instead on switching to renewable energy sources.

While AUKUS’ SSN ambitions are lofty, some analysts believe that its rationale may be ambiguous, impractical, and militarily unsound. Sam Roggeveen cites AUKUS critics in a March 2024 article, where neither the Morrison nor Albanese governments can explain in detail what the SSNs are intended to accomplish.

Roggeveen points out that the discussion has primarily been focused on hazy definitions of “deterrence” without having a thought-provoking discussion about how best to achieve it.

He makes the claim that he had doubts about the Australian Labor Party’s sincerity in backing AUKUS, saying it was more a matter of political calculation than genuine conviction. He also emphasizes the project’s financial burden, which could lead to cost overruns and program delays, potentially straining other defense budgets.

Roggeveen also points out concerns about the potential impact of a second US Trump administration, including worries that Trump might not support it. Notably, he wonders whether the AUKUS SSN project is a wise idea, suggesting that Australia should use its geographic distance to avoid attempting to project military power into China’s near seas.

Continue Reading

China business groups campaign against using US chips – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

After the US announced new export controls to prohibit the shipment of high-end US cards to China, four Chinese business organizations have asked their members to refrain from purchasing American tradition semiconductors due to” safety” issues. &nbsp,

Individual claims from the Internet Society of China, the China Semiconductor Industry Association, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, and the China Association of Communications Enterprises stated that the most recent US device export controls have shaken Chinese firms ‘ trust and confidence in using British cards.

According to the Internet Society of China, Taiwanese companies should carefully select whether to purchase US cards internally or from abroad. &nbsp,

US cards are no longer safe and trustworthy, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, because Washington’s device export controls against China have hampered American firms ‘ supply chains and raised operating expenses.

The organization did not go into detail about how the change in US export regulations affected the quality of American bits. &nbsp,

Foreign product manufacturers are unsure whether to pursue these organizations ‘ recommendations to cut down on US chips. Some Chinese commentators claimed that the plan will help Chinese device manufacturers long-term increase their market share of lineage chips. &nbsp,

A Hunan-based columnist who uses the pseudonym” Jindou” claims in an article that” the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology ( MIIT ) has stated earlier this year that chips produced in the US will be phased out of China’s telecommunication networks by 2027. ” This is definitely not an empty talk” .&nbsp,

He claims that since 2018, China has tremendously increased its investments in nearby chipmakers and related manufacturers, laying the groundwork for the nation to slowly remove US manufacturers from its supply chain.

He claims that China’s chip exports increased faster than its chip goods, demonstrating that it will not need to buy foreign chips again. He claims that the US will shed its position as the world’s leader once China can take control of the lineage device market.

In the first 10 months of this year, China’s chip exports surged 19.6 % year-on-year to 246 billion units while chip imports increased 15 % to 456 billion units, according to China’s General Administration of Customs. &nbsp,

Beijing’s retribution

Wang Feiyun, a Beijing-based journalist, writes that as the US forbids Taiwanese firms from buying its high-end chips, it’s good that Chinese firms reduce their payments of British legacy cards. &nbsp,

According to Wang,” We stop buying US cards, as well as preventing the US from obtaining China’s natural materials,” Wang says in reference to the recent decision by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce to outsource some of the crucial metals used in semiconductor manufacturing to the US. &nbsp,

The Commerce Ministry said on December 3 that the exports of chromium, germanium, arsenic and” superhard components” such as diamond and cubic boron nitride to the US are now totally banned. Additionally, it added that greater end-user checks may be required for exports of graphene elements to the US. &nbsp,

Because China has previously publicly targeted the US, Wang claims that the most recent round of Chinese reprisals is stronger than the previous ones. ” Besides, American companies ‘ exports of Chinese important metal for legal apply are also banned”.

He says it’s a smart move that Chinese business organizations, instead of the Chinese authorities, called for reducing the payments of US cards. He claims that the US will not be able to come up with a justification for filing a World Trade Organization problem. &nbsp,

” It is true that China produces inferior cards. But really, 14-nanometer cards are good enough for making 90 % of electronic materials”, he says. ” And China has already started producing 28nm chips in large numbers with a 95 % yield.”

He claims that the US’s actions against China will only lead to a microprocessor conflict, which will result in US-based companies like Intel and Qualcomm losing market share.

US sanctions&nbsp,

Following two previous rounds in October 2021 and 2022, the US Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security ( BIS ) released the third package of chip export regulations against China on December 2. &nbsp,

The BIS added 140 Chinese chip manufacturers and suppliers to its” Entity List,” as well as new export restrictions for 24 different types of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, three different software tools for creating or producing semiconductors, and high-bandwidth memory ( HBM ) chips. &nbsp,

” This behavior is the pinnacle of the Biden-Harris president’s intended approach, in concert with our allies and partners, to affect the People’s Republic of China’s ability to indigenize the production of advanced technology that pose a threat to our national surveillance”, said US Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo. &nbsp,

She argued that the Department of Commerce’s continued expansion of US trade controls highlights its main function in carrying out the country’s broader federal protection strategy. &nbsp,

American media have &nbsp, reported&nbsp, on all these fresh controls over the past few decades, but the news was postponed to this month because the US had to discuss them with its allies, including Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and the Netherlands. &nbsp,

China has “remaining major protests with the US for updating the semiconductor export controls, sanctioning Chinese companies, and deliberately stifling China’s technological development,” according to Lin Jian, a spokeswoman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry, on December 3.

An article published by King &amp, Wood Mallesons, a Beijing-based law company, said the protection of the latest US device ban is very large as several chip makers ‘ subsidiaries, dozens of state-owned Foreign chip makers and two investment firms were sanctioned. &nbsp,

The chip ban demonstrated that the Biden administration is well-versed in key players in China’s chip industry and that some Chinese chip manufacturers ‘ operations will be impacted in the short run.

Read: China sharpens trade war tools ahead of Trump’s arrival

Continue Reading

Perdue as Beijing envoy will boost US-China investor confidence – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The appointment of former US Senator David Perdue as adviser to Beijing by Donald Trump demonstrates a rational strategy to US-China relationships that will likely be welcomed by foreign buyers. &nbsp,

Perdue brings a business-savvy view to the political field at a time when US-China connections are becoming more significant in international markets as a previous CEO with extensive expertise in Asia. &nbsp,

Perdue’s appointment could help guide diplomatic discussions toward more financially beneficial outcomes, bringing in more profit for global investors, as the two financial superpowers are at their peak.

The US-China financial marriage has been a key area of global investment strategies, and Perdue’s knowledge provides him with a unique perspective on this crucial area. &nbsp,

Perdue has strong associations and an understanding of the political and business details of the Asian market. He is a former Fortune 500 main professional and a US senator who has lived in Hong Kong and Singapore. &nbsp,

For traders, this relationship may be seen as a good step in the direction of creating a more stable and successful partnership between the US and China, as well as providing new funding opportunities and strategies in Asia.

Perdue’s focus on business and economic discussions sets him apart from other political appointments. &nbsp,

Perdue’s experience as a business leader favors an economic-focused approach, in contrast to the more traditional foreign policy technique used in other senior positions like Mike Waltz and Marco Rubio for Secretary of State. &nbsp,

This could be of specific attention to investors, as business-driven politics offers more consistency and less uncertainty, especially when it comes to business agreements and economic partnerships.

For buyers in industries that are heavily intertwined with US-China business, Perdue’s visit offers possible balance. &nbsp,

The original president’s expertise may aid in trade negotiations, making it easier for businesses with business interests to have a more predictable environment in China. &nbsp,

As businesses continue to look for answers regarding taxes, trade barriers, and the future of the global supply chain, his proper authority may be important in navigating these gentle trade associations between the US and China.

Trump’s presidency has historically had a strong grip against Chinese trade practices, but Perdue’s visit may point to a move toward preserving US economic passions while continuing to cooperate with China. &nbsp,

This method is likely to result in a more healthy bargaining strategy that benefits both economies. This results in a reduction in political confusion and possible avenues for the US and China to work together rather than compete.

Perdue’s visit also coincides with the expanding trend of using business experience in senior political positions. &nbsp,

As world trade expands, and cross-border financial connections become more sophisticated, standard politics may no longer be much to address the needs of modern economy. &nbsp,

His background in business gives him the tools to influence China on a stage where he is less concerned with ideological differences and more focused on finding alternatives for trade and investment.

Traders who have experienced a hard atmosphere in the midst of tariffs and trade restrictions are likely to find the shift to a more business-focused political approach comforting. Perdue’s experience navigating difficult international markets suggests that he can cultivate stronger business relationships, lessen the risk of unexpected policy changes, and make the environment for investment more conducive. &nbsp,

Strengthening ties with Washington may be essential to sustaining worldwide business growth, especially with China, which is the second-largest economy in the world.

Also, Perdue’s deep knowledge of the Chinese industry and company culture offers investors a distinct advantage. &nbsp,

Businesses and financial institutions that are actively involved in Asia will gain from having one in a key political position who is skilled in moving economic deals ahead. Traders in sectors such as systems, banking, and manufacturing — industries that rely heavily on US-China relations — are likely to see this visit as a positive growth for long-term security.

While Perdue’s visit highlights a more realistic view of US-China relationships, it also highlights a wider pattern of financial politics that may influence international investment strategies in the future. &nbsp,

As political tensions continue to rise, buyers will look for signs that global economic ties are moving towards joint, rather than aggressive, options. Perdue’s visit, so, offers hope that the US can sustain a productive working relationship with China, keeping markets firm and ensuring that global trade continues to flourish.

Perdue’s appointment as Beijing’s ambassador is seen as a potentially crucial moment for international investors, especially those who have exposure to the US and Chinese markets. Perdue has the opportunity to shape US-China relations in ways that benefit investors and guarantee the continued expansion of the global economy by balancing economic and diplomatic interests.

Nigel Green is the deVere Group’s CEO and founder.

Continue Reading

South Korea: Yoon’s martial law declaration no bolt from the blue – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

One practically understands North Korean President&nbsp, Yoon Sook-yeol’s stress. The communist opposition in&nbsp, South Korea, the Democrat Party, holds a commanding majority in the National Assembly. They have been attempting to hinder and undermine him since day one.

Since he took office in May 2022, they have tried to oust him 22 days and had blocked his plans at every turn. His wife is being targeted for corruption charges as well as his major representatives are being impeached.

So much for” the faithful criticism”. This seems also beyond sharp-elbowed politicians. Yoon described it as a “legislative dictatorship“.

But Yoon’s declaration of martial law on December 4 was a” shot, available, purpose” sort of thing. It did not appear to be based on any specific information about an imminent threat that may warrant or elicit public assistance for such a radical shift in a well-established politics.

The consequences

According to some reports, Yoon was encouraged by the defence minister and perhaps the Army’s nose to declare martial law as the best way to defeat the criticism that had made South Korea illegitimate. &nbsp,

But, Yoon’s own party’s officials came out against the move. No overwhelming public assistance existed, and even the military’s help sagged.

Yoon rescinded the order a few hours after declaring martial law. Yet, the damage was done. Besides the damage to North Korean civil society, it is a major headache for American when a vital ally in Northeast Asia is in such a bind.

The Chinese are completely unconcerned.

Individuals callng for the departure of South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, Seoul, December 4, 2024. Photo: ©Kyodo.

Yoon crying dog?

Here is something else to acquire: President Yoon in his speech announcing and justifying martial law warned of North Korea&nbsp, adherents in the opposition.

He is truly best. &nbsp, There is a significant part of South Korea’s Democrat Party and leftist social globe that is pro-North Korea&nbsp, and even pro-China&nbsp, – as painful as that is to imagine. They are also anti-American.

President&nbsp, Moon Jae In, Yoon’s predecessor, was preternaturally sympathetic to both North Korea and the People’s Republic of China ( PRC ). &nbsp,

Additionally, he was hostile toward the US. In his book, he tells of his joy on hearing the Americans were defeated in&nbsp, Vietnam.

The extreme National Assembly

Hard-core radicals were likewise employed by Moon in his management and in great positions. Imagine if extremists from the 1960s resurrected America. ( Some people claim that they have done it a few times in recent years, but that is another story. )

In South Korea the illiberal student extremists are from the 1980s – and are known as&nbsp, Jusapa. &nbsp,

Get Lee In-young, the Unification Minister appointed in July 2020. Read the&nbsp, transcript&nbsp, of his assurance hearing&nbsp, in the National Assembly. &nbsp,

Lee was biting his lips but did not seem to have changed significantly since his days as the&nbsp,# 2 people in the Anti-American Youth Association, which was the underwater organization providing command to Jeondaehyup. a harsh, dramatic 1980s student business, Jeondaehyup was based upon North Korea’s Juche philosophy. &nbsp,

Over the past four decades, the Democrat Party hasn’t changed. &nbsp,

Its current president, &nbsp, Lee Jae Myung, has called British forces in South Korea “occupying troops”. However, he is accommodating towards the PRC, including its location on bringing&nbsp, Taiwan&nbsp, under its hand.

Tara O of East Asia Research&nbsp, continues to perform superb work on this topic. Her analysis is essential for anyone interested in understanding the background, beliefs, and political goals of South Korea’s leftists.

Communist supremacy

Liberals in South Korea have long desired a one-party system in place of their own. They have aimed to rule over the government’s valves, including those held by media outlets, labor unions, and education. &nbsp,

However, this objective was achieved through Moon Jae In’s poll in 2017 and the succeeding National Assembly elections in 2020 and 2024. That is what gave the socialists complete control over the National Assembly. &nbsp,

Additionally, it is conceivable that the National Assembly is a more appealing goal than actually South Korea’s administration. &nbsp,

During a South Korean National Assembly plenary session in Seoul, on December 5, 2024, a report about the president’s prosecution movement was made. Photo: ©Yonhap / Kyodo.

The National Assembly can make a president’s living almost impossible in the North Korean program. Likewise, in the United States, a president has tremendous power even if the criticism holds both houses of Congress.

This author believes that there is reliable proof of common political exploitation in the 2020 and 2024 National Assembly votes. This deserves much more evaluation than it has so far.

Unfortunately, most South Korean people have no desire to be ruled by North Korea or a North Korean-like program. However, they also support the US-ROK empire. &nbsp, &nbsp,

But it doesn’t matter as much when a group of extreme radical, whether religious or not, can overtake a government and relocate a nation where the majority of people are opposed. &nbsp, We have seen it before.

The conclusion activity

Whatever happens, Yoon’s decision to declare martial law will forever discredit liberals in South Korea. South Korean liberals are typically pro-American, supporting American-style rights and pro-free areas. &nbsp,

This works to the Democratic Party’s benefits. It even roils the ROK-US empire – at a time when the PRC is on the walk along with its erstwhile supporters, North Korea and&nbsp, Russia.

On top of that, President Yoon’s foreign policy efforts perhaps be lost. Seoul has steadfastly bolstered its ties with Japan, and South Korea is providing US with weapons to remove its sending to, say, Ukraine. &nbsp, &nbsp,

With the political clout and standing that come with that, South Korea is a big supplier of weapons both in Asia and the world.

Who stands to gain from the “entropic war” that has been occurring in South Korea for at least the past seven years and that just happened to explode?

Anwer: The PRC. &nbsp,

One very thinks they encouraged it, given the PRC’s track record of employing stochastic war and political war from&nbsp, Washington&nbsp, to the Solomon Islands and over.

For over 70 years, the US-South Korea empire has performed admirably well. And it is able to fend off a North Korean invasion, at least for the moment.

Entropic war might, nevertheless, accomplish for the ally what dynamic warfare could not.

This disaster is one more the Trump Administration needs to deal with. As if it needed more.

RELATED:

Grant Newsham, a resigned US Marine captain, is the publisher of&nbsp, When China Attacks: A Warning to America.

This content was first published by JAPAN Forward. It is republished with authority.

Continue Reading

Yoon’s martial law blunder is a step toward political oblivion – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

The government and the opposition have been calling for President Yoon Suk Yeol to step down from office for weeks, with accusations that the president had handled numerous scandals and mismanaged crucial policies. The government’s attempted military law declaration on Tuesday, the latest and most glaring of his feints, added fuel to the flames. On Wednesday, six opposition parties introduced articles of impeachment against Yoon for alleged rebellion, with a political vote expected at 5 PM on Saturday, December 7.

Lee Jae-Myung, head of the main opposition Democratic Party, when reluctant to fully embrace Yoon’s resignation for fear of failure, is now actively demanding the government’s treatment. Those looking for an indictable act involving the use of a smoking gun appear to have discovered it. Yoon, through either folly or misunderstanding, has provided impeachment-seekers with stronger utilize to create their event. Before Tuesday, if anyone was on the fence about Yoon, that border was blown over by the social gasp at his crazy and authoritarian behavior.

Impeachment needs ruling-party vote

To be sure, some hurdles lie back. Yoon’s party’s leadership is essentially united, rejecting any efforts to remove him from office. At least eight PPP lawmakers may be persuaded to complete the articles given the current political climate.

Even if the action is approved by parliament, the Constitutional Court would need to accept the current six-member panel and agree to hear the case universally. That is a challenging task. Democratic illiteracy is no constitutional in its own right. Nor is the work of declaring martial law, which is completely within the government’s jurisdiction.

But assuming Yoon lives, the underlying truth will only deteriorate. Even in historically conservative strongholds, his approval rating is still below 20 %. The common motion seeking Yoon’s impeachment or resignation, which began as early as August 2022, is just poised to grow and enhance. According to a new poll, tenth of the population in Korea supports the president’s removal.

Yoon’s declare that Lee and his opposition group are affecting legislative processes with majority rule will no longer have the same impact as it once did. If anything, the senator has widened the gap between the legislative and executive branches.

As potential opponents of the president’s unique party idea their weapons, inner conflicts are expected to worsen. ” If President Yoon does not reveal his plan to step down before voting tomorrow”, senior PPP legislator Ahn Cheol-soo said on Friday,” I have no choice but to help prosecution”.

Now on Tuesday, Han Dong-hoon, again regarded as Yoon’s lieutenant, strongly opposed the military law charter, labeling it a error. What was once referred to as a Yoon-Han gang is then a thing of the past. On Wednesday, 18 legislators who shared the pro-Han faction’s position cast a ballot to change Yoon’s order. Han has requested that the president left his own political party and stated that Yoon needs to be immediately removed from power.

It’s also uncertain how many sympathizers will come from the ruling group.

Finally, there is the international dimensions to the latest event. European leaders and officials have canceled their travel to South Korea while martial law has been repealed, and various nations have issued travel warnings. The Nuclear Consultative Group’s gathering and table practice with its rivals in Seoul have been indefinitely postponed by the US Department of Defense. Additionally, the condition precludes Shigeru Ishiba’s possible trip to South Korea in the coming month. On Wednesday, Ishiba stated that the government is monitoring advances with “particular and burial” problem.

According to experts, local instability could compromise South Korea’s reputation as a pillar of liberal democracy on the global stage as well as the validity of its multilateral pact with Tokyo and Washington, which is unfortunately Yoon’s signature accomplishment. This crisis also occurs at the most inappropriate moment as North Korea and Russia improve their military ties and attempt to disturb global norms.

Leading up to this year’s unrest, the gap between the DP and Yoon, now strained by his group’s electoral defeat in April, widened. The opposition group vetoed bills consistently after the leader vetoed them, which evidently caused trouble for the ruling party. The conflict grew worse just when the DP moved to reduce the federal expenditure, which could destroy Yoon’s most important policies, and filed motions to remove three sitting prosecutors and a deputy state auditor. Some of these lawyers were involved in continued inquiries into DP chief Lee, which created a source of conflict.

Nevertheless, all of this, at its core, is a social problem—one that can and should be resolved through political methods. By dispatching the army without considering all other options, Yoon largely chose a dead-end route. It may be too little, too late, with the senator making agreements with the opposition or making radical new case appointments to lessen the damage. A return to politics at the firing of a gun, a phenomenon South Korea hasn’t seen in decades since the start of its attractive democracy, will remain etched in the memory of the populace for a long time.

Country however reeling

Time after Yoon’s stunning declaration left the nation in tumult, South Korea is also reeling. Although the attempt was quickly overturned after 190 politicians cast a ballot against it, the agonizing six hours of chaos are still vivid in your mind. Moments after Yoon’s televised address and the declaration of martial law, planes flew through Seoul as soldiers and officers gathered at the National Assembly. Arrests were reportedly attempted against several politicians, including Chairman Han Dong-hoon of Yoon’s own ruling People Power Party. According to one pundit,” It was like a scene from a blockbuster movie.”

Yoon’s rationale for issuing the decree only added to the confusion. In his address, he accused the opposition party of engaging in “anti-state” activities” and justified the measure&nbsp, to” eradicate pro-North Korean forces” and safeguard the” constitutional order of freedom. ” Whatever the merit of these justifications, it became the shortest-lived martial law in the nation’s history, serving no discernible purpose.

Why, then, did Yoon make such a risky decision politically? For now, speculation outweighs concrete answers. Some claim it was a shock-and-awe tactic to regain control of his political standing, while others see it as a diversionary plot to divert voters ‘ attention away from Yoon’s growing scandals. But regardless of precise motives, one thing seems clear: Yoon has effectively expedited his political downfall. Even if he completes his remaining two-and-a-half years in office he is bound to limp through, not as a lame duck, but as a dead duck.

Kenji Yoshida works for JAPAN Forward as a translator and correspondent in Seoul.

Reitaku University associate professor and historian Jason Morgan.

Continue Reading

Hamas not as hot in Malaysia as it used to be – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia

International ties to Hamas have been under investigation since the radical group’s unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7 was launched.

Some countries have tried to tarnish or conceal their past relationships, or acted as a pawn in a diplomatic effort. Malaysia’s premier minister, Anwar Ibrahim, on the other hand, fast phoned Hamas leaders and expressed his unwavering support.

This reply was not wholly unexpected. Because Malaysia is a multiracial nation, my research demonstrates that all anti-Secularist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Israel beliefs serve as a metaphorical refusal of secularism and the West.

For some Malay patriots, Israel, Jews and Zionism have come to represent the pinnacle of this danger, which then functions as an assurance of political Islam and Malay power.

This ethnoreligious patriotism, in my opinion, is a form of cultural power. By appealing directly to ethnic Malay Muslims, who make up about 60 % of the population, it keeps the authorities in favor.

The Indonesian government attempt to integrate ethnic Malays by creating an imaginary and outdoor enemy that is threatening Malay Islam and its dominance in the country.

Such unity expresses in Ketuanan Melayu, which translates as” Asian vassalage” in English. This state-promoted strategy is morally amalgamated to a standard anti-Western conversation that, suitable for a previously colonised nation, places emphasis on post-colonial and developing-world nationalism.

It involves showing cooperation with Muslims who have been raped by non-Muslims, a move that perfectly harmonies with a straightforward conception of the Palestinian cause.

YouTube video

]embedded articles]

In August 2024, Anwar Ibrahim addresses a pro-Palestine protest in a Kuala Lumpur facility.

Since its independence in 1957, Malaysia has been a major part of its international policy.

The nation was the first Southeast Asian nation to grant the Palestine Liberation Organization ( PLO ) full diplomatic status after the second country in the world. The original PLO head, Yasser Arafat, paid gift to Malaysia’s help when he visited in the 1980s and early 90s, ranking it as superior to that from Muslim countries.

Malaysia has also lobbied constantly at the UN for Palestine, constantly donated money to support organizations, and often awards scholarships to Arab students. Malaysia and Hamas quickly established connections when the organization gained popularity in the late 1990s.

Under the former prime minister Najib Razak, who actually traveled to Hamas-controlled Gaza in 2013, this marriage grew particularly close.

In the late 2010s, when Malaysian political parties started to lose reputation, Indonesian speech about the Israel-Palestine turmoil grew even more potent. Barisan Nasional, the coalition that had for decades dominated the government’s politics, lost Malaysia’s public vote in 2018.

Ibrahim has also struggled to win support from Malay Muslims as part of the novel ruling coalition. According to a 2023 ballot by Malaysian think tank Ilham Centre, he had only a 24 % approval rating among ethnic Malays. Therefore, the authorities have used extremely expressive religion forms to try to win this group’s support.

Hamas ‘ portrayal as Muslim freedom soldiers frequently reflects this. Strong anti-Israel and antisemitism, including politicians who accuse one another of being a” Israeli adviser,” add to these sentiments.

Questioning Hamas connections

In 2019, the Indonesian government reaffirmed their commitment to Hamas by hosting a number of senior representatives from the organization.

This occurred as Hamas’s recognition and position of authority in Gaza had declined, and its status internationally was made more vulnerable by Israel’s strengthening foreign ties as part of the Abraham Accords, which established normal relationships between Israel and Bahrain.

But once the entire details of the crimes committed on October 7 were uncovered, Indonesian citizens, civil society organizations and opposition social forces all expressed pain with the president’s place.

In Malaysian news reports, Ibrahim’s position is said to be intended to” shore up his Islamist credentials” rather than to show concern for the Palestinian people. Additionally, on October 7, there were calls to revoke Hamas officials ‘ visas shortly after.

Opposition politicians challenged Ibrahim’s claims of” threats” and “intimidation” by the US after it summoned the Malaysian ambassador in Washington to express concerns around the country’s engagement with the terrorist group.

And in response to photos of schoolchildren receiving toy guns and balaclavas during” Solidarity with Palestine” week, the government was forced to backtrack. In a joint statement, seven civil society organizations expressed concern about the potential negative effects of such an event.

Concerns were also expressed about the possibility of sanctions being imposed on Malaysia by the West in relation to Hamas funding through pro-Palestinian Malaysian organizations.

Ten days after the anti-corruption agency in Malaysia froze its bank accounts and suspended the country’s charity group Aman Palestin Berhad in a response to these fears.

Khaled Meshaal giving a talk in Malaysia.
Khaled Meshaal, who served as the second chairman of the Hamas Political Bureau from 1996 to 2017, giving a talk in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, in 2015. Photo: hairul Effendi / Shutterstock via The Conversation

After October 7, Malaysian society should be aware of the questioning and outright rejecting of Hamas links as part of a trend toward a more inclusive Malaysia and support for a more inclusive Malaysia.

Anti-Semitism in Contemporary Malaysia ( 2019 ), a chapter in my book, highlighted the importance that such rhetoric plays in the development of a racial and religiously divisive agenda in the Malaysian public.

In particular, there is strong dissatisfaction from the growing population of secular-leaning and middle-class urban Malays, as well as ethnic minorities.

This has been developing for some time. When Malaysian citizens were denied entry to the 2019 Paralympics after refusing to grant Israeli athletes visas, the dissatisfaction was obvious online.

Similar dissatisfaction is evident on Malaysian social media pages, such as those of the left-leaning news portal Malaysiakini and the Malay Mail, Malaysia’s oldest daily newspaper. In light of the underrepresentation of minorities at home, many commentators point out Malaysia’s hypocrisy in supporting Palestine.

Malaysia’s tiny, historic Jewish community and its Penang island cemetery are also gaining more and more attention. This is more proof that Malaysians are seeking an alternative history narrative to the one promoted by the state.

The Israel-Palestine situation is complex, dangerous and tragic. Over 45, 000 people have been killed since the October 7 attack, 97 Israeli hostages are still missing, and the devastation in Gaza is estimated at over US$ 18 billion.

The context of the conflict in Malaysia illustrates how the needs and experiences of the Palestinian and Israeli people are frequently completely disconnected from these issues.

Mary Jane Ainslie is associate professor in international communications, University of Nottingham

The Conversation has republished this article under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Nokia replacing Huawei at Deutsche Telekom sites in Germany – Asia Times

By:
On:
In: Asia, Technology

In a large implementation of so-called Open RAN technologies that will outbid China’s Huawei in the area, Deutsche Telecom has signed a contract with Finland’s Nokia and its Chinese partner Fujitsu to provide 5G network equipment for more than 3, 000 sites in northeastern Germany.

Nokia’s return as a supplier of radio access network (RAN ) equipment to Deutsche Telekom is announced in the contract on November 27 for the first time since 2017.

The implementation in Neubrandenbeug, north of Berlin, began in December 2023 with the inclusion of Nokia’s Open RAN-compliant 5G AirScale baseband option and Fujitsu’s television models into Deutsche TeleKom’s business system.

Claudia Nemat, Deutsche Telekom committee member for technology and innovation, said at the moment, &nbsp,” Open RAN is essential to Deutsche Telekom’s strategy to promote greater dealer diversity and promote customer-oriented development in the radio access network. Our business rollout with Fujitsu and Nokia is a significant step in the development of multi-vendor Open RAN as the preferred network technology in the future.

Tommi Uitto, Nokia’s president of Mobile Networks, said on the news of the new deal that the company’s tech “ensures that multi-supplier O-RAN systems may be deployed without any agreements in terms of performance, energy efficiency or protection”.

He said that Nokia and Deutsche Telekom have “agreed to explore O-RAN technology around Cloud RAN, 3rd party CaaS]Connectivity-as-a-Service], RIC]RAN Intelligent Controller], SMO]Service Management and Orchestration ] and energy efficiency” .&nbsp, &nbsp, &nbsp,

Huawei and ZTE from China’s Huawei and ZTE from Germany’s 5G telecom network were not specifically stated in the two companies ‘ public statements, but the telecom trade press concentrated on that.

German telecom network operators, including Telefonica, Vodafone, and Deutsche Telekom, have agreed to remove Chinese equipment from their core networks by the end of 2026 and from their entire networks by the end of 2029, under the pressure of the US and the EU.

In June 2023, Thierry Breton, the EU’s then-commissioner for internal market, referred to Huawei and ZTE as “high-risk suppliers”.

Different businesses can supply various components of a telecom network using open RAN standards. This enables telecom service providers to choose between large suppliers of fully proprietary systems like Huawei, Ericsson, and Nokia as well as from smaller national champions like Samsung in South Korea and NEC and Fujitsu in Japan.

In theory, Open RAN is a multi-vendor system. In practice, it tends toward what cynics call” single-vendor open RAN”, with the primary vendor being Nokia or Ericsson. Fujitsu competes with both of them. In 2023, ATT chose Ericsson, along with Fujitsu and software vendor Mavenir, as its primary Open RAN vendor.

Rakuten Mobile procures equipment and software from many different vendors, but chose Japan’s leading telecom equipment maker, NEC, to make its radio units. Open RAN was developed in conjunction with NTT DoCoMo by NEC. Samsung works with KDDI.

Huawei is shifting its focus to nations outside the US’s sphere of influence as a result of being barred from the European market for 5G and more cutting-edge telecom equipment.

Brazil, which has a population of about 215 million people, compared to 445 million for the EU and 85 million for Germany, has a GDP growth rate of about 3 %, compared to less than 1 % for the EU, and has experienced a slight decline in Germany.

Huawei has been in Brazil for more than two decades, supplying 3G, 4G and now 5G equipment to several mobile network operators, including Vivo, Claro and TIM.

It is also supplying 5G equipment to operators of private networks, including one controlling cameras, forklifts and other autonomous vehicles at Vivo’s distribution center in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

In July of this year, Claro, part of Mexico’s America Movil telecom group, successfully completed a test of 5.5G (5G-Advanced ) in Brasilia using Huawei equipment, suggesting that Brazil might be the second country after China to make commercial use of the new technology.

Additionally, Nokia and Ericsson supply private network operators in Brazil with 5G mobile and private network operators, according to an agreement signed in August between Nokia and TIM. Huawei and the two European businesses both run Brazilian factories for telecom equipment.

Only Costa Rica has prohibited the use of Chinese telecom equipment elsewhere in Latin America, according to a study conducted at the Spanish university Universidad de Navarra.

Near the US border, Mexico does not use Chinese telecom equipment. The service provider for Telcel in America Movil has installed Huawei in the south of the nation and Ericsson in the north.

Nokia made new agreements with Indonesia and Saudi Arabia on December 5. Through 2027, Nokia and Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison ( IOH) plan to continue working on the expansion of IOH’s national 4G and 5G mobile network in Indonesia.

This comes after IOH’s 14-month core network consolidation project with Huawei is finished, which was announced at the end of August. In rural areas, average downlink times have since been shortened by up to 15 %, while social media response times have decreased and internet game and video performance has improved.

In Saudi Arabia, Nokia has introduced technology to improve the efficiency, capacity and reliability of Aramco’s fiber optic network. This follows the Saudi Telecom Company (STC )’s commercial launch last month of Huawei’s Superlink high-speed 5G wireless transmission system to serve far-offers of the nation.

As of right now, China has reduced Nokia and Ericsson’s presence to insignificance in retaliation, and the US and its allies continue to award telecom equipment contracts based on quality and price, while China and its allies have eliminated or are currently eliminating 5G equipment made by Huawei and ZTE.

Follow this writer on&nbsp, X: @ScottFo83517667

Continue Reading