Barkar Nash (Page 66)

The Pollution Control Department (PCD ) made its pollution control plans for the upcoming year public, which aim to reduce nationwide hotspots by at least 30 %.

At a press conference on Monday, PCD Chief Preeyaporn Suwanaked revealed that the National Environment Board last month approved a plan for the year to combat cloud pollutants, including preventive steps in forests, agrarian, and urban areas.

Ms Preeyaporn said that the PCD may focus on deployment methods involving car use, including open bus fare cuts, car investigations, and work-from-home orders for urban areas.

In order to stop man-made forest fires in the north and northern regions, the PCD even put together a risk chart of the 14 forest complexes.

She stated that landowners in agricultural regions must file with the government before engaging in fire-related activities.

According to Ms. Preeyaporn,” We have set up our goal to reduce the number of nationwide spots next year by 30 %, compared to this time.”

She stated that the country is currently transitioning to La Nina, which will be in place from September to March of next year. New heavy rain has fallen as a result of the move. In comparison to previous years, a wind such as this may help reduce the number of global hotspots.

Ms. Preeyaporn stated that the division will continue to work closely with the relevant organizations to reduce air pollution because the condition of haze pollution looks better for the upcoming year.

According to PCD Air Quality and Noise Management Division producer Sakda Tridech, good particulate matter is expected to rise next month as a result of a high-pressure program from China.

The prime minister, the interior minister, and the federal police chief are all in need of a lawyer, and forty-three non-governmental organizations have signed an opened letter to the government demanding that the defendants in the 2004 Tak Bai murder case be tried before the statute of limitations expires this Friday.

At a conference held on Monday to explain the looming end of the case, which involves a number of legislators and state officials, including former Pheu Thai Party list MP Pisal Wattanawongkiri.

” Twenty years have passed, and righteousness has not been served”, said Surichai Wun’Gaeo, director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Research at Chulalongkorn University.

Angkhana Neelapaijit, a senator and original member of the National Human Rights Commission, said while it is the president’s responsibility to deliver righteousness in the case, it is the friends of victims who have been fighting for justice in court, as the country’s constitutional techniques are moving at a snail’s pace.

” If the Tak Bai case is considered a crime against humanity or genocide, then the case wo n’t expire”, she said, referring to the Friday deadline.

On October 25, 2004, security forces in Tak Bai city of Narathiwat staged a protest asking for the transfer of six prisoners in front of a police station.

Over 80 persons are alleged to have died in the incidents that followed the arrest of activists and their transportation to a military hospital in Pattani.

The PM ca n’t claim that the case was settled by her government because it occurred a while ago, and she ca n’t cite the Yingluck Shinawatra administration’s remedies as proof of closure, Ms. Angkhana said.

” Even Thaksin]Shinawatra] has said he has ]almost ] forgotten]about the massacre ]”, she said.

The government ca n’t hide behind Gen Pisal’s resignation from Pheu Thai, as Sunai Phasuk, an adviser to Human Rights Watch Thailand, said the party will still have to ask why they chose him as an MP in the first place despite his track record.

Additionally, Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai expressed unease over the use of the Tak Bai situation to justify the government’s position as the criminal.

Law enforcement agencies are working hard to track these suspects and prosecute them, he said, but it is n’t simple to do so.

The prime minister, the interior minister, and the federal police chief are all in need of a lawyer, so forty-three non-governmental organizations have signed an opened letter to the president to demand that the defendants in the 2004 Tak Bai murder situation be tried before the statute of limitations expires this Friday.

The looming expiration of the case, which involves a number of legislators and state officials, including Pisal Wattanawongkiri, a former listing MP of the decision Pheu Thai Party, was the subject of the open letter at a conference on Monday.

” Twenty years have passed, and righteousness has not been served”, said Surichai Wun’Gaeo, director of the Centre for Peace and Conflict Research at Chulalongkorn University.

Angkhana Neelapaijit, a senator and original member of the National Human Rights Commission, said while it is the president’s responsibility to deliver righteousness in the case, it is the friends of victims who have been fighting for justice in court, as the country’s constitutional techniques are moving at a snail’s pace.

” If the Tak Bai case is considered a crime against humanity or genocide, then the case wo n’t expire”, she said, referring to the Friday deadline.

On October 25, 2004, security forces in Tak Bai city of Narathiwat staged a protest asking for the transfer of six prisoners in front of a police station.

Over 80 persons are alleged to have died in the incidents that followed the arrest of activists and their transportation to a military hospital in Pattani.

The PM ca n’t claim that the case has nothing to do with her administration because it happened a long time ago and cite the Yingluck Shinawatra administration’s remedies as justification for the case’s closure, Ms. Angkhana said.

” Even Thaksin]Shinawatra] has said he has ]almost ] forgotten]about the massacre ]”, she said.

According to Sunai Phasuk, an adviser to Human Rights Watch Thailand, the government ca n’t hide behind Gen Pisal’s resignation from Pheu Thai because the party will still have to explain why they chose him as an MP in the first place despite his track record.

Additionally, Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai expressed his uneasy feelings about how the government was used to describe the state as the villain.

Law enforcement agencies are working hard to track these suspects and prosecute them, he said, but it is n’t simple to do so.

EC to needle Thaksin ‘ effect’ on parties

The Election Commission’s (EC ) decision to investigate allegations that the ruling Pheu Thai Party and five coalition partners had allegedly allowed a non-member to exert influence on a prime minister shrugged off.

The complaints concerned the gathering of influential Pheu Thai, Bumjaithai, United Thai Nation ( UTN), Palang Pracharath ( PPRP ), Chartthaipattana, and Prachachat parties at former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s residence in Bangkok on the day Srettha Thavisin was fired as prime minister.

The Constitutional Court dismissed Mr Srettha on Aug 14 for appointing Pichit Chuenban, an ex-convict, as PM’s Office Minister in violation of the law. Later that evening, important members of the six events met to discuss Mr Srettha’s leader.

The six parties were accused of allowing Thaksin, an outsider, to impose unlawful control, thus violating the Political Parties Act, an crime punishable by gathering dissolution.

Before deciding Chaikasem Nitisiri may take the position, coalition parties and Thaksin discussed potential alternatives for Mr. Srettha at the Aug. 14 meet.

Nevertheless, the following morning, Pheu Thai executives convened an urgent gathering and voted for Ms. Paetongtarn to become their primary minister. This resulted in her winning the legislative seat.

When asked about the EC’s research, Ms Paetongtarn, who is also the ruling party president, said on Monday that she was never worried about the situation.

Chousak Sirinil, the party’s deputy president, said the group had now clarified the matter and would take it up when it came up with a response on Monday.

He claimed that the group’s executives and those in charge of gathering affairs had no way of exercising their judgment at the meeting on August 14 because the allegations of unlawful interference were unrelated to the meeting.

When questioned about the rising number of complaints, many of which lacked a justification, and whether preventative measures should be put in place, he said the scenario would serve as a justification for a review of the contract and natural laws.

He claimed that there are laws in place already that hold those who file bogus accusations accountable. He argued that issues for party dissolution will continue to be made unless the whole process is improved.

According to Mr. Chousak, the choices of the relevant public-private organizations determine whether Pheu Thai will pursue legal action against those who made the charges.

Phumtham Wechayachai, a key member of the ruling Pheu Thai Party, expressed no worries about the issues, saying the group and the alliance would let the operation take its course.

He claimed, however, that during her first month in office, Ms. Paetongtarn and her state faced numerous problems. He expressed his hope that the government, which is attempting to revive the economy, wo n’t become incumbered by the situation.

Mr. Phumtham stated that the group would stand up for the accusations and that it had no problems as long as the procedure was transparent and open.

Anutin Charnvirakul, the group’s head, stated on Monday that the group’s executive must approve all of its decisions.

He claimed the prime minister hosted the colloquial meal, and that the coalition party leader had to choose the topics to discuss. The first of these groups since Ms. Paetongtarn’s election took place on Monday at a motel in Bangkok. Before the supper was served, Ms. Paetongtarn was audible talking about mobile cabinet meetings.

The EC may make a decision on whether to investigate or ask the Constitutional Court to break the political parties, according to Prinya Thaewanarumitkul, a law professor at Thammasat University.

Election Commission to investigate allegations that Pheu Thai and partnership parties were disbanding.

The Election Commission’s (EC ) decision to investigate allegations that the ruling Pheu Thai Party and five coalition partners had allegedly allowed a non-member to exert influence on a prime minister shrugged off.

The complaints concerned the gathering of influential Pheu Thai, Bumjaithai, United Thai Nation ( UTN), Palang Pracharath ( PPRP ), Chartthaipattana, and Prachachat parties at former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s residence in Bangkok on the day Srettha Thavisin was fired as prime minister.

The Constitutional Court dismissed Mr Srettha on Aug 14 for appointing Pichit Chuenban, an ex-convict, as PM’s Office Minister in violation of the law. Later that evening, important members of the six events met to discuss Mr Srettha’s leader.

The six parties were accused of allowing Thaksin, an outsider, to impose unlawful control, thus violating the Political Parties Act, an crime punishable by gathering dissolution.

Before deciding Chaikasem Nitisiri may take the position, coalition parties and Thaksin discussed potential alternatives for Mr. Srettha at the Aug. 14 meet.

Nevertheless, the following morning, Pheu Thai executives convened an urgent conference and voted for Ms. Paetongtarn to get their prime minister. This resulted in her winning the legislative seat.

When asked about the EC’s research, Ms Paetongtarn, who is also the ruling party president, said on Monday that she was never worried about the situation.

Chousak Sirinil, the party’s deputy president, said the group had now clarified the matter and may take it up when it came up with a response on Monday.

He asserted that the party’s executives and those in charge of gathering affairs lack the independence to practice their judgment at the Aug 14 meeting because it had nothing to do with the allegations of unlawful interference.

False issues

When questioned about the rising number of complaints, many of which lacked a justification, and whether steps should be taken to stop the abuse, he said the situation would serve as a justification for a review of the contract and natural rules.

He claimed that there are laws in place already that hold those who file bogus accusations accountable. He argued that issues for group dissolution will continue to be made unless the whole process is improved.

According to Mr. Chousak, the choices of the relevant public-private organizations determine whether Pheu Thai will pursue legal action against those who made the accusations.

Phumtham Wechayachai, a key member of the ruling Pheu Thai Party, expressed no worries about the issues, saying the group and the alliance would let the operation take its course.

He claimed, however, that during her first month in office, Ms. Paetongtarn and her state faced numerous issues. He expressed his hope that the government, which is attempting to revive the economy, wo n’t become sluggish as a result of the situation.

Mr. Phumtham stated that the group would stand up for the accusations and that it had no problems as long as the procedure was transparent and open.

Anutin Charnvirakul, the group’s head, stated on Monday that the group is not under the control of anyone and that the party’s executive must approve all of its decisions.

When questioned about the casual dining of the coalition functions on Monday, he claimed the prime minister had hosted the event and that she had to choose the topics to discuss. The first of these groups since Ms. Paetongtarn’s election took place on Monday at a motel in Bangkok. Before the supper was served, Ms. Paetongtarn was audible talking about mobile cabinet meetings.

The EC may make a decision on whether to investigate or ask the Constitutional Court to break the political parties, according to Prinya Thaewanarumitkul, a law professor at Thammasat University.

Following press reports that it may have encroached on forest area, police and forest officials began an investigation of the Cherntawan International Meditation Center in Muang area, which is run by well-known priest Phra Maha Vudhijaya Vajiramedhi, or V Vajiramedhi.

The evaluation of the meditation center in tambon Huai Sak was led by Pol Lt. Gen. Yodsawat Aekkul, examiner of the Central Investigation Bureau’s Natural Resources and Environmental Crime Division, and Prasit Thachang, director of Chiang Rai’s Forest Resource Management Office 2.

Phra Maha Vudhijaya Vajiramedhi, 51, was unavailable during Monday’s observation as he was apparently in Japan on a yoga journey. The top priest has no intention of going back to Thailand right away.

The Doi Pui National Forest Reserve serves as the location of the yoga center.

The National Office of Buddhism, through the National Office of Buddhism, requested and obtained consent to construct the center on 113 acres of land.

The office was afterwards successful in asking the center to increase its land area by 30 ra, bringing the center’s total land area to 143 rai.

The authorities were able to discover that the center might have expanded beyond what was permitted to handle 190 acres of land. In a national forest supply, it is estimated that the area that the agreement did not cover was around 47 ra.

The research is expected to take 3 to 4 days, according to Mr. Prasit, with progress being made everyday available to the public.

However, Natural Resources and Environment Minister Chalermchai Sri-on announced a seven-day date for the conclusion of the fact-finding investigation.

Surachai Achalaboon, director-general of the Royal Forest Department, said that if there are basis for the incident, the prayer heart may become charged with bush invasion under the National Forest Reserve Act.

He claimed that the department may halt the use of the area and order the destruction of the buildings on the land if the center consciously espoused on the property.

After game clips of him preaching to people and important suspects in the image Group fraud went viral, Phra Maha Vudhijaya Vajiramedhi found himself in warm water.

He was criticized for acting “unclergy-like” because his doctrines were widely regarded as encouraging individuals to eke out money.