Casino bill could land govt in hot water

Previous contract writers warn the authorities may be at risk of violating ethics rules and undermining Thailand’s national plan if it doesn’t lose its push for the casino-entertainment complex expenses.
Thirty original authors of the 2007 contract, comprising high-profile professionals, issued an open letter on Sunday to House Speaker Wan Muhamad Noor Matha and Senate Speaker Mongkol Surasatja, calling for the new expenses to be withdrawn from congress.
The controversial costs may be voted on in parliament on Wednesday.
Lawmakers are expected to determine whether the costs will become adopted during its first reading amid intensifying criticism from some rooms.
The party of former contract drafters outlined six factors to govern its call.
Second, the bill was neither serious nor important.
Legalising games was not declared by the decision Pheu Thai Party or another coalition parties during the election campaign as a plan they intended to adopt. The events are under no obligation to apply it.
The group said the casino-entertainment difficult plan was floated by former top Thaksin Shinawatra, seen as being the de facto leader of Pheu Thai, before the gathering “embraced” it.
Next, functions associated with preparing or materialising the review laws may contradict Areas 65 and 75 of the law as well as violate the National Strategy Act.
Part 65 pertains to government projects that are cooperative with the 20-year regional plan.
Part 75 aims to maintain a good and even supply of financial benefits to people and the advertising of citizens ‘ self-reliance based on the validity principle.
The party argues the costs runs store to the National Strategy Act which seeks to achieve long-term financial prosperity and security by adhering to the validity process.
Last year, Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai defended the act as a critical financial determine to offset rising US taxes on Thai products.
The former contract writers warned lawmakers pushing the document law may find themselves in risk of abusing democratic powers and violating ethics, which are punishable by a lifetime ban from politics.
Third, the proposed law would see state lands, which are national assets, being set aside and occupied by casinos and entertainment complexes with no guarantee of worthy returns. This could constitute a breach of the state asset utilisation law.
Fourth, the changes could pander to the interests of criminal and gambling enterprises, which does nothing to improve the economy while worsening crimes and vices.
Fifth, the bill broadens people’s access to online gambling, possibly causing the nation’s gambling problem to spin out of control.
Sixth, the proposed law offers no protective measure against people becoming addicts.
” Any acts associated with the draft law are deficient in moral value and integrity which politicians under democratic rule are expected to possess”, the group said in the open letter.
” The bill aims to generate vested interests while calls for thorough consideration and social resistance to the proposed law fall on deaf ears”, it added.
The group members include experts in wide-ranging fields, such as Jaran Pakdithanakul, Chirmsak Pinthong and Vicha Mahakun.
The Chiang Mai Doctors ‘ Group on Sunday joined the critics, saying the casino-entertainment complex bill will have long-term ramifications for the younger generation.
Wirangrong Dabbaransi, head of the Network of Universities for Reform has invited opponents of the entertainment complex bill to gather at Chulalongkorn University on Tuesday to oppose the plan.
Meanwhile, Pheu Thai secretary-general Sorawong Thienthong, who is also minister of tourism and sports, said people should stop demonising the bill by mislabelling it as a” casino law”.
The bill is pending a review and far from finalised, he said, adding coalition parties agreed with the bill heading to parliament for deliberation.
Pheu Thai list-MP Anusorn Iamsa-ard said the bill will not be rushed.