Charter referendum plan still up in the air

MFP claims that the Pheu Thai government is wasting day.
Concerns about the outcome of the proposed referendum on changing the charter are growing in response to claims made by the Move Forward Party ( MFP ) that the government is dragging its feet on the matter.
According to Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, who has been given the responsibility of assembling a board to examine the referendum’s programs, there is still debate over whether or not to hold one.
After the government held its second conference on Wednesday, he made the remark.
The drive to democratize the existing contract, which many observers claim is a holdover from the 2014 coup, was one of the urgent policies discussed at the annual cabinet meeting.
Several academics and interest groups have offered to assist in redesigning the contract, according to Mr. Phumtham, the business minister.
Their positions on what needs to be changed, however, greatly vary ,” he said.
Additionally, Mr. Phumtham stated that unlike the prior administration, the government does not want the attempt to improve the charter to be hampered by legal and professional barriers.
He was making reference to numerous parties’ attempts to amend the contract, which were rejected by the Constitutional Court after it was decided that a referendum may be held in order to determine whether the law should be changed.
The government’s decision to establish a referendum research board, according to MFP list-MP Parit Wacharasindhu, is merely an effort to buy time.
He cited the Pheu Thai Party’s promise to hold a referendum on contract article on August 2 and its inclusion of participation from the general public in the charter-redrafting assembly.
But, Mr. Parit claimed that the government appeared to be backtracking on its pledge to modify the charter.
A prime ministerial buy, not a cupboard resolution, which calls for stronger lawful compliance, will be used to create the study panel, according to the MP.
The effort to amend the constitution has experienced trials and tribulations in congress.
Both Houses agreed in February 2021 that all charter-redrafting council members should be chosen.
During the next browsing of the bill amending the contract in parliament, an agreement was reached.
However, some parties and legislators voted against the costs in the third and final reading, citing the Constitutional Court’s decision regarding the election.
The MFP and Pheu Thai, who were in the opposition at the time, simultaneously introduced a motion to activate the Referendum Act in an effort to restart the charter amendment effort.
The Senate rejected the movements in February.
As some lawmakers had suggested, it would be impossible to hold a vote on the same day as the general election on May 14.
According to Mr. Parit, the government has the authority to enact the Referendum Act in order to start the constitutional act process without consulting the Senate.
He claimed that the government’s decision to establish a referendum review board was superfluous.