At Tibet forum, China’s Wang Yi calls for territorial integrity

BEIJING: In the midst of escalating tensions with India over a contentious border in the eastern Himalayas, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi stated on Thursday( Oct.5 ) that the region’s nations must respect each other’S sovereignty.

Wang stated at the community in Nyingchi, 160 kilometers from Arunachal Pradesh, which China claims to be a part of Tibet, that” we must uphold mutual respect and trust, simultaneously keep local unification, and respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Reuters asked India’s international department for comment, but it didn’t get a response right away.

Officials from nations like Nepal, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Mongolia were present at the community in Tibet, the next round of trans-Himalayan speech since its founding in 2018. As in 2018 and 2019, there were no staff from India present.

After a frontier conflict in 2020 that resulted in the deaths of 20 American and four Chinese men, relations between China and India sank. This time, China infuriated India by publishing a chart indicating that the eastern Himalayan state of Arunachal Pradesh is actually part of southern Tibet.

As part of a critique approach at the Human Rights Council in Geneva in early 2024, Beijing claimed to have happily liberated Tibet in 1951 after sending Chinese forces into the area. This has also caused global problem with UN member states.

This year, UN experts have expressed numerous worries about Tibet, most just in August when they brought up the situation of Chinese rights activists who are imprisoned.

According to a speech from US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, the United States imposed visa restrictions on unnamed Chinese officials in August for allegedly participating in” forced integration” of Chinese children through state-run boarding schools in an effort to eradicate Tibet’s practices.

China has vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

Wang claimed on Thursday that” some Western forces” fabrications about Tibet were unsupportable, based on intellectual prejudice, and would disprove” in the face of facts.”