The propaganda strategy is gaining momentum.
PUBLISHED: 30 Jan 2025 at 05: 02
A legal system has launched a signature-collection initiative to demand a vote on whether legal casinos may be permitted in the nation.
Thanakorn Komkris, secretary-general of the Stop Gambling Foundation, said the system aims to obtain at least 50, 000 signatures to get a vote to evaluate public opinion.
The foundation recently launched an online petition asking citizens if they back the Entertainment Complex Bill, which the judgement Pheu Thai Party is trying to pass.
So far, more than 70, 000 people have signed against the act, Mr Thanakorn said.
He claimed that the community considered legalizing casinos to be a crucial public health issue, necessitating a referendum to determine whether or not the project should proceed.
The costs will become tabled before congress. If endorsed, some casino-entertainment compounds will be allowed to start nationwide.
The government believes usually because it will have a bigger social impact on upcoming generations, he said, while the government does not consider this to be a significant issue.
When the 50, 000 signatures are gathered, they will be submitted, along with a petition seeking the referendum, to the Election Commission (EC ).
The polling place will then check the credentials of the petition’s signers, which may take up to 30 times.
After that, the EC did forward the knowledge to the government through its secretary, Mr Thanakorn said.
He claimed that the government has no authority to accept the petition and that all it can do is agree to it and set the referendum date. He cited the Referendum Act.
Prior to now, vice prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai rebuffed names for a bill election.
He claimed that while the federal welcomes opinions on its plans, any delay could have an impact on the economy.
These amusement structures are an important part of the government’s financial signal, he said.
The government has given the Council of State, the government’s legal shoulder, 50 weeks to complete reviewing the leisure complex act before forwarding it to the House for consideration.
It insists that no vote is necessary because the legislation has already been approved by parliament.
Pakorn Nilprapunt, the mayor’s secretary-general, said earlier the state has emphasised this act must be treated as serious, stressing the 50-day maximum evaluation time, which was agreed upon in principle by the cabinet.
When questioned about whether a referendum may be held to evaluate public opinion, he replied that the decision was up to the government.
If it thinks the costs poses any risk, it may acquire this, he noted.