Case 1: No staying in BTO even
A couple bought a five-room Build-to-Order ( BTO ) flat in 2015 but left it unoccupied after collecting their keys.  , They stayed at a landed property owned by the sister’s family otherwise.
They even put the straight up for sale, marketing it as unfilled.
The smooth was informed that it was being sold, and images revealed that it was in “bare situation.” The smooth was left unattended, according to an examination.
” Non-occupation of the level during the MOP is a significant lease copyright. As the users did not possess the straight and had other hotel, HDB compulsorily acquired the flat”, said the Housing Board.  ,
Scenario 2: Illegal leasing
A woman and her children purchased a three-bedroom HDB apartment from the resale industry in 2018 and requested authorization to hire out one bedroom.
The owner and approved occupants were required to remain in the apartment while the rental agreement was in place.
But, HDB afterwards received input that , the entire level had been rented out.  ,
Studies revealed that the lady and her kids had previously resided in the apartment.  , She had bought the product only to generate rental income and did no need it for accommodation.
Scenario 3: Son’s personal property was put into trust.
In 2017, a couple’s son and daughter were listed as authorized occupiers of the senior residence.
The younger man’s child, who is a small, was given a private home property in trust by the spouse and his father in December 2020.
During the MOP, level owners are not permitted to purchase private property, including one that they can trust for a friend.
HDB suggested that the father either sell the personal property or renounce the annexation and transfer control of the property to his parents.
Despite being repeatedly reminded by the Housing Board, he informed HDB that he was not interested in either choice and that he would never pursue a legal solution.  ,