According to a study by Nida Poll, the majority of Thais are concerned about the rise in vice and gaming addiction and question whether the construction of a casino-entertainment diverse will boost the economy as the government claims.
People were asked to respond to the review to share their lingering or unresolved questions and other concerns regarding the commission’s subsequent approval of a document costs allowing the construction of entertainment complexes that include casinos. The responses were as follows:
32.60 % of respondents were of the opinion that this policy may lead to a world devoid of sin and wickedness and threaten national security.
30.2 % of respondents questioned whether and how it would actually contribute to the country’s economy’s improvement.
28.9 % of respondents questioned what steps the government would take to stop Thai gamblers from developing addictions.
24.8 % of respondents questioned the steps the government would take to stop money laundering.
24.6 % of respondents questioned how the government could stop the casino-entertainment advanced from becoming a haven for powerful individuals and legal cases.
20. 15 % of respondents questioned whether the state had any measures to reduce social effects, and what kind.
18.63 % of respondents questioned whether and how games could properly address the problem of improper playing in casinos.
18.5 % of people questioned whether it would actually draw more visitors and improve their numbers.
17.48 % of respondents questioned what benefits this plan would bring to Thai citizens.
16.56 percent of respondents questioned whether it would provide politicians with money.
14.27 % claimed they had no lingering queries.
12.90 % of respondents questioned whether it would actually lead to more employment opportunities for Thai people.
12.14 percent of respondents questioned how the licence procedure could be held responsible, guilty, and free of corruption.
11. 98 % of respondents inquired before making the decision whether a common vote had been conducted.
10. 15 % questioned whether the state had conducted a feasibility study on this policy.
10 % of the population was questioned on whether the anticipated casino-entertainment complexes would actually reduce the number of Thai citizens who travel overseas to gamble, and whether the community had been asked if they wanted for compounds in their neighborhoods.
9.39 % questioned whether they could trust the policy committee’s impartiality, openness, and responsibilities, as well as the location of the casino-themed entertainment structures.
7.40 % inquired as to why the plan was being put in a rush.
5.7 % of people in Thailand questioned what conditions must be met before entering the game.
4. 50 % posed a question about how the state may prevent casinos from operating in entertainment centers.
3.5 % of respondents questioned whether leisure facilities could exist without gambling.
3.2 % of Thai citizens questioned the entrance fee, stating whether it should be too high or too low.
3.05 % of the respondents inquired if there would be anything else besides licensing costs that could be shared with the state and the areas.
2.21 percent of respondents questioned why the document bill’s key points were never clearly laid out.
2. 14 % of respondents questioned whether the state’s licensing fees would be worthwhile.
1. 60 % questioned why the plan council had the authority to decide crucial information.
Fight worries
When questioned about whether the building of a casino-entertainment challenging could lead to social and political conflict, the interviewees responded as follows:
31.8 % predicted a new, violent conflict may result from it.
It may result in a new issue, but not one that would be aggressive, according to 31.68 %.
26. 9 percent believed that it would be just a matter of competing viewpoints, not a fight.
9.16 % of respondents said there would undoubtedly be no issues brought on by conflicts or problems.
0.8 % of respondents said they were uninterested or did not.
On March 18 to February 20, 1, 310 individuals aged 18 and over from different levels of education and employment were sampled in the survey.