Denies’secret offers ‘ made while in office
Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has acknowledged that she might not be able to survive the opening day of a no-confidence discussion against her because it will carry on until 5:30 am the following day.
The censure argument is scheduled to take place on Monday through Tuesday.
The government and the government had seven days to respond to the questions while opposition parties had 28 hours to answer them. The House Speaker and his deputies, who control the trials, were given two hours.
Ms. Paetongtarn said she might not be able to attend the program until 5:30 a.m. on Tuesday, adding that she would need to go home for a few hours to rest before the debate’s next day.
When questioned about the opposition’s decision to drop Thaksin Shinawatra’s brand from its condemnation activity, Ms. Paetongtarn claimed that her father had not responded to the question.
She also refrained from making allegations that the opposition claimed that” secret deals” reached during this administration’s career, including one involving Thaksin’s discharge, would be made public during the discussion.
She claimed,” There aren’t any like offers as the people claimed.” They may be attempting to put a little color to make things more interesting, the opposition says.
She stated that she was convinced that the coalition parties would continue to be united and that they would back her during the criticism discussion.
Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut, the leader of the opposition party and People’s Party ( PP ) leader, previously stated that Pheu Thai Party agreements, where family benefits come before the country’s interests, would dominate the discussion.
He added that during the conversation, the government can expect to hear a variety of expressions, not only “family member,” and that the revised activity allows the opposition to bring up additional family members if needed.
The censure motion substituted the phrase” a family member” with the brand Thaksin.
” We think that the government prioritizes the pursuits of its citizens.” It places the objectives of the Shinawatra family first, according to Mr. Natthaphong.
He claimed that several of the problems that were brought up during the discussion were in-depth details that were never made public.
The PM’s treatment may not be based on sufficient data, he said, but it could serve as the starting point for lawsuits that might lead to her being removed.
The PP’s deputy president, Wiroj Lakkhanaadisorn, criticized Ms. Paetongtarn yesterday for resusciating her for a moment of debate attendance up until 5:30 a.m.
” The government whip suggested that the discussion should continue until 5:30 a.m. on the first day of the conversation. However, he claimed that the PM would not cooperate with other legislature officers who were on duty.
Mr. Wiroj also criticised Pheu Thai’s decision to ascribe 20 gathering MPs to ensure that the opposition adheres to political meeting rules during the discussion. He claimed that” this will only destroy the leadership of the premier minister.”
The no-confidence activity, which was presented to the legislature president on February 27, singles out the prime minister and accuses her of lacked authority and allowing her father to put pressure on the government.
Ms. Paetongtarn stated that she was willing to respond to all inquiries in the censure argument and that she would allow ministers to respond to inquiries that might worry them.