Opposition claims that among the many issues covered will be the effect of Thaksin.
PUBLISHED: 27 Feb 2025 at 12: 25
The opposition made a number of charges against her, including putting pressure on her parents Thaksin Shinawatra, and filed a censure motion on Thursday, targeting just Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra.
Opposition head and Women’s Party leader Natthaphong Ruengpanyawut said the prime minister lacked management, skills, knowledge and skills to mind the regional management.
He made the comment at congress, where Ms. Paetongtarn had her first official meeting since her appointment as prime minister in August, in August. Her presence came after numerous requests from Members to appear and respond to inquiries.
She stated on Wednesday that she would allow ministers to respond to any questions that may worry them and that she was prepared to answer any questions in a discussion over censure. She added that because of its power, the coalition would endure a reprimand debate.
Mr. Natthaphong claimed that the premier had no desire to solve people’s issues and that he had failed in economic management because Southeast Asian countries’ economies ‘ economies’ economies ‘ economies ‘ economies grow most slowly.
The opposition head made reference to former prime minister Thaksin and said that the prime minister had allowed employees to have control over her and that her father had allowed them to influence her.
He claimed that the debate, which is scheduled to begin on March 24, had address issues involving Thaksin, despite warnings from some Pheu Thai Party statistics that the criticism may concentrate solely on those who are really in the state.
Mr. Natthaphong claimed that the opposition had consciously chosen to question the prime minister solely because she was the underlying cause of all the national administration’s failures.
He claimed that the primary secretary should have the opportunity to address issues about the country’s problems at the same time.
Because the prime minister is responsible for all of the difficulties, he said, “it may be useless to criticize another individual ministries.”
He claimed that Prime Minister Paetongtarn failed to control the coalition’s vote and that the loss was the result of the formation of a partnership state with political parties from various wires.
The alliance came together just to satisfy the social demands made by parties with varying ideologies, and officials ‘ appointments were not based on their abilities and knowledge, he claimed.
Mr. Natthaphong claimed that the no-confidence motion’s content may concern some ministries and alliance parties, even though it only addressed the prime minister.
The opposition’s numerous concerns, according to Mr. Natthaphong, were supported by strong evidence that could lead to further studies.
He added that the outcome of the conversation may also indicate whether the prime minister had the power to control the coalition’s votes.
Pale Muhamad Noor Matha, the president of the Parliament, predicted that the discussion may begin on March 24. The criticism wants five days but paddles from the government, the opposition and House people have yet to acknowledge on its length, he added.