Certifications FOR WORKS
Additionally, according to the explanation, URA and BCA made sure that all necessary certifications were obtained for the functions carried out at 26 Ridout Road.  ,
URA’s acceptance is only required for works that affect preserved buildings or monuments, or those that exceed 10 % of the property’s total ground area. For position properties that SLA has leased out, URA’s approval is required.
URA and SLA have put together a number of pre-approved functions that don’t need URA’s acceptance and just need SLA’s in-principle deal to simplify the planning software process for functions carried out on these parameters.  ,
SLA’s in-principle deal is required before work can be carried out on the leased property. URA issued directives in 2015 and 2017 to remind the business about this refined process,” said Factually.
Landlords must also get clearance from related professional organizations, such as BCA, where needed. Negligible creating works are one category of works that are not subject to BCA’s approval, as required by the Building Control Regulations 2003.
The renter or SLA’s certified representative also has the responsibility to obtain the necessary approvals from important agencies before carrying out the proposed functions.  ,
A competent person has a legitimate practice license, is registered as an designer with the Board of Architects, or as a skilled expert with the Professional Engineers Board, and is a qualified individual.
Technically, the landlord has been obtaining SLA’s in-principle contract for fortifications carried out on the property since 2024. BCA’s assent was likewise obtained.
The qualified individual had requested URA’s endorsement, but the organization claimed that it was not necessary.
Because the pool deployment was done outside the preserved building, URA’s approval was not required for the tenant’s swimming pool installed in 2018.  ,
The July 2023 Review of the Rentals of State Properties at No. 26 and No. 31 Ridout Road addressed the fact that URA’s endorsement was not required.
BCA’s assent was hardly required since the share assembly was considered” insignificant creating works” under the Building Control Regulations. Factually added, this was because the construction and earth-retaining construction work did not exceed 1.5 meters in height.  ,
SLA, as the landlord, had likewise carried out fundamental functions.
This included replacement of damaged forest people in 2024, repair and replacement of existing doors and windows in 2024/2020, and maintenance to forest ground beams and joists at the main tower and forest beams at a linkway in 2018.
For these structural works, all relevant approvals from URA and BCA were obtained.  ,
In accordance with the relevant conservation and restoration guidelines, SLA was responsible for the costs of the structural works as part of its obligations as landlord to make sure the rented property is in good condition for safe occupancy and to protect the property’s heritage value.  ,
Factually stated that SLA’s obligation to this end had been addressed in the review report and during the parliamentary session on July 3, 2023.
No public funds have been used to finance the earthworks that have been carried out on the property since 2024, according to the statement.
The tenant at 26 Ridout Road was responsible for the full cost of the earthworks that had been completed since 2024, as well as the additional tenant-managed improvements. No money from the government was used to finance these projects.
Factually, it is” an ongoing, collective effort” to uphold a system of governance with high standards of integrity.  ,
We urge the public to be selective, particularly with regard to TOC articles that have previously made unsupported allegations and omitted publicly available facts. Such actions undermine our public institutions.”
On Tuesday night, Twenty Twenty Twenty Thirty added the correction notice to its YouTube video. As of 10pm on Tuesday, TOC has not.