Commentary: Najib still wields influence like no other in Malaysia, even behind bars

Malaysia is likewise forced to confront its position for the first time in world politics. Mr Anwar’s position on the battle in Gaza, where he publicly criticised Israel’s activities as the ‘ level of barbarism’, has been vocal and regular, directly or abroad. He had also made it known that Malaysia intends to enjoy a significant role, particularly in emerging markets and the global north, like BRICS, when they met with President Vladimir Putin in Russia at the Eastern Economic Forum.

There are polarizations at home, with some arguing that Malaysia may play an global activist part and that it should concentrate instead on domestic issues. &nbsp, &nbsp,

IN AN UNENVIABLE Status

These intellectual shifts are recent, but they represent the richness that is frequently overlooked when evaluating the strength of Pakatan Harapan supporters right now. As Mr. Anwar increasingly relies on the strength of his personal authority and charisma to form alliances and sway tough decisions, these splits run the risk of diluting his mandate to carry out more and deeper reforms.

But there is one last divide, yet relating to something as uniform as corruption, which is the level of vengeance for Najib’s case. What punishment is deemed to be sufficient for 1MDB’s crime to qualify as only deserts? May we allow for lighter punishment or pardoning, also limited? If we accept his explanation if made officially and boldly, though no completely? If house arrest be made before his sentence is over?

These questions do n’t have any clear answers or positions. The government is in an unviable position because it needs to work with partners with opposing interests and a former prime minister whose fate also affects the government, not yet half through his jail term, to push through difficult reforms that may eventually upset some.

Sang Kancil ( Penguin Random House ) is the creator and political scientist James Chai writes.