‘No interference’ in Move Forward case

On the eve of the party breakdown case decision, PM tries to calm down international ambassadors and critics.

The Costitutional Court is scheduled to read its ruling in the Move Forward Party dissolution case starting at 3pm on Wednesday.
Beginning at 3 p.m. on Wednesday, the Costitutional Court will begin reading its decision in the Move Forward Party breakdown situation.

According to Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, the government does not tamper with the court process and may explain its position when the Constitutional Court laws on Wednesday regarding the dissolution of the opposition Move Forward Party.

According to Mr. Srettha,” the senior unit is not in a position to interfere with the justice method.” ” We will not let other countries to do so, either. Thailand’s judicial process is impartial and is line with international norms.

At a press conference on Wednesday, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs may explain the situation.

Mr Srettha was responding to a controversy that followed a meeting between Pita Limjaroenrat, deputy director to Move Forward, with officials from 18 countries. Additionally, this week’s issue of The Economist invited Mr. Pita to contribute a specific opinion piece on the situation.

Rachada Dhnadirek, a member of the Democratic Party, warned the officials that their comments on the situation might be seen as interference with the court system as a result of the meeting with them.

The officials, who have not made any public statements that might be interpreted as attempts to ingrain themselves in Thailand’s domestic affairs, were invited by Move Forward director Parit Wacharasindhu, who said.

Additionally, deputy prime minister Phumtham Wechayachai added that the event did n’t bother him. He claimed that officials ‘ jobs include engaging with officials of all kinds.

As Thailand seeks a seat on the UN Human Rights Council from 2025 to 2027, the government has grown cognizant of international perceptions of how social cases are handled. In the middle of this time, a decision will be made.

In a statement in April, two UN special rapporteurs, Clement Nyaletsossi Voule ( peaceful assembly and association ) and Irene Khan ( freedom of expression and expression ) expressed their concern about the Move Forward case.

The Thai ambassador to the UN, Usana Berananda, sent a letter to the UN on August 2 outlining the legal justification for the Election Commission’s (EC ) petition seeking party dissolution.

The Thai Constitutional Court is impartial and supports one of the foundational principles of democracy. The decision will be made in accordance with formed law and the constitution,” she wrote.

Thailand reiterates its commitments under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and guarantees that its people have the right to freedom of expression and quiet assembly.

Ras Chalee Chan, a vice-minister for international affairs, said on Tuesday that the government has nothing to do with the situation and it cannot interfere with the court’s decision.

Disintegration seen as good

Most social experts predicted that Move Forward, which had the most seats and seats next year, would be dissolved.

In the event of a breakdown purchase, prominent party figures have said they have prepared to resurrect under the leadership of another party. They do n’t anticipate any MPs joining the government coalition’s existing parties. Numerous people of the military-linked state joined established events when the former group Future Forward wasdissolved in 2020. None of them won re-election in 2023.

The Constitutional Court ruled on January 31 that Move Forward’s attempts to amend Section 112 of the Criminal Code, also known as the der guess rules, were intended to defame the constitutional king.

The judge also forbade the MFP from amending Part 112 through any non-legislative procedure, and ordered it to stop all attempts to do so.

The EC sought the group’s breakdown on the grounds that it had violated Section 92 of the natural law governing political parties. The part gives the court the power to dissolve any party that threatens the democratic monarchy.

The polling firm also requested that the court grant group managers’ election rights for ten years and forbid anyone who does not comply with Sections 92 and 94 of the law from registering or serving as celebration executives.

The decision will be presented to the public at Wednesday’s meeting of the Move Forward Party’s offices in Ramkhamhaeng Soi 42 in the Hua Mak area. A life flow of the court decision will follow at 3pm, followed by listeners and conversations.