Poll leaders have the ability to “pick and chose rules.”
PUBLISHED: 1 Jul 2024 at 05: 06
Move Forward Party (MFP) chief adviserPita Limjaroenrathas accused the Election Commission (EC) of double standards for its petition to the Constitutional Court seeking to disband the party.
The MFP’s struggle against the MFP was updated on Sunday by Mr. Pita, highlighting the EC’s policy of filing grievances against the MFP. This is against the law.
He claimed that the EC has a triple standard because it relied solely on Section 92 of the natural law for political events, which allows the EC to obtain the MFP’s abandon without conducting an investigation.
According to Mr. Pita, it is obvious that Section 93 of the laws cannot be used without a link to Section 92. A double regular may happen, he said, if both sections are exercised differently in a group breakdown case.
The EC if petition the court to dissolve any party when trustworthy evidence is that any party has carried out acts that undermine the constitutional king.
Section 93, however, says the group registration, when discovering like acts, may gather facts and evidence and provide it to the EC for thought, which did follow the rules and methods specified by the commission.
He added the EC was exercise merely Section 92 in a party dissolution case it wished to expand, but if it wants to slow down the process, it was exercising both sections continuously.
But, Mr. Pita said that the party would be on an “expressway” to breakdown if both sections were used differently in the MFP disintegration case.
The question is,” Can the EC use its judgment in this manner without anyone else getting involved in the selection”?
He added that a group facing breakdown must file a complaint with the EC.
This is also highlighted by the EC itself’s written document, which states that a party may be allowed to recognize and defend the situation with the EC before it is submitted to the jury.
The EC has previously responded to the MFP’s problems, denying the group is being treated unfairly.
The MFP was given the order to file information within seven days on June 19 for a hearing on Wednesday.