Mr. Martinez claimed that the Spanish federal authorities agency Civil Guard could demonstrate that Ong and Ms. Fang were living together at the time of her passing. He claimed that they examined the prints found on Ong’s shoes while looking at camera film.
” In my capacity as guidance for Audrey’s home, I will ask a judicial sentence of 20 to 25 years, without ruling out revisable continuous imprisonment, for the crime of murder because to date and pending further investigation, I may prove the existence of malice aforethought and malice aforethought in the actions of Ong”, he said.
Ong has exercised his right to not speak and has not explained the facts against him, according to Mr. Martinez. Because the judge determined there was” enough anecdotal evidence to keep him allegedly concerned for Audrey’s death,” he is still in pre-trial detention.
” In addition to the facts, there is a danger of flight, a risk of loss of evidence”, said the mother’s attorney.
When more facts become accessible, Mr Fang said he plans to challenge the election of Ong as his daughter’s CPF recipient. He is now collaborating with a law firm to handle his sister’s property by obtaining a Letter of Probate.
That will also allow him to examine her prior information, but he said it may take three to five weeks.
VICTIM IS” DIRECT OPPOSITE” OF Criminal
Ms. Fang informed her home that she might be meeting a former coworker while she was on her own trip to Spain, but she gave no more information. She skipped her journey home on April 9 and stopped responding to emails from her family on April 9.
She was discovered dead on April 10 at a spot 150 kilometers from her motel in Javea.
Before he was arrested, Mr. Fang had not heard of Ong and was unaware of the nature of his daughter’s marriage with the believe.
In later April, Ms Fang’s home discovered that she had bought coverage from the suspect.