MFP defers vote ahead of court ruling

In pending the Constitutional Court’s decision, which will determine the opposition’s fate regarding its effort to amend the lese majete law, the Move Forward Party ( MPP ) has delayed the election of new executives.

The MFP convened its ministerial meeting in Bangkok tuesday, where people were told of the delay.

No new directors may be chosen until the judge case was concluded, according to group official Parit Wacharasindhu as he emerged from the meeting.

The Election Commission (EC ) has urged the Court to oust the MFP in accordance with Section 92 of the Political Parties Act. The situation has been accepted for reading by the court.

If the EC has obtained sufficient proof of an act that the judge feels is inconvenient to the political regime with the King as head of state, the law grants the EC the authority to ask for the disintegration of a party.

The MFP was found to have pushed for modifications to Section 112 of the Criminal Code, also known as the der guess law, indicating an intent to destroy the democratic king, in response to the court’s decision on January 31.

The EC acted against the MFP as an organization that enforces the Political Parties Act because the Jan. 31 decision provides grounds for breakdown.

Mr Parit even outlined the group’s interests in the coming months.

The MFP is using the split to create more than 50 bills ahead of the reconvening of parliament in July despite the fact that parliament is currently in recess.

Party MPs may expand their social networks and support bases while working with their constituents and producing reports on issues that people need assistance with.

In the interim, it wants to field candidates for statewide administrative organization people in at least 19 provinces.

In three of the regions, the MFP has chosen prospects.

The MFP was compiling retorts of the breakdown allegations, according to MFP chief Thawatchai Tulathon, who spoke yesterday.

The case involves a lot of paperwork and is difficult. He claimed that the court has the authority to extend the deadline for submitting crucial defense files.

According to Mr. Thawatchai, the group needs more time to examine the EC petition. He would need to identify whether the complaint is connected to the 44 MFP MPs who co-signed a demand for adjustments to the Lese Majority Law.

However, Pita Limjaroenrat, MFP leader’s general director, said the group deserves enough time to put up a battle against what may amount to its democratic execution.

He insisted the group’s morale was strongly intact.

Have the power that get previously questioned themselves about the benefits of disbanding a political party?

It may undermine us in the near future, but it might galvanise us greatly and help us advance in the upcoming elections, according to Mr. Pita.