At the start of the hearing, Deputy Public Prosecutor Edwin Soh addressed the court and called this another one of Mr Lim’s “delay tactics”, as the trial had been originally fixed to begin on Aug 29.
After that date, Mr Lim had discharged his counsel and was granted an adjournment to seek a new defence counsel, and then granted another adjournment for the new counsel to take instructions, said Mr Soh.
He added that it was only a few hours earlier that the prosecution had gotten the application to seek yet another adjournment because of Mr Lim’s medical certificate.
In response, Mr Foo acknowledged that the notice had been given rather late but explained that Mr Lim had said he felt like he was coming down with COVID-19 on Dec 8 and Mr Foo had then advised him to see a doctor.
But Mr Lim did not see a doctor until Dec 10, he added.
Mr Foo said that on Sunday he waited in his office for Mr Lim to hand him the medical certificate but left between 10pm and 11pm when Mr Lim did not turn up.
“I only found the medical certificate in the office this morning, underneath my door,” said Mr Foo.
This, Mr Foo added, was the reason why the medical certificate was only uploaded two hours before Mr Lim’s hearing was scheduled to begin.
Speaking to reporters after the hearing, Mr Foo shared that Mr Lim’s diagnosis on the medical certificate was not COVID-19 but gastroenteritis, which is triggered by the infection and inflammation of the digestive system.
Given the circumstances, Mr Foo sought for an adjournment to Dec 27.
The prosecution did not object to the application, stating that they had gotten the investigation officer to call the clinic and ascertained that the medical certificate was in fact issued on Dec 10 at 10.50am.
Mr Lim will return to court on Dec 27 to begin trial.
This article was originally published in TODAY.