SINGAPORE: A person who was standing by his car when another driver crashed into it lied to the police, a physician, and an insurance claim that the collision had injured his chest.
On Monday, October 23, Chai Wen Hin, 29, was given a two-day prison term after admitting to one count of providing false data to an employee.
On May 11, 2021, at around 1 p.m., the jury overheard Chai standing behind his placed vehicles on Park Crescent.
Mr. Ho Jin Sam, a 72-year-old man, is said to have turned his automobile into Chai’s parked car and reportedly refused to give him his phone number.
Chai visited a physician the following day and was granted four days of skilled keep. He explained to the physician that he was wearing his helmet and was in a stationary vehicle when the accident happened.
After the incident, he claimed to have chest pain.
After that, he went to a police station and reported the car crash to the officers. He claimed in his authorities report that Mr. Ho’s car turned into his top car while he was waiting for a friend at the scene of the accident.
” As it( seemed) that he was about to drive off, I got out and went to his car. He told me that he was unaware that his vehicle had run into me, according to Chai.
He asserted that despite having requested Mr. Ho’s details, he was just permitted to take a photo of his license plate number.
Chai reported to the police that his car had dented license plates and a free back car. The effect, he claimed,” made my neck feeling uncomfortable on the correct part.”
In order to file an insurance claim against Mr. Ho for the harm done to his car, he finally submitted an incident report to the General Insurance Association.
When asked” Are you claiming under your own insurance policy for repair to your vehicle?” in the report, he replied,” no-claiming third party.”
He claimed to have a neck injury and to be in pain in the document.
Chai’s state of chest soreness was untrue, according to the attorney.
He was not hurt by the motion because he was outside his car at the time of it, according to the counsel. & nbsp,
Chai was standing outside his car at the time, according to closed-circuit broadcast images.
On July 5, 2021, the traffic police investigation official questioned Chai after realizing that false information had been provided.
In an addition to his General Insurance Association record, Chai stated that he had not been hurt and retracted the false statement.
According to the attorney, Mr. Ho might have faced inquiries into the incident, such as for careless driving, as a result of Chai’s false speech, which would have prompted the traffic police to launch an investigation.
The Public Defender’s Office, who represented Chai, stated that he had never intended to file a false damage claim against Mr. Ho, regardless of the type of insurance.
The attorney demanded a minimum sentence of five days in prison, claiming that Chai had been lying for about two weeks and that, had he not been confronted, there was no reason for him to change his story.
He could have been sentenced to up to six months in prison for providing false information to a public servant, fined up as much as S$ 5, 000 ( US$ 3, 642 ), or both.