There are both excitement and skepticism about the Move Forward Party’s( MFP ) future as a result of the change in the guard.
Political pundits were attentively observing who would take the helm when Parliament’s largest group, which has 151 MPs, called an assembly next month to choose a new innovator and board executives.
Pita Limjarorenrat, who shot to political stardom and was credited with adding paint to the MFP’s splendor and propelling the group to vote success, left the management unoccupied with his resignation.
Mr. Pita resigned because the Constitutional Court was getting involved in his high-profile television holding case, which was keeping the MFP from taking the lead in the opposition.
Mr. Pita has been suspended as an MP by the Constitutional Court pending a decision in the ownership event. The longer his expulsion lasts, the more politically the MFP stands to lose by not being able to find someone who can shine in the position of opposition leader.
In order for the group to focus on the task of monitoring the government, plan called for Mr. Pita to resign as MFP head and let his son take over.
There was much rumor that there would be a two-horse competition in the days leading up to the MFP management vote.
Sirikanya Tansakul was the front-runner after being brought to the fore during the election strategy when she displayed the vision and certifications required to persuade voters she may be elected finance minister.
The party secretary-general, Chaithawat Tulathon, who was dubbed the party’s brain and principal strategist, was the other solid contender.
Because of what they perceived to be Ms. Sirikanya’s poor performance during election fundraising, some experts gave her the thumbs down.
On the other hand, Mr. Chaithawat outshone her with his outer personality, which reflected his delicacy, maturity, and level-headedness. He is regarded as one of the main designers of MFP plans, which are responsible for the party’s distinctiveness.
No one objected when Mr. Chaithawat, who received 330 votes at the party assembly, was irresistibly chosen to succeed Mrs. Pita. Just three abstained and five voted against him.
But the defeat speech he gave shocked a lot of social observers.
If and when Mr. Pita makes a return as an MP,” The new directors and I are prepared to endure down.”
According to Mr. Chaithawat,” The changes in leadership that have occurred today [ Sept 24 ] are therefore temporary.
But, Mr. Pita, who was present at the command election, expressed a conflicting opinion when he said that his son was the real deal.
A social supply believes Mr. Chaithawat may be in the long run as MFP boss, despite the fact that his speech raised questions about how he was supposed to lead the party.
The Future Forward Party ( FFP ), which later became the MFP, was co-founded by the Songkhla native. The previous FFP head Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit, who is now in charge of the Progressive Movement, and he had collaborated carefully.
Their relationship began when they were the editors of Fah Diew Gun( Same Sky ), a publication known for occasionally delving deeply into social criticism and political activism.
According to the cause, Mr. Pita’s decision to step down as MFP leader may involve more than first appears. His departure might have come at the perfect time to provide the MFP with the most leverage possible as a” professional – active” main opposition party that wants to maximize its influence on the political scene.
A youthful, flamboyant politician with a good family and education, Mr. Pita— a successful MFP poster boy— has proven to be an enormous advantage for the group during elections. He used his charisma to support the MFP win its election, and the leader needs to have a different set of skills in order to keep the party’s popularity up until the next election and realize its goal of staging an overwhelming victory and running the government alone.
According to the source, this is where Mr. Chaithawat’s strong hands in management, strategy development, and strategic foresight will be tested.
The MFP has established itself as a force to be reckoned with when criticizing the government— a posh name for finding fault with it.
A trust gap experienced by Pheu Thai may cause the swing of public support to jump in favor of the MFP in a social environment divided into two camps, one led by the ruling party and the other by it. The group may find comfort in the knowledge that it can replicate an election succeed but by a much wider leeway in subsequent polls if the MFP you gain and maintain the pounds of popularity.
Wallet problems might get worse.
Srettha: Protects divisive plan
The Pheu Thai Party-led government had come up with a good reason to reconsider its 10, 000 baht digital budget policy in response to criticism from financial experts, including past Bank of Thailand governors.
Sadly, when urging the followers of the contentious program to voice their opinions, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin let the opportunity to change the program or backwards out slip away, according to observers.
He used his X accounts, formerly known as Twitter, to muster the people behind the game show during a visit to Phitsanulok last weekend, in addition to asking locals to talk out if they agreed with the scheme’s merits.
” Don’t allow people who are opposed to this plan quit it without good reason if you agree with me and support it.” And let us understand if you like it and think the plan is a good idea. Mr. Srettha wrote,” We’re these to work for you, so we need your help.
The text of the prime minister is not well received by the policy’s detractors.
They worry that it might spark a clash between supporters and opponents of the plan, and by urging the followers to speak out, the prime minister might be perceived as preparing to conceal behind the backing he has amassed should something go wrong with the scheme’s application.
It’s completely out of line to motivate people to confront each other when damage happens in the future because they didn’t put the blame on the people.
Acting Democrat head Jurin Laksanawisit was cited as saying,” Moreover, it feels like people could be used as a weapon to prevent taking duty.”
Mr. Srettha defended himself by saying he was only attempting to gauge public opinion— both positive and negative — about the digital wallet plan with no intention of inciting conflict or causing divisions.
Reviewers of the policy claim that the nation is in a good position to weather economic pain, but they are particularly worried about where the money will come from to fund the plan.
It is estimated that the system may cost a staggering 560 billion baht to fund, and it is still unfamiliar where the money will come from. This could have significant effects on both the public debt and the economy at large.
The number of people aged 16 and older who are eligible to receive the pamphlets is estimated to be around 54.8 million, according to the authorities, so the funds is probably smaller than previously estimated.
The digital wallet plan will be a pilot of the market, which is expected to grow by an average of 5 % periodically during the government’s four-year expression, and it also makes the case that the national economy is not already reaching its full potential.
Political scientist Phichai Ratnatilaka Na Bhuket from the National Institute of Development Administration ( Nida ) has no doubt that the Pheu Thai-led government will continue with the plan despite the criticism, though it is likely to make adjustments to keep it afloat.
Since the Covid – 19 crisis has passed, the freebie is widely regarded as unnecessary, according to the researcher, so the government should prepare for harsher criticism and stronger weight without fine-tuning the flyer scheme.
He doubts that anyone in Pheu Thai, who proposed the plan during the election campaign, is knowledgeable about how to carry it out successfully.
He believed that rather than being carefully planned and its possible effects on the economy considered, the digital wallet scheme was hastily developed with the intention of appealing to voters in order for Pheu Thai to level a landslide success.
There is also a real risk of how tragic it would be if the bag plan were to experience widespread corruption, such as the Yingluck Shinawatra administration’s rice-pledging program, which resulted in enormous financial losses.
According to Mr. Phichai,” I believe it would be truly beneficial for the nation if this scheme were to be abandoned or subjected to such rigorous scrutiny that it cannot continue.”
The plan will be put into action by the state in February of next year.
Express watchdogs like the National Anti-Corruption Commission and activists like Dr. Warong Dechkitvigrom, who gained notoriety for exposing the rice-pledging system scandal, are keeping a close eye on it.
Dr. Warong, also known as” Dr. Rice” for his extensive research into the rice pledging policy, took action this week by submitting a request to the Office of the Ombudsman requesting that it investigate the digital wallet legislation and request that the Administrative Court revoke its ban.