The investigation officer’s affidavit, which contains first, credible evidence that Su committed his crimes, was then used to inform the court that he had been charged with crimes that do not call for bail.
If Su is released on bail, Mr. Hu continued, there is a major risk of cooperation that could seriously jeopardize ongoing investigations.
Defence is one of the reasons prosecutors oppose loan.
Su’s defense attorney, Mr. Julian Tay from law firm Lee & amp, Lee, argued that the presumption of innocence is the fundamental basis for bail and opposed the prosecution ‘ decision for no bail.
There is no proof that Su intended to escape or has made any preparations to do so in order to avoid appearing in court, according to Mr. Tay, who argued that his three items were overstated.
According to Mr. Tay,” My buyer has established himself in Singapore since 2017 and has strong personal and financial ties to the city.”
Su’s attorney continued,” Su did not leave his home users by fleeing Singapore and becoming a criminal on the run ,” because his” full community” is almost here in Singapore.
Su’s goods, which were estimated to be worth around S$ 170 million and are now being seized, were likewise brought up by Mr. Tay.
Mr. Tay argued,” I submit that the trial has no basis to suggest that he would simply flee from all of his large assets in Singapore.”
He has every right to remain in Singapore in order to protect himself and recover his property there.
Instead of denying loan, Mr. Tay urged the judge to take into account imposing specific bail conditions to serve as safeguards, such as enforcing e-tagging, establishing a curfew, or issuing no contact orders.
In the event that loan conditions are broken, these conditions may give the court the right to immediately withdraw bail.
Mr. Tay also noted that Su being in custody has resulted in significant prejudice because his client has had to make his defense in jail, where it is not only difficult to meet but likewise challenging to receive instructions.
IF HE ABSCONDS, ACCUSED May Guide” Really Cozy” Living
The attorney responded to the defense’s claim of presumptive discrimination by stating that everyone, including investigators, is required to follow the same rules set forth by prisons.
Mr. Hu also added that it should be noted that parole hearings do not necessitate thorough factfinding in relation to Mr Tay’s discussion.
He emphasized that Su has sizable assets abroad, which, should he leave the country with his family members who are not Singaporean citizens or permanent residents, could effectively permit Su to live a very comfortable life.
Judge Tan, who concurred with the trial that Su poses a very high flight risk, decided to deny bail in response to the defense and prosecution’s submissions.
Su can move around easily because he has multiple passports and a sizable amount of money abroad, the judge also agreed.
The judge added that if Su is granted bail, there is a substantial chance of collusion or witness tampering due to his extensive financial dealings with the other accused and three other parties involved who left Singapore.
Su is scheduled to return to court for a pre-trial event in one month.
Originally released in & nbsp, TODAY, this article.