MP election bill goes to charter court

Three small parties look for validity check

The questionable organic bill to the election of MPs is being referred to the charter court to ensure it does not violate the constitution, according to 3 small parties that will sought the courtroom action.

The New Palang Dharma Party, the Thailänder Teachers for People Celebration and the Pheu Chart Thai Party with each other sought the review via Parliament President Chuan Leekpai on Thursday.

In their petition, backed by 106 MPs and senators, to the court, the three parties pointed to content in the organic costs which may contradict the particular charter and defined the potentially problematic way the bill came to be adopted simply by parliament.

The petition also stated that the issues being put to the particular Constitutional Court just for review are not straight related to the contentious method of calculating the number of list MPs to be allocated to parties generally elections. Large events support dividing the party-list votes by 100 to determine the party’s share associated with list MPs whilst small parties possess rallied behind record votes being separated by 500.

Rather, the difficulties the three small events are raising with all the court go much deeper than the calculation method.

Actually the parties possess sought the court’s ruling on whether or not Section 25 from the organic bill has been constitutionally valid, as it might be in conflict along with Section 93 from the charter, which governs how list MPs are decided.

Also, the particular parties requested the court’s ruling upon Section 26, which is linked to Section 131 in the organic expenses which bars votes that had been dishonestly earned from being tallied and counted. Area 26 has been created in a way that could be construed as defying the particular constitution, its critics say.

The petition mentioned the organic bill on the election associated with MPs may not have already been legitimately adopted.

The expenses, sponsored by the Political election Commission (EC), did not pass parliamentary overview since it was adopted at the last minute after the previous version from the bill was officially dropped on account of its failure to be approved by parliament by the deadline.

That previous version of the bill had been looked at. However , the majority of congress voted to switch the particular calculation of listing MPs. Instead of the checklist votes being separated by 100, most of parliamentarians opted for the quantity being divided simply by 500, which was backed by small parties.

Huge parties which stand firmly behind the 100 divisor were accused of keeping away from the parliamentary sittings in order to force deficiencies in quorum which recurred until the day the particular amendment to the organic bill was meant to have passed parliament.

It turned out the quorum fell short even on the day of the deadline, evoking the organic bill to be sunk. The death of the bill effectively prompted its substitute by the EC-sponsored costs supportive of the hundred divisor.