Commentary: Just business or ‘a betrayal’? Why HK tycoon Li Ka-shing’s Panama Canal deal has upset China

THE BUSINESS POLITICISATION
The deal was “purely commercial in nature and utterly related to current social media reports regarding the Panama Ports,” according to CK Hutchison’s co-managing producer Frank Sixt. However, later events have demonstrated that the transaction is much more than just a commercial one.
According to US press reviews, BlackRock’s chairman and CEO Larry Fink reportedly contacted Mr. Trump to discuss the Panama Canal offer. This raises concerns about the Li mother’s changing connection with Taiwanese management.
In the first 20 years of transformation and beginning, Mr. Li Ka-shing, dubbed” Superman” by the Hong Kong media for his business skills and contacts, had recently secured special discussions with China’s officials, including Deng Xiaoping and Jiang Zemin. His mother’s ties to Beijing have cooled over the past 20 years, though.
While Mr. Fink has immediate access to Mr. Trump, the Li home may not have the same access to Zhongnanhai, the mixture where China’s top leaders reside and work, which is regarded as the equivalent of the White House.
Maybe the Li home genuinely believes the deal is only for business or that getting Beijing to know about it may make things worse. In any case, the resulting discussion should serve as a wake-up call for them and another Hong Kong tycoons.
I find it uncomfortable to say that business will be politicized, particularly in multibillion-dollar multinational deals in proper industries, and that it will also be practiced all over the world.
Past South China Morning Post Editor-in-Chief Wang Xiangwei He is currently a journalist at Hong Kong Baptist University.