THE YOON ENDGAME
There are currently many endgame scenarios, the majority of which depend on how Mr. Yoon’s congressional allies respond to the growing political pressure.
First, he may continue by properly handing over his administration to his legislative partners. Only that, Mr. Yoon delivered a simple speech a few hours before the ballot on Saturday, offering. He made an offer to allow the traditional PPP, his ally social party in the National Assembly, to set plan in his place.
PPP politicians may use this as bait to prevent them from supporting his treatment. Perhaps they will keep Mr. Yoon if they believe they will continue to rule the nation with him relegated to a curious caregiver part. Because he fears a prosecution and a sentence in prison, Mr. Yoon definitely makes for a huge agreement. In 2017, a North Korean leader who had been removed from office by impeachment entered prison. If removed, Mr Yoon probably did too.
Another possibility is that Mr. Yoon steps down as part of a non-prosecution quat. In 1974, US President Richard Nixon was persuaded to retire in protest of the Watergate scandal because of this casual agreement. Mr Nixon may perhaps have been convicted, he faced prison period. To clasp that, he left company freely, and his son pardoned him. Mr. Yoon may opt for such a deal, but it’s not clear if he trusts the opposition enough to refuse to bring charges against him if he leaves.
A last chance, at the sides of the argument, is democratic revision. South Korea’s leader now serves one five-year name. South Korea’s social technology has long advocated for the country to join the US national system for two four-year terms. If enacted, Mr Yoon’s expression had ending in May 2026, no May 2027.
This option appeals because it avoids a second prosecution of a South Korean president in only eight years and avoids the political intrigues of the government. A democracy should constantly remove its chief executive from its hands.