Parliament rejects PSP’s public housing proposals, passes PAP motion on affordable and accessible HDB flats

Parliament rejects PSP’s public housing proposals, passes PAP motion on affordable and accessible HDB flats

Included in their motion upon Public Housing Guidelines, PSP Non-Constituency MPs Mr Leong plus Ms Hazel Poa had made two proposals to address issues about public housing.

They suggested an Affordable Home Scheme that defers land costs from BTO purchases, along with such costs to become paid only if the flat is sold over the resale market. One more proposal, the Millennial Apartments Scheme, would provide a large stock associated with “quality flats” near the central business region for young Singaporeans to rent for two to five many years.

In his counter-motion, Mr Lee mentioned public housing remained broadly accessible and affordable, and stressed the need for sustainable enhancements to housing plan.

He declared that the Government was studying changes to that policy, and will introduce more “Shorter Waiting Time” BTO flats through 2024, and think about more support just for first-time Housing Board (HDB) flat customers to purchase resale condominiums.

In his shutting speech on Wednesday, Mr Lee stated that the PSP movement has “noble intentions” but the party’s claim that the system is “fundamentally broken” is undesirable.  

“By no means are usually we saying by means of this motion that every is well plus good, and that nothing needs fixing, this is a perfect system, ” he said. “Our system is far from perfect but it has accomplished through the generations the final results that we have laid on the table today. ”

Mr Lee also described the WP’s amendment as “attempts at politicking”.

“For the Leader associated with Opposition to characterise our motion as us sitting on our laurels and therefore necessitating this late amendment, I think is misplaced, ” he additional.

On Wednesday, Mr Leong anxious that the current strategy is not delivering preferred outcomes, such as Main Provident Fund (CPF) savings being “depleted”.

He additional current market conditions provide a “brilliant opportunity” for any reset of plans, as foreigners stay eager to put money into the property market.


Mature Minister of State for National Advancement Sim Ann criticised the “perplexing nature” of the PSP’s Inexpensive Home Scheme, which she said included a “super low price upon entry”.

If BTO applicants were attracted from the low prices, that would create a lot of demand, and he or she questioned if this would subsequently make it more difficult for first-timers to get a smooth and worsen current concerns about accessibility.

By relocating from an affordability model to a cost-based pricing model, it was possible that prospective sellers could find yourself paying a much increased price to the Government if they sold their particular flats, Ms Sim added.

The lady went on to deny arguments by PSP and Assoc Prof Jamus Lim (WP – Sengkang) that this use of CPF financial savings to buy HDB flats, as well as lease decay, put retirement adequacy at risk.

“Owning a HDB toned that can last us for life is, in itself, important for retirement safety, ” she said. “But we never depend on home ownership alone for pension needs. This is why CPF policy is also centered on helping individuals safe a lifelong cash payout through CPF LIFE. ”

On reconciling appreciating flat values with all the reality of rent decay, Ms Sim said that aside from pumpiing, “strong economic basic principles and rising incomes” also had an effect on the value of flats.

“Unity, hard work and good policies might help to continue creating favourable economic circumstances for Singapore. Since our economy is more mature, growth prices cannot be as fast as previously, but we still work towards delivering a better life for Singaporeans, which would include enhancement in incomes.

“Getting this correct would mean that the value of this flat would certainly continue rising to get a considerable time, ” the girl said.

Ms Sim also declined PSP’s Millennial House Scheme idea, arguing that the Government experienced good reasons to keep subsidised rental housing “very targeted”, as homeownership was an important objective of public housing for nation-building and financial security.