Johnny Depp’s attorneys call Amber Heard’s post-trial motions for a mistrial “frivolous”

Johnny Depp's attorneys call Amber Heard's post-trial motions for a mistrial "frivolous"
Noticed and Depp were both found liable for defamation in their lawsuits against one another last month. The jury initially granted $15 million in damages to Depp and only $2 million to Heard. Even though, because punitive problems in the state associated with Virginia are capped at $350, 1000, the judge decreased Depp’s $5 mil in punitive damages to that amount.
Attorneys meant for Heard asked the particular court to declare a mistrial plus order a new test in a motion filed last week .
Depp’s attorneys contended in a memo filed Monday that a determine cannot arbitrarily substitute their judgment for the of a jury,
The particular memo also said Heard’s contention which the damages awarded to her ex-husband are excessive plus unsupported by the evidence is usually “baseless. ”
“While Ms. Heard slings an exceptional quantity of mud at the wall in the hope that will something might stick, the jury’s judgement on damages has been perfectly reasonable plus supported by the evidence and testimony in this case, ” Depp’s lawful team states in the memo.
Attorneys for Heard also claimed within a court filing last week that the information on the jury panel checklist sent to counsel before trial does not appear to match the demographics of one of the jurors, compromising Heard’s rights to due process.
Noticed waived her directly to challenge the accuracy of the jury solar panel information because her team didn’t raise the issue with the courtroom at the time, Depp’s lawyers argue.
“Mr. Depp respectfully requests that this Court deny Microsoft. Heard’s frivolous motion in its entirety plus reject her unrealistic requests to set apart the jury judgement, dismiss the issue, or, in the alternate, order a new test and investigate Juror 15, ” the memo says.
Depp sued Heard for defamation over a 2018 op-ed she wrote for your Washington Post in which she described herself as a “public figure representing domestic abuse. ” Though Depp was not named within the article, he claimed it cost your pet lucrative acting tasks.
Heard countersued Depp, to whom the girl was married from 2015-2016 before divorcing, for defamation over statements Depp’s attorney made about her abuse claims.
After many weeks of testimony, the jury found that Heard defamed Depp in three individual statements in The Wa Post piece, which Depp defamed Heard with one declaration his attorney made.