After one year in office, the majority of Bangkok residents are happy with Governor Chadchart Sittipunt’s performance, according to a National Institute of Development Administration ( Nida Poll ) opinion survey.
In order to determine their views on Mr. Chadchart’s efficiency during his first year in business, the poll was conducted over the phone on May 24 and 30 with 2, 000 qualified voters aged 18 and older from different levels of education, income, and activities in all 50 towns of Bangkok.
In 17 various ways, the respondents were asked to rate Mr. Chachart’s shows:
1. Public parks and green spaces: 42.20 % good, 27.55 % excellent, 14.75 fair, 10.95 % underwhelming, and 4.55 percent lacking information
2. 2. Wastewater, dust, and 44.35 % of the population are good, 23.45 % are excellent, 18.45 are fair, 12.35 % are poor, 1.40 % have no information.
3. 3. Promotion of travel to Bangkok: 43.85 % good, 22.4 % excellent, 15.40 % fair, 10.20 % poor, and 8.95 % uninformed.
4.. 4. Public services at city offices: 41.85 % good, 21.00 % excellent, 18 % fair, 10.20 % subpar, and 8.95 % lack of information.
5. 5. Keeping sidewalks( sidewalks ) clear of hawkers, stalls, and parked cars: 44.05 % good, 20.75 % excellent, 18.40 % fair, 14.30 % poor, 2.50 % no information
6. 6. Measures for crime prevention, public safety, and property security, including lighting and security cameras, are as follows: 4.130 % good, 9.5 % excellent, 20.00 % fair, 11.95 percent poor, 5.0 % no information
7. 7. Promotion of sports: 42.40 % good, 19.85 % excellent, 17.35 % fair, 12.25 % no information, and 8.15 % poor.
8. 8. Landscape improvement: 48.40 % good, 19.70 % excellent, 17.25 % fair, 12.05 % poor, and 2.600 % lack of information
9. Flood management: 36.1 % good, 19.2 % excellent, 16.0 % no information, 15.7 % fair, and 12.80 % poor.
10. Corruption issues in city offices are dealt with as follows: 29.35 % good, 21.45 % fair, 18.25 % excellent, 17.05 % no information, and 13.90 % poor.
11. Protests were handled: 40.55 % well, 17.70 % very good, 16.05 fair, 14.65 % no information, and 11.05 % poorly.
12. Development of public transportation: 17.5 % good, 19.5 % fair, 15.0 % excellent, 17.80 % no information, and 11.2 % poor.
13. Handling of education, children, and youth affairs: 36.75 % good, 20.55 % fair, 16.70 % no information, 15.055 % excellent, 19.5 % poor
14. Public health: 45.05 % good, 20.05 % fair, 14.45 % excellent, 10.60 % poor, and 9.85 % unreported.
15.. 15. Homeless people and beggars are handled in the following ways: 40.30 % well, 27.10 % fair, 13.85 % poor, 10.40 % very good, and 8.35 % without information.
16. 39.75 % of traffic issues are good, 26.85 % are fair, 18.45 % are poor, 10.30 % are excellent, and 4.65 % are in the dark.
17. – 17. Living expenses: 35.5 % fair, 27.15 % good, 19.5 % poor, 12.85 % no information, and 5.45 % very good.
When asked to rate Mr. Chadchart’s overall performance over the course of his first year in office, they responded that there had been little to no change from before, with a rating of 45.45 % good, 27.75 % excellent, 14.80 % fair, and 10.00 % poor.